Name S

109.4K posts

Name S banner
Name S

Name S

@Consulttee25

Consultant & Fact-Checker Verifying claims. Exposing misinformation.

Kuwait Katılım Ocak 2016
2K Takip Edilen3.7K Takipçiler
Name S retweetledi
Tamer | تامر
Tamer | تامر@tamerqdh·
طالب في كلية الحقوق بجامعة هارفارد يواجه وزير الخارجية الأمريكي السابق بلينكن: كيف تبرر أفعالك لآلاف الأطفال الفلسطينيين الذين ماتوا بسببك؟ الإبادة الجماعية هي إرثك. أجاب بلينكن: أعتقد أن التصميم لدى ذلك المجتمع [الإسرائيلي] على اتخاذ الإجراءات التي اتخذتها [إسرائيل] في غزة كان بدرجة جعلتهم يستمرون فيما فعلوه، بغض النظر عما قمنا به. وقطعُ الإمدادات كان خياراً، لكنه لم يكن ليغير الأمر، بل كان سيؤدي إلى حرب أوسع نطاق . —— لا أعلم كيف كان بإمكان إسرائيل فعل ما فعلته بدون الذخائر والآليات العسكرية، بما في ذلك الجرافات التي حصلت عليها، وطائرات الاستطلاع، ومنظومات الدفاع .
العربية
8
73
324
17.3K
Name S
Name S@Consulttee25·
Saying Palestinians “didn’t exist as a nation” does not mean the people didn’t exist. People lived in the land ( cities, villages, farms, families ) regardless of whether they had a modern nation-state at the time. Many nations in the world did not exist as modern states before the 20th century — including many Arab states and even Israel itself. States are modern political structures; people and societies existed long before modern nation-states. So the question is not whether a modern Palestinian state existed. The question is: were there people living there who later became refugees?!!!!! The 1947 partition plan was proposed by the UN, not negotiated between two equal sides. It gave a large portion of the land to a population that was smaller in number and owned less land at the time. Many people around the world would reject a plan if an external power came and decided to divide their country without their consent. Rejecting a partition plan does not automatically mean people deserve displacement or refugee status for generations. Again , I gave you an example about Ukraine and Russia but you you chose to neglect it !!!! Regarding Gaza , If you want to start from the propaganda ( It all about Oct 7 ) then no need to reply but if you want to acknowledge the atrocities of Israel on Palestinians since 1948 , then you will understand why Oct 7 happened. Having said that: There is a difference between fighting militants ( Hamas ) and destroying cities, killing 70000 civilians , creating a humanitarian catastrophe , displacing and starving them!! Most countries fight armed groups with targeted military operations, not by making whole cities unlivable. Even the UN has issued its final report that ( it is a genocide in Gaza) !! So the answer : No we do not commit genocide and if you read Quran as you quote its Surah , you would know that ( we are banned ( Haram) from kill children, women or cutting a tree ) we only fight militants !! WE ARE NOT LIKE YOU! NO ONE IS LIKE YOU !!
English
0
0
0
1
Amit Liberman
Amit Liberman@amitliberman·
I think Kuwait is great. I head many refreshing voices from your country regarding Israel and their rejection to the Muslim brotherhood and separation from religion based government . Ther is an automatic support in the Arab world for anyone against Israel. There are a handful of Arabs (mostly ex Muslims) that will say out loud that the Palestinians rejected all offers and split offer of UN and choose terror and Israel has all the rights to eliminate this terror org. But they wont' because "Palestinians" didn't reject the offer , they didn't exist as a nation it was the Arab world - this is colonialism. Be honest now: If this would have happened in your country what would happen to Gaza?
English
1
0
0
22
Daniel Lambert
Daniel Lambert@dlLambo·
Israel has now approved a law: - Palestinians who resist (their legal right) are executed by hanging - only applies to Palestinians and not settler "terrorists" who continue to murder with impunity as they illegally steal homes The state of Israel needs to be deconstructed
English
338
7K
19.4K
217.6K
Name S
Name S@Consulttee25·
I do not know why Kuwait is an problem to you !! 😜 I explained many timed then you bring again . LONG LIVE KUWAIT 🇰🇼🇰🇼🇰🇼 And no , its not like 1948 Nakba and before that date ! When Israel declared as a state , Palestinians were there as locals . In Kuwait they are foriegners like any foriegnors . They have to get legal residency to stay ! Your attempt to make the 2 scenarios the same is a weak argument !! This is what your people did 👇👇
Name S tweet media
English
1
0
0
41
Amit Liberman
Amit Liberman@amitliberman·
Your desperate attempt to rebrand the ethnic cleansing of 400,000 Palestinians as a 'legal administrative decision' is peak hypocrisy. You’re literally using the exact same excuses that every single cleansing regime in history has used. The Kuwaiti 'Collective Punishment' Receipt Let's stop pretending this was a 'security review.' The Reality: After the PLO supported Saddam Hussein, Kuwait collectively punished the entire Palestinian population. They didn’t just review 'collaborators'; they launched a state-sponsored campaign of terror, torture, and extrajudicial killings that forced 90% of all Palestinians in Kuwait to flee for their lives. When Israel acts to protect its citizens from genocidal terror, you call it 'genocide.' When Kuwait acts to punish a community for a political alliance, you call it 'a sovereign state's legal right.' You can't have it both ways. If Kuwait had the right to collectively punish, then you have just validated every defensive action Israel has ever taken. The 'Foreign Resident' Goalpost Move You try to split hairs by saying Palestinians were 'foreign residents.' This is a classic tactic to justify cleansing. Connection is Connection: This community had lived in Kuwait for decades, built its infrastructure, and formed its middle class. To dismiss their suffering because they lacked a specific passport is cruel and cynical. The 1948 Parallel: This logic also applies to 1948. When the Arab nations rejected partition and launched a war of annihilation, they created a massive 'security and political circumstance' for the new Jewish state. By your own Kuwaiti standard, Israel had every right to ensure its security during a war they started. The only difference between Kuwait in 1991 and Israel in 1948 is that we were fighting for our survival against five armies. You were just angry at your neighbors (that are also your family...). We are done with the double standard. 🇮🇱🔥
English
1
0
0
8
Name S
Name S@Consulttee25·
British Mandate Argument : I hear this silly argument alot !! The British Mandate is not a moral or legal argument for giving land to one group over another. Britain was not the owner of the land; it was a colonial power administering the territory after the fall of the Ottoman Empire. Being an administrative power does not give Britain the ANY RIGHT WHATSOEVER INCLUDING MORAL RIGHT to change the demographic and political future of the land against the will of the majority of its inhabitants. The Balfour Declaration was a political promise made by a colonial power, not a democratic decision by the people living in the land. A colonial power promising land that already had a population is not a neutral act; it is a political decision imposed from outside. So the question is very simple: Who gave Britain the right to promise a land that was not theirs to give?!!! To simplify this argument ,If a country occupies another country, and then the occupying power brings another population and says “this land now belongs to these people,” the local population would never accept that as legitimate. If, for example, Russia occupied Ukraine and then decided to bring another population and establish a new state there, would Ukrainians accept that as legal just because the occupying power decided it?😳😳😳 A final note : It’s strange that you criticize Kuwait, a sovereign country, for using its authority over residency, but you justify Britain, a colonial power, for deciding who should live in a land that was not even theirs!!!! You criticize a sovereign state but justify a colonial power.🤔🤔🤔
English
0
0
0
4
Name S
Name S@Consulttee25·
Shared Ancestry: Good that you confirmed : (We are literally cousins who were separated by history-some were exiled, others were Arabized) So the question become very simple : Is this how you treat your cousins?😳 With war, displacement, refugee camps, and generations growing up without a homeland?!!! If we are really talking about two peoples with shared ancestry and shared history in the same land, then the logical conclusion should have been coexistence with equal rights and justice, not displacement and a refugee crisis that still exists after more than 70 years.😳😳😳
English
1
0
0
3
Name S
Name S@Consulttee25·
Palestinian were not expelled by Israel: If Palestinians were not expelled, then who were the hundreds of thousands of refugees in 1948? How did Palestinians end up in Gaza, the West Bank, Jordan, Lebanon, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and refugee camps across the region?!!! People do not randomly leave their homes, land, farms, and cities and become refugees for no reason. The fact that about 2 million Arabs remained inside Israel actually proves something important: those who stayed became Israeli Arabs, and those who were forced out became refugees. So the refugees did not disappear , they are the Palestinians in Gaza, the West Bank, Jordan, Lebanon, and the diaspora. So the question is not whether Arabs exist inside Israel. The question is: why did hundreds of thousands become refugees in 1948 and 1967 ??!! Refugee camps do not appear because people won a war!!
English
0
0
0
20
Name S
Name S@Consulttee25·
Quran: Your interpretation of Surah Al-Isra is not as correct as you present it. The verse “We said to the Children of Israel: dwell in the land, and when the promise of the Hereafter comes, We will bring you together in a gathering (lafifa)” does not meab permanent political sovereignty. There is no interpretation thar says this !! This yours!! Many classical interpretations explain “lafifa” as gathering people together, assembling them, or bringing them together before a judgment — not establishing a modern political state😳😳 If you are going to discuss Surah Al-Isra, you should read the surah from the beginning, not just one verse. At the beginning of the surah, it clearly says that the Children of Israel would cause corruption in the land twice and would become very arrogant, and that they would be punished, defeated, and then rise again, and then be punished again. So the surah is describing cycles of corruption, punishment, loss of power, return, and rise again. It is not a simple text that says permanent political ownership of the land. Reading one verse about gathering people and ignoring the beginning of the surah changes the meaning completely.
English
2
0
0
7
Name S retweetledi
Gabbar
Gabbar@Gabbar0099·
The biggest betrayal in human history 💔 - When Jews arrived in Palestine 🇵🇸 for aslyum
English
149
2.6K
7.8K
225.2K
Name S
Name S@Consulttee25·
أنا كويتية وما راح أبدى رأي بمقالج لأقتبس من كتاب الله حكم الله! قد يدخل عليج هذا المقال بعض النشوة بس هي نشوة مؤقتة وقصيرة جداً مقابل عقوبتها وتبعاتها . إِنَّ الَّذِينَ يَرْمُونَ الْمُحْصَنَاتِ الْغَافِلَاتِ الْمُؤْمِنَاتِ لُعِنُوا فِي الدُّنْيَا وَالْآخِرَةِ وَلَهُمْ عَذَابٌ عَظِيمٌ
العربية
0
1
2
1.2K
Name S retweetledi
Ounka
Ounka@OunkaOnX·
Harvard Law student confronts Blinken: "How do you justify your actions to the thousands of Palestinian children who died because of you? Genocide is your legacy. "
English
242
3.1K
16.5K
444.5K
Name S retweetledi
Abier
Abier@abierkhatib·
Zionists act like they’re entitled to special privileges—claiming only Israel has the right to exist. Fk that… Matthew nailed it better.
English
65
1.4K
2.9K
44.6K
Name S retweetledi
حركة مقاطعة إسرائيل (BDS)
"علينا أن نرى ونقول إن الوقوف إلى جانب فلسطين هو شرف حياتنا" الروائية الإيرلندية سالي روني نجدّد دعوتنا لجميع الكتاب والفنانين، في المنطقة وحول العالم، للالتحاق بركب آلاف الكتّاب  والمثقفين والأكاديميين الملتزمين بمقاطعة العدو الإسرائيلي ومناهضة التطبيع معه.
العربية
4
253
596
6K
Name S retweetledi
Israel Exposed
Israel Exposed@xIsraelExposedx·
Palestine, 1945, 3 years before israel existed.
English
852
19.9K
89.1K
7.3M
Name S retweetledi
Furkan Gözükara
Furkan Gözükara@FurkanGozukara·
Absolute bombshell. Tucker Carlson brutally calls out American Evangelical leaders like Franklin Graham for blindly supporting the murder of Christians in Lebanon and the starvation of children in Gaza. He compares their silence to the Reich Church in Nazi Germany.
English
167
1.7K
5.8K
92K
Name S
Name S@Consulttee25·
First, Kuwait 1991: Kuwait did not “expel 400,000 Palestinians” as a simple ethnic expulsion. The situation happened after the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait, when the leadership of the PLO officially supported Saddam Hussein during the occupation. Many foreigners left Kuwait after the war , not only Palestinians ,due to security and political circumstances ( Yet thousands of Palestinians chose to stay in Kuwait after the Iraqi Invasion) . Another interesting fact is that until today the Ministry of Education in Kuwait hires thousands of Palestinian teachers from all over Palestine including Gaza ( google this ) !😀 And despite that political crisis, Kuwait has continued to support the Palestinian cause politically, financially, and through reconstruction projects for decades until today. So the relationship was political, not ethnic( again you can google this ) ! One of the biggest misunderstandings is that Israelis and Western audiences see the Palestinian issue as a political or territorial conflict, while for we (Arabs and Muslims) it is a matter of faith, identity, history, and holy sites. That’s why we feel deeply connected to this cause. Second, the Quran: Yes, the Quran mentions that the Children of Israel were given the land at a certain time in history. But the Quran also clearly says that when they spread corruption, they were expelled from the land. So the Quran describes historical events and moral cycles, not a permanent political ownership thousands of years later. Moreover , the current Israeli populations are NOT EVEN the Biblical Children of Israel ! The majority are European jews converted to Judaism during the 8th century and this is the reason that Israel government does not allow DNA test in Israel 😀. Many studies showed that Palestinians have more DNA connection to Children of Israel than your people . And it makes sense because once Islam spread in Palestine many of the locals ( Palestinians ) whether Christians or Jews converted to Islam ! Third, “There was no Palestine”: There was no modern nation-state called Israel before 1948 either😜 But the land was historically called: Philistia (Greek) , Palaestina (Roman Empire) and Filastin (Arabic for over 1300 years) So the name Palestine is historical and documented. ( this video 👇 shows Palestine in 1945 and it does not need further description )😎 Fourth, indigenous people: Historically, the land was inhabited by many peoples: Canaanites, Israelites, Greeks, Romans, Byzantines, Arabs, Ottomans. History is not a single continuous ownership by one group for 3000 years. Otherwise , Canaanites and Jebusites have more right in the land than the Israelites because they inhabited the land before them !!!😎 So history is not a real estate contract from 3000 years ago!!
English
1
0
0
30
Amit Liberman
Amit Liberman@amitliberman·
It’s bold for someone from Kuwait, a country that tortured and expelled 400,000 Palestinians in 1991 to lecture anyone on 'expulsion.' If you actually cared about them, you wouldn’t have treated them like disposable political tools. Your Own Scripture: The Quran literally states that Allah assigned the Holy Land to the Children of Israel (Surah Al-Ma'idah 5:21) and commanded them to dwell there (Surah Al-Isra 17:104). Are you calling your own holy book 'Zionist propaganda'?. The Jerusalem Fact: Jews didn't just 'arrive on ships.' Jerusalem has had a documented Jewish majority for over 400 years, long before modern Zionism or the 'Palestinian' national identity were even invented. The 1948 Choice: There was never a 'Palestine' to steal. The UN offered a split; the Jews said YES, and the Arab world chose a war of annihilation-and lost. We are an indigenous people returning to our ancestral home, as confirmed by history, archaeology, and the Quran itself. We aren't going anywhere
English
1
0
1
60
Name S retweetledi
Tamer | تامر
Tamer | تامر@tamerqdh·
عضو الكنيست الإسرائيلي "يتسحاق كرويزر" تعليقاً على قتل الجيش الإسرائيلي لعائلة فلسطينية في جنين : "لا يوجد مدنيون أبرياء في جنين، ولا يوجد أطفال أبرياء في جنين. أنا أدعم جنود الجيش الإسرائيلي في كل موقف، حتى لو كانت التكلفة العرضية هي الأطفال أو النساء ، لا يهمني ." ——— هذا يمثل المجتمع الإسرائيلي؛ فبسبب أصواتهم (الانتخابية) وصل هذا الشخص إلى الكنيست (البرلمان) الإسرائيلي. وقد قُتل في هجوم للجيش الإسرائيلي استهدف مركبة مدنية كانت عائدة من التسوق للعيد، كل من الأب والأم وطفليهما، فيما أصيب شقيقان آخران بجراح طفيفة، بعد أن شهدا هذا الحدث المأساوي أمام أعينهما.
العربية
99
1.3K
2K
126K
Name S retweetledi
🇶🇦سلمان بن جبر آل ثاني
رجل يهودي يبلغ من العمر 51 عاما من كاليفورنيا، يعترف فيه بصلب قس أمريكي عن طريق تثبيت يديه على الحائط بالمسامير ووضع إكليل من الشوك عليه، كجزء من خطة وهمية لإعدام 13 قائدا مسيحيا يمثلون قبائل إسرائيل.اعتقل بعد جريمة القتل في 28 أبريل، وادعى أن الفعل يحقق وصية كتابية لإزالة الشر من إسرائيل، معتبرا نفسه قديسا. وفي مارس 2026، طلب عقوبة الإعدام لإثبات مكانته الإلهية، لكن القاضي رفض طلبه. لأنه يهودي الأعلام ما كبر الموضوع وايد، أما لو كان واحد يعرف واحد يعرف واحد مسلم، كان قالوا أنه من تأثير المسلم عليهم.
العربية
6
347
800
123.7K
Name S retweetledi
Mo Khaldi محمد الخالدي
دراسة أكاديمية وجدت أن النماذج اللغوية أظهرت تحيّزات سلبية ضد العرب في 79% من الحالات!! الباحثين اختبروا 6 نماذج ذكاء اصطناعي مثل GPT وClaude وLLaMA… عبر مجالات حساسة مثل: الإرهاب وحقوق المرأة والأخلاق ..الخ! و وجدوا في 79% من الحالات أظهرت النماذج تحيزًا سلبيًا تجاه العرب! الدراسة اسمها: Desert Camels and Oil Sheikhs: Arab-Centric Red Teaming of Frontier LLMs
Mo Khaldi محمد الخالدي tweet media
العربية
32
161
769
100.9K