Cerous

60 posts

Cerous

Cerous

@Cerouus

Katılım Ekim 2014
402 Takip Edilen3 Takipçiler
Cerous
Cerous@Cerouus·
@Stark_axie @nv188 @IWDominate It's only valid in a vacuum. Your logic works up until it collides with realty. The mechanical plays he performed in the past are absolutely mind-boggling when you go back and watch him. Faker has evolved as a player in a world where his hands can no longer do what they used to.
English
1
0
0
600
stark.ron
stark.ron@Stark_axie·
@nv188 @IWDominate dom is arguing that because the gap between him and the next was inconceivable in the past, that alone means he was in his prime then. i'm arguing that he could be even better now, its just that the gap is less because others have improved (totally valid supposition imo)
English
3
0
5
3.5K
Cerous
Cerous@Cerouus·
@burner0829 @DogetoroH101 @Kongou_Dess13 @TheRoyalSerf The sad part is that you'll never accept that you and other people like you, in your desire to endlessly appease others, enables the delusion to continue to grow and grow until the gap between reality and delusion is at a fatal level when they inevitably collapse back together.
English
0
0
4
37
Thomas Sowell Quotes
Thomas Sowell Quotes@ThomasSowell·
One of the bittersweet things about growing old is realizing how mistaken you were when you were young. As a young political leftist, I saw the left as the voice of the common man. Nothing could be further from the truth.
English
120
2.7K
11.2K
206.1K
Cerous
Cerous@Cerouus·
@oldbooksguy I think that Flowers for Algernon should be mandatory reading.
English
1
0
1
33
Jash Dholani
Jash Dholani@oldbooksguy·
What's a great book that should be more widely read?
English
438
44
505
494.8K
T1 Trollthem
T1 Trollthem@Trollthem67·
@Vleytt @lolesports I don't know, in Worlds they had the meta in their hands Right now they don't, i don't trust Oner and you'll see why the next games, he's playing for gen g each time T1 and GenG faced each other.
English
1
0
1
572
LoL Esports
LoL Esports@lolesports·
FAKER WHAT WAS THAT
English
130
3.8K
17.2K
1M
Cerous
Cerous@Cerouus·
@RichardHanania There's no way you said the things you say today back then lol. I have no issue with your position on plenty of things. But old Twitter was certainly very curated. But I assume you're smart enough to have known that and adjusted what you projected.
English
0
0
0
43
Richard Hanania
Richard Hanania@RichardHanania·
There's a young fan who tells me I would be huge on Twitch and everyone will like pay me to answer questions or something. I can't believe there's any audience for this. Would anyone be interested? I don't know what kids are into.
English
41
1
130
32.8K
Cerous
Cerous@Cerouus·
@Culture_Crit For Science, I would include Demonic Makes by Richard Wrangham. Otherwise very solid list.
English
0
0
0
6
Cerous
Cerous@Cerouus·
@_Skankhunt_420 @Thorin Griffin was never going to win with Sword. And next-in-line-Doran wasn't the answer either considering he's consistently the sore spot for GenG.
English
0
0
0
29
Chad Guevara
Chad Guevara@_Skankhunt_420·
@Thorin It's a shame Griffin never worked out. Could have been one of the best roster of all time.
English
1
0
19
1.8K
Thorin
Thorin@Thorin·
Chovy being the first player in history to make the play-offs of Worlds five straight years really highlights how much he underachieved in the early years of his career. Guy is G.O.A.T candidate material and really could be sitting on 6+ LCK titles and a bunch of Worlds. Sure, the DRX and HLE were unlikely to do anything, but that was due to the quality of his team-mates. His Griffin line-ups and all of these Gen.G could have taken it all. #Worlds2023
English
17
7
288
56.1K
Cerous
Cerous@Cerouus·
@aimeeterese Crab Mentality is what I hear most often.
English
0
0
1
96
Aimee Terese
Aimee Terese@aimeeterese·
Do Americans use the phrase “tall poppy syndrome”? You see it happening a lot on here and it just makes me laugh. Certain losers need to drag down people they worry are becoming too powerful or successful for them to keep pace. Such a niggardly mindset. They hate excellence!
English
33
0
55
10.8K
Cerous
Cerous@Cerouus·
@spooky_stokes @songofalchemy @MarmotRespecter If either of us refused to contribute to the flow of thought, the conversation would have ended. You'll know a natural conversation from one you must work for in an instant.
English
0
0
1
29
Cerous
Cerous@Cerouus·
@spooky_stokes @songofalchemy @MarmotRespecter I'm confused how not responding, like the original man who refused to elaborate without extra hand holding, would further or maintain the conversation. If you use our exchange as an example, there's an obvious back and forth. With concessions and redirections.
English
1
0
0
25
Cerous
Cerous@Cerouus·
@spooky_stokes @songofalchemy @MarmotRespecter The fundamental difference in our perspective comes in the arbitrary line in the sand. The man brought this energy into the conversation himself, and decided to THEN apply what you're preaching about gating the flow. Do, or do not. "A man who chases two rabbits catches neither.
English
1
0
0
27
Cerous
Cerous@Cerouus·
@spooky_stokes @songofalchemy @MarmotRespecter This boils down to personal accountability. Taking ownership of what we project. It's unnatural to pass this burden onto others. It's a whole subset of personality profiles, not an isolated incident.
English
0
0
3
269
Cerous
Cerous@Cerouus·
@spooky_stokes @songofalchemy @MarmotRespecter You're failing to realize that the man at the bar brought that facet into the conversation of his own free will, and had no desire or natural ability to express it in any self sustaining way. The burden is on him to seamlessly move through the paces. Not pass the burden along.
English
1
0
3
307
Cerous
Cerous@Cerouus·
@ihearthammock @SoegaardConsult @PlotACourse @Rainmaker1973 No. The stationary car will 'concede'. It won't act as an immovable object in the way the wall will. Two cars with identical mass hitting head on at 60mph each will experience force equal to hitting an immovable wall at 60mph
English
0
0
3
1.1K
Massimo
Massimo@Rainmaker1973·
This is what a spacecraft's wall looks like after an impact with a space debris of ~1.2 cm Ø at a speed of 21,760 km/h [source, read more: buff.ly/2oIi8U8]
Massimo tweet media
English
169
911
11.1K
1.5M
Cerous
Cerous@Cerouus·
@tekwendell Out of curiosity since I'm not involved in this field in any way. It would seem that this is either an oversight by previous designers, or something new has allowed an efficiency improvement so big? Or is this only applicable for some hyper specialized task this guy's working on?
English
1
0
0
75

Keşfet

@Stark_axie @nv188 @IWDominate @burner0829 @DogetoroH101 @Kongou_Dess13 @TheRoyalSerf @SoterMt