CesarE

@necropanda94 @Sirikamiloli Clearly not, persecuted? Different matter, although not impossible

@CesarEmilio_10 @Sirikamiloli Its legal in america.

no

@necropanda94 @Sirikamiloli Because Americans seem unable to read

@CesarEmilio_10 @Sirikamiloli Youre in mexico, whyre you trying to tell americans what their laws are?

@necropanda94 @L0rdZero01 @spiderzkitty @shipilkaships @Sirikamiloli Uh, no, they kept moving the goal post. Denial isn't healthy pedo

@CesarEmilio_10 @L0rdZero01 @spiderzkitty @shipilkaships @Sirikamiloli Again, incorrect. You have already been dragged on american laws by others. Lolicon art is legal in america, cry about, cope

@GhollowayMA94 @Ashen_Tarnished @shipilkaships @Sirikamiloli Alright then, Ill read the paper when i have the time and energy for long reads. In the meantime could you address any of the other arguments Ive made? This account has gone out of its way to reply to them all pretty much. I am curious how you explain cases such as Dorontabi

@CesarEmilio_10 @Ashen_Tarnished @shipilkaships @Sirikamiloli I am not arguing from a “I am a therapist, so you should listen to me.” POV: I am arguing from a “Research does not support your claim.” POV. If you are not going to bother reading the article and the research I cite, it is not worth engaging in a discussion with you.

@L0rdZero01 @spiderzkitty @shipilkaships @Sirikamiloli Terrible example. Eating is a basic need, isn't illegal under federal law nor does food have non negligible CSAM in it. Lolicon is illegal or at the very least prosecutable, and there's a non zero chance you masturbate to traced CSAM with it. Why risk this?

@CesarEmilio_10 @spiderzkitty @shipilkaships @Sirikamiloli Eating can be addictive and this website talks about it. eatingdisorderhope.com/information/fo… Does that mean you shouldn't eat? It's the same slippery slope fallacy you're using. *Anything* can be addiction, that doesn’t make those actions inherently bad.

@glen_calz @pain44918298 @Gaming1zanagiVT @Sirikamiloli You wouldn't be masturbating to pre pubescent children if you didn't have an attraction to pre pubescent children in the first place, its all just so incredibly simple, you rely on so many mental gymnastics to justify this depravity.

@glen_calz @pain44918298 @Gaming1zanagiVT @Sirikamiloli No you absolute moron, from the conception of this entire meaningless "debate", that's been my entire point. Lolicon is just your legal*(not really, but less illegal) alternative to CSAM Not all pedophiles consume CSAM, doesn't mean they're not pedophiles

@glen_calz @pain44918298 @Gaming1zanagiVT @Sirikamiloli You had no argument so you called me a retard lol, not sure why your self awareness suddenly dropped to the negatives

@CesarEmilio_10 @pain44918298 @Gaming1zanagiVT @Sirikamiloli sure buddy you have no reasonable proven argument so you result to calling me a pedo

@glen_calz @pain44918298 @Gaming1zanagiVT @Sirikamiloli Oopsie doopsie, you forgot about ai generated cp again 😥 Not pedophilic since its not a real child, or is it?

@CesarEmilio_10 @pain44918298 @Gaming1zanagiVT @Sirikamiloli The DSM-5 does not explicitly state 'real children', but all professionals agree that it is from the standpoint of a real child. There is no specific mention of cartoons.

@Sirikamiloli @necropanda94 Well tbf, your bio just says north America, if that means mexico then you're probably right, but if you're in the us or Canada, you're cooked. Either way you're still a pedo

@CesarEmilio_10 @necropanda94 Im not doing anything illegal

@glen_calz @pain44918298 @Gaming1zanagiVT @Sirikamiloli Ok pedo

@CesarEmilio_10 @pain44918298 @Gaming1zanagiVT @Sirikamiloli Ive debunked you thoroughly keep coping

@grok @Sirikamiloli Oopsie doopsie, almost like grok disagrees with itself 😥

Lolicon refers to fictional anime-style drawings of characters with youthful appearances in sexual contexts. Pedophilia is a psychiatric disorder involving primary sexual attraction to real prepubescent children (typically under 13). Lolis are not children—they are stylized 2D illustrations with no real age, biology, or harm involved. "Defining age" in fiction is narrative, not literal. Attraction to adults displaying neotenous/childlike traits (petite build, youthful face) in real people is distinct from pedophilia if the individuals are adults; it's often called "lolicon" loosely but clinically aligns more with preferences for neoteny, not prepubescents. Overapplying "pedophilia" to purely fictional or adult scenarios dilutes the clinical term's precision for cases involving actual child victims. Definitions matter for clarity.

Here's the things you've been wrong -Using pedophilia term wrong -Using plead guilty cases to prove lolicon is illegal, which is not -Saying "ok pedo" to every normal person with ordinary intelligence that can differentiate between reality and fiction -Using laws that does not affect lolicon -Etc There's time for you to redeem yourself, either you apologize or delete your account, choose wisely

@glen_calz @pain44918298 @Gaming1zanagiVT @Sirikamiloli Where's the section about lolicons in DSM-5?

@CesarEmilio_10 @pain44918298 @Gaming1zanagiVT @Sirikamiloli DSM-5 did you not read?

@glen_calz @pain44918298 @Gaming1zanagiVT @Sirikamiloli Theyre talking about pedophilic disorder you illiterate fuck 😭 She literally verbatim says "you said you arent attracted to real children" WOW, almost like that's the entire debate? Proving whether you have an attraction to real children or not? Jesus Christ you're an idiot.

@CesarEmilio_10 @pain44918298 @Gaming1zanagiVT @Sirikamiloli you were saying? 1/2

@glen_calz @pain44918298 @Gaming1zanagiVT @Sirikamiloli Yeah yeah, you already posted this pedo. Now where's the study she made on you pedophiles to reach this conclusion? Where's the data? Oh right, its just another unfounded assumption over lack of research

@CesarEmilio_10 @pain44918298 @Gaming1zanagiVT @Sirikamiloli

@glen_calz @pain44918298 @Gaming1zanagiVT @Sirikamiloli Sorry for expecting an actual argument from another pedophile in denial, that's my bad

@CesarEmilio_10 @pain44918298 @Gaming1zanagiVT @Sirikamiloli Jesus the retardation is strong with this one

@Sirikamiloli @necropanda94 You should, pedo.

@CesarEmilio_10 @necropanda94 Plead guilty

@L0rdZero01 @spiderzkitty @shipilkaships @Sirikamiloli Uh no, that's just how addiction works lol. You missed the first few arguments i was making where i established why you're more than likely addicted, any reasonable person would stop consuming the content over the real risks (both legal and moral) i presented, but you don't

@CesarEmilio_10 @armorkny @spiderzkitty @shipilkaships @Sirikamiloli Bro, your entire argument is a slippery slope fallacy. This website is not even against consuming porn, it's against porn addiction, which is different. They're not claiming porn always leads to that. Arguing "desensitiation" is really flawed for many reasons.

@glen_calz @pain44918298 @Gaming1zanagiVT @Sirikamiloli From the available information Consuming lolicon puts you at risk, both legal and moral, as you absolutely can be charged "despite how much you want to believe the contrary", but arguably more important, you can end up consuming content traced from CSAM x.com/CesarEmilio_10…

@glen_calz @pain44918298 @Gaming1zanagiVT @Sirikamiloli There's also no evidence that it reduces child abuse, it can go either way, and regardless that doesn't debunk my argument that you're pedophiles. Indeed, there's no study saying "lolicon is pedophilia" nor "Lolicon isn't pedophilia", what we can make are logical conclusions...