Angel Parikh

58.9K posts

Angel Parikh banner
Angel Parikh

Angel Parikh

@ContextMatters4

Interests are Economics | Geo-Politics | Trader/Investor, Trading tweets/RTs r for Educational Purpose, Some tweets r Self-conversation

India Katılım Ocak 2014
1.1K Takip Edilen5.9K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Angel Parikh
Angel Parikh@ContextMatters4·
@chartideas6 @stockmitra @vish107 @ap_pune @contrarianEPS @WeekendInvestng @Tradersschoice @hvgoenka @nooreshtech @Ajaya_buddy @AvinashGoraksha @P_diwan @porinju @iamrakeshbansal @entrepreneur987 @PratinGandhi @Iamsamirarora @ToshniwalEquity Enough money is there in markets. Not saying I am having everyday green but if u try, u can have it. Debate may not help anyone achieve that but keeping ur greed in check may. I am going to work on 15% weekly. I dont mind failing but first need to try than questioning.
English
18
5
129
0
Angel Parikh retweetledi
Macro Liquidity by Sunil Reddy
In 1967, Indira Gandhi appealed to Indians: “Don’t buy Gold.” The reason was that India’s foreign exchange position was under stress, imports were becoming difficult, and the currency system needed people to show “national discipline.” But what followed? One of the biggest Gold bull markets in history. From the late 1960s to 1980, Gold exploded higher globally, and in rupee terms the move was even more brutal. This is the real lesson: When governments tell citizens not to buy Gold, they are usually not worried about your jewellery. They are worried about pressure on the currency, pressure on reserves, and pressure on the financial system. Gold doesn’t become important when everything is normal. Gold becomes important when the system starts asking you not to buy it.
Macro Liquidity by Sunil Reddy tweet media
English
80
432
1.6K
228.4K
Angel Parikh retweetledi
The Kobeissi Letter
The Kobeissi Letter@KobeissiLetter·
BREAKING: Iran has warned it could enrich uranium to 90% purity if attacked again by the US or Israel. 90% enrichment is widely considered weapons-grade uranium.
English
471
565
5.2K
396.3K
Angel Parikh retweetledi
Alternative News
Alternative News@AlternatNews·
In chess, Zugzwang (from German: “compulsion to move”) is the term for a situation where every possible move you can make worsens your position, but you are forced to move anyway because it’s your turn. Trump is in such a situation. He can flatten Iran, but Iran would destroy the power plants of Israel in turn. Trump can destroy the Iranian oil infrastructure, and Iran would damage UAE and others. Trump can send in 16,000 marines, but Iran would send 160,000 with ten thousands of the drones that kill soldiers in Ukraine. Zugzwang indeed. If you can think of a way out, please reply.
Alternative News tweet mediaAlternative News tweet media
Alternative News@AlternatNews

The problem is in the mirror. Trump cannot look into it and see a man who is losing. The Strait of Hormuz will remain closed for exactly as long as it takes for reality to hollow out that particular psychological defence.

English
16
42
90
3.8K
Angel Parikh retweetledi
Joumanna Nasr Bercetche
Why are oil prices not higher ? Via Morgan Stanley's Martijn Rats & team 1) market had significant buffers before the start of the war 2) market expects the Strait to re-open soon 3) seaborne oil exports from the US have surged unexpectedly 4) China has (also unexpectedly) cut its imports of seaborne oil , down 5.5mbd in the last month- drawing down on inventories instead => The rise in seaborne exports from the US and decline in imports into China has absorbed 9.3 mb/d of the 12.3 mb/d YoY Middle East decline, shielding the rest of the world But: analysts warn a 'sustained closure could cause renewed tightness'. Bull Case $130-150
Joumanna Nasr Bercetche tweet media
English
23
134
493
64.1K
Angel Parikh retweetledi
OpIndia.com
OpIndia.com@OpIndia_com·
Madhya Pradesh: 50 IAS officers purchase argicultural land on same day Approve ₹3,200 crore bypass project, reclassify land as ‘residential’ and jack up property prices 11 times opindia.com/news-updates/m…
OpIndia.com tweet media
English
1.2K
9K
23.7K
2.2M
Angel Parikh
Angel Parikh@ContextMatters4·
So basically peace talks are nothing but buying time for preparations of war it seems.
English
0
0
0
41
Angel Parikh
Angel Parikh@ContextMatters4·
Looking at the rigidity of the both the sides, chances are very less that nay peace deal possible between #Iran and #US. And when one look at the sovereignty point of view, it looks legitimate for #Iran to remain rigid. So only thing remian is U$A need to become some flexible.
English
1
1
2
164
Angel Parikh retweetledi
Alok Jain ⚡
Alok Jain ⚡@WeekendInvestng·
P. Chidambaram had also pleaded with Indian citizens not to buy gold for one year in 2012-13. The gold held at that time used to be $1 trillion. Now it is $5 trillion. indiatoday.in/india/story/ch…
English
37
28
254
133.5K
Angel Parikh
Angel Parikh@ContextMatters4·
Well said👍 Buying gold is nothing but transforming dollars into real asset and protecting urself from inflation.
Macro Liquidity by Sunil Reddy@Macrobysunil

Indian PM Modi asked people to stop buying Gold for 1 year. This is about the uncomfortable truth that India has become so dependent on the dollar system that citizens protecting themselves with Gold is now seen as a threat. Because Gold is not just a metal. Gold is the one asset the paper currency system cannot print, sanction, freeze, dilute or manufacture out of thin air. Now look at the bigger game. The dollar empire never wanted countries like India to become truly self-sufficient, asset-backed, export-dominant economies. The strategy was always simple: Turn nations into consumption machines. Make them import oil, gas, electronics, defence systems, high-end technology and key necessities. Price all critical things in dollars. Then force those nations to constantly earn dollars just to survive. Once a country depends on dollars for its basic needs, the dollar empire controls the terms. They control the cost of your imports. They control your access to liquidity. They control your currency pressure. They control your inflation cycle. They control how much pain your citizens feel when the dollar strengthens. This is how dependency is created. Not through direct colonisation. Through trade deficits, currency pressure and imported inflation. And now when citizens run toward Gold, the oldest protection against currency debasement ,suddenly the same system says: “Don’t buy Gold.” Why? Because Gold breaks the illusion. Gold reminds people that paper money is only trust. Gold reminds people that savings in weak currency can be silently destroyed. Gold reminds people that purchasing power matters more than GDP headlines. Gold reminds people that the real battle is not return on capital, but return of purchasing power. For the government, Gold buying is a forex problem. But for the citizen, Gold is protection from the same forex problem. When the rupee depreciates, who suffers? The common man. When oil rises, who pays? The common man. When imports become expensive, who loses purchasing power? The common man. When inflation eats savings, who gets punished? The common man. So why should the citizen sacrifice his protection to defend a system that already made him dependent? The real issue is not Indians buying Gold. The real issue is India being pushed into a model where we consume what we don’t produce, import what we can’t avoid, and pay for necessities in a currency we don’t control. That is the trap. Gold is not the problem. Gold is the escape route from the problem. So the conclusion is simple: If you want to support the dollar empire, stop buying Gold. If you want to support yourself, protect your purchasing power. Buy Gold. Accumulate Silver. Own real assets. Escape the paper trap.

English
0
0
2
137
Angel Parikh
Angel Parikh@ContextMatters4·
Now full on anti-incumbancy is seen everywhere. Not sure our govt is able to see it. Seems in next election in 2029, middle class will do "hisab chukata" by voting current govt out.
English
1
0
1
163
Angel Parikh retweetledi
Mel
Mel@Villgecrazylady·
Contrary to the delusional ramblings of grandpa MAGA, the JCPOA was not just a “Obama Deal.” It was an agreement crafted by the 5 permanent members of the UN Security Council, + Germany, and it was adopted via unanimous UN Security Council vote. The EU also passed its own resolution backing it. EVERYONE agreed it was a good deal. Everyone that is EXCEPT ISRAEL. So let’s be real clear on this, Trump didn’t blow up the JCPOA for any of our allies. He didn’t do it for us. He did it for Israel. Because they own him. Period.
Mel tweet media
English
64
468
1.5K
21.6K
Angel Parikh
Angel Parikh@ContextMatters4·
@NalinisKitchen I disconnect immeditaely when I start hearing that message and then again call that number, 2nd time, no such irritating message and call connects directly.
English
0
0
2
94
Nalini Unagar
Nalini Unagar@NalinisKitchen·
Dear @TRAI, Imagine your recharge plan is going to expire in 2 days. Imagine someone is following your sister late at night, and she is trying to call you for help. Imagine you are injured on the road and desperately trying to call a family member. But before the call even connects, telecom companies play long warnings like “your plan is expiring soon, please recharge” in two languages. During this warning, the actual call does not connect, and valuable time gets wasted. In emergency situations, even a few seconds matter. These repeated recharge reminders are extremely frustrating. We already know when to recharge. Customers should not be forced to listen to long, nonsensical warnings. Please order all telecom companies to immediately stop these nonsense warnings before calls, or allow the call to connect while the warning plays in the background. Be serious.
English
799
5K
14.2K
276.7K
Angel Parikh
Angel Parikh@ContextMatters4·
The balance lies somewhere in between.
L2WTrades@L2WTrades

"trading is too risky" you spent 8 hours in a cubicle today asking another man when you're allowed to eat lunch you gave a bank 30 years of your future income and called it "building equity" you're $47,000 in student debt for a degree that a hiring manager will skim for 6 seconds before deciding your career you spent your entire adult life betting your future on the assumption your employer never decides you're expendable you signed a 30-year mortgage betting that your job, your health, your marriage, and the economy will all remain stable for three decades straight but risking $500 on a trade with a predefined stop loss where you know the EXACT maximum you can lose before you click the button that's "too risky" stop the problem isn't risk. you take risk every single day. massive, uncontrolled, unquantified risk. you just don't call it risk because you're used to it the problem is you can SEE the risk in trading a $500 loss on a screen feels more real than the statistical probability of dying on your morning commute. because the number is right there. red. staring at you. quantified. undeniable your brain doesn't register risk based on actual probability. it registers risk based on VISIBILITY. the more visible the outcome, the scarier it feels. even when the actual risk is smaller this is why: - people think a $500 stop loss is "too much risk" but owe $47,000 on a degree they don't use - people call trading "gambling" but hand 30 years of income to a bank for a house they'll barely own by 55 - people say "I can't afford to lose money" while spending 84,000 hours earning $25/hour for someone who'd replace them in 2 weeks the visible risk feels dangerous the invisible risk feels safe neither assessment is accurate here's the real risk comparison nobody makes: YOUR JOB: - can be eliminated tomorrow with no warning - income goes to $0 in one email - no stop loss. no maximum drawdown. no risk management - you find out you lost everything AFTER it happens - recovery time: 3-6 months of job searching while burning savings - you had zero control A TRADE: - maximum loss defined BEFORE you enter - $500 risk. known. chosen. accepted in advance - if wrong: lose $500. account still intact. try again tomorrow - if right: $1,250+ on a 2.5R winner - recovery time: literally the next trade - you had total control one has unlimited uncontrolled downside that you can't see coming the other has $500 of controlled downside that you chose before it happened and the one with total control is the one you call "risky" here's what's actually happening in your brain: loss aversion. humans feel losses 2.5x more intensely than equivalent gains. a $500 loss HURTS more than a $500 gain FEELS GOOD. so your brain says "avoid the thing that causes visible loss" even when the invisible risks in your life are 100x larger this is why most people never start trading. not because the risk is too high. because the VISIBILITY of the risk is too high. they can handle losing $50,000 in home equity over 18 months because it happens slowly, invisibly, in a quarterly statement they don't open they can't handle losing $500 on a screen in 4 minutes because they WATCHED it happen same money. different visibility. completely different emotional response the traders who make it figured something out: the $500 loss isn't the risk the $500 loss is the COST OF DOING BUSINESS a restaurant pays rent. a lawyer pays for office space. a doctor pays malpractice insurance. those aren't "risks." they're overhead. costs that the business absorbs because the revenue exceeds the expense over time a $500 trading loss is the same thing. it's overhead. the cost of running a business that produces $5,000-$50,000/month. the loss isn't a failure. it's a line item the traders who blow up are the ones who treat every loss like a personal attack instead of an expense report the traders who compound are the ones who budget for losses the same way a restaurant budgets for food cost expected losses this month: 8-10 trades at $500 = $4,000-$5,000 in overhead expected wins this month: 12-15 trades at $1,250 = $15,000-$18,750 net after overhead: $10,000-$13,750 that's not risk. that's a business with a 73% gross margin your job has a 100% margin - until the day it goes to 0% with no warning which one is actually risky? you're not afraid of risk you're afraid of SEEING risk and that fear is costing you more than any trade ever could because the riskiest thing you can do is spend 84,000 hours in a system where someone else decides when your income stops and call it "safe" (free discord in bio. if you think you're a good fit - DM me "SYSTEM" for 1-on-1 coaching. i only take on 1-2 traders at a time to work with fully private)

English
0
0
0
110
Brijesh😇
Brijesh😇@koolbrijesh92·
@ContextMatters4 P2P collect request already discontinued since October 2025. This is either fake or a pretty old story
English
1
0
1
6
Angel Parikh
Angel Parikh@ContextMatters4·
What Iran lacks is air defence. They are known for their defence capabilities and fighting prolonged war, why they are not strong in air defence is something they need to look out for. Because of lack of air defence, Israel or US can think of such strategies.
Mario Nawfal@MarioNawfal

🚨🇮🇱🇺🇸Israel just told Washington to bomb Iran's energy infrastructure into total destruction in 24 hours... Per Israeli Channel 12, Israel has conveyed a message to the U.S. advocating for a decisive shift in objective. Israeli officials are urging the U.S. to prioritize the complete destruction of Iran's energy infrastructure as the move that breaks the current stalemate. The Israeli position, as relayed by these sources, suggests the operation could be completed within a 24-hour window. The rationale is that rapid and total neutralization of Iran's energy sector would effectively cripple the economy, leaving Tehran with no choice but to enter negotiations in a submissive state. This is the maximum-pressure scenario Netanyahu's government has been pushing since the ceasefire began, and the timing is no accident. Iran has signaled it's moving toward accepting the U.S. memorandum of understanding with modifications. The diplomatic track is converging. Trump is six days from the China summit and racing to close a deal he can present to Xi as a foreign policy victory. Israel's intervention is designed to derail exactly that outcome. A 24-hour total destruction of Iranian energy infrastructure would be a strategic catastrophe that ends any possibility of Iran agreeing to anything close to a face-saving deal. It would also drive global oil to levels that crash economies worldwide. Source: Israeli Channel 12

English
0
0
1
173
Angel Parikh
Angel Parikh@ContextMatters4·
If not possible then go for re-election.
English
0
0
0
67
Angel Parikh
Angel Parikh@ContextMatters4·
Easy & better solution would be join hands either with DMK or AIADMK. So small small parties and their demands will be hard to manage. Whereas in case of DMK or AIADMK, both will want power so stability will be more. news18.com/india/116-117-…
English
2
0
0
167