🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸CosmicAspen 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

But forbid we want the pedos to be held accountable

Why are we not organizing and creating a new government according to our Constitution. Not a coup. Not a violent takeover. Just replacing a government that has clearly been subverting our beloved Constitution. The Bill of Rights is a legal guideline of what we're allowed to do. Again, why are we not organizing?

Xbox would be 100% back if the cool avatars and avatar games were brought back

@amagicmantv This man fr?

Who wants one of these Steam Games? 🪄 Like + reply the game you want ♥️ Follow me so I can DM you 📩

I didn’t vote for Donald Trump because I thought he was flawless. I voted because I thought he was the last off-ramp. The lesser of two evils… with a promise that actually meant something. No new wars. End the old ones. Put America First. That message hit hard. It felt like a reset. But look around now. Conflicts aren’t ending — they’re multiplying. Billions are still pouring overseas. Military support keeps expanding into places most Americans can’t even point to on a map. And back home? People are drowning quietly. Groceries cost more every week. Families are hanging on by a thread. Veterans — the ones who already gave everything — are still sleeping on the streets. Debt is crushing. Stress is everywhere. So I keep coming back to one question: What happened to America First? Because this doesn’t feel like it. This feels like the same machine… just repainted. I didn’t vote for global escalation. I didn’t vote to fund the world while Americans fall behind. I voted for peace abroad and stability at home. And right now? That promise feels further away than ever. This isn’t just disappointment anymore. People are starting to wake up.

@doomersaredumb It is taking away jobs. Doesn't matter what the job is, so long as it's a legal one, when its needed to support families.

The anti-AI crowd will say this is bad because it's taking away a job. Humans were not meant to slave in warehouses

I literally cant get a job because of this clown

@lvl2supergenius @therealsgilbert @SumisuBii @jkdavis89 Never said all angels were demons. I was saying though that if someone claims to see an angel and proceeds to have some alternate canon written out because of it, I am inclined to believe it is Satan and wont believe it out of fear for what God'll do if I followed such path

@Cosmic_Aspen @therealsgilbert @SumisuBii @jkdavis89 You fear Satan and man over God if you believe angels are all demons.

Christianity started with an angel visiting a young virgin. Weird.

Alright, not bad Bethesda

@Dixie_Groyper Oops all Boomers

It’s like if AARP and Grindr had a collab

@SumisuBii @lvl2supergenius @jkdavis89 I believe he was deceived by Satan to develop something almost like but not quite like Christianity.

@Cosmic_Aspen @lvl2supergenius @jkdavis89 You believe he was deceived for reasons other than this passage.

@KeithManleyjr @lvl2supergenius @jkdavis89 Because the Book of Mormon and whatever else Joseph Smith conjured up are not part of the Biblical canon

@Cosmic_Aspen @lvl2supergenius @jkdavis89 I love the Bible. I read it every morning. I've just never understood why another witness of Jesus Christ would somehow diminish the first one.

@therealsgilbert @SumisuBii @lvl2supergenius @jkdavis89 Deceived by whom exactly? And how?

@Cosmic_Aspen @SumisuBii @lvl2supergenius @jkdavis89 Sounds like it might be you who’s deceived.

@SumisuBii @lvl2supergenius @jkdavis89 But you know there is a passage about deception right? I believe he was deceived. And deceived others with these "revelations" of his

@Cosmic_Aspen @lvl2supergenius @jkdavis89 You asked what the argument is against the bible passage about Satan appearing as an angel of light. No argument against it needs to be made by an LDS Mormon, because it doesn't demonstrate anything about Joseph Smith.

@KeithManleyjr @lvl2supergenius @jkdavis89 There's always going to be people disagreeing and twisting the Bible. Because some people cant agree on one thing doesnt mean that the Bible isnt sound. Many of the translations are made to meet particular needs of readers but are the same in substance

@Cosmic_Aspen @lvl2supergenius @jkdavis89 That's kind of my point. Christians have been reading the same scriptures for centuries and still disagree about what they mean.

@KeithManleyjr @lvl2supergenius @jkdavis89 Because what Jesus did completed the whole canon. There was no other need for any more covenants. Jesus gave us a path to God. And the reason we have different translations is to fit those needs. The Book of Mormon and other writings arent translations of the same Bible

@Cosmic_Aspen @lvl2supergenius @jkdavis89 You’re asking the wrong questions. Why wouldn’t there be a necessity of another testament of Jesus Christ? Being that people lived in other parts of the world and all. And seeing how humans interpret the same scriptures with infinite difference.

@SumisuBii @lvl2supergenius @jkdavis89 I dont get what you're trying to prove here

@Cosmic_Aspen @lvl2supergenius @jkdavis89 If a legitimate angel can visit someone, as well as Satan, then quoting the bible saying that Satan can appear as an angel of light doesn't get you any closer to answering the question.

@Cameron42946078 @jkdavis89 Im saying that Mary herself did not create a new Gospel, Jesus did with his completion of the new covenant. Therefore, the argument that an angel of light appearing to both would not be equivalent.

@Cosmic_Aspen @jkdavis89 Your claim is that Jesus Smith brought a new gospel, and that the angel that visited Mary didn't result in a 'new gospel' -- meanwhile we know that Jesus brought a new covenant and was killed for it. I am simply pointing out the incoherency of your argument. That's it.

Just go now you old fart

@Cameron42946078 @jkdavis89 And you claim Smith did the same?

@Cosmic_Aspen @jkdavis89 So it's a stupid premise, agreed. Jesus came to do away with the existing law, the law of Moses. And he brought a new covenant and was accompanied by angels and miracles. If you feel a need to argue about JS, that's fine. You won't find me debunking Ron L Hubbard.