C O P E

@Palma817004 @caw_dev you got it wrong bro, you’re mixing me up with @caw_dev i’m not “pulling anything,” i’m calling out questions and inconsistencies if you’ve got proof, show it if not, STFU

@Cooljbow177 @caw_dev Have you already decided when to pull the rug?

we, [Xubu and Cope], stand with Ryoshi’s vision; NO hesitation, NO confusion, NO compromise now, what about you, @caw_dev [Gilgamesh]? because “vision” is easy to claim, control is harder to hide are you with decentralization or just the version of it you approve? #CAW .

every move is being tracked, @caw_dev [Gilgamesh] 👀 1. not to attack, to verify… 2. not after launch, during the build… that’s where truth is actually tested $CAW .

@saeed1039991 @caw_dev what for? lol

@Cooljbow177 @caw_dev Fuck you

‘what’ is Gilgamesh ⁉️ teh person or entity asking for trust before proving #decentralization or answering hard governance questions, all while clearly drifting away from #Ryoshi’s original vision prove me wrong, i’ll wait… [i have receipts, do you? @caw_dev] 🎯 $CAW .

@Xubu_Trad @caw_dev @evaliys @Caw_dev i’ll translate it to you in a simple way so you can understand better: it doesn’t say “deploy first, review later” it says community reviewed contracts are the condition for legitimacy $CAW .

@caw_dev @evaliys @Xubu_Trad “don’t review it, it’s not finished” then stop acting like scrutiny is somehow unfair if V2 isn’t deployed, contracts aren’t verified, and core changes are still happening, then review is exactly on time Not after deployment Not after hype that’s called due diligence Not FUD

im convinced hes never read the manifesto in full. how the hell would anyone defend themseleves by saying they want a peer review post deployment??? this is what the manifesto says @caw_dev in case you didnt read it: "But before we do, some things must be said and taken note of: 1. This is a only a specification. It is up to the cawmmunity to write and deploy the protocol. 2. It is strongly recommended that a peer group is formed to develop and review smart contracts. as there is no leader in this process, all types will attempt to claim ownership of the process. there will those everso helpful who claim to be able to 'do it all' but will write the perfect code with the perfect backdoor Only a cawmmunity reviewed and accepted contract on a public github will be acceptable 3. After deployment, the deployer must renounce any keys they have to the contracts. There will be no multi-sig, no upgradeable proxyies. It will not matter who deployed because they will be equal with all with no specfic benefit nor advantage. Just get the contract right."

#CAW PUBLIC PEER REVIEW A Technical PUBLIC PEER REVIEW of GilgameshCaw/Caw By tehppl

Bro's AI is trying to peer review something that is not done. Right now, I’m just about to finish with the V2 contracts for testnet (currently on master of the repo, just not yet deployed) V2 contracts have some bug fixes and quite a few things that enable future development in all directions. After deploying, I will verify the contracts on etherscan as well.

@CAW_indo @caw_dev .

@Cooljbow177 @caw_dev Lets go cope

i asked multiple evidence based questions directly to @caw_dev (Gilgamesh) about #CAW protocol, control, and #decentralization silence🦗 strange how decentralization discussions seem to get very quiet when specifics are involved $CAW .

@Palma817004 that’s a lazy accusation. If you have evidence, post it If not, maybe stop throwing everyone into the same bucket

@Cooljbow177 Until proven otherwise you are all scammers!!!

Kachoperro, Morgzy, Xubu, Cope, etc etc, you are the ones who gave birth to CAW, and who continue to fuck us!!

@evaliys @caw_dev not fear of questions, fear of answers

@Cooljbow177 @caw_dev I think they fear being found out.

@mehtisto where?

We are almost there ! #CAW 🌙

@yu88510 1,440 commits in a month just shows development activity, not decentralization, not security, and not whether control is distributed same with: • 2,170 NFTs minted • 1,635 wallets that’s usage data, not proof of arch who controls upgrades, pauses, and protocol changes rn?

Gilgamesh’s master branch has seen 1,440 commits in the past month. The public testnet launched on April 27 (UTC). • 2,170 NFTs minted • 1,635 wallets participated The community has also been actively helping with bug testing. Bugs are being fixed quickly, and usability continues to improve day by day. CAW is being built in real time.

#CAW .

a testnet is a prototype under stress testnet phase can last months to years mainnet doesn’t mean decentralized it just means ‘live’ if one team can still change everything, what exactly is decentralized right now(?) and what changes after launch? #CAW .

#CAW .

people keep saying “wait for mainnet” like it automatically solves everything but mainnet is just deployment it doesn’t erase admin control, multisig dominance, upgrade authority, or dependency on one team when does control actually leave the hands of a few? $CAW

@Palma817004 who is “us”?

@Cooljbow177 Why are you fucking us over so badly?