Computational Wu Wei

@GearlessRoe not (technically speaking) the best way, the trajectory of the bullet it's not ideal, better to incline about 45 degrees in order to point directly to the brain Now, if you don't pull the trigger, we can study the geometry deeply. At some point 🧠 will shut off anyway, no rush

Is it fiduciary if you sell the tools of silence? Is the use of the tool a fiduciary act? Will I enact honesty, loyalty, and care?

@mommaleo Lì dentro c'è weed, vero? Gesù ti prego fa sì che almeno questa volta le aspettative incontrino la realtà 🙏🏻

Come on…

@ProofofMaro È solo la vostra mente dissociata dalla realtà che vi trae in inganno per mezzo delle percezioni. La mente che vede oggetti lavora per categorie kantiane e similitudini, aumentando lo scarto nella traduzione.

“Why does every AI generated girl look like you? Does that make me the best prompt engineer?” -Pops

@QuantumTumbler @digijordan Tool artifacts are ancient totems from aliens to hide the truth! Me smash, me knows! No fool me secret gov control clouds. Me scream at clouds! me power!

Me see first TV picture of big sky-ball from space. TIROS-1 make it long time ago, April 1, 1960. Ugh! Now big fire-bird Artemis II go zoom to moon on April 1, 2026. Ooga! April 1 always fool day. NASA do crazy old rituals like dumb caveman dance. What big meaning? Me brain hurt... Hmmm... trick? Or moon god laugh?

The first television image of Earth from space, was taken by the TIROS-1 on April 1, 1960. Artemis II is blasting off towards the moon on April 1, 2026. April 1st is April Fools Day. NASA loves rituals. What’s the meaning here…?

@QuanticASI nothing, because there is no such a thing. What Santa dreams? Nothing, there is no Santa, if you are jot a kid anymore, if you still a kid: welcome to the real world 🤗

what does an omniscient being dream about?

It’s a system that remembers the past, but not in the visible state Imagine a crowd moving in a square. Each person has memory (experiences, habits), if you look from above, you only see chaos . It is a non-Markovian system, but observed through an almost Markovian variable.

@HedgehogCabin @metafuel The cat and the boar

Nothing to do with hedgehogs, and I can't even credit the owner as it was sent to me unnamed so long ago. But it's a clip I often look at when I need to smile and warm my heart, so thought it might cheer you too and provide a little sunshine on a cloudy day. The cat and the bird, who have clearly never read any books about how their species are supposed to interact, sweetly playing. And this darling little dog, "Photo me, Mummy, photo me!"😍

@msiyasmsi Visually impressive, less informative but it's usually a trade-off

@QuantumTumbler that is also why I uave several silkie chicken. brief list of good reasons: 1. they are free to shit while roaming around free, shit is important. 2. eggs 3. meat 4. I prefer to kill my roosters respecring every part, at least I know the had the best life (free, no cages)

Reminder to eat your eggs today 🍳 Nature really just said “Here’s a compact protein package, full of nutrients, easy to cook, and works any time of day.” And people still skip it. Breakfast, lunch, dinner doesn’t matter. Scrambled, fried, boiled pick your move. Simple food. High signal. Eat your eggs. 🥚💪

@QuantumTumbler @beffjezos Hai ragione, è il modo più onesto di proseguire. Semplice, misurabile, riproducibile, falsificabile. Però bisogna guardare per dire se è vero o no. Più persone guardano, meglio è.

Respect building is what matters. If you’ve got something real, keep it simple → what’s the setup → what’s the measurable output → what can someone else replicate No need to over-label it upfront. ‘More advanced than X’ doesn’t mean much without constraints and results. If it survives independent testing, people will pay attention. Until then, it’s just a model.

We're going to need a whole new schooling system. An online learning AI can have a theory of mind for each student and do perfect curriculum fine-tuning. This will be a way for human brains to distill some of the intelligence of big models. Who's building this?

@ElenaRae644820 Sono d'accordo su tutto ma sarebbe interessante approfondire questo concetto: la pace interiore non come oggetto da conquistare ma come continuo processo di decostruzione ed integrazione che mantiene la tensione, accettare la perturbazione rende possibile l'allineamento.

The human mind has the potential to know, in each moment, what course of action to take. Confusion is not the default state. It is a signal of fragmentation. At its highest level, the mind is an orientation system — continuously integrating information, prioritising what matters, and guiding action in real time. But this level of clarity requires something rare: A mind that is coherent enough to hold complexity, while remaining receptive to the body’s signals, and responsive enough to act without hesitation. Most people have parts of this — but not all of it, at once. Either there is insight without action, or action without attunement, or sensitivity without stability. True intelligence is the integration of all three: clarity, listening, and timely execution. This is internal synchronisation. And it is where human potential begins — because everything you can achieve emerges from the quality of coordination within you.

@QuantumTumbler @beffjezos Let's build then! I am building already, but there is so much to explore :) maybe if you have an email i could send you an abstract with runs and measurements. It's more advanced than ALife, Friston with no inference, SOC-like.

@Computatio42241 @beffjezos Yeah that part’s real. But proximity in ideas only matters if it turns into action. You can have people ‘close’ conceptually across the world, but if nothing gets built, tested, or realized, it stays abstract. The internet connects minds. Reality filters what actually works.

@DIYDisclosure And something magical happen in december.... you must be talking about Santa!

@Computatio42241 The handsome and fit old man from the Sistine Chapel ceiling? There's a best-selling book about him

We need a prequel about what God was doing before creation; that’s a lot of eternity to just skip over

@kekmaximusk Questo è un paradosso. Consigliare di non dare consigli non richiesti senza che sia stato richiesto. Allora rilancio con questo: Per fare le cose bene, bisogna fare bene le cose.

never volunteer advice only provide it when asked

@GearlessRoe Se il modello interno è fossilizzato e alla deriva, il linguaggio non riesce più a creare una relazione di condivisione, la tensione si accumula, la comunicazione di senso, cessa. È frustrante più per te che per loro,a capire il perché può aiutarti ad accettarlo.

@Computatio42241 Yeah I'm down. Coherent and honest is all I offer. Everything else is strategy and sleep deprivation. 😆

I will die being the only one to see my vision. I will remain the outlier. I will forever disagree with the entire world. Your words are not new. You are not special. You are an echo from the beginning of time. You are misaligned.

@msiyasmsi Interesting!

@QuantumTumbler @ElenaRae644820 That is exactly what my model can do. It's a change of paradigma

Yeah I agree with the direction, but I’d frame it a little differently. Technology isn’t what harmed the system… misaligned use of it did. And now you’re seeing the shift people building with the constraints instead of against them. That’s the real tipping point. Not just more tech, but better-aligned tech. When it actually works with reality, the ‘healing’ part isn’t some separate goal… it’s just a byproduct of doing it right.

This is what real innovation actually looks like. Not hype. Not buzzwords. Just people running into constraints and figuring something out that actually works. What Solugen did isn’t magic. They didn’t invent some brand new law of nature. They took biology and chemistry two things that already worked and combined them in a way that holds up in the real world. That’s the part people skip over. Higher yield, less waste, smaller footprint… that’s not storytelling. That’s what happens when the system is aligned with reality instead of fighting it. And the origin is the best part. This came out of cancer research. An obscure enzyme pathway. Then someone else looking at industrial peroxide production. Those two threads connect, and suddenly you’ve got a completely different way to manufacture chemicals. That’s how breakthroughs actually happen. Not by staying in your lane, but by noticing where two lanes quietly intersect. And if you zoom out, this isn’t just about chemicals. It’s a shift in how things get built. The old model was brute force fossil inputs, massive plants, scale everything and deal with the inefficiencies later. This new model is different. It’s smaller, more modular, more intentional. You design the system correctly upfront instead of trying to control it after the fact. You’re starting to see the same pattern everywhere. AI, biology, robotics… it’s not about one field “winning,” it’s about what happens when they start overlapping. That’s where things get interesting. Because the real advantage isn’t being the best in one domain anymore. It’s being able to connect domains in a way that still works when you take it out of theory and put it into the real world. That’s the filter. If it works in reality, it scales. If it doesn’t, it was just a good story. youtu.be/PCypBUVhff8?si…

Il linguaggio comunicativo è un'interfaccia dissipativa tra fue sistemi non isomorfi.