DooChump

@ledgerstatus Oh stop it

There is a lot of really reckless behavior happening in this administration.

@davidclowery I’ve been saying this for years

We sold out.

@BraddrofliT Excellent idea

Not everyone will agree but... Social media needs to shut down for a year or two so people can go back to being themselves again… 🙌

@hwinkler4real Just dumped a 13 “ brown to start mine!

Sat morning Special: 20 “ brown to start the day

@allontanarsio Like a million bucks

What does this painting make you feel?

@willchamberlain A good start

What do you call hundreds of educators losing their jobs for celebrating Charlie Kirk’s death?

@andrewdoyle_com No

A lot of vitriol in the comments. But we so rarely see people on social media admit they were mistaken and apologise. Shouldn’t that count for something?

@_ConnieShaw Na, cancel em

I find Stephen King repulsive. But I am concerned at this response, along with the campaign to remove or even expel George Abaraonye, Oxford Union president elect. You may find their speech highly offensive, as I do. But it is not unlawful. Please, let’s not use leftist woke tactics and start cancelling or boycotting people. Draw attention to their comments yes, but let people decide whether to democratically remove him, or whether to buy the books.

@iowahawkblog Na

Stephen King should be commended for this, not further dragged. He acknowledged a making mistake, set the facts straight, deleted the original tweet, and apologized for it. Twitter would be a better place if we saw more of this.

@peterboghossian Na

When someone admits they made a mistake and apologizes, accept the apology. The longer we create a culture of ridicule and shame, the less likely it is people will apologize, and the longer moral derangement will fester.

@StephenKing an a hole, u r

I was wrong, and I apologize. I have deleted the post.

@davidclowery Get new friends cheif

Today is one of those days where I’m thankful I didn’t marry someone brainwashed by social media into justifying murder. Cause a lot of my friends didn’t escape that.

@davidclowery Only got about 30 words in, but you’re right, ai sux

So, at a lot of universities there is moderate pressure on instructors to experiment with AI themselves, not just come up with student use guidelines. So after a summer of experimenting, I’ve found one consistent use case. Feed my lecture notes and slides into one of the LLMs and ask it to summarize the key concepts and come up with midterm short answer and multi choice multi select midterm questions. Although there is not a single midterm question that is usable without correction, and key concepts are always slightly off. It does often show me where my slides and lecture notes could be clearer (cause it gets things wrong). It’s like having a slightly below average intelligence focus group to pre-vet your slides. Are these sort of small ball efficiencies worth the massive build out? Probably not. To justify the buildout and potential negative externalities in a laissez-innovation course we are on, we’re gonna need to see some bigger improvements and LLMs seem to be hitting a wall. But from my tinkering I can tell you already what harried adjunct professors teaching 6 course a semester are gonna do, they’re gonna use it to create slides and notes, summarize books and articles, and even grade student papers. It’s gonna do a passable job, but everything is gonna be riddled with small and subtle errors that degrade instruction. Not in a way that really shows up at the lower levels of Blooms Taxonomy but becomes catastrophic at the higher levels.