Chase

2.9K posts

Chase banner
Chase

Chase

@Chase_Commerce

Reshaping Commerce.

Katılım Ekim 2024
974 Takip Edilen2.8K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Chase
Chase@Chase_Commerce·
everyone should own a TikTok Shop affiliate page that makes them $5,000-$10,000/mo without going viral sadly, most think it takes crazy editing skills or dancing on camera here’s how to scale to $5K/mo in 90 days, working just 1-2 hours a day:
English
23
14
246
42.8K
Chase
Chase@Chase_Commerce·
if this post made you interested in ACTUAL high quality UGC videos from REAL creators at $1 each... check out hourlyugc(.com) (trusted by 100s of top brands, 10,000+ tasks completed weekly, 14-18hr average first delivery) - Chase
English
0
0
1
28
Chase
Chase@Chase_Commerce·
paying UGC creators anything over $1 per video in 2026 is a SCAM... we literally hire college girls at $25/hour. one session is 60 to 90 minutes. that's 15 to 30+ raw videos per session. you end up paying like $1 per raw video. then just book 5 to 8 sessions a week. now you've got 100+ raw videos every 7 days. all that's left is to get a filipino to edit those videos at $2 to $5 per hour on capcut. competent ones push 25+ finished videos per shift. overall, a fully loaded production cost lands at $1 to $3 per video. meanwhile agencies charge $300 to $500 per video for the same thing lol. literally the same college girls with iphones. they just slap "agency" on the invoice and 20x the price. and don't even get me started on "premium" UGC creators charging $200 a video because they have a portfolio and follower count. follower counts don't predict UGC performance. portfolios don't either. the only thing that converts is authentic delivery on camera. you can find that at $25/hour nowadays. brands at $1M-$20M+ revenue figured this out 12-18 months ago. now smaller ones are getting on it too. because UGC shouldn't be difficult nor expensive.
English
1
9
15
354
Stephen Bishop
Stephen Bishop@_stephenbishop_·
These types of creatives took ENTIRE agencies costing you $1,000s MONTHLY... Now you can literally make them in minutes with AI. All you need to know is how to prompt. Like + comment "PROMPT" and I'll send you 60+ prompts that you can use. (Videos + images included)
Stephen Bishop tweet mediaStephen Bishop tweet media
English
20
4
40
1.7K
Chase
Chase@Chase_Commerce·
i'm LEAKING the full $1 per UGC video production playbook: one of our brand partners literally used this to drop CAC by 40%+ in 30 days.... all while running 100+ finished videos a day at $1-$2 each. like + comment "UGC" and i'll send it over (must be following + RT for priority access)
English
3
0
4
158
Chase
Chase@Chase_Commerce·
meta has a hidden trust score running on every ad account... (and AI creatives f*ck it) yet most brands don't know about it. but it's been quietly tanking the performance of accounts running AI content for 12 months. so here's what it actually is: meta runs 2 scoring systems that AI creative gets hit by. the page quality score affects your delivery and costs at the account level. the relevance score affects each ad in the auction. both get hammered by AI content for different reasons. reason 1: user engagement. obviously, AI ads feel synthetic to viewers. it just isn't good enough yet, or well, ever. this causes people to scroll past faster, and they hide them more often. meta reads those signals and downranks your relevance score. you see it as climbing CPMs in your dashboard. reason 2: the unoriginality penalty. meta specifically downranks content that recycles prompts or lacks a unique human touch. every brand using the same AI tool with similar prompts is competing in a pool meta is actively suppressing. reason 3: the AI disclosure requirement. meta now requires advertisers to label photorealistic content made or heavily edited with AI. and if you skip the disclosure, your page quality takes a direct hit. but if you do use it, your engagement collapses because users avoid labeled AI content. both paths damage the account. reason 4: fact-checker risk. AI hallucinates product claims constantly. one flagged ad and your account trust drops. enough flags and the account gets disabled outright. overall, your AI UGC stack isn't producing cost effective creative. it's producing creative meta's own systems are designed to penalize. so running it just isn't worth it anymore, even if it gets better. that's why the brands actually scaling switched to hourly UGC for $1 per video.
English
1
1
9
449
Chase
Chase@Chase_Commerce·
if this post made you interested in ACTUAL high quality UGC videos from REAL creators at $1 each... check this out: hourlyugc.com (trusted by 100s of top brands, 10,000+ tasks completed weekly, 14-18hr average first delivery) - Chase
English
0
0
1
115
Chase
Chase@Chase_Commerce·
people still think the BIG ecom brands run AI UGC lmao. AI UGC is not worth it long-term, the costs are high and it's unreliable. many of the SaaS companies like Higgsfield, MaxFusion, Arcads, etc literally use actual people for their posts/promotions. they either deepfake influencers or genuinely just pay them for it. so yeah, the reality is AI UGC isn't what it's brought out to be. that $99 subscription ends up costing you $199+ after extra credits. and if you're a big ecom brand, you usually get an agency to generate + run the promotions for you which costs $1,000s more. you're literally better off paying an hourly UGC creator $1 per video while paying a filipino VA $3/hr to edit & post for you.
Chase@Chase_Commerce

x.com/i/article/2058…

English
2
0
8
1.3K
Chase
Chase@Chase_Commerce·
"oUr agEncy gives uS 8 UGC vIdeos a mOnth..." we literally pay college girls $25/hour. a single creator session lasts 60 to 90 minutes and produces 15 to 30 raw videos. we book 5 to 8 sessions a week across our creator roster. that's 100+ finished outputs every 7 days at full capacity. then just get filipinos to handle editing at $2/hour lol. if they're competent, they'll push out 25 finished videos per shift. and since claude handles the research + template extraction, everything is practically automated. that gives you time to pull yesterday's top performing videos from competitor data, extract the repeatable script patterns, and brief the creators on it. your costs end up being max $2 per video, and since the videos were made by humans... you won't need to regenerate or anything. this is what the top ecom brands are running nowadays, not some AI slop or agency UGC. literally get a video for $1 each, use AI for scripts and trend search, then give the videoto a filipino to edit, and publish it. it shouldn't be difficult nor expensive.
English
0
1
19
1.3K
Chase
Chase@Chase_Commerce·
people have 0 clue on how cheap human UGC is... you don't need to use AI UGC or agencies that end up costing $1,000s monthly. it's possible to get $1 PER video, while automating the entire process. i explained how in this article:
Chase@Chase_Commerce

x.com/i/article/2057…

English
0
0
1
262
Stephen Bishop
Stephen Bishop@_stephenbishop_·
Stop asking Claude for fresh hook ideas... There's a better way to find them. I've been using this system across client accounts for months and it's the single highest-leverage thing I've found for keeping creative fresh post-Andromeda. Basically, you just mine winning hooks from categories your competitors aren't watching -> Remix them into your product with AI -> Test against real data. This is PERFECT for DTC brands and agencies who keep getting AI slop hooks. So if you're asking Claude for "10 hook ideas" and getting back the same recycled garbage every time... Start doing this instead: → Pick 5 adjacent categories where buyer psychology overlaps → Pull top-performing ads from each (Meta Ad Library) → Grab the exact language, word for word → Feed it into Claude with your brand context → Get 5 remixed hooks that keep the winning structure There's literally no starting from scratch every cycle or recycling what your competitors are already running. I put together a detailed doc on this, in it you'll get: → The 5-category framework → The Meta Ad Library workflow → The exact Claude prompt that does the adapting → Real remix examples for supplements and skincare → The post-Andromeda testing protocol And it's completely free. Just like + Comment "REMIX" (Must be following so I can DM)
English
10
0
11
250
Chase
Chase@Chase_Commerce·
"UGC isn't scalable..." cope. you can run hourly UGC for less than $1 a video in 2026. now sure, some agencies still charge $400 to $500 per promotion, that model exists. but it's just not the only option anymore. you can literally get a vetted creator at $25 an hour who shoots 20 to 30 raw videos in a single session. then literally just get a VA to edit them if necessary. this way you can spam as many UGC videos as you want at super high quality.
English
0
0
3
224
Chase
Chase@Chase_Commerce·
you can't convince me this is the future of UGC... i don't care if this took 5 minutes to generate, i'm 100% certain it was regenerated multiple times to get right. and even then you can clearly see it's AI slop. i swear, AI UGC SEEMS great and all until you realize that you still need to: - know how prompting works - spend credits on regeneration - get references so it isn't complete slop not to mention how fast platforms are moving in on AI generated content/creatives. you're genuinely better off running hourly UGC.
English
3
1
8
770
Chase
Chase@Chase_Commerce·
meta's algorithm in 2026 rewards creative volume over creative quality. this means 30 mediocre ads beat 5 great ads at the same spend almost every time. and sure, this SOUNDS wrong... but it's how andromeda actually works now. the algorithm needs variation to optimize, and 5 ads only gives it 5 data points. but 30+ ads gives it 30+ (obviously) this is important since the system can't find winners if you don't feed it enough options to test. so stop trying to pick your winning ad in advance, you literally can't. the algorithm finds it for you when you give it enough to work with. yet i still see brands obsessing over hook copy for ads that are never going to scale because they're under threshold. they think the issue is creative quality when it's that the algorithm doesn't have enough data to optimize delivery. so yeah, less perfecting and more producing.
Chase tweet media
English
0
0
2
103
Stephen Bishop
Stephen Bishop@_stephenbishop_·
You SHOULDN'T be generating 10 clips without planning the shot structure... Then spending 3h+ in CapCut trying to make 10 disconnected shots feel like one video. So I built the pre-production system that fixes it, and I'm giving it away for free. Tenframe builds a 15-second, 10-frame storyboard sheet from a quick brief. Tell it your topic, your style, your character, and your product. Then it hands you back a ready-to-paste image generation prompt that produces the full storyboard sheet, plus the matching Seedance 2.0 video prompt to animate it. What you get: 1) 15-second, 10-frame, 1.5s-per-frame structure that locks the shot sequence before any video gets generated 2) 5 style presets (Premium 3D Animation, Claymation, Realistic UGC Ad, POV-Style Ad, Founder Voice) so the visual register matches your category 3) Copy rules baked in that strip the AI tone out of every caption and label 4) Real-brand prop library by environment (kitchen, bedroom, car, street, studio) so your scenes pass the AI-detection test 5) 3-layer brand name pronunciation defense baked into the matching Seedance prompt so your brand name doesn't get mumbled All shipped in 2 formats. Comment "TEN" and I'll send it over. (Must be following + RT for priority access)
English
11
4
11
451