MrsSkids

@ZackPolanski Who are the far right? How would I recognise a member? What would their politics be?

Good morning! I wanted to show you the side profiles of a Mesocephalic (normal) faced bunny vs a brachycephalic (flat) face bunny. The contrast is very obvious. Both bunnies have the same number of teeth which is 28. The practice of selective breeding to achieve a certain “cuteness” means to breed the shortest possible faced bunnies together with the aim of getting an even shorter faced litter of kits. This is unnatural, and means that there is a lot less space for those 28 teeth, leading to a whole range of health complications like malocclusion (misaligned jaw) Breathing problems and eye problems, mostly due to those pesky teeth not having enough space and everything being to squashed. This is cruel, leaves so many vulnerable animals to a life of pain, and early death. When we see first hand the pain and cruelty that these bunnies experience, because some humans want them to be “cuter” it baffles me. This needs to stop. They are not objects for our viewing pleasure, they feel love, pain, loneliness and fear. We have dedicated our lives to give them a place where they will know love, regardless of their physical appearance. We need your support to grow our voice ,because we proudly speak for the voiceless. You are the bunnies marketing team. One voice at a time we become heard. ❤️

Be grateful to the IOC for protecting women’s sport? Do not be so ridiculous telegraph.co.uk/gift/9bf3a4fc4…

Wales votes on 7th May 2026 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 Women and girls in Wales have been dismissed. Talked over. Told that standing up for ourselves is an act of cruelty. We will scrutinise every party's policies - which pledge to lift us, and which seek to diminish us. Every woman in Wales has a vote. And we know how to use it. @Plaid_Cymru @WelshLibDems @WalesGreenParty @RUKWales @WelshLabour @WelshConserv

I am so proud to feature in this year’s Women in Westminster: The 100 list, alongside so many inspiring women across Parliament and public life. 👉 Read the 2026 list here:: #the100" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">politicshome.com/in-focus/wiw.h…

If a political party does not respect your sex, it does not deserve your X. Elections to the Senedd in Wales take place in May 2026. These will be seismic and likely see a major power shift. Also: ❎An expansion of Senedd members from 60 to 96. ❎A new closed list system - vote for the party, not the individual. What issues will be important to the women of Wales? Follow @waleswomenvote for valuable information to help you decide where to cast your valuable vote. We are 51% of the population. Make your vote count.

So many people are not seeing us 😢 As a charity we rely on visibility and support from you. Please give Maddy a share and help us get seen ❤️

@ProfStephenW @KBtheYoungOG Your stunning lack of empathy and understanding of child and adolescent development is striking. What a movement you represent.

Can't wait for @PrifWeinidog @WelshLabour @WelshGovernment to come out and say they will act on the Supreme Court judgment and recognise that 'woman' means sex and not a subjective sense of identity.

This is like getting your leg bitten off by a shark and then parsing whether the deed was done by a Great White Shark, or a by Tiger Shark. We don't care about the specific flavour of the mental illness/personality disorder/paraphilia of the men who bypass our consent and who violate our boundaries. They are all selfish, transgressive, and psychopathic. And we've had enough of them.

WARNING: Don't feed the autogynephiles Here's what's interesting about this post by @BriannaWu. He suggests that the guy in the dress who shot up the school in Canada was just a fetishistic crossdresser who was experimenting with a female identity publicly -- not a real "trans girl" like him. This is to create the illusion that there are two distinct categories of straight men who wear women's clothes in public. Wu is the actual sufferer of transness; the other guy is just some horny dude who wears skirts n' heels for masturbation purposes. But they are not discrete categories of men. They are men with the same paraphilia, and what looks to the outsider like different "kinds" is actually different *phases* of the same compulsion. The specificities of the compulsion are also different but it's the same thing. These men have to decide to lean in to the compulsion, or find alternative ways of dealing with it. Many autogynephiles never take it public. Wu has gone all in on it, however, which is a sign that the compulsion is very strong with him. He also seems kind of naturally sociopathic, and he's a known compulsive liar (as we say here in TERFlandia -- "they're not just men, they're the worst men"). I repeat: what you think is different types of trans is actually just different phases of the same sexual compulsion. This explains how the ye olde distinction between "transsexual" and "transvestite" came about. The former were so tormented by their compulsion that they asked to be castrated. The latter got there eventually, or not at all, depending on how much they indulged. They dip their toe, then lower themselves in. Wu is fully submerged. That's why they so often refer to it as a "gender journey". Wu is passing through a particular phase of the autgynephile's gender journey. The Tumbler Ridge guy was experiencing another, much earlier, phase. That's what Wu is accidentally revealing in this post. Wu knows better than anybody that it is the experimenting with the identity that makes the "dysphoria" more intense. It locks in the identity via repetition and "relief". He himself definitely started his gender journey the same way. They all do. They do it occasionally for wanks, eventually fail to get high, take it public, need more, and more, and more. The struggle is real. Eventually the "distress" gets so intense that they start calling themselves "trans women". On this journey, the final destination is Brianna Wu types: grossly disfigured males dressed up as their favourite porn genre (this is the bit where they're high) and eventually, a sexless old lump of a bloke trying desperately to keep the flame and the fantasy alive. Look at Bruce Jenner. He's come down. All the Daves crash to earth eventually. Wu is currently up, and he's trying desperately hard to stay there. That requires your input. Don't be fooled into thinking that because Wu is "topped" on the regular by a man (he's married to bloke who doesn't publicly crossdress) that he's "one of the gay ones";. The autogynephile fantasy is a masochistic fantasy. He wants to be a "gaping hole", to act out the "disempowering" role of a submissive, lowly woman. He's a creep, and he's trying to maintain this false distinction between real trans and crossdressers in order to ensure you obey the rules in his personal sexual fantasy arena. The man just got half his jaw and chin surgically removed to get the next "high". Even if you don't give a shit about women's rights, you should know that you're feeding this creep scraps of wank fodder every time you call him "she". Don't feed the autogynephiles.

Never forget the people who cheered this on.

A young detransitioner, Fox Varian, has won $2 million damages in a medical malpractice lawsuit, in which she sued the psychologist and surgeon who approved her for a double mastectomy, aged 16. Varian's mother testified that she'd been against the surgery, but was pressured into agreeing because she'd been told that unless her daughter transitioned she was likely to commit suicide. As the floodgates open, and more and more detransitioners sue the clinicians who subjected them to an unregulated medical experiment, gender identity activists will almost certainly continue to ignore any evidence that fails to support their preferred narrative. They'll keep insisting that hardly any transitioned people regret their irreversible procedures, that gender clinicians know exactly what they're doing, that surgeries, cross-sex hormones and puberty blockers are of proven benefit and that minors who're denied these treatments will to kill themselves. All of this is a lie. Speaking at the WPATH conference in 2021, British endocrinology consultant Leighton Seal admitted 'we are doing procedures here where we don’t have outcome data.' A woman from Utah said she felt gender clinicians like her were making it up as they went along: 'Because I feel like we’re all just winging it, you know? And which is okay, you’re winging it too. But maybe we can just, like, wing it together.' (thefp.com/p/were-all-jus…) This will go down in history as one of the worst medical scandals of all time. Adults inside and outside the medical profession sold troubled young people like Varian the idea that all of their complex trauma would be resolved by removing healthy body parts. As more and more detransitioners arrive in court, the public will learn the full extent of the harm done to kids in the name of an ideology. Clinicians performing these 'treatments' will go down in history as barbarous activists who betrayed a sacred oath: to do no harm. But we should never forget how many people outside the medical profession urged these young people on, gleefully assuring them that anyone advising caution was an evil bigot. There are people in elitist professions like publishing and academia, not to mention politicians and celebrities with young fan bases, who did all they could to champion the idea of gender identity, and kept pushing it even as the evidence of harm mounted. They're just as culpable as the clinicians. Too lazy to think more deeply than the fashionable mantras that got them social media likes, too arrogant to look at evidence from anyone outside their political bubble, they've slurred whistleblowers and attacked anyone with valid questions. In doing so, they've created a cultural climate without which this appalling tragedy could not have taken place. Never forget, because only by learning the lesson can we stop this happening again. thefp.com/p/a-legal-firs…

I don’t support Reform, but I do care about misinformation and the squalor Westminster has become. Your post here is an example. It’s unworthy. The fact you always turn off replies, which shouldn’t be allowed for paid public representatives, shows your cowardice. Be accountable.

💥 Congratulations to the Darlington nurses ! 👏👏👏 “By requiring the Claimants to share a changing room with a biological male trans woman… the Respondent engaged in unwanted conduct related to sex and gender reassignment which had the effect of violating the dignity of the Claimants and creating for the Claimants a hostile, humiliating and degrading environment."

As you are not a lawyer but merely a medical student, you may find it helpful to have some basic points clarified for you. 1. All decisions by the UK Supreme Court are, by definition, ‘authoritative’, because they have legal authority. 2. ‘Authoritative’ is a technical legal term that does not mean the same as ‘unchallengeable’. 3. A Supreme Court ruling can certainly be ‘challenged’ by seeking declarations from the European Court of Human Rights, but only on extremely limited grounds. 4. A decision by the ECHR does not overturn or overrule a judgment of the SC. It can only act as a directive to the UK Parliament to change the law on the basis that the ECHR can determine British law is incompatible with the Convention. 5. Technically, the law in the UK remains as specified by the SC until such time as the UK Parliament introduces legislation to enact the ECHR ruling. 6. Also, technically, as a sovereign nation, the UK can ignore ECHR rulings, although it might be sanctioned diplomatically as a result. 7. Certainly, a SC ruling can be ‘overturned’ by new legislation, although all UK legislation has to be ECHR compatible and if it isn’t, it can be declared ‘incompatible’ in court. 8. So, the situation is not as you claim it to be. 9. Moreover, whilst the precipitating legal issue in the FWS case was the Scottish Government allowing males to count as females on public boards if they claimed to ‘identify’ as women, the basis of the SG’s reasoning related to the definitions of ‘man’, ‘woman’ and ‘sex’ in UK equalities legislation. The SC decision relates to the proper interpretation of those three terms throughout the relevant legislation and not just in respect of public boards. 10. It is, therefore, fundamentally wrong to claim that the decision is limited to one specific equality issue. The fact that you have done so is a primary indication that, as non-experts often do, you have opted merely to repeat propaganda from a position of ignorance Because it fits a narrative that you want to promote. 11. Your legal ignorance is matched by your basic lack of knowledge relating to the impact upon women of the widespread failure of organisations and institutions to correctly interpret and apply the law in this area. There are innumerable examples of women being directly harmed by men being permitted to masquerade as women, to cloak themselves in a parody of womanhood based on regressive and sexist stereotypes of femininity. You either have not been paying attention or are, again, merely parroting propaganda points. 12. One can only speculate as to why a medical student seems content to ignore basic, observable and objective scientific reality. If you are unable to understand that sex is a fundamental and necessary categorisation concept for society and medical practice alike, then perhaps medicine is the wrong profession for you and you should look elsewhere. Just make sure that isn’t the law, because that does not appear as if it would be a strong area for you either.

Get dressed, ye merry gentlemen, let nothing ye dismay! For it is Christmas, Christmas, Christmas. Christmas, Christmas Day! It’s Christmas Christmas Christmas Christmas Christmas Christmas Day… It is Chri-hi-hi-hi-hi-hi-histmas day, Chrissymas Day, it is Chriiiiiiiistmas Day!

All other typos can go home. This one wins.

Happy Solstice Folks 🙏

A festive beaver for you. Look at her, she is wet, hairy and gripping her favourite wood. #DoYourPelvicFloorExercises or I shall unleash more terrible puns at you. Nobody wants that. #DryByChristmas