Clam Dong

@Mengu09 There is a one-mana counter spell called consign to memory.

Mistrise Village is extremely powerful in Cascade decks, making your Living End / Crashing Footfalls uncounterable, although a great counterplay to that is Sink into Stupor, which is outstanding in any Cascade strategies (it wasn't printed back when Outburst was legal). #MTGModern

@MahfuzVanGogh How many affinity you played?

🔥 NEW VIDEO! 🔥 Phoenix Dredge keeps evolving, and this time I reached 3RD PLACE in a Modern Challenge after an undefeated 7-0 start. I’m hooked! The biggest difference wasn’t even in the deck, but improving how to navigate post-board games more effectively. Link in the replies!

@MaleficentCorgi people just love the nice pretty old time

Can someone help me understand why UR Murktide is back when Frog still exists? I see a lot of people playing UR again and I'm just really confused about why it's UR and not UB making a comeback. Genuinely curious

@PiemontiAndrea we are back

Murktide fans, are we back!?

@PiemontiAndrea Good game, I am the one who just played the mirror with you

The first time to enjoy AI. Love my bunny.

ahhh, dude

6-1 to 6-3. Kind of tilt.

Used UW control climb from mythic 1800 to top 100 with 98 percent win rate in bo1. And the deck seems not playable totally in bo3. And more and more eldrazi appears these two days. What should I do after I have cost nearly all my wild cards:(

@Mirapphire acq上应该神人少点

@ClamDzw 打了半天感觉碰到神人太多的话玩蓝白这种被动牌可能差一点

times to prepare bo3

@NateUtahraptor Not on a 1/1 token. Plz read the words.

@ClamDzw @fireshoes I do not think I would conclude that my opponent didn't have a removal spell simply because they didn't use it on a 1/1 token that dies at the end of the turn anyway.

@DanRed50295234 @fireshoes Yeah, therefore I can only complain it on the X here

@ClamDzw @fireshoes Unfortunately, based on the rules as they are written and interpreted, the judge call in your case was correct. I don't particularly agree with reversing game actions but it is what it is.

@Puffsun2 @fireshoes Because I am not playing mtga.

@ClamDzw @fireshoes Why would you ever respond to Dalkovan Encampment mainphase with a removal spell? The only information gained here is that you don't have something weird like Trickbind.

@KaramVinicius @fireshoes We are finally here,😀

@ClamDzw @fireshoes Anyway, let's just agree to disagree

@KaramVinicius @fireshoes And also according to your opinions, if I have removals, I should kill the creature ASAP. Otherwise I will give my opponent the time to take back his play:)

@ClamDzw @fireshoes Your removal spell scenario makes no sense since - again - you could just wait for combat. Imagine you actually HAD the removal spell and your opponent got "the tell" that you didn't by taking it back lil

@KaramVinicius @fireshoes The point is: in chess or poker, every action matters. You can not take back after you make a move or make a bet in an official tournament. I think there should be no difference especially in competitive MTG tournament, especially in pro tour.

@ClamDzw @fireshoes You don't believe in scenarios where no information is gained regardless of priority? Because there are plenty of examples, even with open mana. I don't think your situation leaves any interpretation for a different outcome but maybe a slightly different scenario would.

@KaramVinicius @fireshoes the out come will be different totally based on what he played on that turn.

@DanRed50295234 @fireshoes Yep, that’s why even the commentator said the judge should not let Seth take back in the live. Since everyone thinks he shouldn’t.

@fireshoes @ClamDzw It seems like the same situation as Seth's at the Protour. Its not a popular call but its reversible. No definitve info was gained.

@KaramVinicius @fireshoes I can understand it’s okay based on the rules now. Therefore I respected the judge’s decision during the tournament. But I personally think the “take back” should only happened before you pass the priority. You can not wait for your opponent’s response and then change your mind.

@ClamDzw @fireshoes You are stretching the definition of "no new information" to the point that nothing would fit. It you feel like this is a problem and 0 takebacks should be allowed at all times then I get your point but respectfully disagree. Current policy was correctly applied either way.