Chicago Hodl

10.2K posts

Chicago Hodl banner
Chicago Hodl

Chicago Hodl

@ChiHodl

Bitcoin Only | Burn the heretic. Kill the mutant. Purge the unclean.

Katılım Mart 2021
1.8K Takip Edilen1.3K Takipçiler
Chicago Hodl
Chicago Hodl@ChiHodl·
Law school rankings are worthless if you don’t want big law. That being said go where your heart tells you and it’ll work out. Also worth considering is that T&E is in high demand right now and paying pretty well at entry level. PS: I’m a T&E attorney, feel free to dm if you ever have questions.
English
1
0
1
130
Susie₿dds
Susie₿dds@SusieBdds·
Do I have any attorney followers? Question for you… would you go to a top 14 law school for full sticker if you had zero interest in big law? It’s her dream law school but 5x the cost of her other options and she wants to go into Trusts & Estate planning law.
English
23
2
22
4.9K
Chicago Hodl
Chicago Hodl@ChiHodl·
I interrupt my 5.5 month Twitter hiatus to remind you all: WWII never ended.
English
1
0
1
82
Thomas Massie
Thomas Massie@RepThomasMassie·
FBI Director Kash Patel will testify in our Judiciary Committee this Wednesday. If you were me, what questions would you ask him? If you want to send the question in a direct message (assuming I follow you), please do.
English
6.7K
2.6K
24.8K
1.2M
Chicago Hodl
Chicago Hodl@ChiHodl·
Me betting every bears over the rest of the season knowing they’ll give up 50 with Jaylon out for the year
English
1
0
1
152
Chicago Hodl
Chicago Hodl@ChiHodl·
IMO, no but there’s not really a right or wrong answer. It’s a “to each their own thing” but basic gun safety would tell you the mag should not be kept in the gun when not in use and there shouldn’t be a bullet chambered. Just store the mag close by. If you’re going to leave it loaded then you especially need to make sure to put it somewhere completely out of sight & mind. If you have children it shouldn’t be kept anywhere they can access it (this should be the case either way). No matter what you do, keep the safety on until you’re ready to fire.
English
1
0
1
41
Lysander
Lysander@UnderCoercion·
Im having to learn quickly about home defense. Trying not to be a pussy. Do you keep your self defensive weapon loaded and chambered?
Lysander tweet media
English
9
0
7
570
Chicago Hodl retweetledi
Carol Roth
Carol Roth@caroljsroth·
The Chicago Bears are like the Chicago roads- always under construction and being rebuilt yet never quite finished. #DaBears
English
30
37
280
20.9K
Rearden Vibes 🛩 fork/acc
Rearden Vibes 🛩 fork/acc@reardencode·
I love JPEGs on the chain. They give us something to do then there's not enough transactions otherwise. Spam is only spam if it doesn't pay its way. Arguably Brc20 that causes excess UTXO creation and doesn't compensate anyone for that externality is spam. JPEGs are not.
Walker⚡️@WalkerAmerica

**ADAM BACK DID NOT MENTION KNOTS** People who called Adam “pro spam” (and worse) for weeks are now celebrating that “Adam is back.” NEWSFLASH: he never left. Obviously Adam freaking Back is not “pro spam” and never was. He simply did not agree with the efficacy of the proposed "solution" (Knots node implementation) from a technical perspective (and still does not agree that node filtering of spam is a viable solution, based on my reading of his thread). Instead, Adam is trying to lay out the *economic* case for how to deal with incentives to filter spam at the *miner/pool* level, while clearly stating “bitcoin is about money, spam has no place in the timechain. what defaults the bitcoin core project puts in the reference client matter in this." Again, clearly Adam is not "pro spam." A key line that jumped out to me was “to prevail, we have to make economic sense (or we work against our own objectives)”. Adam focuses on *miners/pools*—and their economic incentives, or lack thereof—not on node implementations. If you’ve spent the past weeks bashing Adam because you think he is a “spam apologist,” now is a good time to check your assumptions and consider that Adam wants what is best for bitcoin... as do you... as do I. We ALL want what’s best for Bitcoin to make sure it succeeds as unfuckable sound money and a censorship-resistant medium of exchange. No serious person is like "OOOH YEAH I LOVE SPAM! MORE JPEGS ON THE TIMECHAIN, PLEASE!" It is possible to disagree with the efficacy of a proposed solution *without* being a "spam apologist." Just because someone has a different opinion than you do about a solution does not mean that person is your enemy or has been "compromised." This should be obvious but apparently it needs to be said... @adam3us I hope I have not misrepresented anything you said -- just trying to help parse your thread for my fellow plebs. Thanks for all you do.

English
15
0
32
10.6K
Bit Paine ⚡️
Bit Paine ⚡️@BitPaine·
Sorry but “being forced to relay other peoples transactions, even if you don’t agree with them” is literally, explicitly, emphatically what you consent to when you run a bitcoin node.
Nithu Sezni@nithusezni

@Oliverderci1 @adam3us @BitPaine @rusty__tillery @LukeDashjr From a libertarian private property perspective I object to filters being described as censorship. Filters are an expression of freedom of association. I respect your right to transact, but I do not consent to being forced to spread the message to others.

English
42
6
147
14.5K
Chicago Hodl
Chicago Hodl@ChiHodl·
The people who are truly a threat to our democracy have voluntarily outed themselves this week. It also turns out the people who claim to be “anti fascist” are the most fascist of anyone in this country.
English
0
0
4
67
Mr. Carter
Mr. Carter@ThackeryCarter·
I guess cancel culture is multi party thing now 🤔
English
1
0
0
25
Chicago Hodl retweetledi
Bit Paine ⚡️
Bit Paine ⚡️@BitPaine·
There is not a single person with whom I disagree politically whose death I would not mourn - let alone that I would celebrate. Not Obama - not Hillary Clinton - not Hassan Piker - not AOC - not Bernie Sanders - not even that contemptible sniveling little cumstain Destiny. It is therefore shocking to me the degree to which calling for - and celebrating - political assassinations has become normalized, socially permissible behavior on the left. It will always be possible to find politically radical sub populations that will cheer at such things, but we are seeing solid pluralities - if not majorities - of left-wing people musing, justifying, celebrating political assassination. We are seeing major left-leaning news organizations like the New York Times and MSNBC speak ill of the assassinated - as if to justify without going quite so far as to say it was justified, at least not without a wink and a nudge. I do not recognize the left-wing of this country anymore. Something deeply, deeply evil has been incubating these last 10 to 15 years of Hitler rhetoric, such that they now believe - apparently quite broadly - that lethal force is justified to protect against what they they have been told is incipient fascism. It is unclear to me where we go from here - if fully half of the country has normalized political violence. But you must resist any urge to use or justify violent in return. America must not descend to the level of these murderous, communist radicals. Their poisonous ideology must be defeated on the debate stage and at the ballot box. For those on the right wing of this country - particularly the center right - it is now our responsibility to keep the peace. The left has lost any remaining pretense to being custodians of the moral high ground. The onus is now ours to ensure the only red in the streets is the color of Republican victory at the polls.
English
58
63
753
39K
Chicago Hodl
Chicago Hodl@ChiHodl·
I just have to assume people cheering the assassination didn’t see the video. No human being can watch that and celebrate.
English
1
0
2
80
Chicago Hodl
Chicago Hodl@ChiHodl·
@Badguybtc He was a suspect but they cleared him. He was still charged with obstruction of justice for resisting.
English
1
0
1
33
The ₿ad Goy
The ₿ad Goy@Badguybtc·
Notice how camera crews were right there ready to film the pants down perp walk and everything. The death is real but so is the false flag. Authoritarianism will result.
English
1
0
1
84
Chicago Hodl
Chicago Hodl@ChiHodl·
Matthew Dowd should be fired
English
0
0
1
70
Chicago Hodl
Chicago Hodl@ChiHodl·
@peterktodd @Rob1Ham Nothing about the assassination of Charlie Kirk was ethical or moral. And not everything needs to be about Ukraine. The charge with which you try to justify Charlie’s murder is speech. Which should never been the justification for murder.
English
0
0
1
216
Peter Todd
Peter Todd@peterktodd·
Dude, there are scores of extremist Muslims who genuinely believe that their job is to murder and subjugate every non-Muslim on the planet because Allah wills it. Saying "ethics is in the eye of the beholder" is trite nonsense. Obviously it is. Doesn't mean anything worthwhile. We live in societies where we usually decide that violence isn't acceptable in politics. But we also tend to push those boundaries in extreme cases because that policy a political strategy. Not really a solid ethical line.
English
2
0
0
361
Rob Hamilton
Rob Hamilton@Rob1Ham·
Praying for Charlie and the US. Violence over politics is never the answer.
English
4
2
98
4.4K
Chicago Hodl
Chicago Hodl@ChiHodl·
The left needs to be shamed into oblivion. They should be referred to as the Party of Political Violence in every election from here on out.
English
1
0
2
62
Chicago Hodl retweetledi
gfodor.id
gfodor.id@gfodor·
What’s the point of liberalism if it leads to the “let’s talk it out” guy bleeding out on the debate stage?
English
649
6.7K
86.8K
1.6M