C O P E

9.4K posts

C O P E banner
C O P E

C O P E

@Cooljbow111

⚜️ the walker /zero fucks given / nothing i tweet is a financial advice / dyor

USA Katılım Haziran 2014
0 Takip Edilen3.9K Takipçiler
C O P E
C O P E@Cooljbow111·
@A3126558789003A no one serious is asking for “instant decentralization” as a switch flip teh concern is whether the system is structurally moving toward reduced trust assumptions, or just deferring control under the same center while calling it progress
English
0
0
2
66
A.
A.@A3126558789003A·
@Cooljbow111 分散型を即時に求めたすぎて草 他人に作らせといて即時分散型にしろ約束は信用できないって文句言ってる理想論界隈で勝手に盛り上がって下さいね
日本語
1
0
1
81
A.
A.@A3126558789003A·
ギルガメッシュ氏が構築終わったら所有権放棄するって言ってるんだから今それをぐちぐち言う必要はない それよりも頑張って作り上げてる物にリスペクトだし協力してくれてる方々にも感謝 #caw
日本語
2
3
39
3.1K
C O P E retweetledi
C O P E
C O P E@Cooljbow111·
@A3126558789003A #decentralization delayed is decentralization denied until proven otherwise “ownership will be renounced later” is not a feature, it’s a promise promises require trust trust is exactly what decentralization is supposed to remove capisce 🤌🏼 $CAW .
C O P E tweet media
English
1
2
5
359
dyj.jr
dyj.jr@dyj_jr·
#CAW アンチの人って何を根拠に詐欺だの何だの吠えてるんだろう?一つも詐欺と言い切る根拠を示してない… その割に何故かファンダ的要素が出て来ると何故か絡んでくる…他人が何に投資するかは自由。例え詐欺でも自己責任でどうでもいい事でしょ?詐欺と断言して言い切るならその根拠を示せば?
日本語
3
2
30
5.4K
C O P E
C O P E@Cooljbow111·
@Kachoperro2 says criticism is welcome when focused on facts and concrete evidence Xubu and myself did exactly that… result? banned from $CAW TG you can’t ask for fact-based criticism while removing people who present it… $CAW .
C O P E tweet media
English
1
2
9
625
C O P E
C O P E@Cooljbow111·
@evaliys either control is fully removed from the system, or it still exists and if it still exists, it’s not #CAW
English
4
2
8
571
C O P E
C O P E@Cooljbow111·
“trust me for now, decentralization later” is still a trust based system if promises are required, the protocol isn’t there yet #decentralization starts when no one needs to trust your word @caw_dev $CAW .
C O P E tweet media
English
2
4
15
815
C O P E
C O P E@Cooljbow111·
@Smokeyclt @caw_dev decentralization isn’t something that “will happen later,” it either exists now or it doesn’t and the chart usually reflects that uncertainty
English
0
0
0
62
Smokey
Smokey@Smokeyclt·
@Cooljbow111 @caw_dev I think the developer is doing a good job. Without him, we wouldn't have anything to show. I'm sure he will do something about the ownership. Otherwise, what's the point of building something against Manifesto ? My concern is about the chart
English
1
0
0
94
Evaly
Evaly@evaliys·
CAW itself is 100% pure decentralization, 99.5% decentralization is not CAW!
C O P E@Cooljbow111

if it’s not pure #decentralization, it’s not #CAW period . •not “mostly decentralized” •not “trust us for now” •not decentralization with training wheels either the system removes dependency, or it’s just another platform wearing a mask $CAW .

English
2
0
22
1.2K
C O P E
C O P E@Cooljbow111·
@Smokeyclt @caw_dev at some point, the market stops caring about promises and starts pricing reality…
English
0
0
1
120
Smokey
Smokey@Smokeyclt·
@Cooljbow111 @caw_dev major concern is the price chart. After all these years, we remain at all time low. Meanwhile, numerous projects lacking both a team and any real utility are delivering 10x in just few weeks. I am not sure what sets this project apart, but it unfortunately appears to be cursed.
English
1
0
0
129
C O P E
C O P E@Cooljbow111·
noticing what seems to be a major shift in Olavieestbelle’s stance on $CAW development curious what changed, and whether this reflects an evolving strategy tied to Gilgamesh [ @caw_dev ]or something else entirely…🤔 @CommunityCaw @Kachoperro2 #CAW .
C O P E tweet mediaC O P E tweet media
English
1
1
10
2K
LA VERDAD
LA VERDAD@VerdadThetruth·
@Xubu_Trad @dyj_jr Eres como una niña con caprichos. Tu mente es pequeña. Investiga mejor antes de mentir.
Español
3
0
2
109
C O P E
C O P E@Cooljbow111·
if decentralization is real, teh deployer becomes the first person who has to lose power on purpose and prove it on-chain just saying… $CAW .
C O P E tweet media
English
5
4
29
2.6K
C O P E
C O P E@Cooljbow111·
the issue isn’t proving it’s a scam the issue is: why are there enough red flags that people are forced to ask in the first place? if everything is fine, transparency should be easy #CAW .
dyj.jr@dyj_jr

#CAW アンチの人って何を根拠に詐欺だの何だの吠えてるんだろう?一つも詐欺と言い切る根拠を示してない… その割に何故かファンダ的要素が出て来ると何故か絡んでくる…他人が何に投資するかは自由。例え詐欺でも自己責任でどうでもいい事でしょ?詐欺と断言して言い切るならその根拠を示せば?

English
1
1
8
1.5K
C O P E
C O P E@Cooljbow111·
if it’s not pure #decentralization, it’s not #CAW period . •not “mostly decentralized” •not “trust us for now” •not decentralization with training wheels either the system removes dependency, or it’s just another platform wearing a mask $CAW .
English
0
4
12
2.4K
C O P E
C O P E@Cooljbow111·
@37GO16 @yu88510 trust in crypto isn’t built through sympathy campaigns or selective replies if legitimate concerns are asked repeatedly, the response shouldn’t be silence or narrative management, it should be specifics, documentation, and verifiable actions transparency isn’t optional #CAW
English
0
1
5
510
C O P E
C O P E@Cooljbow111·
@Xubu_Trad agreed! if you’re okay with any level of centralization, you never understood #CAW in the first place it’s not “less control”, it’s no control to rely on the moment you accept checkpoints, gatekeepers, or silent leaders… it stops being #CAW
English
1
1
4
995
RΛZ13L 🌒
RΛZ13L 🌒@Xubu_Trad·
If you are accepting any kind of centralization, you do not understand what caw is … Simply put #CAW
English
1
3
14
1.6K