Crypto Law Review

15.3K posts

Crypto Law Review banner
Crypto Law Review

Crypto Law Review

@CryptoLawRev

Journal stretching legal imaginaries — onchain, offchain, and against the chain. ISSN 2689-9612

Katılım Ağustos 2018
2.1K Takip Edilen5.6K Takipçiler
Crypto Law Review retweetledi
River
River@River·
Chuck Norris was the only one who could double spend bitcoin. Rest in peace.
English
50
210
2.3K
69.9K
Crypto Law Review
Crypto Law Review@CryptoLawRev·
There’s always a better way to do proof of work.
Ilan Komargodski@komargodski

Crypto is not just a ledger of transactions---it’s a ledger of truth and trust. That’s what makes Bitcoin valuable. For Bitcoin this requires burning energy on random number guessing. What if we could instead leverage massive, real-world computation to achieve the same level of security? This has been an outstanding open problem for more than 30 years in academia, and since the emergence of blockchains in industry. Last year, we proposed the first solution (eprint.iacr.org/2025/685). Our mathematical breakthrough suggests piggy-backing on matrix multiplications, the native operation of GPUs that power the AI revolution, from pre-training, post-training, to inference. The potential applications are endless: improving the unit-economics of LLMs, shifting AI-generated wealth back to users, and enabling new primitives such as settlement and even UBI systems for AI agents. Since then, we've worked hard turning the math into a fully operational system. From the algebra and CUDA kernels to a working L1 blockchain and a production LLM inference pipeline implementing this “2-for-1” technology. Today, we’re excited to share that the @prlnet is ready, and will soon enable serving SoTA LLMs while mining the blockchain at negligible additional cost. Along the way, we encountered many fascinating challenges. We’re now publishing them as a collaborative Polymath challenge, spanning open questions in math, systems and economics. If you’re interested, take a look and feel free to reach out: pearlpolymath.com. #PRL #AIMoney

English
0
0
0
179
Yishan
Yishan@yishan·
The killer app for AI will be the company that agrees to insure AI products for liability: AI malpractice insurance. AI can do many things, but it can’t be held liable the way a human or corp can. So either a user is always on their own, or anyone who offers an AI product has to be responsible for screwups. Risk always exists, and someone has to bear the risk. (You can insist it be the user, but if you can take on the risk, you’ll get more users) This probably looks like a real-time product that analyzes the strength/reliability of the AI system + the inherent product risk + exact request risk… and insures it against downside liability when things go wrong. This will be a key enabling layer. I imagine this will be especially important in fields like medicine, law, construction, financial services, enterprise Saas, cybersecurity, manufacturing… anything where AI malfunction can cause large, legible losses.
English
10
5
56
7.4K
Crypto Law Review retweetledi
Kpaxs
Kpaxs@Kpaxs·
There is a specific kind of intelligence that is almost never celebrated but is consistently effective: the intelligence that recognizes when the game being played is not the game worth playing.
English
155
1.6K
11.6K
607.8K
Crypto Law Review
Crypto Law Review@CryptoLawRev·
Ethereum “values” & Mandate discourse over the past months & year is smh. The only value that matters is the value poor folks should be able to earn with Ethereum. CROPS as means to this end. Ethereum’s untouchables problem. Big problem. But problem that must be solved.
English
1
0
2
114
Crypto Law Review retweetledi
Crypto Law Review
Crypto Law Review@CryptoLawRev·
@TheEylon “The Resolution will be a strategic integration by the establishment.” Yes, but … That future is depressing af.
English
0
0
0
4
Crypto Law Review
Crypto Law Review@CryptoLawRev·
The core foundation for @xAI must be law — positive law, doctrine, instructions, dispute resolution — an area xAI is uniquely positioned to lead. Everything else is downstream. Curious if @grok is smart enough to figure this one out yet & invest accordingly. Et tu @elonmusk ?
Elon Musk@elonmusk

@beffjezos xAI was not built right first time around, so is being rebuilt from the foundations up. Same thing happened with Tesla.

English
1
0
0
84
Crypto Law Review
Crypto Law Review@CryptoLawRev·
Where Vitalik rediscovers Ethereum’s superpower as a Public Bulletin Board (yesss 100% yess finally yess 💯) & allowing Ethereans to finally secure Ethereum as PUBLIC infra, instead of weaksauce captured crypto finance infra.
vitalik.eth@VitalikButerin

I was recently at Real World Crypto (that's crypto as in cryptography) and the associated side events, and one thing that struck me was that it was a clarifying experience in terms of understanding *what blockchains are for*. We blockchain people (myself included) often have a tendency to start off from the perspective that we are Ethereum, and therefore we need to go around and find use cases for Ethereum - and generate arguments for why sticking Ethereum into all kinds of places is beneficial. But recently I have been thinking from a different perspective. For a moment, let us forget that we are "the Ethereum community". Rather, we are maintainers of the Ethereum tool, and members of the {CROPS (censorship-resistant, open-source, private, secure) tech | sanctuary tech | non-corposlop tech | d/acc | ...} community. Going in with zero attachment to Ethereum specifically, and entering a context (like RWC) where there are people with in-principle aligned values but no blockchain baggage, can we re-derive from zero in what places Ethereum adds the most value? From attending the events, the first answer that comes up is actually not what you think. It's not smart contracts, it's not even payments. It's what cryptographers call a "public bulletin board". See, lots of cryptographic protocols - including secure online voting, secure software and website version control, certificate revocation... - all require some publicly writable and readable place where people can post blobs of data. This does not require any computation functionality. In fact, it does not directly require money - though it does _indirectly_ require money, because if you want permissionless anti-spam it has to be economic. The only thing it _fundamentally_ requires is data availability. And it just so happened that Ethereum recently did an upgrade (PeerDAS) to increase the amount of data availability it provides by 2.3x, with a path to going another 10-100x higher! Next, payments. Many protocols require payments for many reasons. Some things need to be charged for to reduce spam. Other things because they are services provided by someone who expends resources and needs to be compensated. If you want a permissionless API that does not get spammed to death, you need payments. And Ethereum + ZK payment channels (eg. ethresear.ch/t/zk-api-usage… ) is one of the best payment systems for APIs you can come up with. If you are making a private and secure application (eg. a messenger, or many other things), and you do not want to let people to spam the system by creating a million accounts and then uploading a gigabyte-sized video on each one, you need sybil resistance, and if you care about security and privacy, you really should care about permissionless participation (ie. don't have mandatory phone number dependency). ETH payment as anti-sybil tool is a natural backstop in such use cases. Finally, smart contracts. One major use case is _security deposits_: ETH put into lockboxes that provably get destroyed if a proof is submitted that the owner violated some protocol rule. Another is actually implementing things like ZK payment channels. A third is making it easy to have pointers to "digital objects" that represent some socially defined external entity (not necessarily an RWA!), and for those pointers to interact with each other. *Technically*, for every use case other than use cases handling ETH itself, the smart contracts are "just a convenience": you could just use the chain as a bulletin board, and use ZK-SNARKs to provide the results of any computations over it. But in practice, standardizing such things is hard, and you get the most interoperability if you just take the same mechanism that enables programs to control ETH, and let other digital objects use it too. And from here, we start getting into a huge number of potential applications, including all of the things happening in defi. --- So yes, Ethereum has a lot of value, that you can see from first principles if you take a step back and see it purely as a technical tool: global shared memory. I suspect that a big bottleneck to seeing more of this kind of usage is that the world has not yet updated to the fact that we are no longer in 2020-22, fees are now extremely low, and we have a much stronger scaling roadmap to make sure that they will continue to stay low, even if much higher levels of usage return. Infrastructure for not exposing fee volatility to users is much more mature (eg. one way to do this for many use cases is to just operate a blob publisher). Ethereum blobs as a bulletin board, ETH as an asset and universal-backup means of payment, and Ethereum smart contracts as a shared programming layer, all make total sense as part of a decentralized, private and secure open source software stack. But we should continue to improve the Ethereum protocol and infrastructure so that it's actually effective in all of these situations.

English
0
0
0
99
Crypto Law Review retweetledi
sudo rm -rf --no-preserve-root /
folks are so obsessed with the "institutionalisation" of Ethereum, trying to drag it into the same exact cages as the old financial system. I fucking reject that guys. Being _and_ staying the outsider is Ethereum's power move, not a liability. Anything that snuggles up to entrenched institutions inherits their rules, their incentives, their surveillance. Look around guys, some chains are already suffocating under it. Ethereum must thrive beyond those walls: permissionless to join, independent, and fearless (this is probably the most important trait these days). Ethereum will win _because_ it refuses to play by their rules.
English
17
24
133
5.3K
Crypto Law Review
Crypto Law Review@CryptoLawRev·
It’s not WWIII, but the inaugural global Special Military Operation.
English
1
0
1
71
Dima Zeniuk
Dima Zeniuk@DimaZeniuk·
@FutureJurvetson @elonmusk One of the greatest moments in engineering. Never saw a Starship launch in real life, can’t wait to see that massive rocket lift off
English
5
0
48
5.4K
Dima Zeniuk
Dima Zeniuk@DimaZeniuk·
What are you feeling when you watch this?
English
4.9K
2K
14.8K
1.4M
Crypto Law Review retweetledi
Charles Curran
Charles Curran@charliebcurran·
The people experimenting with Generative AI like Demna at Gucci and Jia Zhangke should tell you everything you need to know about where the avant-garde of image making is today. Cry and bemoan all you want, it’s the most radical break in artistic possibility in our lifetime.
English
8
13
92
18.6K