Christopher Kabanda

@SmallCapSmarts Times have changed. I am the next only RenTech, but better than it. Check my winrates on the latest update of confirmations introduced to my trading & investor password for you log in my account. Free high winrate strategy is also on this channel : youtube.com/playlist?list=…

@TritonTrades PnL with investor password on my profile proves otherwise.

if you see anyone flexing an 80% winrate or more, just know their RR is super low i bet you more than half their trades are BE or negative RR 0.3R with an 80% winrate is not the flex you think it is

@lsptvofficial @andrew_nfx x.com/ChristopherKab…

@andrew_nfx If you are not spending a full session meaning 5 plus hours in front of the screens and taking this seriously you are not trading you are gambling. I agree this 1-2 hours a day nonsense is ridiculous.

Trading for '1-2 hours a day' is a lie sold by people who don't actually trade I'm on the charts most of the day Not taking 20 trades But watching Waiting Ready for my A+ setups That level of screen time is what made me profitable in the first place You can't learn price action by staring at charts for 90 minutes, at least not at the start

@andrew_nfx We ict traders have time based trading and can trade only about 20 minutes per day minimum. We only trade in ICT open sessions where there's powerful trades.

@jeeniuz @00sshaikh I have 1 on my profile with investor password

@00sshaikh And those 3 have no track record above One Year.

“ICT works bro haha …. like there are 3 traders out of 150 thousand of them that make 10k a month!”

@x_xplode @sharkell14 You can't put the words calculate d and gamble in one sentence. Google search the difference between gambling and speculation.

@sharkell14 Yes, it’s basically a calculated GAMBLE. Don’t let anyone sweet talk you into it.

Soo forex is basically a well calculated gamble?

@MoneyIsClear @sharkell14 We're profitable trading. Check my performance history and strategy on my profile.

@sharkell14 70-80% of retail forex traders lose money, brokers are required to disclose that. The calculated part is real, the edge just belongs to institutions with faster data and deeper pockets. You're not gambling wrong, you're just sitting at their table.

@sharkell14 @iamkboyz Come join mine then. Investor password you can log in my account to see my performance is on pics below. Video broker statements and trade histories are on my profile link, I'll livestream end of this month.

@iamkboyz No teach me then when I start making money under your excellent mentorship I'll pay you

@Coins_1914 @fwBen_ @sharkell14 Sports betting is harder because sports are more subjective. That doesn't make it safer it only makes it more of gambling (no clear edge).

@fwBen_ @sharkell14 Make technical analysis no deceive you. We analyze teams before placing bets. In forex, you're guessing whether market goes up or down, 2 options In betting, it's win, draw or lose, 3 options See why betting is hard? 😲

@sharkell14 @dfwalfred 70/30, 97/3 for daytrading.

@dfwalfred 50/50

@sharkell14 Trading is speculation not gambling though. Google search the difference. Some firms and small banks trade, sometimes with people's money. Research on this.

@LethalityTrader @RiceBunnyCap Research on Patrick Nill, on the world trading competitions website for 5 years. Dude stop teaching people if you know nothing much about trading. How can you not know tonnes of money can't do big returns too😅

there is no serious verified top 5 of retail traders with real sustained win rates of 70%, 80%, or 100%. because once results are truly audited, those numbers almost never appear at elite level. real financial history has already shown what exceptional performance looks like.... and it looks nothing like the fantasy percentages internet trading culture keeps selling every day.

1. Jim Simons — 39% net annual (66% gross) 2. Stanley Druckenmiller — ~30% annual 3. George Soros — ~30% annual 4. Peter Lynch — 29.2% annual 5. Warren Buffett — ~20% annual but your favorite trader claims 70%, 80%, and even 100%. if the industry educated itself just a little, people would realize they’ve been trapped in a huge scam for many years without even noticing.

@LethalityTrader You're the one not educated. Those guys trade billions or multimillions at least. Slippage can't make them trade our strategies.

@fahmeedx Not with online speculative trading with consistently profitable methods.

you lowkey have to sell your soul to make six figures without connections

@hunchonet Only helps if you're learning from a consistently profitable mentor with legit trade histories. Nearly all traders lose money, so it's kinde a good thing if people tell their loved ones that they trade. The criticism helps you to be more cautious & trade in demo or forward test

Don’t tell anybody you trade.

@filthyrXch7 @hunchonet You can't blame your loved ones for doubting though. Nearly all traders lose money long term. Problem isbfew trade in demo or forward test before using money.

@hunchonet Rs, most will doubt u and the negative energy is unneeded. But the ones that believe in you…. Most of that group will expect you to pull them up with you. No, cNt save anyone if i dont save myself first. 🫡 quick morning g. Done by ten again with buying power left

@Corleone_Trades Just stroking your ego. The most dangerous type is the first one. Rich scammers who show off lambos have tonnes of followers. People get hooked to being shown money. Each of the popular scammers have at least 100K to a few million YouTube subscribers. They do more damage

The trading industry has 2 types of scammers. The obvious ones: Lambos. Lifestyle flex. You can spot them in 5 seconds. They’re not dangerous because nobody with a brain falls for it. Then there’s the second type. The ones who call out the Lambo guys to gain YOUR trust. “I’m transparent.” “My trading is real.” “Watch out for those fake gurus.” And then they sell you the same thing in different packaging. Wolves in sheep’s clothing. These are the dangerous ones because they look like the good guys. You don’t have to say what you are. You just have to be it.

@LordshipRy @DrWhiteW Most of his strategies including FVGs are not subjective. Maybe those like MMXM, breakers and mitigation.

@DrWhiteW Because it's very subjective. It's just a canvas and he gives the building blocks to build your own house, based on how you see it.

I keep telling people ( and for this they will stone me), leave ICT alone after studying fvg. That alone is enough. Now it is time to go and build something of your own using that. If all he did was so perfect, why does he keep coming up with so many models?

@DrWhiteW He has tonnes of models because he's a legend with a lot of knowledge. People get to choose which model they like, so it's a bonus. All ICT concepts work, the man is not a liar.

@RiP_Rembo @leerawllings Not if you don't have the necessary knowledge

@leerawllings Just keep grinding...

Sad truth is: Trading has destroyed more lives than it has made but we are never ready for this conversation.

@OyeDominic123 @leerawllings You did. You did not manage risk well.

@leerawllings I still dey battle my own since 2024 sold a lot of stuffs to cover investors' funds, Goldusd did a terrible thing in my life