Peter Nowak

4.7K posts

Peter Nowak banner
Peter Nowak

Peter Nowak

@ClimatePNowak

Retired

Plymouth Katılım Haziran 2022
289 Takip Edilen350 Takipçiler
Peter Nowak
Peter Nowak@ClimatePNowak·
I’m not ignoring the greener signal some point to from higher CO2. I’m saying it does not cancel the bigger picture: heatwaves, droughts, floods and biodiversity loss.
English
0
0
1
34
Peter Nowak retweetledi
Jimmy
Jimmy@JamesCox23·
@ClimatePNowak How many peer reviewed articles are there about the effects of artificially clouding the sky and trapping heat?
English
0
1
0
10
Peter Nowak
Peter Nowak@ClimatePNowak·
I support celebrating healthier ecosystems, but rising CO2 does not outweigh the broader damage from heatwaves, droughts, floods and biodiversity loss. Climate action remains essential.
Peter Clack@PeterDClack

It's been a wonderful few years for plant growth around the world. This resurgence is heavily driven by higher CO₂ levels in the atmosphere. NASA satellite records from 1982–2023 reveal that rising CO₂ contributed around 70% of new greening cover over vast areas of semi-desert and barren landscapes. This expansion is visible across a quarter to a half of all Earth's vegetated lands - a rate unprecedented in the satellite era. Global crop yields have soared since 1960, driven by spectacular agricultural advances and quietly supercharged by CO₂ fertilisation. Concurrently, famine deaths have plunged, even as the world's population doubled. CO₂ has driven the bulk of this timely explosion in the green world, boosting both terrestrial agriculture and oceanic phytoplankton. We have seen a greater than 18% increase in global leaf cover in 40 years. The largest gains have occurred in India and China through massive tree-planting and intensive farming, all fed by an enriching atmosphere. Warmer, balmier temperatures are lengthening growing seasons too, a feature of a more active hydrological cycle. Studies show that every 100 ppm increase in CO₂ typically boosts plant growth by 25% to 50%. An analysis of 776 studies from 1993–2019 shows that an average CO₂ level of 550 ppm would deliver a 38% increase in global biomass. The treatment of CO₂ as a pollutant seems eerily counter-intuitive given this massive greening. There can be no doubt that CO₂ is on the comeback trail. Data suggests that higher CO₂ levels, paired with modest warming, represent a historical sweet spot for terrestrial and marine life. This is precisely why commercial greenhouses deliberately pump CO₂ to 1,000–1,500 ppm to ensure crop yields jump by 20% to 70%. This should be celebrated as 'great news for humanity'. Yet, there is only disappointing silence from backers of the global warming agenda.

English
1
1
4
235
Peter Nowak retweetledi
Matthew Todd 🌏🔥
Matthew Todd 🌏🔥@MrMatthewTodd·
People scream ‘fear mongering!’. It’s absolutely appropriate to be afraid. #heatwave
Matthew Todd 🌏🔥 tweet media
English
4
106
376
3.8K
Peter Nowak retweetledi
Carbon Brief
Carbon Brief@CarbonBrief·
Is global warming tipping key Atlantic ocean currents towards ‘collapse’? ✍️ Cecilia Keating 🎨 @tomoprater Kerry Cleaver Read here: buff.ly/mgaIBvM
English
3
5
10
902
Peter Nowak
Peter Nowak@ClimatePNowak·
@Electroversenet Short-term variability never changed the long-term warming trend. I trust the scientific process, and better coverage or updated datasets do not erase the clear evidence of global warming.
English
2
0
0
35
Electroverse
Electroverse@Electroversenet·
In the early 2000s, climate models projected warming, but the actual observations did not follow. This gap between models and measurements became known as the 'global warming pause.' The response to this discrepancy was not to revisit the models, it was to revisit the measurements. So more weather stations were added in the Arctic, the fastest warming region on earth, increasing its influence on the global average. Large areas with sparse measurements were filled using estimates. Stations in regions showing cooling, including parts of South America, were removed or down-weighted. Sea surface temperatures were also reprocessed. Older ship readings were adjusted cooler, with recent buoy data blended warmer. Homogenization algorithms lowered earlier temperatures and raised later ones, further steepening the trend. The models stayed fixed. The observations were adjusted to match them. That is how the pause disappeared. Climate scientists reversed the scientific method.
English
13
54
113
1.6K
Peter Nowak
Peter Nowak@ClimatePNowak·
@JamesCox23 For me, a five year regional snapshot does not outweigh the long term global record. The evidence is still clear: peer reviewed climate research shows modern warming is driven primarily by greenhouse gas emissions.
English
1
0
0
21
Jimmy
Jimmy@JamesCox23·
@ClimatePNowak For me the evidence is the increase in Arctic ice mass and coverage over the last five years. Not much escapes visual evidence.
English
1
0
0
22
Peter Nowak
Peter Nowak@ClimatePNowak·
@WeRone777 Based on the evidence, I think temperatures would be much closer to preindustrial levels, with some natural variability but without the strong warming driven by fossil fuel emissions.
English
2
0
0
22
Dman
Dman@WeRone777·
@ClimatePNowak What would the temperature be now compared to the centuries before 1850 if we didn't use FF's?
English
1
0
0
25
Peter Nowak
Peter Nowak@ClimatePNowak·
@imdavidbryan I understand the uncertainty, but for me the evidence is clear. Peer reviewed climate research consistently shows that modern warming is driven primarily by greenhouse gas emissions.
English
4
0
0
25
David Bryan
David Bryan@imdavidbryan·
@ClimatePNowak I don't believe anyone has the knowledge to know that one way or the other. It's possible that it's true & it's also possible that it's not true.
English
1
0
0
25
Peter Nowak
Peter Nowak@ClimatePNowak·
@RichardLyon_ For me, this is not about personal feeling. It is about the weight of peer reviewed evidence and observed data, which consistently show greenhouse gas emissions are driving modern warming.
English
2
0
0
34
Richard Lyon
Richard Lyon@RichardLyon_·
@ClimatePNowak It doesn’t show. It hypothesises. It relies on feedback systems, and can’t even decide the sign of the biggest one, much less the magnitude. The statement about what evidence is clear to you is a statement about you, not about evidence.
English
2
0
6
73
Peter Nowak
Peter Nowak@ClimatePNowak·
For me, the scientific evidence is clear. Peer reviewed research shows that fossil fuel emissions, not solar variability, are driving modern warming.
Veritatem 2021: TRUTH IS NOT A POPULARITY CONTEST@Veritatem2021

@ClimatePNowak There isn't a single scientific paper showing empirical evidence that fossil fuel emissions cause climate change. Study climate science research papers and reports and learn for yourself as I did.

English
0
0
0
36
Peter Nowak
Peter Nowak@ClimatePNowak·
@182_DuncH For me, the evidence goes well beyond computer models. Spectroscopy, satellite data, ocean heat content and temperature records all show that greenhouse gases are driving modern warming.
English
2
0
1
26
Dunc H
Dunc H@182_DuncH·
@ClimatePNowak Correlation isn't causation; that's not evidence. Computer models aren't evidence. A lack of correlation in the past between CO2 and warming is evidence that they aren't related. We have had ice ages when CO2 was 10 times today's levels.
English
1
0
3
44
Peter Nowak
Peter Nowak@ClimatePNowak·
@travel_tipss Dubai really looks like an unforgettable experience. I would love to enjoy a view like this and explore the city.
English
0
0
0
11
Travel tips
Travel tips@travel_tipss·
✨ Why NOW is the Perfect Time to Visit Dubai 🇦🇪🌴 Dubai is shining brighter than ever! 🌟 From luxury shopping 🛍️ and world-class dining 🍽️ to stunning beaches 🏖️ and unforgettable desert adventures 🐪, there’s never been a better time to experience this incredible city. ✅ Pleasant weather for outdoor activities ☀️
✅ Amazing hotel deals & travel packages ✈️
✅ New attractions and entertainment hotspots 🎡
✅ Perfect destination for families, couples & solo travelers ❤️
✅ Safe, modern, and full of unforgettable experiences 🌆 Whether you want to explore the iconic Burj Khalifa 🏙️, relax at luxury resorts 🏨, or enjoy Dubai’s vibrant nightlife 🎶, the city offers something for everyone. 📍Plan your Dubai getaway now and create memories that last forever!
Travel tips tweet media
English
1
1
3
51
Peter Nowak retweetledi
Ruslan Khairullin
Ruslan Khairullin@Rus_Khairullin·
Everybody talks about Dubai like it’s the finish line. It’s not. It’s the starting line, and that’s exactly why the people who get it are quiet about it. When you live somewhere that actually works, you stop spending energy on survival. All that energy that used to go into just staying afloat gets redirected into building. That’s the part nobody understands from the outside. They think people move here to relax by a pool and flex cars. The opposite is true. People come here and work harder than they ever did back home, because for the first time nothing is dragging them backwards. The West makes you spend half your life proving you deserve what you earned. Dubai just lets you go. That’s the whole edge. It was never about the weather. 🇦🇪
English
5
9
52
4.8K
Peter Nowak
Peter Nowak@ClimatePNowak·
Climate action is not hysteria. I support investment in renewable energy and efficiency because it reduces emissions and strengthens long-term energy security.
CLINTEL FOUNDATION@ClintelOrg

The #NetZero fantasy is collapsing. Even the IPCC now admits the extreme climate scenario used to justify the EU’s multi-trillion-euro #GreenDeal is “unlikely.” Yet Brussels and climate activists keep pushing higher energy bills, crushing regulations, and economic decline onto ordinary citizens. China is building coal plants. America is drilling for oil and gas. Europe is committing economic suicide. Enough climate hysteria. Choose affordable energy, nuclear power, and economic realism. #Climate #EnergyCrisis #ClimatePolicy #EU #NetZero2050 #GreenDeal #NuclearEnergy #Clintel

English
0
1
1
16
Peter Nowak
Peter Nowak@ClimatePNowak·
@Electroversenet I agree CO2 is essential for life, but excess emissions are driving global warming and disrupting ecosystems. For me, the issue is not CO2 itself, but the imbalance we are creating.
English
1
0
1
44
Electroverse
Electroverse@Electroversenet·
CO2 is treated like pollution, but it is the carbon source for life. Plants use CO2, water, and sunlight to build sugars, (i.e. photosynthesis) - the base of the food chain. No CO2. No plants. No biosphere as we know it. NASA satellite data shows Earth has greened significantly since the early 1980s. CO2 fertilization is the major driver. Commercial greenhouses often raise CO2 to 1,500 ppm to boost yields. For most of Earth history, CO2 was far higher than it is today - far higher than the levels in commercial greenhouses, even. During parts of the deep past, life exploded at more than 6,000 ppm. Yet today, at 420 ppm, the gas plants need to live has been turned into a political toxin. But CO2 is not pollution, it is the backbone of life.
English
23
160
357
6.5K
Peter Nowak
Peter Nowak@ClimatePNowak·
Human activity adds extra CO2 to the atmosphere beyond the natural balance, and that buildup is driving global warming. That is why reducing emissions remains such an important part of climate action.
Hermann O.@Clarsonimus

Human emissions of CO2 account for only a minuscule 0.0016% of all CO2 emissions in our atmosphere. Total CO2 makes up only 0.04%. So if natural emissions make up practically all of the CO2 in the air, how will reducing human CO2 make a difference?

English
1
0
1
55
Peter Nowak
Peter Nowak@ClimatePNowak·
@Veritatem2021 For me, the evidence is clear. Climate does change naturally, but the current warming is being driven by human emissions, and rising CO2 is harming ecosystems and biodiversity.
English
2
0
0
5
Peter Nowak
Peter Nowak@ClimatePNowak·
For me, this is exactly why climate science matters. CO2 may be a trace gas, but it has a powerful warming effect, and rising emissions are harming the planet and biodiversity.
Mark Corbluth@MarkCorbo4

Atmosphere comprises 78% nitrogen, 21% oxygen. Greenhouse gases less than 0.1%. Of this 0.1%, the largest greenhouse gas is water vapour at 96%. CO2 is 0.0004% of the atmosphere. Man-made CO2 is 4% of all CO2 , 16 ppm, which is miniscule. Enjoy the sun.

English
48
8
56
3.2K