Correction Line Ag

535 posts

Correction Line Ag banner
Correction Line Ag

Correction Line Ag

@CorrectionAg

CLA is dedicated to seeking customers who have the passion and mindset of practicing non-traditional ways with their farming operation and having fun with it.

Cherokee, OK Katılım Şubat 2022
910 Takip Edilen1.1K Takipçiler
Correction Line Ag retweetledi
BW Fusion
BW Fusion@bw_fusion·
Universities have proven growers get 20–40 cents back on every fertility dollar spent. Over-application isn't the answer. It makes the system worse. Jason Schley broke down the fix at Commodity Classic 2026. 30 minutes. Worth every one of them. youtu.be/SEpe15Hbe2w
YouTube video
YouTube
English
0
8
10
6K
Correction Line Ag retweetledi
Jason Schley
Jason Schley@JasonSchley·
Stress in my opinion impacts nutrient uptake > then ppm levels do. I’ll take it a step further, you can pour the fertilizer on and if your plants don’t have extra energy to drive the exudation it won’t matter, as the plant still can’t eat efficiently. I personally believe plant nutrition & stress management are tied together and need to be when creating a fertilizer plan/budget.
Jason Schley tweet media
English
5
11
72
7.9K
Correction Line Ag retweetledi
Logan Maurer
Logan Maurer@maurer_logan·
Most fields don’t suffer from a true nutrient shortage, they suffer from a nutrient access problem. Decades of fertilizer application have built large nutrient reserves in the soil, but without energy, those nutrients stay locked up. That energy starts with plant-created sugar, which is the currency of the plant. Through photosynthesis, plants produce sugar and spend it through their roots to power nutrient uptake and biological activity. In the soil, that energy shows up as WEOC (water-extractable organic carbon) — the currency of the soil that feeds microbes and drives nutrient exchange. This message isn’t about eliminating fertilizer or ignoring crop removal. It’s about a systems approach that improves how nutrients cycle and move. When sugar production increases and WEOC is present, biology becomes active, enzymes function, and stored nutrients begin to flow into plant-available forms. That’s how fertilizer efficiency improves over time. Growers don’t simply decide to use less fertilizer, they EARN the right by building a system where nutrients are unlocked, not wasted, and every input works harder.
Logan Maurer tweet media
English
1
8
46
5.2K
Correction Line Ag retweetledi
BW Fusion
BW Fusion@bw_fusion·
Get ahead of the 2026 growing season and join us on the road for an agronomy event you won't want to miss! 📍 January 26th: Noblesville, IN 📍 February 3rd: Sioux Falls, SD 📍 February 5th: Manhattan, KS Get insights from agronomists, microbiologists, and farmers who are doing more with fewer inputs and seeing the payoff in a bigger ROI. Register today! bit.ly/3YF3D2g
BW Fusion tweet media
English
0
4
12
599
Correction Line Ag retweetledi
Mason Claude
Mason Claude@MasonClaude5·
Fertilizer is guaranteed to work, season long availability is not 1/4 in rainfall will solubilize 150 lbs MAP+KCl at the wrong time if the crop isn’t growing Only 20-50% of fertilizer gets in the plant, the rest is tied up If you’re not managing mineralization you’re guessing
Mason Claude tweet media
English
2
5
39
5K
Correction Line Ag retweetledi
Mason Claude
Mason Claude@MasonClaude5·
Probability matters more than potential Farming is all about predictive outcomes. You need to increase your odds of a yield response to fertilizer Fertilizer has a large opportunity to help and hurt profit Hold your fertilizer to a higher standard and improve profit potential.
Mason Claude tweet media
English
4
5
60
9.6K
Correction Line Ag retweetledi
Logan Maurer
Logan Maurer@maurer_logan·
We apply $100 of phosphorus—so why can’t the crop get $100 back? Because phosphorus is constantly cycling, not sitting “available.” Soil P exists in three pools: total P (large reserves that are mostly insoluble or organic), active P (what Bray and Olsen soil tests measure), and solution P (the very small fraction roots can actually take up). Even active P is often fixed—tied to iron and aluminum in low-pH soils or calcium in high-pH soils… making it temporarily unavailable. The movement between these pools happens every minute of the day and goes both directions. What drives that movement is soil biology. Microbes produce enzymes that mineralize organic P and release fixed P back into plant-available forms. Healthy plants fuel this system by feeding microbes sugars through root exudates. When plants are stressed or late in the season, exudation slows, microbes back off, and phosphorus refixes. True P efficiency comes from managing the cycle, not just the rate.
Logan Maurer tweet media
English
2
3
31
3.1K
Correction Line Ag retweetledi
Crop Cast Pod
Crop Cast Pod@cropcastpod·
Every biological and chemical reaction in your soil traces back to one thing: carbon. Join the conversation with @sean_nettleton, @JasonSchley, and @Bkitch1Bodie on how WEOC shapes stress, mineralization, nitrogen management, and yield potential. 👇 bit.ly/48Nufmb
English
2
7
29
17.9K
Correction Line Ag retweetledi
Jason Schley
Jason Schley@JasonSchley·
Thanks John, look forward to watching the you tube video you provided. It’s interesting that the majority think along the lines of more is always better but very very few people actually audit any part of the fertilizer program, and if they do we tend to look at the low end and assume the high rates are the best.
John Kempf@Johnkempf

Very well articulated. The yield drag effect of nitrogen is our most viewed webinar on @AdvancingEcoAg channel on YouTube. youtu.be/A5QQz51bWGA?si…

English
2
3
20
6.5K
Correction Line Ag retweetledi
Jason Schley
Jason Schley@JasonSchley·
This is not talked about enough in ag production. I feel if people know the truth we will focus on the things that can make an impact. The subject line is much deeper than what I recorded but want to get people to think outside the box without confusion. These are facts. Dig deeper, we can’t afford not to focus on carbon. If you want to call me out go ahead, but the industry isn’t telling the truth to be efficient in what we all risk it all for. And this is the truth.
Jason Schley@JasonSchley

Let’s try this, nitrogen management is deeper than most think about in my opinion. Not posting this to argue. Posting this, to help you think deeper about what your nitrogen dollars are capable of.

English
1
3
50
22.4K
Correction Line Ag retweetledi
Faith Lois
Faith Lois@FaithLois12·
Some food for thought… what happens when you reached a “magical” PPM value on a soil test?! The grower in this clip said he had multiple record crops with a low soil test… don’t think availability was the issue. Maybe the method of measure is…
Travis P. Messer@travismesser81

🤔or maybe this grower has tremendous WEOC scores along w/ really high HT3 numbers? Or maybe his available pool is larger than most wait, Melich 3 will tell us the whole story right ? PPM chemistry only focused fertility programs is why this industry is failing farmers today.

English
1
2
24
6.7K
Correction Line Ag retweetledi
Jason Schley
Jason Schley@JasonSchley·
I would agree with this comment, N deficiency limits the potential gain in soil carbon, it also limits a system from creating a healthy plant, so it’s a double whammy on WEOC. ***Microbes need N. They don’t like excessive N. most farms have excessive N at a minimum for at least an extended period of time. Lower N rates favor fungal-dominated communities, which efficiently incorporate C into stable WEOC fractions. High N shifts to bacteria, which respire more C as CO₂, reducing WEOC by 10-20%. High N accelerates microbial breakdown of labile C, depleting WEOC as microbes mineralize organic matter faster for energy. Lower N limits this “priming effect,” preserving WEOC. A 2019 study in Midwest maize systems showed N fertilization suppressed SOM mineralization by 13-21% at optimal rates but increased overall C turnover at excess levels, leading to 10-15% lower WEOC in high-N plots. This is from papers, our data which is much deeper and has more years to it, shows high N usage has even greater destruction of Weoc than the above papers. I only respond as I think what you shared is good, but it doesn’t tell the story. It only captures the eye of N is good for soil carbon.
Andrew McGuire@agronomistag

N fertilizer has similar benefits for soil organic matter. csanr.wsu.edu/nitrogen-ferti…

English
7
6
60
24.8K
Correction Line Ag retweetledi
Correction Line Ag retweetledi
Sean Nettleton
Sean Nettleton@sean_nettleton·
I really enjoyed visiting with @Cornfrmr. I’ve been a fanboy for years, and I really appreciate his willingness to share his story!
Crop Cast Pod@cropcastpod

What do soil health and human health have in common? A lot more than you think. 👀 On episode #56, Nebraska farmer Randy Uhrmacher (@Cornfrmr) talks irrigation, weed control, and why managing blood sugar helped him rethink balance. Listen now. bit.ly/3LqsWBL

English
0
1
10
2K
Mason Claude
Mason Claude@MasonClaude5·
One thing that still baffles me is lease agreements that require a corn/soybean rotation but a bonus/flex structure based on only corn. I believe in fair deals but it seems one sided to me 🤷‍♂️
GIF
English
1
0
8
1.2K
Correction Line Ag retweetledi
Gavin Spoor
Gavin Spoor@gavin_spoor·
Draper head makes this combine an entirely different beast. Wow
Gavin Spoor tweet media
English
20
8
258
19.2K