Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Roser
7.9K posts

Roser
@CathRoser
20 {} “If we sin, we are thine, knowing thy greatness: and if we sin not, we know that we are counted with thee. For to know thee is perfect justice”
Katılım Aralık 2018
389 Takip Edilen626 Takipçiler

@ScholasticsFan @DoorDashThomist yeah i really dont get how it’s being read as a rejection of sufficient grace
English

@DoorDashThomist Many do not understand this condemnation unfortunately.
English

@ruckusofantioch it’s basically just if u care about the incarnation lol
English

@CathRoser They giving everyone St. Maximus the Confessor 😭
English

@Infanttheology @ScholasticsFan Viz. that it is merely an evil and not a guilt (i.e. sin proper) so long as it is not “drawn” to the “unlawful” (i.e. consenting to concupiscence and actually incurring guilt)
And that concupiscence remission following baptism is with respect to the PAST guilt incurred
English

@Infanttheology @ScholasticsFan The question in the first highlighted portion is pretty explicitly explained by St. Augustine in On Marriage and Concupiscence within the passages that I cited
The passage cited in the other highlighted portion also pretty explicitly endorse what I’m saying



English

@redeemed_zoomer All having different polity, sacramentology, soteriology, and visibly excommunicated from one another
English

“If thou wilt be perfect, go sell what thou hast, and give to the poor… every one that hath left house, or brethren, or sisters, or father, or mother, or wife, or children, or lands for my name's sake, shall receive an hundredfold, and shall possess life everlasting”
Redeemed Zoomer 👑@redeemed_zoomer
This kinda holiness is far superior to monks meditating on mountains btw
English

From people getting fed up of that stupid nonsense.
Child of SS Thomas@ChildOfStThomas
Catholics today struggle with laxism greatly. Reading books from the Saints, you will see condemnations of people who do not take measures to prepare for the Eucharist, who do not prepare for confession, for people who do not fast, etc. Where does this laxism come from?
English

@Infanttheology @ScholasticsFan I could just say likewise lol
See On Nature and Grace by Domingo de Soto, the relevant treatment of Scheeben in his dogmatics, etc.
English


@DeoVindiceXIV Yeah it’s kinda hard because well over half of the questions’ answers were all correct so you kinda j have to go off of preference
English


@Infanttheology @ScholasticsFan He also explicitly says that concupiscence is a punishment for sin within the same work
English

@Infanttheology @ScholasticsFan The guilt which is remitted is specifically that which was incurred in the "natural" / unregenerate man. Kinda just reading comprehension issue lol
English
Roser retweetledi
Roser retweetledi

Please, in your charity, support the work of the O.P. Prayer Apostolate via our PayPal Fundraiser.
Anyone who donates £25 or above will receive a copy of our upcoming prayer book, Devotions to Saint Dominic.
Thank you for your charity!
paypal.com/pools/c/9nEeBg…

English

@Infanttheology @ScholasticsFan …but this guilt, by Christ's grace through the remission of all sins, is not suffered to prevail in the regenerate man, if he does not yield obedience to it whenever it urges him to the commission of evil.”
English

@Infanttheology @ScholasticsFan …by a certain manner of speech it is called sin, since it arose from sin, and, when it has the upper hand, produces sin, the guilt of it prevails in the natural man…
English

@Infanttheology @ScholasticsFan Your specified "RC teaching" is nearly what St. Augustine affirms verbatim btw
English

@ScholasticsFan "The question is whether it remains formally sin in the regenerate."
Because current RC teaching says if no consent is involved it is not considered/called sin, correct?
Whereas we would say even sans consent it is damnable sin but not reckoned sin because of Christ's blood.
English











