CiteCase 🇮🇳

3

12

6.6K

CiteCase 🇮🇳@CiteCase·3h

Is it not true that judges already use legal research assistants to draft judgments after telling them what they have decided in that case? They don't sign it without going through and reviewing it. If an AI does this job of assistants, what's wrong in it? Of course, there should be thorough review of that output.

English

1

577

Karuna Nundy@karunanundy·10h

Because law is entirely expressed through language and an LLM 'filling in' language amounts to outsourcing a part of the judgment. This judgment could then be riddled with the AI model's inbuilt bias and hallucinations.

ତୁଣ୍ଡ ବାଇଦ@humanbodybkm

@karunanundy But if the factual and legal analysis, the grounds for reasoning, the ultimate decision and the form of decision have been entirely fed by the judge as prompts, and all the LLM does is filling in the language like a ghost writer, what's the harm Ma'am?

English

3

5

13

3.7K

CiteCase 🇮🇳@CiteCase·15h

@Rudespot Does it need unanimous acceptance? There's no veto power, we believe?

English

0

2

505

Rudrajyoti Nath Ray@Rudespot·17h

Quiz Q, @CiteCase, Good Morning! If a Collegium Member refuses acceptance of SC elevation reccos. everytime, I repeat, everytime, what's the solution apart from concluding that would never happen!??

English

0

1

956

CiteCase 🇮🇳@CiteCase·18h

@gautambhatia88 This is going to be the future also soon- with judgments, pleadings, phd thesis, columns.

English

1

7

1.4K

Gautam Bhatia@gautambhatia88·1d

Have now read two very consequential orders from a specific SC bench that have *every* hallmark of AI-writing, heh. "Not x, but y" in every second sentence. "Neither a, nor b," where both "a" and "b" are highly manicured expressions you just won't use in a normal sentence. Etc.

English

12

70

531

40.2K

CiteCase 🇮🇳@CiteCase·1d

Bhikhubhai Govindbhai Patel v. State of Gujarat 2026 INSC 532 - S.482 CrPC - Quashing - FIR Long Delay - IPC - False Document - Cheating - caseciter.com/2026insc532/

English

4

19

913

CiteCase 🇮🇳@CiteCase·1d

Nandkishore Mishra v. State of Madhya Pradesh 2026 INSC 531 Criminal Appeal- Legal Aid - Notice To Accused caseciter.com/2026insc531/

English

3

6

561

CiteCase 🇮🇳@CiteCase·1d

Can Courts refuse to decide a matter on merits merely because the Counsel for the party is not prepared ?

Anil Kumar Rai v. Union of India - Dismissal Without Going Into Merits - Advocate Readiness caseciter.com/anil-kumar-rai…

English

9

40

3.6K

CiteCase 🇮🇳@CiteCase·1d

Anil Kumar Rai v. Union of India - Dismissal Without Going Into Merits - Advocate Readiness caseciter.com/anil-kumar-rai…

English

3

8

4.2K

CiteCase 🇮🇳@CiteCase·1d

Justice Aravind Kumar bench has clarified that Gulfisha Fatima judgment does not say that Section 43D(5) UAPA eclipses Article 21 Constitution. It notes that the accused in this case themselves relied on Gulfisha Fatima judgment in support of their bail plea.

Tasleem Ahmed v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi - S.43D(5) UAPA - Larger Bench Reference caseciter.com/tasleem-ahmed-…

English

6

23

2.1K

CiteCase 🇮🇳@CiteCase·1d

Why not constitute a Constitution Bench to examine the validity of bail restriction provisions under UAPA,NDPS, PMLA vis-a-vis prolonged incarceration and settle the law once and for all? 1️⃣If it's just initial stage, full rigour applies. 2️⃣If there's prolonged incarceration, rigour melts down. Even then bail is not automatic, but has to be considered w.r.t facts and circumstances. In fact, is it not what apparently Najeeb , Gulfisha and Andrabi hold?

Essentially, now another 3 J Bench of #SupremeCourt constituted by CJI Surya Kant will interpret what the 3 J Bench Judgment authored by Justice Surya Kant meant by “melt down”? We might even have a new legal doctrine: Doctrine Of Melting Down ! Good Night and Sweet dreams !

English

5

25

2.4K

CiteCase 🇮🇳@CiteCase·2d

Essentially, now another 3 J Bench of #SupremeCourt constituted by CJI Surya Kant will interpret what the 3 J Bench Judgment authored by Justice Surya Kant meant by “melt down”? We might even have a new legal doctrine: Doctrine Of Melting Down ! Good Night and Sweet dreams !

Circle of Precedents ! In 2021, Justice Surya Kant authored the 3 J Bench #SupremeCourt Judgment in KA Najeeb ! Different 2 J Benches interpreted it differently ! In 2026, now a 2 J Bench placed it before CJI Surya Kant for referring it to larger bench ! Basically now CJI Surya Kant will constitute a 3 J Bench to interpret the judgment authored by Justice Surya Kant !

English

3

25

4.6K

CiteCase 🇮🇳@CiteCase·2d

Circle of Precedents ! In 2021, Justice Surya Kant authored the 3 J Bench #SupremeCourt Judgment in KA Najeeb ! Different 2 J Benches interpreted it differently ! In 2026, now a 2 J Bench placed it before CJI Surya Kant for referring it to larger bench ! Basically now CJI Surya Kant will constitute a 3 J Bench to interpret the judgment authored by Justice Surya Kant !

Law of Precedents is Super Fun ! In 2021, a Three Judges Bench judgment interprets Article 21 vis-a-vis UAPA Bail Restriction (KA Najeeb) ! Fast forward to 2026: Two Two Judges Bench interpret the said judgment it differently. (Gulfisha Fathima & Syed Iftikhar Andrabi ) Now, another Two Judges Bench now refers it to larger bench. (Tasleem Ahmed)

English

3

11

65

11.7K

CiteCase 🇮🇳@CiteCase·2d

Today’s #SupremeCourt Daily Digest is out ! You can read only this one for just र9 or you can subscribe.citecase.in for just र730 per year !

Dear judges, lawyers and law students, Want to stay updated with all #SupremeCourt Judgments? It takes your 10 minutes and costs you only ₹2 a day for this. Just try our Supreme Court Daily Digests. Subscribe here: citecase.in/register

English

1

417

CiteCase 🇮🇳@CiteCase·2d

We asked @NotebookLM to make a video-presentation about KA Najeeb - Gulfisha Fathima - Syed Ifthikar Andrabi - Tasleem Ahmed Judgments. Here is it:

On Violation of Article 21 rights due to prolonged incarnation vs S.43D(5) UAPA issue, now another #SupremeCourt bench notes that KA Najeeb judgment is being interpreted differently by two-judge benches (Gulfisha & Andrabi ) and says it requires consideration by larger bench !

English

4

20

1.8K

CiteCase 🇮🇳@CiteCase·2d

Tug of War of Precedent !

Law of Precedents is Super Fun ! In 2021, a Three Judges Bench judgment interprets Article 21 vis-a-vis UAPA Bail Restriction (KA Najeeb) ! Fast forward to 2026: Two Two Judges Bench interpret the said judgment it differently. (Gulfisha Fathima & Syed Iftikhar Andrabi ) Now, another Two Judges Bench now refers it to larger bench. (Tasleem Ahmed)

English

10

46

2.9K

CiteCase 🇮🇳@CiteCase·2d

Law of Precedents is Super Fun ! In 2021, a Three Judges Bench judgment interprets Article 21 vis-a-vis UAPA Bail Restriction (KA Najeeb) ! Fast forward to 2026: Two Two Judges Bench interpret the said judgment it differently. (Gulfisha Fathima & Syed Iftikhar Andrabi ) Now, another Two Judges Bench now refers it to larger bench. (Tasleem Ahmed)

On Violation of Article 21 rights due to prolonged incarnation vs S.43D(5) UAPA issue, now another #SupremeCourt bench notes that KA Najeeb judgment is being interpreted differently by two-judge benches (Gulfisha & Andrabi ) and says it requires consideration by larger bench !

English

7

49

16.6K

CiteCase 🇮🇳@CiteCase·2d

Today #SupremeCourt bench headed by Justice Aravind Kumar criticizes observations made by the bench of Justices BV Nagarathna & Ujjal Bhuyan in Syed Iftikhar Andrabi Judgment which had made comments about Judgment in Gulfisha Fathima (authored by Justice Aravind Kumar)

On Violation of Article 21 rights due to prolonged incarnation vs S.43D(5) UAPA issue, now another #SupremeCourt bench notes that KA Najeeb judgment is being interpreted differently by two-judge benches (Gulfisha & Andrabi ) and says it requires consideration by larger bench !

English

8

41

6.1K

CiteCase 🇮🇳@CiteCase·2d

@Rudespot x.com/CiteCase/statu… Here is it !

On Violation of Article 21 rights due to prolonged incarnation vs S.43D(5) UAPA issue, now another #SupremeCourt bench notes that KA Najeeb judgment is being interpreted differently by two-judge benches (Gulfisha & Andrabi ) and says it requires consideration by larger bench !

English

SANJAY HEGDE@sanjayuvacha

1

177

Rudrajyoti Nath Ray@Rudespot·2d

@CiteCase Kuch pata chala? Order nikla? Order VC mei? Batao, batao @CiteCase? twitter.com/sanjayuvacha/s…

Two benches of the Supreme Court have differing views on K A Najeeb. Right now Justice Arvind Kumar dictating a detailed order possibly in response to the judgment in Andrabi's case.

Filipino

0

93

CiteCase 🇮🇳@CiteCase·6d

An interesting and unusual clarification in a #SupremeCourt judgment authored Justice Ujjal Bhuyan clarifying UAPA -bail principles ! He says that it is based on invaluable inputs of Justice BV Nagarathna, the other judge on the bench !

Syed Iftikhar Andrabi v. National Investigation Agency, Jammu - UAPA Act- Bail Is The Rule caseciter.com/2026insc503/

English