Colin Bennett

1.6K posts

Colin Bennett banner
Colin Bennett

Colin Bennett

@ColinBennett0

Privacy and surveillance author, researcher, teacher, advocate and policy wonk (not necessarily in that order)

University of Victoria, Canada Katılım Ocak 2013
255 Takip Edilen1.4K Takipçiler
Colin Bennett retweetledi
LBC
LBC@LBC·
"If you're at work, do it now and see what happens..." James O'Brien has a challenge for anyone that doesn't think Elon Musk performed a Nazi salute at the inauguration.
English
2K
1.6K
6.4K
704.5K
Colin Bennett retweetledi
The Hill Times
The Hill Times@TheHillTimes·
Despite growing tensions in the House of Commons, the Liberals, Tories, and NDP filed identical arguments on Oct. 9 in an ongoing legal saga over the use of voters' personal data. #cdnpoli buff.ly/4hsFrbj
English
0
1
2
811
Colin Bennett
Colin Bennett@ColinBennett0·
Just want to say that I missed my late colleague Norman Ruff of @uvicpoli during the #BCelection2024 Nobody on any channel IMHO equalled Norman's unparalleled knowledge and analytical abilities
English
0
0
0
363
Colin Bennett retweetledi
OPC
OPC@PrivacyPrivee·
Statement by the Privacy Commissioner following release of committee report on the federal government’s use of technological tools capable of extracting personal data from mobile devices and computers. priv.gc.ca/en/opc-news/sp…
OPC tweet media
English
1
5
6
774
Colin Bennett retweetledi
David T.S. Fraser
David T.S. Fraser@privacylawyer·
An overview of the digital bills currently pending before the Canadian Parliament, at risk of falling off the order paper if the current government is defeated or prorogues Parliament. youtu.be/xfyCls97uwE
YouTube video
YouTube
English
2
6
11
2.1K
Colin Bennett
Colin Bennett@ColinBennett0·
Proud to have worked on new @coe guidelines on privacy and voter authentication/ registration. Critical as more and more countries introduce biometrics into elections. coe.int/en/web/portal/…
English
0
4
5
543
Colin Bennett retweetledi
Senator Colin Deacon 🇨🇦🇺🇦
A highly consequential BC court decision, more than a year in the making, just came down: “The ability of an individual to control their personal information is intimately connected to their individual autonomy, dignity and privacy. These fundamental values lie at the heart of democracy”. This is the all-important decision of B.C. Supreme Court Justice Gordon Weatherill. What’s its genesis? Simply, whether our federal political parties are able to gather and use your private information as they choose, and whether they should be accountable if they are responsible for a data breach. The federal Liberals, Conservatives and NDP, at this time when partisan polarization is at its worst, agree that they should not. Last June, some of us in the Senate were troubled by this fact. It wasn’t easy to find. The very last page in the Budget 2023 Implementation Act included an amendment to the Elections Canada Act (lnkd.in/es4k9jFt). It sounded innocuous enough, introducing what seemed to be a reasonable amendment to the Canada Elections Act, the stated purpose being: “…to provide for a national, uniform, exclusive and complete regime applicable to registered parties and eligible parties respecting their collection, use, disclosure, retention and disposal of personal information.” If you are interested, have a look at my 2nd Reading speech (lnkd.in/et4NYXSw), Senator Scott Tannas’ Amendment (lnkd.in/eVrzrcJZ), and my speech in support of that Amendment (lnkd.in/e4zrqJ-D). At the time, I was troubled that a budget bill was being used to change the Canada Elections Act. This challenges the long-standing practice of openly debating these changes in Parliament and, arguably, set a troubling precedent. The other point of concern was that there is no national, uniform and complete privacy regime governing how federal political parties currently collect, use, disclose, retain and dispose of personal information. Much more recently, the Government has introduced Bill C-65, but it provides few protections (lnkd.in/emvUDd4J). What I can’t understand is why the Liberals and NDP agreed to the amendments in C-47 and, apparently, to those in C-65? Simply, using baseball analogies, the Conservatives are in the major leagues when it comes to gathering and using personal information to target their messaging to voters. Liberals might be playing single A ball, but the NDP are very much in the minor leagues. Regardless, Justice Weatherill captured the underlying problem: “The rapid advancement of technological tools allowing for the harvesting of private information for the purpose of profiling and micro-targeting voters has created risks of misuse of personal information… The Parliament of Canada has not yet taken any significant action. The Legislature of the British Columbia has.” Well done BC!! #PrivacyMatters
The Globe and Mail@globeandmail

Federal political parties lose bid to keep tight hold on voter information in B.C. court ruling theglobeandmail.com/canada/article…

English
5
7
12
1.7K
Colin Bennett retweetledi
EFF
EFF@EFF·
When you join EFF, not only can you get a gift to show our thanks, you also get to know you're supporting the leading nonprofit defending your rights on the internet. eff.org/join
English
2
11
38
9.1K