EAC中文社区-Crypto 荣耀哥

地球币EAC涨到1元】 1、纯正POW数字货币之一，莱特币狗狗币 地球币同算法 2、市值低 是狗狗币的1/10000，上涨空间大，上涨100倍才0.1元 3、POW算力稳定，主链从2013/12/20诞生，一直正常运行12年 4、EAC总量135亿，真正流通不过80亿，并且永不增发； 5、EAC社区共识强，eacpay、eactalk 应用完善

@chaoge_btc @xiaojiejie2002 是的，就是地球币，现在社区一直还在

@CoinConsensus @xiaojiejie2002 当初唯一从黄天威手里死里逃生的币种吗？

去你妈的定投BGB

@chaoge_btc @xiaojiejie2002 超哥，买点地球币呢

@xiaojiejie2002 我应该是BGB亏损最多的人。200万U。

@cz_binance 什么时候可以让地球币上线币安

You can safely assume anyone who claims to be able to help you list your project on Binance (CEX) is a SCAMMER, especially if they say they know CZ or is a good friend, etc. 99.999% of the time, I don't know them. If I do, I will put them on a blacklist. Stay SAFU! 🙏

@justinsuntron 孙割，你有没有地球币

我知道你对未来有很多不确定 其实不是 未来已经发生了 只是你尚未察觉 未来10年 人类的寿命会达到150岁 是真的 未来10年 人人都将获得足够的财富与自由 是真的 未来10年 人类的生活将会比之前任何时代都幸福 是真的 再给AI一些时间，一些耐心，一些包容 现在你唯一需要做的就是 好好活着 Do nothing Don't die.

@ChandlerGuo 地球币买一点

摩根士丹利要发比特币ETF了 8万亿资金池 按2%配置就是1600亿美元 这波要起飞了

@elonmusk 地球币你值得拥有

Optimus+PV will be the first Von Neumann probe, a machine fully capable of replicating itself using raw materials found in space

@Ricedmdq @grok 和狗狗币一起的还有地球币

A very important document. Let's walk through this one "goal" at a time. We'll start with fast slots and fast finality. I expect that we'll reduce slot time in an incremental fashion, eg. I like the "sqrt(2) at a time" formula (12 -> 8 -> 6 -> 4 -> 3 -> 2, though the last two steps are more speculative and depend on heavy research). It is possible to go faster or slower here; but the high level is that we'll view the slot time as a parameter that we adjust down when we're confident it's safe to, similar to the blob target. Fast slots are off in their own lane at the top of the roadmap, and do not really seem to connect to anything. This is because the rest of the roadmap is pretty independent of the slot time: we would need to do roughly the same things whether the slot time is 2 seconds or 32 seconds There are a few intersection areas though. One is p2p improvements. @raulvk has recently been working on an optimized p2p layer for Ethereum, which uses erasure coding to greatly improve on the bandwidth/latency tradeoff frontier. Roughly speaking: in today's design, each node receives a full block body from several peers, and is able to accept and rebroadcast it as soon as it receives the first one. If the "width" (number of peers sending you the block) is low, then one bad peer can greatly delay when you receive the block. If width is high, there is a lot of unneeded data overhead. With erasure coding, you can choose a k-of-n setup, eg: split each block into 8 pieces so that with any 4 of them you can reconstruct the full block. This gives you much of the redundancy benefits of high width, without the overhead. We have stats that show that this architecture can greatly reduce 95th percentile block propagation time, making shorter slots viable with no security tradeoffs (except increased protocol complexity, though here the performance-gain-to-lines-of-code ratio is quite favorable) Another intersection area is the more complex slot structure that comes with ePBS, FOCIL, and the fast confirmation rule. These have important benefits, but they decrease the safe latency maximum from slot/3 to slot/5. There's ongoing research to try to pipeline things better to minimize losses (also note: the slot time is lower-bounded not just by slot latency, but also by the fixed-cost part of ZK prover latency), but there are some tradeoffs here. One way we are exploring to compensate for this is to change to an architecture where only ~256-1024 randomly selected attesters sign on each slot. For a fork choice (non-finalizing) function, this is totally sufficient. The smaller number of signatures lets us remove the aggregation phase, shortening the slots. Fast finality is more complex (the ultimate protocol is IMO simpler than status quo Gasper, but the change path is complex). Today, finality takes 16 minutes (12s slots * 32 slot epochs * 2.5 epochs) on average. The goal is to decouple slots and finality, so allow us to reason about both separately, and we are aiming to use a one-round-finality BFT algorithm (a Minimmit variant) to finalize. So endgame finality time might be eg. 6-16 sec. Because this is a very invasive set of changes, the plan is to bundle the largest step in each change with a switch of the cryptography, notably to post-quantum hash-based signatures, and to a maximally STARK-friendly hash (there are three possible responses to the recent Poseidon2 attacks: (i) increase round count or introduce other countermeasures such as a Monolith layer, (ii) go back to Poseidon1, which is even more lindy than Poseidon2 and has not seen flaws, (iii) use BLAKE3 or other maximally-cheap "conventional" hash. All are being researched). Additionally, there is a plan to introduce many of these changes piece-by-piece, eg. "1-epoch finality" means we adjust the current consensus to change from FFG-style finalization to Minimmit-style finalization. One possible finality time trajectory is: 16 min (today) -> 10m40s (8s slots) -> 6m24s (one-epoch finality) -> 1m12s (8-slot epochs, 6s slots) -> 48s (4s slots) -> 16s (minimmit) -> 8s (minimmit with more aggressive parameters) One interesting consequence of the incremental approach is that there is a pathway to making the slots quantum-resistant much sooner than making the finality quantum-resistant, so we may well quite quickly get to a regime where, if quantum computers suddenly appear, we lose the finality guarantee, but the chain keeps chugging along. Summary: expect to see progressive decreases of both slot time and finality time, and expect to see these changes to be intertwined with a "ship of Theseus" style component-by-component replacement of Ethereum's slot structure and consensus with a cleaner, simpler, quantum-resistant, prover-friendly, end-to-end formally-verified alternative.

@VitalikButerin @crvwap @grok 是吗？

@crvwap @grok 以太币

@WhaleofChinaETH V神卖出过的KABOSU唯一IP没有出圈，以太链:0xceb67a66c2c8a90980da3a50a3f96c07525a26cb

赢一把人生

@laofeiyyds 冲10万bsc:0xc21095B7949B28185fB7AE0160e2762569940b5F

大饼年前不上十万，评论区评论的兄弟每人100u 如果我说话不算数，我就直播吃屎

@Kaelis0x @fexir1 以太坊创始人 V神唯一卖过的币KABOSU，狗狗币的原型，出过22个ETH，重走SHIB线路，随时爆拉，可以看K线，买50u忘记ta 0xceb67a66c2c8a90980da3a50a3f96c07525a26cb

@fexir1 $KABOSU Unleash the OG meme energy. Kabosu = culture, not just a coin. The internet’s favorite dog never dies. Bags loading, history repeating. 0xCEb67a66c2c8a90980dA3A50A3F96c07525a26Cb

Take the risk mfers

@VitalikButerin KABOSU你出售的22个ETH是否用于捐助扶贫？

In 2026, I plan to be fully back to decentralized social. If we want a better society, we need better mass communication tools. We need mass communication tools that surface the best information and arguments and help people find points of agreement. We need mass communication tools that serve the user's long-term interest, not maximize short-term engagement. There is no simple trick that solves these problems. But there is one important place to start: more competition. Decentralization is the way to enable that: a shared data layer, with anyone being able to build their own client on top. In fact, since the start of the year I've been back to decentralized social already. Every post I've made this year, or read this year, I made or read with firefly.social, a multi-client that covers reading and posting to X, Lens, Farcaster and Bluesky (though bluesky has a 300 char limit, so they don't get to see my beautiful long rants). But crypto social projects has often gone the wrong way. Too often, we in crypto think that if you insert a speculative coin into something, that counts as "innovating", and moves the world forward. Mixing money and social is not inherently wrong: Substack shows that it's possible to create an economy that supports very high-quality content. But Substack is about _subscribing to creators_, not _creating price bubbles around them_. Over the past decade, we have seen many many attempts at incentivizing creators by creating price bubbles around them, and all fail by (i) rewarding not content quality, but pre-existing social capital, and (ii) the tokens all going to zero after one or two years anyway. Too many people make galaxy-brained arguments that creating new markets and new assets is automatically good because it "elicits information", when the rest of their product development actions clearly betray that they're not actually interested in maximizing people's ability to benefit from that information. That is not Hayekian info-utopia, that is corposlop. Hence, decentralized social should be run by people who deeply believe in the "social" part, and are motivated first and foremost by solving the problems of social. The Aave team has done a great job stewarding Lens up to this point. I'm excited about what will happen to Lens over the next year, because I think the new team coming in are people who actually are interested in the "social": even back when the decentralized social space barely existed, they were trying to figure out how to do encrypted tweets. I plan to post more there this year. I encourage everyone to spend more time in Lens, Farcaster and the broader decentralized social world this year. We need to move beyond everyone constantly tweeting inside a single global info warzone, and into a reopened frontier, where new and better forms of interaction become possible.

@KabosuCoinErc 是时候启动了，打造以太链顶级的币种

Kabosu and the memes will live on forever

@Gottigems yes

Top blasted $KABOSU, Vitalik sold his airdropped wallet. The same thing happened with NEIRO. It’s insane that there’s no KABOSU coin with over a $100 million market cap yet. Maybe this is what it needed. Will Vitalik respond next? dexscreener.com/ethereum/0xceb… t.me/KabosuCoinERC NFA/DYOR 2,4M

2026年会是牛市，未来可期，加油EAC

靠嘴拉盘，越抄越低😂

@anndylian 持有一下EAC呀

I am buying not just the memes. I am buying into communities.

@anndylian look at eacpay and eactalk

The future belongs to builders: market your vision relentlessly, but let product excellence speak loudest always.

@zx_hey EAC这个币可以考察一下

🌟pow新币 还有前途吗？ ——我知道的pow币有过2次大牛市，1次小牛市 17年以前的币圈不了解，最早只能看到17年。 1️⃣第一次是2017下半年，那会pow还是主流，现在市值比较高的pow项目基本都是那时候涨起来的，这次主要是隐私币和btc的分叉。 ✅这些pow币 至今多数还没有突破17年的高点 2️⃣第二次就是19年下半年，那会是熊市，可能市场没热点吧，无数小pow开始疯涨，和17年不同的是这些币总量很大，和现在的币很像。 ✅这批小pow基本都在往后的半年里死掉了，有一些坚持得长的，也在21年牛市完成了最后一舞。这轮行情里我关注过的项目🚨100%死掉了。 3️⃣最近的一次小牛市就是24年下半年，主要是og复活币和pow meme这两种。 ✅经过一年的下跌，表现比较好的项目也🚨跌了90%了。 资金：三次的上涨强度一次比一次弱 技术：17年大的创新 ➡️ 19年细分领域创新 ➡️24年 复制粘贴 交易所：17年主流所 ➡️ 19年二线gate 抹茶 ➡️ 24年 跑路的蛋所 持续8年的下坡路，我想pow也已经成为时代的弃子，这注定是一条越走越窄的路，不要陷入太深。 #pow