Chase

everyone should own a TikTok Shop affiliate page that makes them $5,000-$10,000/mo without going viral sadly, most think it takes crazy editing skills or dancing on camera here’s how to scale to $5K/mo in 90 days, working just 1-2 hours a day:

here's how we're getting human-filmed UGC ads for $1-$2 a video: 1/ have claude pull yesterday's top videos on kalodata 2/ break those down into repeatable script templates 3/drop the templates on HourlyUGC 4/ a college creator films 15+ of them an hour at $25/hr here's why it's cracked (copy this): claude does the part that used to need an expensive strategist. it scrapes the top performing UGC in your niche off kalodata, pulls apart the hooks and scripts, and hands you the patterns already converting. then you turn those into templates so the creator never has to think. she gets a hook, a script, and a reference video, and just films it. that's why she knocks out 15+ clips an hour instead of a handful. and you hire her by the hour, not per video, so the cost anchors to her time instead of a markup. at $25 an hour for 15+ clips, that's under $2 a video before editing. a editor finishes them for a couple bucks, and you land at $1 to $3 a finished video. actual humans, filmed fast, for less than the AI tools cost once you count the regenerations. and the platforms actually push it because it's real, while they bury the AI stuff. so you get cheaper videos, real faces, and better delivery, all from one setup. meanwhile the brands still on AI are paying $5+ a clip after regenerations, watching it get buried, and wondering why their costs keep climbing. congrats, you escaped AI slop.

watched a brand burn $30k on AI credits before they realized human UGC is cheaper AND better. they went all in on AI last year. generating 100s of videos + images monthly... then the bills started stacking up: the $1-$2 videos ended up being $5+, because they burned 3 or 4 regenerations to get one usable clip. on top of that they hit the tier wall and upgraded for the features they actually needed. $30k later, they finally started looking for another solution. and 2 things hit them at once. 1) the AI ads were getting more expensive to run every single month. the platform flagged content as AI and cooked reach, so their CPMs kept climbing on the exact same videos. 2) the AI stuff converted worse than the human tests they'd run early on. people noticed the AI videos in seconds and kept scrolling. meaning they were paying more to reach fewer people with content that sold less. that's when the whole "AI is cheaper" story fell apart. so they rebuilt the whole thing on real humans. claude pulled winning UGC videos in their niche and wrote scripts. then human creators filmed them by the hour through a platform like HourlyUGC, and an editor finished them for $1-$2. fully done, $1 to $3 a video. cheaper than the AI once you count the regenerations and the rising delivery costs, and it actually converts. they spent $30k to learn human UGC wins on both cost and performance. you can just learn it from this post.

POV: you just printed a few Ms with Fable 5 + human UGC...

watched an $8M ecom brand go from $160 a video to $2... and 50x their volume doing it: before, they were running a mix of agency videos and AI UGC. they were paying about $160 a finished video. and they were capped at 30 - 40 videos a month, because at that price they couldn't afford more. so they were starving meta on creative, their CPMs got cooked, and the account stalled. AI UGC was a big part of it... it looked cheap per clip, but the platform was raising their delivery costs on it every month. so they rebuilt the whole thing. 1) claude pulls the top performing UGC in their niche every morning and turns it into scripts. 2) human creators film those scripts for $1/hour through hourlyugc. 3) an editor finishes them on for a $2-$3 each. fully loaded, they dropped from $160 a video to about $3-$4 max. and their output went from 30 to 40 a month to over 500+/week. that's the 50x for way less money and HIGHER quality conten.t not to mention, with that much fresh human creative to test, they found winners constantly. - CPMs dropped around 25% - CAC came down over 40% - CTR jumped about 40% so they got cheaper production, way more volume, and better performance. yet they weren't doing anything magic. they just stopped overpaying for agency videos and stopped running AI content the platform was penalizing.

@phemeinfluence Just use HourlyUGC (dot) com and you'll have 100+ in 24hrs

🚨UGC CREATORS W/ 1K+ FOLLOWERS on tiktok/instagram GARNIER is looking for creators, for their upcoming campaign that goes live in August! $4500 monthly retainer, 2x 1 minute videos weekly , free product gifting Apply in DMs If you are interested, (Must be following us)

@CharlieCannon9 Just make a post on HourlyUGC and get 100+ in the next 24hrs

$$ HIRING - UGC Creators / Filmers for Spin360 Fan Requirements: -Beautiful B-Roll / Lighting / Scenes -Creative hook ideas -High shot quality -Ability to create lots of content Looking for beautiful content we can use in our meta ad scripts! Dont need talking heads, good creative intuition DM or comment your portfolio!

i just wrote up the entire human UGC system that $10M+/year ecom brands run their creatives on... in it you'll get (for completely free): - why AI content cooks your delivery once you're spending serious money - a claude research loop that briefs the whole operation before lunch - the exact org structure, who films, who edits, who runs it, so you don't - how the cost actually lands at $1 to $3 a video at scale - the volume threshold meta rewards, and how to hit it every week - the 90-day rollout to hundreds of videos a week like + comment "HOURLY" and i'll send it asap. (must be following + RT for priority access)

@adriansolarzz SLIDESHOW

i'm LEAKING our entire TikTok slideshow system: we used this to produce 900+ pieces of content per client MONTHLY... this is literally the system that's outperforming reels for save rates, DM shares, and substantive comments like + comment "SLIDESHOW" and i'll send it over (must be following + RT for priority access)

high production value is killing your ad performance. the polished, studio-lit, perfectly-edited video you paid big $$$ for is exactly what makes people scroll past it. because people scroll specifically to avoid ads: and the second something looks produced, their brain flags it as a commercial. meaning your production value is a giant signal that says "this is an ad, skip me." now compare a real person filming on an iphone in their bedroom. - a little awkward - slightly shaky - natural light - no script that video doesn't read as an ad, it reads as a real human sharing something. so they stop. they watch since it looks like the content they actually opened the app for. and watch time and native feel are things the platforms reward. the ugly video beats the beautiful one, and it's not close. that's why the best-performing UGC in almost every account looks like it took 5 minutes to make. because it did. and the raw version is also way cheaper, which really stings if you've been overpaying for polish. a human creator on an iphone runs you $1 - $2 an hour nowadays. yet your polished agency spot runs $400 and converts worse. you just paying a premium to actively lower your own performance. so drop the production budget and put it into people filming on iphones. let the slightly ugly, actually real content do the work.

@kyrinahlis @pitchlo_ @pitchlo_ DM me. We have 50,000 creators ready to go. HourlyUGC(dot)com

@pitchlo_ @Chase_Commerce

a mortgage company is looking to pay creators 30+ $250–$500 per video to make UGC content around finance. they want 2 videos from each creator, done by end of july/early august. Comment your niche below 👇 — finance, lifestyle, business app.pitchlo.com/go/d1c8d029-d6…

i just watched an influencer ask for $4,000 for one UGC video. they average 1,000 views a post. and brands are actually paying it lol. meanwhile there's a whole other camp making the exact opposite mistake. they saw the AI UGC hype, the "i generated 500 deepfake ads while i slept" posts, and figured they found the cheap way out. they spend $0.50 on an AI video and launch it. and for 3 days it kind of works. the CTR looks fine, testing speed feels insane, so it feels okay... and then it dies. - performance throttles - conversions drop to zero - the ad's cooked so now you've got 2 camps both losing. one's overpaying entitled influencers $4k for content that doesn't convert. the other's pumping out AI slop that dies after 72h because there's nothing real in it. both camps are missing the same thing. when someone's scrolling tiktok or instagram, they're not there for a commercial. an AI avatar with dead eyes and flawless skin is the last thing they want. what they're actually after is something that feels real. the brain spots fake in a fraction of a second, way before it can explain why. an AI ad might get a pause out of novelty, but it never earns trust. and trust is the only currency that matters when you're asking someone to pull out their card. the brands actually scaling past 7 figures right now sit in neither camp. they skip both the $4k influencer and the 50-cent AI garbage. they hire real vetted creators by the hour through a platform like hourlyugc. at $25 an hour a good creator films 10 to 15 raw, ugly, honest hooks in her bedroom. no script or ring light, just excitement and your product in her hand. so you stop paying for an agency's overhead and an influencer's ego. you're just buying time. you get the testing speed of AI and keep the trust signals only a real human sets off. the volume Meta's algorithm wants, without killing the authenticity that drives the actual sale. it shouldn't cost $4,000, and it shouldn't be AI slop.

almost every ecom brand over $1M+/year is moving back to human UGC creators... (let me explain how & why) 1. meta and tiktok started taxing AI content. their classifiers score your creative for AI signals, and the score has memory. an account that keeps submitting AI content builds a synthetic score that inflates your CPMs on everything after it. you can't see it and you can't appeal it, it just shows up as rising delivery costs. 2. AI just converts worse. viewers notice an AI face as off within seconds and scroll. controlled tests show real human creative converting 20% - 60% higher on identical products, traffic, and offers. stack a 40% CPM penalty on a 30% conversion drop and you get roughly 60% more expensive customers. 3. people miss something... go look at what the AI UGC tools run for their own ads in meta's library. it's all real humans on iphones, founder content and actual creators. they run the exact model their marketing calls obsolete, because for their own money they make the rational call. what they switched to is simple. human creators hired by the hour at $25 to $35. they film 15 to 30 clips a session, an editor finishes them for a couple bucks, and you land at $1 to $3 a video. AI is still used in the stack of course, just on research and scripts with claude, never on camera. meta rewards 30 - 50 fresh variations a week now, and this is the only model that hits that volume at a price that works. this isn't theory either. a $100M agency switched their whole creative off AI to hourly humans and dropped CAC 40% in 30 days, nothing else changed. a $70M brand scaled to 100+ videos a day on human creators and lifted ROAS 40% over the next quarter. so it's clear a window to move is open right now, but it closes the second this becomes standard.

"UGC is dead in 2026..." is what i'd say if i was a sped. UGC matters more now than it ever has. every platform is creative-led. because the creative is the targeting now. meta decides who sees your ad off the creative itself. tiktok and reels are all about getting that one hit. so brands that are cooking are also producing and testing the most creatives, which surfaces the most winners. what actually died is expensive UGC. because something changed over time: human UGC became cheaper AND better than AI UGC. cheaper, because you hire a creator by the hour instead of per video. $25 to $35 an hour through a marketplace like hourlyugc filming for multiple clips. that's 40+ clips an hour, then an editor finishes them for a couple bucks each. and it will ALWAYS perform better since it's a real human.

TikTok shop CEO will literally tell your brand to get out 275 videos a day Which sounds insane But with a hourly + commission creator army is ridiculously easy

On TikTok shop if you just have a video that gets more clicks It will get more views Point blank CTR is king

Fable 5 just made world-class UGC research basically free... think about it, a video that prints was decided before the camera even gets turned on. someone studied what was already winning in the niche, pulled the patterns out, and wrote the script off proof instead of vibes. that work used to be a $100k a year creative strategist watching competitor content all morning. now it's one Fable 5 prompt: you feed it the top performing UGC in your niche, the stuff that's been running for months, pulled off tools like atria or foreplay. it breaks down the hooks, the structure, the pacing, and the angles, then hands back word-for-word scripts. and it carries the whole job in one pass. older models needed a lot more context, and even then had issues to get there, but Fable 5 is cracked. it even checks the batch against your brand voice and flags scripts too close to last week's. and the cost of all that intelligence is a claude subscription you probably already pay for. so the thinking part is now basically free, and the filming has been a $1 for a while. all you do is hire a creator for $25 to $35 an hour through a platform like hourlyugc and they film those scripts at a clip every 30 - 60 seconds. then an editor finishes them for a $2-$3 bucks each. and every friday you feed the week's winners back in, so the scripts get sharper the longer it runs. world-class research feeding $1 production, which means your creators never film a guess again.

hourlyugc has over 50,000 UGC creators who want to work for $25-$40/hr meta ads, VSLs, even LIVEs all billed HOURLY even this VSL was filmed at $35/hr... insane