Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Chest Nuts
431 posts


你的手机号多少岁了?
133号段---1997年中国联通首次推出号段
134号段---2003年中国移动发布
135号段---1999年中国移动发布
136号段---1997年中国移动发布
137号段---1999年中国移动发布
138号段---1995年中国移动发布
139号段---1995年中国移动发布
145号段---2010年随物联网发展而启用
147号段---2010年作为中国移动3G号段推出
149号段---2009年中国电信3G号段启用
150号段---2007年中国移动GSM网络号段
151号段---2008年中国移动推出
152号段---2006年中国移动GSM号段
153号段---2008年中国电信CDMA号段
155号段---2000年中国联通GSM号段
156号段---2006年中国联通推出
157号段---2008年中国移动TD-SCDMA号段
158号段---2006年中国移动推出
159号段---2007年中国移动推出
不过,现在像携号转网、号码回收、靓号偏好等因素,让按号段判断年龄的关系也没那么准确啦。
中文

@NYCskyline99 @ShangguanJiewen 对西藏的军事入侵?那我们怎么不谈谈对墨西哥甚至对美洲大陆本身的入侵?又到了谈人权的时候了,警车冲击民众的时候把你当人吗
中文

@ShangguanJiewen Also, your list of China aggressions completely ignores state sponsored and military executed hacking, illegal seizures and exploitation of territorial waters, let’s not even get started on the military invasion of Tibet.
Then we can start on the human rights abuses.
English

The crucial question is: why are US deep-State adjacent accounts promoting the narrative that China is a threat?
Especially given the context, that China's rise is a peaceful one.
Wisdom on the topic comes from understanding the answer.

Jostein Hauge@haugejostein
It’s baffling how some people still frame China’s rise as a global military threat relative to the US. In the past year alone, the US has bombed *seven different countries.* China hasn't launched a major military strike against another country since 1979.
English

@bboczeng 不对啊,宣称自由民主是普世价值、要全球推广的,结果却反过来支持战争、颠覆他国政权的,不是咱们美国国务卿马尔科吗?
我觉得吧,这些冠冕堂皇的话谁都能说,但唯独咱们美国政府少说点。
策反、颠覆、暗杀、酷刑、轰炸、煽动暴乱乃至侵略,建国以来,咱们美国这250年,哪件坏事没干过?还需要细数吗
中文

不对啊,宣称要杀掉高市早苗狗头的,不是咱们中国自己驻日本的薛剑大使吗?
我觉得吧,这些冠冕堂皇的话所有人都可以说,但唯独咱们中国政府少说点
屠杀、饥荒、暗杀、结扎、封城、煽动暴乱乃至侵略,建国以来,咱们中国最近100年来,哪件坏事没做过?还需要我们仔细数一数吗?
这个政府到底还有什么脸面立足于这个世界之林,每天大肆指点别人呢?
合订本太多了,大家都看不过来了
如果不想录入人类文明耻辱柱的话,我这里是直接建议王毅先生闭嘴
看王先生好歹也是个文化人,或许是被绑架了,言不由衷。
那么也可以选择加入中华民国国籍,永远不用再言不由衷地说谎,成为中国人真正的民族英雄。
谢谢大家
财经真相@Rumoreconomy
中国外交部长王毅于周日表示,“公开杀害一个主权国家的领导人并推动政权更迭,是不可接受的 伊朗屠杀四五万百姓就可以接受?对吗?
中文


@CptNibbleswrth @OopsGuess 你没有搞清楚一个概念。你以为的中国文化 5000 年指的是“中华人民共和国”,但我们指的中国是指“中华文化”。这是一种文化传承,而不是国家政体传承。其中传下来了好的东西,也传下来了坏的东西。在国家概念上我和“李白”不是一个国家的人。但在文化的传承上,我们同属中原大地的文化继承人。
中文

@OopsGuess China has not survived 5000 years as a single entity. The first emperor, Qin Shi Huang, did it about 2300 years ago and it has split multiple times since then. Lastly reunited less than 100 years ago. China is less that 100 years old.
Have you ever opened a single history book?
English

If China were actually as stupid as you imagine, it would’ve collapsed decades ago.
A country doesn’t survive 5,000 years, outmaneuver eight empires, industrialize 1.4 billion people, and reshape global supply chains by following Reddit-level geopolitics like: “if we block their oil, we win.”
A geopolitics elementary school student mistook a PowerPoint cosplay for a national strategy.
Real geopolitics is:
• diversifying energy
• building maritime + land pipelines
• securing domestic production capacity
• long-term industrial planning
• multi-vector diplomacy
• avoiding total dependence on any single supplier
Meanwhile you're out here doing Risk board-game logic.
If Beijing truly operated with your level of intellect, China would’ve been carved up again by 1950.
The irony is:
the only people underestimating China this badly are the ones already losing to it.
History-Actual@T00ManyCommies
This is China. China is our enemy. China wants to defeat us, and be the world's dominant power. That would be bad. China imports upwards of 14% of their oil from Iran. If Iran is no longer an ally of China, and does not sell them oil, this hurts our enemy. That is good. Thank you for coming to my TED Talk.
English
Chest Nuts retweetledi









































