
ChriZern🤖
5.5K posts

ChriZern🤖
@Chrizern
| Father | CMM of Int. SaaS-co. | Tech enthusiast | Crypto Investor | Science & Tech | #TESLA #SPACEX #Neuralink #OpenAI #IOTA #UAP #AI #Codenautica


🚨BREAKING: Peer-Reviewed Study of Palomar Observatory Finds Tens of Thousands of Pre-Sputnik UFOs Orbiting Earth🚨 Stockholm University’s Dr. Beatriz Villarroel (@DrBeaVillarroel) presents high-signal results from the Palomar Observatory plates showing tens of thousands of light-reflecting objects in Earth orbit before Sputnik – a finding that has been accepted in peer reviewed journals. Her colleague Dr. Stephen Bruehl from Vanderbilt also found a statistically significant correlation between these UFO appearances and nuclear detonations (also peer-reviewed). These light transients were found on the plates of the most prominent observatory in the 50’s, the Palomar Observatory. And they exactly comport with how the CIA/Air Force at the time described UFOs – “mirror-like”, “light reflecting”, “metallic” objects. 1. The Core Finding: The Dataset: Digitized Palomar plates (1950–1956) yield ~105,000 transients in the northern hemisphere. Rate ≈ 1.1 transients per hour over ~780 hours. All pre-satellite era. Short flashes, not streaks, match extremely flat, highly reflective surfaces. Like mirrors. 2. Debunking the Debunkers: Transients drop 30–35% inside Earth’s shadow, exactly what you expect if they’re REAL PHYSICAL OBJECTS. Plate defects would not show up more between the sun and earth but drop off in the earth’s shadow. 3. The 1952 DC Flap Connection: Multiple-transient events on July 19 and July 27, 1952 coincide with the Washington, D.C. flyover period. Independent nights. Independent plates. Same window. 4. Nukes ↔ Transients (New Paper): Co-authored analysis led by Dr. Steven Bruehl: 2,700 days indexed; 134 nuclear tests. Baseline transient-day = 11%; day after a nuclear test = ~19%. ~68% increase, p ≈ 0.008. Also a small but significant correlation with UAP reports. Accepted at Scientific Reports. Again, not “Plate Defects”: Emulsion flaws don’t care about Earth’s shadow, nuclear calendars, or public UAP waves. 5. Too good to be true? Decades of “uncorrelated targets” are reportedly classified and filtered from civilian catalogs like NASA. A NASA insider told Beatriz that Space Force is doing the collections on these. Add the historical gatekeeping: National Bureau of Standards Director Don Menzel’s documented destruction of Harvard plates post-1952 and routine removal of classified tracks from modern surveys. 6. What It Implies: Stable, reflective assets in geo-like orbits that respond to nuclear activity. Villarroel will open-source data and code for independent tests across other plate archives to force a verdict. If confirmed, SETI shifts from radio to orbital archaeology 7. Next Steps: Replicate the finding in plates from another observatory from the 50’s. If that’s done, its a full paradigm shift. If you want hard, peer-reviewed data on the UFO–nuclear–orbit triad, this is the episode. Full Documentary 👇






📷 Pivotal moment: signing the MoU between #IOTA & @InstituteGC. In the words of @DomSchiener: "@TWINGlobalOrg is just the beginning – we are also [exploring] how public goods digital infrastructure can be used to empower governments and enterprises around the world.” Read more: blog.iota.org/iota-tbi-mou/





