Christian Lebanon

🚩 جنون للأسف، يستند هذا الطرح إلى فهم مغلوط لمعنى الهوية. فالهوية لا تعني الجمود ولا الانكفاء إلى الماضي، بل تعني تثبيت نفسنا في إرثنا وتقاليدنا ومعتقداتنا وثقافتنا وملامح شخصيتنا التاريخية، فيما نمدّ يدنا بثبات نحو التطوّر والتحسين والمستقبل. إن تسليم الذات بالكامل لرؤية مجرّدة عن المستقبل هو في جوهره تخلٍّ عن الأساس الذي يمكّن المجتمعات من مواجهة المجهول. فالمجتمع الذي يفقد هويته لا يصبح أكثر قدرة على التكيّف، بل يتحوّل إلى كيانٍ معلّق، بلا بوصلة ولا اتجاه. في المقابل، المجتمع المتجذّر في هويته هو وحده القادر على مواجهة التحوّلات بثقة، وعلى قراءة التغيير من خلال منظومة قيم ثابتة، وعلى توجيه مسار التقدّم بدل أن يبتلعه. من هذا المنطلق، فإن تصوير الهوية على أنها عائق أمام التقدّم ليس فقط استخفافاً فكرياً، بل طرحاً خطيراً، لا سيما حين يُسوَّق للأجيال الشابة. ولذلك، أدعو الشباب إلى التشكيك في هذه السرديات السطحية، وإلى البحث العميق، والتمييز بين التقدّم الحقيقي وبين الأفكار التي تنزع عنهم بوصلتهم التاريخية والثقافية.

Lately, all left-paid academics are starting to get out of their holes to attack the rise of our nationalist movement. Yesterday Karim Bitar and today Charles Hayek who in this video, is not doing history but propaganda. And doing it badly. 1. He says it is impossible to revive a cultural identity from the past. That is false. Jews revived Hebrew after centuries of near extinction and rebuilt a nation around it. Armenians survived genocide and dispersion and still restored a strong national culture. Greeks rebuilt a modern identity rooted in antiquity. Irish people resurrected their language and consciousness after deliberate suppression. History already judged this claim and found it ridiculous. 2. He then calls this dangerous and labels it “pseudo science”. This is the oldest trick in the leftist propaganda book. When a people starts rising, you pathologize it. You don’t debate it, you smear it. There is nothing pseudo about reading history, archaeology, inscriptions, manuscripts, or about reviving Syriac, a language that never died and is still spoken and prayed in. 3. Confusing cultural revival with eugenics is not an error, it is a lie. We are not building a society on genetics. We are rebuilding a culture, a worldview, a civilizational continuity. Turning this into a Nazi caricature is intentional dishonesty meant to scare the weak minded. 4. Saying our identity is fictive should immediately disqualify him from teaching. A professor who denies written history, archaeological evidence, and living Syriac manuscripts has no business near students. If he is doing this knowingly, he should lose his license. If he is doing it out of ignorance, then his PhD means nothing. 5. Yes, identities change. Nobody disputes that. What we reject is dissolution. What we reject is being erased and replaced with a forced, abstract, rootless identity. Evolution is natural. Disappearance is not. And this man clearly subscribes to the ideology of disappearance. 6. He also claims that deciding our future is dangerous. The correct legal term is self determination, and it is one of the most basic principles of international law. A people that does not feel threatened with extinction does not become violent. It simply lives. 7. Identity is not just a future project. It is memory carried forward. A future cut from its past is not progress, it is collapse. The only thing that deserves to become archaic is not our living culture, but the academic nonsense he is repeating like a servant of the left globalism reading a script. Our cultural revival is marching. Slowly but surely. Disciplined. Irreversible. And it’s making these witches screech! Hallelujah to the Mountain of Glory.