Your humble host @baroncoleman has shown, through court filings, that BOTH the prosecution and the defense have discussed evidence that corroborates the booking sheet, which shows that Tyler Robinson turned himself in and was taken into police custody BEFORE the Discord messages. Attorneys have an ethical obligation to show candor to the tribunal. We understand that to mean that we cannot make false statements to the court. And if we discover we made a mistake and misstated something, we have an obligation to fix it. And yet, neither the prosecution nor the defense has corrected these filings. Here's what I don't understand. Kyle Rittenhouse. Karen Read. Richard Allen. These are cases that were followed extensively by the Lawtube community. We watched in those cases how what we were fed (slop) turned out to be a false narrative. And yet, many seem to have forgotten this and are devouring the slop they are being fed now. I can maybe understand initially giving the government the benefit of the doubt. But now so much of the narrative has been called into serious question. Rather than be intellectually honest and question whether the government is (once again) lying to us, folks instead pivot to doing mental gymnastics, such as claiming that portions of a piece of evidence with the same bates number isn't from the same piece of evidence. Why? Why do people continue to assume the government is always telling the truth?
