查弊者
5K posts
說個笑話
當台北市長八年 貪污了210萬
當個外科醫生四個月就賺的到的錢
要花八年去貪
是沒看過錢嗎？
中文
“这一场审判不是结束，赖清德，我绝对不会投降“ 前台北市长柯文哲在其涉入的京华城等四大案一审判决出炉后，举行记者会，并且对总统赖清德喊话，强调自己“没有图利也没有贪污“，并称这场审判“是执政者打压在野党的'政治清算' “。
中国国台办发言人朱凤莲称，赖清德政府“打压政治异己，必遭台湾民众唾弃“；台湾陆委会主委邱垂正周五（27日）则反批：“中国大陆是一个极权专制的政权，他们没有资格对台湾说三道四、指指点点“。
你怎么看这场判决？留言分享！
中文
@KP_Taiwan 我认为，台湾需要向美国学习，即便犯罪也能竞选总统，这样可以防止政治迫害。让选民用选票说话，竞争对手的政治迫害自然就失去作用
当然我并不是说柯文哲案就一定是政治迫害，也不是说柯文哲就一定是无辜的
中文
司法要改革 不能再等「某時地」
Judicial reform cannot wait for some vague “time and place”— it must happen here and now
I. Introduction
各位關心柯文哲的朋友、各位媒體記者，大家晚安：
Good evening to all friends caring about Ko Wen-je, and to members of the media:
「司法是國家的最後一道防線，司法應該被人民信任，司法唯一的目的是維持社會的公平正義，司法不可以是政治工具、更不可以是執政者打擊反對黨的工具。
“Judiciary is the last line of defense of a nation. It should be trusted by the people. Its sole purpose is to maintain fairness and justice in society. It must not be a political manipulation tool, nor should it be used by those in power to suppress opposition parties.
司法應當遵守程序正義，司法應該以證據為基礎來辦案，司法不可以用編故事的方法來定罪。」
The judiciary must follow due process. Cases must be handled based on evidence. It must not rely on fabricated narratives to convict.”
這是3月3日，我前往法務部檢察官評鑑委員會，申請評鑑本案檢察官時說的話。這個司法案件並不是在追求事實真相，而是在為一個早已寫好的政治劇本善後而已。
These were the words I spoke on March 3 when I went to the Prosecutor Evaluation Committee of the Ministry of Justice to file a request for evaluating the prosecutors in this case. This trial is not about pursuing facts and truth—it is merely about filling in the final chapters of a political script that was already written in advance.
在這場審判中，證據法則被拋棄、證詞被選擇性採信、程序正義蕩然無存。我們看到的，這不是一個法治國家的審判，而是一場政治操作下的司法表演。
In this trial, the rules of evidence have been abandoned, testimonies have been selectively accepted, and procedural justice has completely collapsed. What we are seeing is not a trial in a country governed by the rule of law, but a judicial performance under political manipulation.
這個案子過程中有太多的政治介入，台灣司法社會信任度本來就不高，誠如本案審判長說的，台灣司法很脆弱，我回應：「老百姓面對國家機器，其實更脆弱」。經過這個案子，台灣司法更脆弱，社會信任度更低了。
There has been far too much political interference throughout this case. Public trust in Taiwan’s judiciary has never been high. As the presiding judge in this case said, Taiwan’s judiciary is very fragile. My response is: “Ordinary people facing the state apparatus are even more fragile.” With this case, Taiwan’s judiciary has become even more fragile, and public trust has declined further.
日本語
小草每次都說不能未審先判：
「憑什麼說柯文哲貪污？」
好了現在我可以說了，柯文哲是垃圾貪污仔。
貪污的都去死一死。
柯文哲一審宣判17年，褫奪公權6年。
中文
