Ben Link

@RichardHeartWin Gotta add another food for thought: why not add more speculation for the chain by working with others, like Firewhale or GodWhale on some projects? Even just a marketing push with these guys would do wonders but you got the gay tablets.

Time for the cryfag beat down part two. Who's next?

@RichardHeartWin And wen stream? Delegating socials to someone? Wen debates with influencers bigger than you? You do nothing.

@BigCat369 @RichardHeartWin @CristinaHype You can still retain your value with BTC unlike his coins

@RichardHeartWin @CristinaHype @CryptoLink007 We got an awesome chain Can’t ask for more, BTC hijacked by wallstreet selling fake bitcoin to the world… until that stops &until people understand markets,& what they actually NEED to get thru the next decade of withdrawal shutdowns/counterparty risks this is it, Accumulating

Richard Heart teaches you how bridges work. Example. Chain A to Chain B. Coins lock on Chain A. MAGIC Coins mint on Chain B. What's this MAGIC step? Chain B doesn't know what's happening on Chain A, so TRUST must be introduced. You have to TRUST validators to not collude with each other to lie about what happened on Chain A. Validators could lie about how much went in on chain A, and inflation bug chain B, then some could bridge back the inflated coins and empty the original coins locked on Chain A. What if a validator dies? What if a validator gets hacked? What if a validator tries to get others to collude with him to lie? What if a validator holds his validating ransom. Some people think that there should be a timelock over the power to try and fix the above problems. LOL. What's the counter balance to the above problems? More trust. You might want some mechanism to add / remove, subtract the quantity of validators needed. In the end, every single bridge has social risk, just like every single chain has social risk. They're computers, run by humans, on networks, and none of those 3 things is perfect. You can only buy down the risk of the original sin of chain B not knowing the true state of chain A, by spreading validation geographically, and across parties and hope for the best, but you can't completely eliminate the risk. The largest hacks in crypto history have been bridge hacks. So now ask yourself, why in this bearest of bear markets does Richard have to teach you about bridges and risks again, for the umpteenth time? As though something has changed? I've been telling you these same exact things over and over again. But I guess some need reminding, or prefer to talk about risk in every thread about benefits. Makes you wonder. TLDR: All bridges are risk, and when done well, that risk appears to be far lower than centralized exchange risk. You're welcome for the education. Again. P.S. Some people have swapped bridged in tokens for native tokens, and enjoyed the experience. P.P.S. I think some folks find it far easier to post negatively than positively. If y'all one of those, work on yourself. Consider it personal development.

@ThunderousClout @RichardHeartWin @FundingGym I said outsiders, not insiders with money on the outside.

@CryptoLink007 @RichardHeartWin @FundingGym I am a shark in this ecosystem because of the dip. I bridged in. Can bridge in more if I want.

@princedeepwater @RichardHeartWin You have nothing of value to add.

@CryptoLink007 @RichardHeartWin OG = original ghey

@RichardHeartWin Wen inc dao as promised?

@RugproofPirate @GigaTheMinter It was

@GigaTheMinter Im genuinely curious. How is there a sngle admin key to the entire chain? If that were the case why werent this bought up 3 years ago? 🤔

"listen bro, just because i preach defi doesn't mean id ever give up control. I own every protocol on this chain with 1 admin key. It's your fault why the chain is going down btw, because this is defi. It has to be that way because what if *parade of imaginary horrible* then i could save you."

@wolfvision @RichardHeartWin @GigaTheMinter That's a retarded take. A chain needs users or VC money. We currently don't have either. It matters because he's already said he doesn't sell at a loss. Man, you really have no clue what you're talking about.

@CryptoLink007 @RichardHeartWin @GigaTheMinter He doesn’t need outsiders. Who cares if he top blasted ETH. It’s not a determining factor here

@FundingGym @AndinBriwel @RichardHeartWin Exactly. these guys are part of why the chain is where it's at

@AndinBriwel @RichardHeartWin No one said or expects buy in. That’s just a rebate cry. Trusting your own chain and bridge enough to “sit on it” is what gives value to the whole ecosystem.

@RGreen622 @FundingGym @RichardHeartWin He already said there's risk with the bridge. Go read his replies.

@FundingGym @RichardHeartWin But he isnt saying Pulsechain is ZERO risk right? Of course he's also not going to say there is some risk with Pulsechain bridge either. No founder would, but its implied of course.

@princedeepwater @FundingGym @RichardHeartWin You seriously don't understand that trust equals pump? They go hand in hand. Why would an outsider bridge in when the founder publicly states he doesn't trust it?? Think.

maybe he's not interested in sending a "trust signal" by bridging big value. he consistently prioritizes zero bridge risk natives over extra validator and issuer trust, then layers on privacy through Liberty, Railgun shielded DeFi, and PRVX. It's clear from the conversations you take part in that most people just want a "No Expectations But Pump My Bags, Richard Please" signal rather than a trust signal. As everyone said on your call today, nobody would care if the price was 10x higher. You are all obsessed with the funds being bridged in for pumping, not for trust.

@wolfvision @RichardHeartWin @GigaTheMinter As much as all of us actually. He bought the literal top of eth like a noob and has no way out yet because he isn't attracting outsiders. Simple as that.

@CryptoLink007 @RichardHeartWin @GigaTheMinter Not any more stuck than you or me. He’s just stuck in greatness being made manifest. Just wait til it’s time to be revealed. To then it’s all smoke. Everyone got an attitude about something but who’s really putting in the work

@GigaTheMinter @RichardHeartWin Notice he can't answer this. Instead of working with us he just insults. Who wants to come here with this attitude by the founder?

@HODLITUP @RichardHeartWin Yep, hopefully he stops crashing out like this.

@RichardHeartWin @CryptoLink007 When the market recovers, we will all be in a much better place as long as we don't paper hand this opportunity away ... Have faith, crypto is volatile.. just because the candles aren't your color today doesn't mean it's not a good coin on a good ecosystem.. $Pls $Plsx $Inc $Hex

@datadevrblx @GigaTheMinter @RichardHeartWin No, he half assed that

@CryptoLink007 @GigaTheMinter @RichardHeartWin I suppose you didn't read his recent tweets because he explained the downsides

LION AND TIGERS AND ADMIN KEYS OH MY! x.com/i/spaces/1pKkO…

@wolfvision @RichardHeartWin @GigaTheMinter Crazy to think that.

@CryptoLink007 @RichardHeartWin @GigaTheMinter He’s not stuck bro.

@Chadlyp95 @RichardHeartWin @GigaTheMinter Been the other way around so far. RH can't even pretend to have multisig for better optics.

@RichardHeartWin @CryptoLink007 @GigaTheMinter It is learning day for GIGA 🤔😂

im not trying to be innovative or anything. I am literally just saying what is objective reality. Richard Heart controls a single admin key that has complete and total control over the entire chain. Everything else is noise and optics. I literally presented a way to present better. I know oyu know this, but you know what you dont know? You look like a scammer to the entire world, and every retard potential onboard in the world falls to the security theatre bullshit. So instead of saying look guys i took 'precautions a b and c, you jsut say, nah taht shit sucks jsut as bad so im going to raw dog it. There is absolutely nothing you can object to with this response..

@datadevrblx @GigaTheMinter @RichardHeartWin How much did RH pay you for this comment? It's brain dead. There is literally no down side to simply having the illusion of more security at the minimum.

First he says "The bridge needs to be controlled by a timelock" @RichardHeartWin Explains why that's a completely stupid idea Then he says "uhhh.... I have a great idea! It should be a multisig instead! @RichardHeartWin Explains why that's even more dumb Then he says "ok well... uhh....I want a multisig anyway so I can shill my bags easier" No words.

@RichardHeartWin Just to be clear to avoid a misunderstanding--you sound like you're scamming when you say this to a legitimate issue. Surely you can't be so oblivious.

@CryptoLink007 I don't work for you buddy.