ChargeUpCapital

Bull Case Thesis for $EOSE: Eos Energy Enterprises ($EOSE) is a competitor in the rapidly expanding energy storage sector, driven by its zinc-based battery technology. ->The global battery storage market is projected to exceed $400 billion by 2035, fueled by renewable integration, grid resilience, and AI-driven energy demand and $EOSE long-duration zinc batteries offer a ~20% cost advantage over lithium-ion, positioning it to capture significant share. ->Proven Technology and Domestic Advantage: $EOSE non-flammable, zinc-based batteries avoid lithium’s supply chain risks which aligns them with US energy independence policies. -> Current Operational projects: 500kWh systems in WI and CA demonstrate reliability, enhancing potential for more adoption. -> Growth Trajectory: Q2 2025 revenue soared to $15.2M (up 46% QoQ, 17x YoY), with 2025 guidance sitting at $150-190M. The $18.8B sales pipeline (up $3.2B QoQ) shows upside potential against the company’s current $1.64B market cap. -> Momentum: Manufacturing output doubled in Q2, with DOE loan support for their standardized, repeatable, and scalable approach to manufacturing. A $336M capital raise and debt restructuring (7% interest vs. 15%) which saves $16M/year, de-risks the balance sheet, with $120.22M cash on hand. -> Technical Setup: Monthly charts show a “W” bottom, with price above all key moving averages. MACD and RSI confirm bullish momentum, with institutional accumulation at ~69%. Break above $6.35 targets $7.40-$9. At $6.32, $EOSE is undervalued relative to its pipeline and market potential. Price Predictions: • Short-Term (3-12 Months): $6.50-$11 • Long-Term (3-5 Years): $15-$26 (conservative)

Sold my $EOSE position. Can’t trust this management anymore.

@StockSavvyShay It might be time to leave this one behind

Dear Joe, I’m writing this as a shareholder who actually wanted to believe in $EOSE is building and who still believes the underlying problem you’re trying to solve is real, urgent & structurally important for the grid. But this quarter wasn’t just a bad print.. it genuinely was a complete trust break. Small-cap investing is like watching your house catch fire since you already know the risk going in but the only way you survive is if you trust the person guiding you to the front door. Once that trust is gone then you don’t just lose money but you burn with it. That’s what this quarter felt like. Reaffirming guidance deep into the quarter and then missing it by this much without pre-announcing tells me that you actually didn't know what was happening inside the factory or chose to stick with the story even as the numbers were falling apart. Both are bad. As CEO, that’s on you. What makes this harder to swallow is the timing since you raised roughly $600M late in the quarter and then turned around and delivered results that were nowhere close to what had been guided. Even if every operational issue you laid out is real then the sequence alone creates a governance problem. You can’t take fresh capital from the market while the quarter is blowing up and then act surprised after the fact. That destroys credibility. I heard the explanations of supplier issues, downtime way above expectations, automation not hitting quality targets, rework, utilization below plan. These are real problems but from the outside it looks like the manufacturing system still isn’t stable enough to support the confidence you projected publicly. You can’t ask investors to underwrite a scaling story when the engine is still sputtering. The frustrating part is that demand doesn’t look like the problem. You booked a lot of new orders, backlog grew and the pipeline is big and the tech actually matters. Long-duration, non-flammable zinc batteries solve a real gap that lithium-ion doesn’t since data centers run 24/7 but the grid wasn’t built for that. Eos sits right at the intersection of AI power demand and grid reliability which is why people believed in this story in the first place. But none of that matters if management credibility is impaired which is exactly what today’s stock action reflects. A 40% drawdown isn’t the market debating long-duration storage but it’s the market GRADING YOU JOE and saying it no longer trusts you on execution. I hope the company does turn it around. I hope the technology scales. I hope the mission succeeds. But as an investor, I already accept enough uncertainty from markets, supply chains and the normal fog of war but what I cannot accept is uncertainty layered with distrust of management communication. This quarter crossed that line and you should assume many shareholders feel the same.

@GrindeOptions Looking like $6.5-$6.8

Where is the new floor for $EOSE now? 🤔

@LamarMK ts.la/lakshay84271

If you need a Tesla referral, feel free to post your link below and let's keep the amazing new $59K Cybertruck selling fast!!! All my referrals are maxed out, but you can still save $1,000 on the new Cybertruck. Check the comment section for referral links from other community members.

@amitisinvesting I’m holding all the way

$GRAB trading as if Singapore is about to get invaded 😂😂😂😂 in all seriousness, yes it sucks to be stuck in something that isn’t moving and was just up 35% a few months ago, but it also begs the question about why and I personally do not see the fundamental argument for why it deserves to be trading at these levels, at all. barclays came out this morning and once again reiterated $7. maybe there is some big earnings surprise and horrible guidance and the thesis changes, but outside of that I feel the shorts are in control and the price simply isn’t matching with the reality of the business. this isn’t that uncommon, it happens all the time and the harsh reality is it happened for the first 2 names that built my portfolio (PLTR and HOOD) for 2 years before those names actually moved. we all have been so conditioned to the quick 50% in a month that many times we forget investing really does take time and stories need the breath to play out. rocketlab had 3+ years of nothing before the incredible run we’ve seen in the past year. the question then becomes opportunity cost. my portfolio did 60% last year and if I had put the grab money somewhere else, it’d probably have been closer to 90%. i don’t know if this is when you quit on a name given nothing has changed — if something changes (like i felt with hims at 58) then im all for cutting bait. but nothing really has changed, price is just not reacting, and that is more of a game of patience versus anything else. institutions continue to acquire, profitability is inflecting, topline growth can accelerate to 30%, and the broader narrative of the position has not changed for me. i can’t focus on looking at it day to day because its like watching paint dry and have other more active parts of my portfolio but at this point I am trusting there is a broader opportunity that will manifest itself and i actually like that it is not as high beta because its something I know I can continue to DCA in cheaply. long shares + options, not sure whats happening but these are the dog days of waiting things out and will review after Q4 earnings 🫡

@amitisinvesting Market about to do a 180°

BREAKING: THE SUPREME COURT WILL NOT ISSUE A TARIFF DECISION ON TRUMP'S TARIFFS TODAY. i guess when you join the supreme court you're allowed to have more vacation days than the rest of us

@amitisinvesting Don’t forget $eose

High beta names have led the way so far in 2026. Drones, energy, space, defense, memory…all themes that have had massive winners in them. However, this rally isn't only happening within high-beta. The S&P 500 is nearing $7000 and being supported by defensives, healthcare, utilities and more even if tech is not leading the way. Ultimately, the risk has now become higher for these names if you weren't in them to start the year, but the market dynamics are proving that having some exposure good be strong if the current macro can hold. Latest Substack dives into the sustainability of this rally, why high beta names are catching a bid, and how the market is beginning to rotate.

@RobinhoodApp $hood to the moon 🚀

It’s almost the holidays and you deserve a gift. Comment below and we may send you some merch.

@WealthCoachMak $EOSE

This is where “You only sell puts on stocks you don’t mind owning” come into play That is absolutely RULE NO. 1 🤷‍♂️ $NVDA $TSLA $AMZN $SPY $QQQ

@WealthCoachMak Learned it the hard way

Option buyers are not in the trade to buy the shares or sell the shares They are in that trade to make a profit… And become “sellers” of that trade So… Stop worrying about early assignments when there is a LOT of extrinsic value left in the trade

@stocktalkweekly We have bottomed for the week

Either we get a monster green day tomorrow to repair these weekly charts, or it's time to flip bias.

@MikeLongTerm Def not more than $500m

BREAKING $GRAB $GOTO More Update🚨🚨🚨 TLDR: $GOTO(Mobility&Delivery) should be sold cheap to $GRAB. Too much corruptions. The Attorney General's Office (AGO) of Indonesia has been probing two major corruption cases involving Nadiem Makarim, the founder of Gojek (now part of GoTo) and former Minister of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology (2019–2024). The first is the "Chromebookgate" scandal, a Rp 9.9 trillion ($600 million) procurement of Google Chromebook laptops for schools during the COVID-19 pandemic. The second, recently surfaced, examines Telkomsel's $450 million investment in GoTo between 2020 and 2021, suspected of causing state losses due to conflicts of interest and poor governance. Telkomsel, Indonesia's largest telecommunications company and a subsidiary of state-owned PT Telkom Indonesia is a major player in mobile services, with over 171 million customers and extensive 4G/5G infrastructure. These cases intersect through Nadiem's dual role as a tech entrepreneur and government official, with the AGO's raids on GoTo's offices in July 2025 linking the probes. While the Chromebook case directly implicates Nadiem as a suspect, the GoTo investment case indirectly ties to him via his founding stake in GoTo and potential influence on regulatory changes favoring the company's 2022 IPO. 1. Direct links to $GOTO and Nadiem ~ Foundational Role: Nadiem's 2010 founding of Gojek positioned him as GoTo's intellectual architect, even after his 2019 exit. The AGO's July 2025 GoTo raid seizing materials on Chromebook procurement explicitly bridged the cases, probing if Nadiem's pre-ministerial Google ties (from 2018 Gojek funding) influenced the laptop specs. While GoTo insists "operations have never been related to Nadiem's duties," the raid suggests investigators see overlap, possibly via informal networks or lingering equity (Nadiem holds non-controlling shares). ~Investment Scrutiny: Telkomsel's $450M (Rp 6.4T) into an unprofitable GoTo followed by a 82% stock plunge has spotlighted Nadiem's legacy. The AGO's March 2023 memo, revived in November 2025, alleges "unlawful actions" without governance, including IDX rule tweaks enabling GoTo's IPO. Nadiem wasn't directly involved post-2019, but public calls ( labor federation urging AGO probe) implicate him via GoTo's board ties to elites. ~This funding supported GoTo's expansion into ride-hailing, e-commerce, and digital payments, but the company's persistent unprofitability (losses since 2010) and a sharp stock decline have raised red flags. The AGO's March 2023 memo flagged "unlawful actions" in the deal, citing governance failures and potential state losses exceeding Rp 4.5 trillion. 2. Corruption pump & dump, and Elite networks ~Thohir Brothers' Shadow: The investment's core suspicion is familial ties Boy Thohir (GoTo commissioner/shareholder) and Erick Thohir (SOE Minister overseeing Telkom). Erick's role enabling the deal despite risks. Tempo reports elite control over state bodies exacerbated issues. This mirrors Nadiem's alleged Google favoritism, suggesting a pattern of cronyism in Indonesia's tech-BUMN nexus. ~Regulatory Manipulation: The 2021 IDX decision waived profit requirements for GoTo's listing, suspected of "significant intervention." As minister, Nadiem's influence on digital policy could have indirectly aided, though unproven. DPR's 2022 probe flagged similar overvaluation fears 3. Financial and State losses ~Quantified Losses: Chromebook: Rp 1.98T from markups and inefficacy (devices useless without internet in remote schools). Telkomsel-GoTo: Potential Rp 6.4T loss from devalued shares (Rp 338 IPO to Rp 61), eroding public funds. Combined, these exceed $700M, Public outrage over "mega corruption." 4. Current Investigation ~The AGO confirmed on November 11, 2025, that it is probing the Telkomsel-GoTo investment for corruption, focusing on conflicts, IDX rule changes, and governance lapses. While Nadiem is a named suspect in the separate Rp 9.9 trillion Chromebook procurement scandal (where Google ties from early Gojek funding are examined), reporters directly asked him during questioning if investigators touched on the Telkomsel deal but he declined comment. Nadiem Makarim’s connection to Telkomsel is not one of direct authority but of proximate influence; a web woven from entrepreneurial legacy, state power, and elite networks. As Gojek’s founder, he built a digital empire that Telkomsel later funded with $450 million in public money, a move now under AGO scrutiny for alleged corruption, conflict of interest, and catastrophic financial loss. Though Nadiem severed operational ties in 2019, his shadow lingers: in GoTo’s boardroom, in regulatory relaxations that enabled its IPO, and in the Chromebook scandal where Google’s early investment in Gojek intersects with a Rp 9.9 trillion state procurement failure. This is more than a financial probe it is a stress test of Indonesia’s governance model at the volatile intersection of tech ambition and public office. The Thohir brothers’ involvement, the IDX’s tailored rule changes, and the silence of key executives all point to a deeper systemic risk: when private innovation collides with state capital without ironclad safeguards, the public pays the price. As of November 11, 2025, Nadiem faces potential life imprisonment in one case while the Telkomsel investigation quietly escalates. The outcome will not only determine his fate but may redefine how Indonesia balances digital transformation with accountability. If the dots connect further from startup funding to ministerial policy to state-backed investment the fallout could reshape trust in both its tech giants and its institutions. Source: tempo.co

@MikeLongTerm @sainikaran997ks @amitisinvesting And if people still don’t understand now is the time to buy $grab, they’ll miss out on a great opportunity to build generational wealth

@sainikaran997ks @amitisinvesting Lol This is so sophisticated on so many levels. I won't be writing abt this. But I got the whole thing down connecting the dots. $GRAB 90-95% market share is inevitable!

$GRAB Huge. Looks like $Grab will be getting $GoTo for the price of peanuts @MikeLongTerm @amitisinvesting

@amitisinvesting Didn’t Bessent say it’ll be tax break and not directly stimmy checks

TRUMP: “AFTER GIVING PEOPLE A $2000 TARIFF DIVIDEND, WE WILL PAY DOWN THE DEBT.” so….are we doing stimmy checks again?

@WealthCoachMak Learning to make the right moves is the hardest part

Option Selling done the right way can be very profitable: $5k account: $75 - 200 / mo $10k: $150 -400 / mo $25k: $400 -$1k / mo $50k: $750 - $2k / mo $100k: $1,500 - $4k / mo $250k: $3k -10k / mo $500k: $7.5k - $20k / mo $1M: $15k - $40k / mo

@WOLF_Financial @amitisinvesting I can’t stop loading on more shares whenever it drops. I’m convinced my dd on $grab is correct with @amitisinvesting and @MikeLongTerm confirming it from their side

Amit Kukreja: Grab $GRAB is a $100B Company Trading at $20B Investor Amit Kukreja (@amitisinvesting) called Grab a future $100 billion company currently trading at just $20 billion with $7 billion in cash. "The level of employee growth that Grab supports in the region is astronomical. They're becoming a super app for the region and taking market share," Amit explains. "It's a very competitive region, margins are tough, but they're getting to the point where it's consolidating and they are the winner." Amit sees Grab as one of four or five winners emerging from Southeast Asia's brutal competition in ride-sharing, delivery, payments, and financial services. The super app strategy mirrors successful Asian models like Meituan. What do you think?

@WealthCoachMak @MillionaireDoor That’s when smart money flows in

@MillionaireDoor If people are worried about a 2-4% pullback... They will be in for a rude awakening when a real drawdown happens.

I see so many crying about the market being so far down....the sky is falling...... Zoom out!

@amitisinvesting Not available in every state

$HOOD BREAKING: Robinhood announces a partnership with Sage Home Loans to offer Gold subscribers mortgage rates that are 0.75% below national averages with a $500 credit. This was piloted earlier in the year, now it’s official. It seems like this is just the beginning for newer financial products that HOOD will offer. As banking rolls out next year, Robinhood will aim to play an integral role in every financial step of someone’s life. Sakhi Gandhi, Director of Partnerships at Robinhood: “Through our work with Sage Home Loans, we’re helping reduce financial barriers to homeownership and empowering customers to build wealth through one of life’s most important investments.” LFG.

@MikeLongTerm Another reason to buy more shares before it takes off 🚀

$GRAB SEA IPO Part 2 🧵 Fun fact: Cambodia, Indonesia, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Thailand, and Vietnam can easily swallow 1 bilion+ shares from $GRAB, and reduce effective float down to 30-50m shares. With Buyback, that will ulitmately reduce supply sharply comparing to now as the business fundamental continues to outperform! Why? Gold and Real Estate are only 2 investment vehicles people in these countries trust. In the last 4-5 years, Real Estate did not return much, in many cases lost money. Vietnam had the highest consumer demand for gold in Southeast Asia in 2022, with 69.1 tons.Indonesia was the second-largest consumer in 2022, with a demand of 50 tons.Thailand had the third-highest consumer demand in 2022, reaching 37.9 tons.Philippines, Malaysia, Myanmar and Cambodia demand for gold or alternative investments are high. Many of them seek to invest in the US/Singapore public companies, but it is extremely difficult. I was not clear on this on prior post, that the Department of Information and Communications Technology (DICT) is pushing tech giants Grab Philippines and GCash to go public to boost the number of digital players in the stock market. The Secretary, Henry said "these super apps are already matured enough financially to go public" Not just Philippines, $GRAB is being pushed or supported to go Public in these emerging economies. It will only benefit $GRAB as it creates more demand for Grab shares naturally and more GRAB loyal customers. For example, I use Grab when I go to SEA for travel. Or I would use Grab services if it available in the US. Does that make sense? Of course there will be regulatory risks, but these govt are pushing GRAB to do it, i'm sure they will provide assistances and ease regulatory.

@Mr_Derivatives Buy the dip

$HOOD officially in a bear market by definition (-20% recent peak to trough move) and is sitting right at the 50dma. What to do here?