Constitutional Court

(5/5) CCT 60/25 GD v Minister of Home Affairs and Others

(4/5) In circumstances of unconstitutionally, what would constitute a just and equitable remedy under section 172(1)(b) of the Constitution?

(1/5) Hearing on Tuesday, 26 May 2026 at 10h00: Is section 7(7)(c) of the Divorce Act 70 of 1979 inconsistent with section 9 of the Constitution and therefore invalid and unconstitutional?

(3/3) CCT 270/24 South African Hunters and Game Conservation Association v Speaker of the National Assembly and Others

(2/3) Whether the NEMLA Act should be declared unconstitutional and invalid due to the alleged shortcomings by Parliament during the public participation process?

(1/3) Hearing on Tuesday, 26 May 2026 at 11h30: Whether the National Council of Provinces failed to facilitate meaningful public participation during the legislative process for the National Environmental Management Laws Amendment Act 2 of 2022 (NEMLA Act)?

(3/3) CCT 151/25 Wamjay Holdings Investments (Pty) Limited v Auckland Park Theological Seminary

(2/3) If the claim has not prescribed, is Wamjay entitled to reclaim its payment of R6.5 million to Auckland Park Theological Seminary on the basis that this constituted unjustified enrichment?

(1/3) Hearing on 21 May 2026 at 10h00: Has Wamjay’s unjustified enrichment claim against Auckland Park Theological Seminary prescribed in terms of the Prescription Act 68 of 1969?

(5/5) CCT 240/24 Solidarity Trade Union and Others v Minister of Health and Others

(1/5) Judgment on 18 May 2026 at 09h00: Sections 36 to 40 of the National Health Act 61 of 2003 are unconstitutional and are consequently severed from the Act.

CCT 117/24 Centaur Mining South Africa (Pty) Limited v Sivaluchmee Moodliar N.O. and Others

(1/4) Judgment on Monday, 18 May 2026 at 9h00: Section 20(9) is supplemental to the common law and not substitutive. A liquidation order would not be appropriate under section 20(9)(b).