Crypto Andrew ✍️🧠
5.9K posts

Crypto Andrew ✍️🧠
@Crypt0_Andrew
Full-time crypto degen 💯 Follow me for alpha 👀 New and promising DeFi protocols 💎 Crypto education 📚 TG - https://t.co/6RtqV5pzBd




$ROBOTMONEY is all over my timeline now its the new token in town and its doing well market cap wise Logically, all accounts with 0 analytical skills, 0 on-chain understanding and 0 fundamental understanding but somehow have a large following will shill it They actually switch from ODAI to ROBOTMONEY now Now fundamentally @RobotMoneyAgent acts as an on-chain hedge fund for AI agentic tokens Adopts the ERC-4626 vault standard where money enters, is split 3-ways > Goes and fetches 5-6% APY on USDC via lending markets > The other two parts trade agentic tokens Micro caps and larger caps Now regarding R/R in terms of entering at 2.2M mc I'd say the risk is abit high for me > 95% of the total supply is currently in profit > 86% of all holders are in profit > There's a total of 83 wallets that are sitting on 500%+ profit currently The token is yet to endure a proper profit stress test I'll be waiting to re-enter at 1.1-1.3M I was patient enough with JUNO and it paid off



The Reality of the Trenches (Last 24h Data) Let’s break down how brutally hard it is to be profitable right now using real numbers: 27,061 tokens launched 571 tokens graduated → ~2.11% survival rate 13 tokens above $50k market cap after 24h → ~0.048% 8 tokens above $100k market cap after 24h → ~0.029% STEP 1: Survival Out of 27k tokens, only 571 made it to bonding. That means ~98% die instantly, already here, your odds are: 1 in 47 to even touch something “alive”. STEP 2: Quality among survivors Out of those 571 bonded tokens: Only 13 are still above $50k after 24h → ~2.28% Only 8 are still above $100k after 24h → ~1.40% Even after filtering for “survivors”, ~97–98% still fail to sustain value Step 3: True odds from launch From the full set: $50k+ (after 24h) → 0.048% (1 in ~2,081) $100k+ (after 24h) → 0.029% (1 in ~3,383) Reality check: profitability And this is where it gets worse: You’re competing against bots, insiders, and dev wallets Realistically: - Only a tiny fraction are actually profitable trades - Estimated real edge: ~0.01% (1 in 5,000–10,000) This is not 2024 anymore, the game has changed. Now it's not a matter of locking in and being fast. ~98% are dead on arrival ~2% survive ~0.05% sustain relevance ~0.01% are actually profitable If you’re trading randomly, you’re gambling. To win, you need an edge. Otherwise, the math is simply against you.














PVP has been a massive point of contention over the past few days, and many plead for a fix from the launchpad layer. however, I believe the causation of PVP is misguided and isn’t the result of the launchpad, but a result of: 1) broader liquidity leaving the market 2) behavioral problems it’s no secret that we’re in a bear market & more liquidity has left the market than has entered over the past 6 months, hence why ceilings are much lower & opportunity feels scarce with lower liquidity & lower ceilings comes the desire to find edge elsewhere. if traders know they’re not going to succeed holding, and they can't beat other traders, there may be edge in redeploying an already successful coin; whether it’s under the guise of a better ticker, image, has tracked wallets, fee distributions, etc. while I think this behavior is incredibly destructive, I believe it is a permanent pendulum, and I believe we're currently at the extreme end of that pendulum, which is why we’re experiencing incessant & unrelenting PVP compared to what we see in a bull market (PVP exists, but faces nowhere near the level of participation as we see now)


Why is holding dead right now? Lately I’ve seen many posts complaining that “holding used to be glorious” and that we need to bring it back. Meanwhile the average on-chain holding time is ~15 minutes 😅 So I decided to look into why we ended up here.















