THE LAST BROADCAST

162 posts

THE LAST BROADCAST

THE LAST BROADCAST

@CarlosRodr_4

Katılım Şubat 2024
207 Takip Edilen42 Takipçiler
THE LAST BROADCAST
THE LAST BROADCAST@CarlosRodr_4·
@Xtopher_Uzo About Martin Luther: His opinion is not the standard Scripture is the standard Simple point: “Mother of Jesus” is directly biblical “Mother of God” is an interpretation built from doctrine, not explicitly stated in the Bible So the issue isn’t denying who Jesus is.
English
0
0
0
8
THE LAST BROADCAST
THE LAST BROADCAST@CarlosRodr_4·
@Xtopher_Uzo You’re mixing what the Bible says with later theological labels. About Virgin Mary: The Bible clearly says she is the mother of Jesus Christ It never uses the phrase “Mother of God” Luke 1:43: Elizabeth says “mother of my Lord” .
English
4
0
0
34
Ojike Uzoma
Ojike Uzoma@Xtopher_Uzo·
Protestants will say Mary is not the mother of God.... Okay?? They will say Mary is the mother of the Human part of Jesus Christ... Okay?? But then some will agree that Jesus is Fully God and fully man. One entity, not separated. But when it comes to the mother of God, protestants will audaciously separately the Divinity of Christ from his flesh. Elizabeth under the influence of the Holy Spirit called Mary "Mother of my Lord" Even Martin Luther, your founding father, recognised Mary as the Mother of God.
English
10
13
57
3.4K
THE LAST BROADCAST
THE LAST BROADCAST@CarlosRodr_4·
@Xtopher_Uzo Your claim about Protestants “separating” Christ: Saying Mary is the mother of Jesus does not divide Him It sticks to the exact wording of scripture instead of adding terms not stated
English
0
0
0
8
THE LAST BROADCAST
THE LAST BROADCAST@CarlosRodr_4·
@Xtopher_Uzo About Jesus being fully God and fully man: That is true biblically But the Bible does not turn that into a command to call Mary “Mother of God” That title is a later theological conclusion
English
0
0
0
8
THE LAST BROADCAST
THE LAST BROADCAST@CarlosRodr_4·
@Xtopher_Uzo That shows respect and recognition It does not define a doctrine or give the exact title “Mother of God” About Jesus being fully God and fully man: That is true biblically But the Bible does not turn that into a command to call Mary “Mother of God”
English
0
0
0
10
THE LAST BROADCAST
THE LAST BROADCAST@CarlosRodr_4·
@Xtopher_Uzo Simple point: The Bible never commands or shows anyone praying to Mary or saints That practice is a later interpretation, not something clearly taught in scripture So quoting those verses doesn’t prove the claim. It adds meaning that isn’t directly in the text.
English
0
0
0
29
THE LAST BROADCAST
THE LAST BROADCAST@CarlosRodr_4·
@Xtopher_Uzo what the Bible actually states. About Virgin Mary: The Bible never says she didn’t die It never says she is in heaven receiving prayers So saying “Mary is NOT dead” is not from scripture
English
5
0
0
150
Ojike Uzoma
Ojike Uzoma@Xtopher_Uzo·
The Blessed Virgin Mary is NOT dead. Unless you're implying that the Mother of our Saviour, Jesus Christ, is in Hell. Catholics do NOT pray TO Mary. She is NOT God. We pray to God alone - Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. That being said, we simply ask Mary and the saints to intercede for us. Asking the saints and angels for intercession is very, very valid and biblical. The saints are very much ALIVE in heaven. Jesus said: “He is not the God of the dead, but of the living, for to him all are alive” (Luke 20:38). We are surrounded by “a great cloud of witnesses” (Hebrews 12:1). And in heaven, the saints actively present our prayers to God; “The twenty-four elders, were holding golden bowls full of incense, which are the prayers of God’s people” (Revelation 5:8). “Another angel, was given much incense to offer, with the prayers of all God’s people. The smoke of the incense, together with the prayers of God’s people, went up before God” (Revelation 8:3-4). Finally, the Bible commands; “Pray for each other. The prayer of a righteous person is powerful and effective” (James 5:16). The saints in heaven are the most righteous - their intercession is even more powerful! So with this, I hope I've been able to convince you, not to confuse you, that the saints are not dead, and Mary is not dead. Saying they are dead is turning the Bible against itself and committing a very serious offense. The COMMUNION OF SAINTS is real.
BrandonFalco@BrandonFalco121

Praying to Mary is Necromancy. Mary is dead. Jesus never prayed to anyone but the father.

English
19
11
97
4.1K
THE LAST BROADCAST
THE LAST BROADCAST@CarlosRodr_4·
@Xtopher_Uzo Clear Bible teaching: 1 Timothy 2:5 says there is one mediator, Jesus Christ No verse adds Mary or the saints to that role
English
0
0
0
22
THE LAST BROADCAST
THE LAST BROADCAST@CarlosRodr_4·
@Xtopher_Uzo Revelation 5:8 and 8:3–4: They show prayers going to God They do not tell believers to pray to saints or ask them for help James 5:16: It tells believers on earth to pray for each other It says nothing about asking people in heaven
English
0
0
0
32
THE LAST BROADCAST
THE LAST BROADCAST@CarlosRodr_4·
@Xtopher_Uzo Luke 20:38: Jesus Christ is teaching about the resurrection He is not saying people in heaven hear prayers or act as intercessors Hebrews 12:1: “Cloud of witnesses” means examples of faith It does not say they are watching you or listening to you
English
0
0
0
33
THE LAST BROADCAST
THE LAST BROADCAST@CarlosRodr_4·
@Xtopher_Uzo So the passage supports Peter having a role, not that following Jesus means obeying a pope or that a pope is infallible. That part is a later interpretation, not what the Bible actually states.
English
0
0
0
9
THE LAST BROADCAST
THE LAST BROADCAST@CarlosRodr_4·
@Xtopher_Uzo You’re quoting a real passage, but your conclusion doesn’t come from the text. In Gospel of John 21:15–17, Jesus Christ tells Saint Peter to “feed my sheep.” That shows responsibility, not absolute authority over all Christians. The Bible never says: “Obey the Pope”
English
2
0
0
84
Ojike Uzoma
Ojike Uzoma@Xtopher_Uzo·
Jesus said to Peter "Simon, son of John, do you love me more than these?” Peter: “Yes, Lord; you know that I love you.” Jesus: “Feed my lambs.” Jesus again, the second time: “Simon, son of John, do you love me?” Peter again: “Yes, Lord; you know that I love you.” Jesus: “Tend my sheep.” Jesus yet again, for the third time: “Simon, son of John, do you love me?” ....Peter was grieved because he said to him the third time, “Do you love me?” Peter: “Lord, you know everything; you know that I love you.” Jesus: “Feed my sheep.” Do you understand now? To follow Jesus Christ is to obey the Pope. He cannot misguide you.
Operation Heal America@OperHealAmerica

Follow Jesus. NOT THE POPE.

English
14
10
88
4K
THE LAST BROADCAST
THE LAST BROADCAST@CarlosRodr_4·
@Xtopher_Uzo Peter has successors with the same authority Any human leader cannot misguide people In fact, scripture shows the opposite: Galatians 2:11, Peter was corrected publicly Romans 3:23, all humans can sin Ephesians 1:22–23, Christ is the head of the church
English
0
0
0
9
Ojike Uzoma
Ojike Uzoma@Xtopher_Uzo·
Standing with Pope Leo is standing with the Gospel. Just like Jesus sat and dined with tax collectors and sinners - and people criticized Him, asking why He was eating with "those sinful people" - He calmly reminded them; “It is not the healthy who need a doctor, but the sick. I came for sinners.” Peter, his successors, too was boldly preaching to and eating with Gentiles, converting souls, until Jewish Christians showed up and he started acting differently to avoid criticism. Paul had to call out the hypocrisy. Now history is repeating itself. Pope Leo XIV, the vicar of Christ, is seen engaging with Muslim clerics - building bridges, visiting mosques, calling for peace - and suddenly protestants Christians are shouting and calling him out. Have we forgotten? These are exactly the people the Church is here for.
Ojike Uzoma tweet media
English
11
14
55
976
THE LAST BROADCAST
THE LAST BROADCAST@CarlosRodr_4·
@Xtopher_Uzo So the gospel didn't speak against that right? So the so called pope didn't speak against this either you all are funny really
English
2
0
0
13
Harmless
Harmless@HarmlessHQ·
When Iran blocked the Strait of Hormuz, you praised them and called it a powerful strategy. Now, Donald Trump wants to help them block the Strait of Hormuz completely, you're now reminding us of international maritime laws. The joke writes itself. 😂😂😂
English
206
2K
12.1K
168.2K
THE LAST BROADCAST
THE LAST BROADCAST@CarlosRodr_4·
@addinoyyi @HarmlessHQ Blockade is literally forcing other countries to buy from USA that's simple trump wanted to lift sanctions on Russia oil everybody complained now his doing this. You have probably not read the act of the deal
English
0
0
0
10
Malik Adinoyi
Malik Adinoyi@addinoyyi·
@CarlosRodr_4 @HarmlessHQ …their oil by themselves. Then his third plan was to use to peace talk deal to open the Strait and it also failed. Now we’re in his fourth plan of using a blockade.
English
2
0
0
10
Harmless
Harmless@HarmlessHQ·
Iran blocked the Strait of Hormuz. The US blocked the Strait of Hormuz. Now, you can't approach Iran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz without also approaching the US. It is no longer about Iran; it is now about Trump.
English
22
35
199
3.3K
THE LAST BROADCAST
THE LAST BROADCAST@CarlosRodr_4·
@addinoyyi @HarmlessHQ So why was he wanting to open it the first time? Because trump literally says one thing and his actions says another thing strait is not needed by them they have Mexico, Venezuela, and Texas oil.
English
0
0
0
6
Malik Adinoyi
Malik Adinoyi@addinoyyi·
@CarlosRodr_4 @HarmlessHQ Immediately after the Strait was closed by Iran, Trump first plan to for US navy to escort every ship to cross the Strait. That first plan didn’t work out. Then 2nd plan was to ask other countries to join him to forcefully open it and it also failed then he asked them to go get…
English
2
0
0
24