Coinholio

6.5K posts

Coinholio

Coinholio

@Coinholio

Katılım Aralık 2012
670 Takip Edilen448 Takipçiler
Coinholio retweetledi
רחל
רחל@AmIsraelChai_·
This is to the hypocrites, haters, and false humanitarians still accusing Israelis of “genocide”: Why do I call you “hypocrites?” Because we were packed like sardines onto cattle cars while you watched, secure in the safety and comfort of your homes. Because we waited in line, naked, in freezing temperatures, to use your “showers,” and while we and our children asphyxiated from Zyklon B, you pretended it wasn’t happening. Because while our flesh was burned in ovens, you looked up in silence at the smoke-filled sky. Because our hair was used to stuff the Mercedes you drove and our skin was used to make the lampshades in your living rooms. Because when some of us escaped the Nazis on the transatlantic liner, the St. Louis, you turned us away, forcing us to return to countries that enabled our slaughter. Because you never raised your voice, or a banner, or marched, or erected a tent while 1.5 million of our children were exterminated. Because 2 out of every 3 of us in Europe disappeared and you STILL deny our genocide. Because this time, when the Nazis returned in green bandanas from Gaza, we foolishly thought you would have our backs. We waited - some of us with our captors in underground tunnels, some of us by the Gaza border, some of us by the door. But you never showed up. Instead, you took to the streets and accused us of “genocide” for having the audacity to fight back, for defending ourselves against the monsters who gang raped, butchered, burned, kidnapped, strangled, tortured, blew up, executed point blank, and decapitated our children and parents - and who paraded their severed heads through the streets of Gaza to cheering crowds. Instead of demanding that Hamas surrender and release the hostages, you raised banners calling for a global intifada. You shouted through bull horns for our annihilation “from the river to the sea.” You set up tent encampments, threatened our teenagers, and blocked their access to hire education. We have been saying “never again” for 80 years. We failed to keep our promise. We let the devil find our doorstep - again, this time binding and burning our families in our own homes, paragliding into our dance festival, opening fire on our beaches. It bound us and our children and then set our homes on fire. It sexually assaulted and mutilated our daughters, kidnapped and tortured our teenagers, starved them and shot them in the head, choked our infants with its bare hands, shot our dogs, and blew up our friends and neighbours in bomb shelters. Why do I call you “haters” and “false humanitarians”? Because when the Allies killed 600,000 German civilians bombing the Nazis, you did not accuse them of genocide. When America bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki, you did not accuse the American people of genocide. But when Israel defended itself against Hamas, and took every possible opportunity (that the Allies did not take fighting the Third Reich) to prevent civilian deaths (planning escape routes, feeding the populace, vaccinating Gazan children, setting up mobile hospitals, making robo calls and dropping fliers in Arabic telling civilians to leave), you accused Israel of genocide. If you were true humanitarians, you would be screaming from the rooftops about the Iranian government slaughtering its own people, about Hamas using Gazans as human shields, about atrocities in Congo, Darfur, Sudan… but you are SILENT. The only explanation for your gross hypocrisy is that you hate Jews. And ps - the IDF soldiers defending Israel are Muslim, Druze, Christian, and Jewish, just like the Israelis they are defending.
רחל tweet media
English
10
103
263
2.2K
Coinholio retweetledi
Rich Toronto
Rich Toronto@rich_toronto·
Yes, the 1948 Nakba was made up. Israel was recognized as a State and the Arab nations attacked, telling the Arabs who lived in the new Israel to leave, that they’d be able to return. The Arabs lost the war, the people who left were fucked, and the Arabs cried “Nakba”. The Arabs who stayed still live in Israel as full citizens. And yes the current “genocide” is made up. The current war is not a genocide. There is zero intent to wipe out the people of Gaza. The people of Gaza attacked Israel and started a war, then cried “genocide” when they got their asses kicked. Sounds a lot like 1948 all over again. You’d think they’d learn, but here we are.
NitrisOxd🇺🇸 💪@OxdNitris

@rich_toronto So without sugar coating it - Was the 1948 Nakba made up? Was the recent Genocide made up? They are simple Yes/No Responses. What the legal age for marriage is - immaterial - it is that countries culture. You dont have to marry at that age.

English
7
47
207
3.8K
Norman Brennan
Norman Brennan@NormanBrennan·
BREAKING NEWS; The Retrial for Manchester Airport Attackers MOHAMMED AMAAS & his brother MUHAMMAD AHMED starts tomorrow & scheduled to last 3/4wks👇 Brothers involved in Manchester Airport trial will be back in the dock next year; Manchester Evening News manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-m…
English
395
1.9K
5.5K
111.6K
Coinholio retweetledi
Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧
Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧@JChimirie66677·
Trump has now compared Starmer to Neville Chamberlain. Not Winston Churchill. Not a loser. Chamberlain. The man whose name has been synonymous with appeasement, miscalculation and the catastrophic misreading of a mortal threat for eighty years. The escalation of historical comparisons tells its own story. Each one has been worse than the last. Each one has been earned. The context makes it worse. Trump has issued Iran a final ultimatum. Open the Strait of Hormuz or face the destruction of every power plant and bridge in the country within four hours. The Strait has been closed for over a month. Oil is heading toward two hundred dollars a barrel. Britain's fiscal headroom is gone. Energy bills are rising. And according to the i newspaper, Starmer is preparing to refuse American use of British bases to strike Iranian bridges and power plants, on the grounds that such targets fall outside the narrow definition of defensive action that Lord Hermer's legal opinion permits. Lord Hermer again. The Attorney General who blocked Diego Garcia at the start of this crisis is now drawing the boundaries of what America can and cannot do from British soil at its most critical moment. He has not stood for election. He has not been held accountable by a single British voter. He was appointed. And he is determining the foreign policy of a country whose closest ally is issuing ultimatums while the world's most important shipping lane remains closed. The suspicion, and it is one that the evidence does nothing to dispel, is that international law is not the reason for these decisions. It is the cover for them. The reason is the same one it has always been: a governing coalition that cannot afford to be seen taking the American side. The pattern established at the very beginning of this crisis has never broken. Starmer and Hermer blocked Diego Garcia. A drone on his own runway forced the reversal. A ship in dry dock took a fortnight to reach a base that had already been hit. He consulted his team on minesweepers. He called for negotiations with the regime bombing his own personnel. He issued humanitarian statements about Lebanon that did not mention Hezbollah once. At every stage the response has been the same: find the legal opinion, follow the process, do the minimum the moment demands and nothing more. And now, as Trump prepares what may be the decisive strike of this conflict, Starmer is drawing up fresh legal reasons why British soil cannot be used to support it. Five weeks in, the pattern is unbroken. Churchill did not need a lawyer to tell him what the moment required. Thatcher assembled a task force within days of Argentina's invasion, acted with clarity and speed, and did not mistake the legal framework for a substitute for leadership. Starmer has never understood that distinction. Lord Hermer has made a career of not understanding it. Together they have produced a foreign policy that has managed to disappoint Washington, alarm Gulf allies, lose the confidence of Cyprus, cede moral leadership to France and earn the Chamberlain comparison from the President of the United States, all within five weeks. Trump's ultimatum may or may not end the crisis. Iran's rejection of the Pakistan-brokered ceasefire suggests the regime is still gambling that continued defiance costs less than surrender. That gamble may yet prove fatal. What is already certain is that Britain will have played no meaningful part in the resolution, having spent five weeks finding legal reasons to watch from the sidelines. Chamberlain famously returned from Munich believing he had secured peace in our time. He had secured nothing except the contempt of history. Starmer will not return from anywhere waving anything. He has simply been present while others acted. The Chamberlain comparison stings precisely because it is not about cowardice. It is about the catastrophic cost of mistaking process for leadership. Appeasement has a new face.
Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧 tweet mediaJim Chimirie 🇬🇧 tweet media
English
73
320
867
10.5K
Coinholio retweetledi
X Freeze
X Freeze@XFreeze·
Headline: "Elon Musk's X receives a 24,000 euro fine for distributing a rape video of a Flemish woman" Reality: Elon Musk didn't own the company in 2020 Belgian media is intentionally conflating current ownership with the failures of the previous regime. They’re trying to taint Elon and 𝕏’s reputation over an incident from a completely different era Notice how they explicitly use "Elon Musk" and "𝕏" image instead of the old management? Timeline for the "reporters" in the back: - 2020: The incident happened - 2021: The video was finally removed via a judge's order - 2022: Elon Musk bought Twitter This is straight-up targeted hate disguised as news Pre-Elon 𝕏 operated completely differently and that broken system is exactly why he bought the platform and rebuilt it entirely This is the dark side of the fraud media that no one talks about..
X Freeze tweet mediaX Freeze tweet media
Robin@xdNiBoR

Update on this story. Every news outlet in Belgium is reporting on it again now that the fine has been set. Just to recap: Video posted on 3rd of July 2020, complaint in Autumn 2020, video taken offline in February 2021… and Elon only buys Twitter in October 2022! Yet everyone uses Elon’s face and the X logo, without ever mentioning it all happened years before he was involved. Easy way to get clicks, obviously….

English
26
97
435
8.6K
Coinholio retweetledi
Bob
Bob@Shariakill·
Just an everyday Islamic prayers in every mosque By “Moderate Muslims”
Bob tweet media
English
2
49
92
2.2K
Coinholio retweetledi
Gatestone Institute
Gatestone Institute@GatestoneInst·
Recent footage from Aleppo and other parts of Syria should serve as a wake-up call to anyone in Washington and European capitals still clinging to the illusion of a "moderate" new Syria under President Ahmed al-Sharaa. gatestoneinstitute.org/22409/new-syri…
English
1
20
38
1.7K
Coinholio retweetledi
James Esses
James Esses@JamesEsses·
🚨This seismic Finnish study confirms that most children who medically transition end up with significantly worse mental health than beforehand. Being ‘trans’ is not an identity. It is a mental health condition. Affirming it will only make it worse.
James Esses tweet media
English
65
635
2.7K
32K
Coinholio retweetledi
Electroverse
Electroverse@Electroversenet·
Last year, CBS reported that the Arctic could be ice-free within 10 years. The trouble is they said the exact same thing 16 years ago. The prediction changed, but the panic stayed the same. This is always the play... Al Gore said the North Pole could be ice-free by 2013. Professor Peter Wadhams warned it would lose its summer ice by 2016. While NASA's James Hansen said by 2018. The list goes on and on. But in reality, satellite data show late summer ice still covers millions of square kilometers with no documented trend for 18 years. Every few years, the timeline resets. The apocalypse is always just "10-or-so" years away.
English
32
306
782
7.9K
Coinholio retweetledi
Joe Rich
Joe Rich@joerichlaw·
The shooting on 13 May 1972, which is the subject of the charges, relates to young members of a British Army patrol ordered to shut down an illegal IRA ‘checkpoint’. They came under fire and were told to return it. Now they’re facing charges 54 years later. That’s Labour justice.
Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧@JChimirie66677

Three former soldiers will appear at Belfast magistrates court on April 20th. One is charged with a killing that took place in May 1972. He is not accused of acting outside his orders. He is accused of acting within them. The distinction no longer appears to matter. This is the reality behind Labour's Northern Ireland Troubles Bill, a piece of legislation dressed in the language of reconciliation that functions, in practice, as an engine of persecution. The state that sent these men to Northern Ireland, that gave them their orders, that relied on their judgment in circumstances no minister has ever faced, is now the state that funds the machinery pursuing them through the courts half a century later. That is not a technicality. It is the central fact. Taxpayer money flows to the lawyers challenging the actions of soldiers whose actions were sanctioned by the taxpayer. The government calls this justice. General Sir Peter Wall, who commanded the British Army for four years, calls it something without moral backbone. He is right. The operational consequences are already visible. Elite soldiers are leaving the SAS and SBS rather than face the prospect of prosecution decades hence for missions carried out under government orders. The crisis has become sufficiently acute that reservists are being brought into the regular SAS to fill roles vacated by those walking out. Britain's most capable fighting force is being quietly hollowed out by a bill whose architects appear indifferent to the result. Seven former SAS commanders have warned that the legislation is doing the enemy's work, that operational secrets exposed through inquiries give hostile states a narrative of lawless troops. Moscow, Tehran and Beijing do not need to discredit British special forces. Westminster is doing it for them. The asymmetry at the heart of this legislation is not incidental. It is structural. IRA members were released under the Good Friday Agreement. Many destroyed evidence, stayed silent, or received letters guaranteeing they would not be pursued. Soldiers kept records, gave statements, and remained traceable. Decades later, only one group remains available for scrutiny. Not because they are more culpable, but because they are more reachable. The Coagh ambush of June 1991 illustrates the logic perfectly. Three IRA men were stopped by the SAS on their way to murder someone. A coroner ruled the force used was justified. Years later a family challenged that ruling, arguing the soldier should have paused after each shot to consider whether to fire the next one. A judge described that argument as ludicrous and utterly divorced from reality. The challenge continues, funded by legal aid, heard at the Court of Appeal just days ago. No verdict ends the process. The process is the punishment. Keir Starmer has said publicly he is absolutely confident there will be no vexatious prosecutions. Three soldiers will be in a Belfast court in sixteen days. His confidence has not reached them. The government insists its bill provides robust protections for veterans. General Sir Nick Parker, who oversaw the final operations in Northern Ireland, says ministers do not understand the duty of the state to stand by those who serve it. The duty to stand by those who serve is contractual, not sentimental. A soldier who follows orders in a war the state authorised cannot later be offered up as payment for political convenience. What is being constructed here is not a legacy process. It is a permanent legal industry, sustained by public money, targeting the most traceable participants in a conflict the state itself waged. The soldiers kept their records. That is now their liability. A serious country does not behave this way. This one, apparently, does. "Keir Starmer has said publicly he is absolutely confident there will be no vexatious prosecutions. Three soldiers will be in a Belfast court in sixteen days. His confidence has not reached them."

English
138
1.3K
3.5K
85.7K
Subversive Force
Subversive Force@sirwg202110·
Meet "Melissa" Harker. Your Green Party candidate for Bridges Ward, Gateshead. And the Co-chair of the LGBTIQA+ Greens.
English
106
45
115
23.2K
Coinholio retweetledi
Vivid.🇮🇱
Vivid.🇮🇱@VividProwess·
🚨BREAKING: PRESIDENT TRUMP threatens the Islamic terror regime in Iran: “Open the Fuckin’ Strait you crazy bastards, or you’ll be living in Hell - JUST WATCH!” It’s going down.
Vivid.🇮🇱 tweet media
English
130
263
1.5K
32.3K
Coinholio
Coinholio@Coinholio·
@ThePosieParker He probably had his islamist nut job mates send threatening letters to him to justify all this security.
English
0
0
3
28
Kellie-Jay Keen
Kellie-Jay Keen@ThePosieParker·
Sadiq’s security is £3.6million a year!! wtf
Sean Russell@sean_russe76226

@ThePosieParker It appears Sadiq Khans security is £3.6m p.a. He has a £300,000 RRover that is bombproof. He is the 3rd most protected person in the country and surrounded by 3 armed guards most of the time.

English
217
1.3K
2.8K
35.3K
Coinholio
Coinholio@Coinholio·
@HumzaYousaf Just a hunch, why are there very few Christians left in Bethlehem since your lot of barbarians took control. x.com/LizaRosen0000/…
Liza Rosen@LizaRosen0000

t.co/LWHtzVSKaH Watch: Benjamin Netanyahu stunned the UN: “When Bethlehem, the birthplace of Jesus, was under Israeli control, 80% of residents were Christian. Under the Palestinian Authority, that number collapsed to under 20%.” This is not theory. This is the result of their rule. And these are the people the world is told to reward with a state.

English
1
8
112
1.9K
Leo Varadkar
Leo Varadkar@LeoVaradkar·
Interesting article by an Irish journalist who recently visited Cuba. I like Kneecap, admire their advocacy for Irish unity and the Irish language. I publicly supported them when they faced ridiculous terrorism charges. Loved the movie. But their decision not to speak up for human rights or democracy while in Cuba, even for artists censored and imprisoned there, was a lost opportunity to speak truth to power and do some good
TheJournal.ie@thejournal_ie

Kneecap in Cuba: Was it an act of protest or propaganda? Hannah McCarthy visits Cuba to find out... jrnl.ie/7000484

English
48
38
686
593.1K
Coinholio retweetledi
Ofer Binshtok - Kafir - עופר בינשטוק
Why do you think Islam will not slaughter you, just as it has slaughtered the nations it reached and wiped out every trace of them in the 1400 years since its inception? What makes you so special that you think it will not happen to you?
English
51
539
2.2K
21.7K
Coinholio retweetledi
Liza Rosen
Liza Rosen@LizaRosen0000·
t.co/LWHtzVSKaH Watch: Benjamin Netanyahu stunned the UN: “When Bethlehem, the birthplace of Jesus, was under Israeli control, 80% of residents were Christian. Under the Palestinian Authority, that number collapsed to under 20%.” This is not theory. This is the result of their rule. And these are the people the world is told to reward with a state.
English
16
526
1.6K
19.9K
Coinholio retweetledi
Samantha Smith
Samantha Smith@SamanthaTaghoy·
The Head of the Grooming Gangs Inquiry says they will investigate public figures who were complicit in the scandal. Alright then. Let’s make it easier for them: 𝗞𝗲𝗶𝗿 𝗦𝘁𝗮𝗿𝗺𝗲𝗿 Called protestors of Pakistani-Muslim grooming gangs “far-Right bandwagon jumpers”, refused a national inquiry until he was forced to backtrack, oversaw the failure to prosecute offenders as head of the Crown Prosecution Service etc. 𝗝𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗣𝗵𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗽𝘀 Voted against a national inquiry, ignored council requests to meet, watered down the Gov’s “local enquiries” until they were scrapped altogether, accused victims of being far-Right, downplayed the severity and scale of abuse, repeatedly denied and shut out victims from speaking out 𝗦𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗾 𝗞𝗵𝗮𝗻 Repeatedly denied the existence of grooming gangs in London, claimed there were “no reported cases and also no indication”, voted down proposals for an inquiry into Pakistani-Muslim grooming gangs in London, took away 4.5 million in funding for the inquiry 𝗦𝗵𝗮𝘂𝗻 𝗗𝗮𝘃𝗶𝗲𝘀 𝗠𝗣 Labour MP and former Leader of Telford and Wrekin Council, oversaw the fallout of the Telford scandal, downplayed the severity and scale of CSE in Telford, attempted to block an independent inquiry, voted against a national inquiry, protected Cabinet members who played an active role in the scandal (eg. Cabinet Member who said that girls’ claims were “made up on the back of a fag packet”) 𝗔𝗻𝗱𝘆 𝗕𝘂𝗿𝗻𝗵𝗮𝗺 Refused to launch an independent inquiry into grooming gangs in Greater Manchester, despite victims’ testimony and police whistleblowers confirming widespread cover-ups 𝗡𝗮𝘇 𝗦𝗵𝗮𝗵 Labour MP who told victims of grooming gangs to “shut their mouths for the good of diversity”, trivialising and silencing abuse survivors 𝗟𝘂𝗰𝘆 𝗣𝗼𝘄𝗲𝗹𝗹 Called Pakistani-Muslim grooming gangs a “far-Right dog whistle” and a “trumpet” that is used to unfairly smear Labour, accused victims of being far-Right and exaggerating their abuse 𝗕𝗮𝗿𝗼𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗔𝘆𝗲𝘀𝗵𝗮 𝗛𝗮𝘇𝗮𝗿𝗮𝗸𝗶 Laughed about the mass rape of little girls by Pakistani-Muslim grooming gangs, joked that every Pakistani person is accused of being a groomer, claimed to instigate grooming gang conspiracies Oh, and every single councillor, police officer, social worker, sexual health clinic staff member, and other official who silenced, vilified or turned a blind eye to the systemic abuse of little British girls. Who else?
English
358
5.1K
15.6K
155K
Coinholio retweetledi
Subversive Force
Subversive Force@sirwg202110·
🚨 FEMALE MUSLIMS FLYING JIHADIST FLAGS IN LONDON THIS AFTERNOON 🧵 I don’t want to hear again from the Mayor of London about how tough it is to be a Muslim in Britain or from Muslim orgs claiming women are "on edge". People flying these flags are calling for violence. This was at the segregated protest outside the Jordanian Embassy where armies of the Ummah were called upon.🧵1/
English
196
1.8K
6.1K
200.3K