shayno crypto

511 posts

shayno crypto

shayno crypto

@CryptoShayno

Katılım Kasım 2020
142 Takip Edilen100 Takipçiler
shayno crypto retweetledi
AusPoll
AusPoll@AusPoll6·
🚨 NEW: Victorian (state) voting intention 🟧 ONP: 26.5% (+26) 🟥 ALP: 25.5% (-11.5) 🟦 L/NP: 21.5% (-13) 🟩 GRN: 13.5% (+2) ⬛️ OTH: 13% (-4) Roy Morgan | 13-16 Feb | n=2462 | +/- 2022 election
English
208
343
3K
781.3K
shayno crypto retweetledi
Charlie Ward Show
Charlie Ward Show@Charlieshowtv·
ITS FINALLY HERE, MY ALL NEW TESLA EXPLORER 9 PHONE !!! I AM GIVING AWAY 500 OF THESE NEW TESLA PHONES TO WHOEVER COMMENTS FOLLOW UP 👍 LIKES AND REPOST THIS POST !!!
Charlie Ward Show tweet mediaCharlie Ward Show tweet media
English
98
85
145
7.8K
Paul White Gold Eagle
Paul White Gold Eagle@PaulGoldEagle·
Exciting News on The QFS: Iso20022 went live on Monday and running on the XRP Stellar blockchain and XLM Lumens. This literally means they have now moved from the old cabal swift system to the new system. Do the Needful while you can. God bless you.
English
74
475
1.6K
63.9K
shayno crypto retweetledi
Charlie Ward Show
Charlie Ward Show@Charlieshowtv·
ITS FINALLY HERE, MY ALL NEW TESLA EXPLORER 9 PHONE !!! I AM GIVING AWAY 500 OF THESE NEW TESLA PHONES TO WHOEVER COMMENTS THUMBS UP 👍 LIKES AND SHARES THIS POST !!!
Charlie Ward Show tweet mediaCharlie Ward Show tweet media
English
133
88
162
6.7K
shayno crypto
shayno crypto@CryptoShayno·
@TerpsMLC It was quite clear she couldn't handle the position people leaving by the droves.
English
0
0
0
8
shayno crypto
shayno crypto@CryptoShayno·
@TerpsMLC Only problem is that the people are turning on labour because the economy ,all the extra taxes, the handling of the Palestine rally in Sydney and also the Muslim community it's turning people away by the droves and onto one nation.
English
0
0
1
35
Christopher Greene 😎🏝🚀⛵️
SOS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! INTERNET DOWN MAUI !!!!!!!!!!!!!! STREAM CUT !!!!!!!!!!!!! LET’S GOOOoOOOOOOOOO !!!!!!!!!!! 🆘 🛟 ‼️
English
8
7
107
9.9K
shayno crypto retweetledi
Charlie Ward Show
Charlie Ward Show@Charlieshowtv·
Giving away 5,000 $XRP to one lucky follower 🔥 Found my old #XRP wallet from 2017 and decided to change someone’s life today. Simply like, retweet and comment "done". Random winner in 24 hours, must be following. Repost and follow
Charlie Ward Show tweet media
English
116
92
186
8.9K
Swift
Swift@swiftcommunity·
Citi is among a growing group of banks working with us to shape our blockchain-based ledger – extending Swift’s infrastructure to support tokenised value at scale. Through industry-wide collaboration, we’re enabling a future where value moves seamlessly in a multi-model, multi-choice world. 👉 Learn more: swift.com/news-events/ne…
Swift tweet media
English
98
160
699
249.7K
Paul Grey
Paul Grey@paulgrey·
The ERC-20 Problems You Described? They Were Solved Years Ago. I just read Hugo Montenegro's piece on how ERC-20 held back blockchain payments for a decade. It's one of the best technical critiques I've seen, and everything he wishes Ethereum had already exists. Not as a proposal. Not as an EIP. Shipping in production since 2020. Let me walk through his three core problems. ⚛️ PROBLEM 1: NO TRANSFER METADATA Hugo describes the reconciliation nightmare: "Which of these 50 transfers was yours?" On XPR Network, every token transfer has a native memo field: transfer(from, to, "100.0000 XPR", "Invoice #12345") That's it. No disposable contract addresses. No off-chain databases. Just a memo. On every transaction. By default. ⚛️⚛️ PROBLEM 2: THE TWO-TRANSACTION TRAP Hugo nails this one. Approve, then transfer. Two signatures. Two gas fees. And that lingering unlimited approval that enabled the $120M BadgerDAO hack. XPR Network doesn't have approve/transferFrom. One action. One signature. Done. For DeFi, contracts use inline actions, multiple operations execute atomically in a single user-signed transaction. No approvals sitting around waiting to be exploited ⚛️⚛️⚛️ PROBLEM 3: ETH'S SPECIAL STATUS Users need ETH for gas, even when transacting other tokens. Hugo calls it "confusing UX" On XPR Network, transactions are literally free for users. Not subsidized. Not abstracted. Actually free. DApps stake resources to cover their users transactions. new users can transact immediately... no "buy gas tokens first" barrier. ⚛️⚛️⚛️⚛️ BUT WAIT, THERE'S MORE Hugo hopes Account Abstraction will eventually give Ethereum "Web2-like" payment experiences. @XPRNetwork ships this today: • Biometric signing (Face ID / Touch ID) - no MetaMask • Human-readable accounts - "paulgnz" not "0x742d35Cc..." • 0.5 second blocks - actual real-time • Native memo on every transfer • Single-signature transactions • Free for end users This isn't theoretical. Metal Pay, Metal X, LOAN Protocol, WebAuth wallet, and dozens of dApps run on this infrastructure daily. WHY DOESN'T EVERYONE KNOW ABOUT THIS? Honestly? Network effects and narrative. Ethereum won the mindshare war early. Most developers never look beyond Solidity. The EOSIO ecosystem had its own baggage that XPR Network (Antelope-based) unfairly inherited. But the architecture was right from the start. Hugo's article perfectly articulates why ERC-20 was "premature generalization." The Antelope token standard wasn't. It included memos, single-step transfers, and a resource model that doesn't punish users.. from day one. THE TAKEAWAY I'm not saying "abandon Ethereum" .... Network effects matter. Liquidity matters. But if you're building payments infrastructure and frustrated by ERC-20's decade-old limitations, maybe look at chains that solved these problems architecturally rather than waiting for Account Abstraction to patch them. The best time to fix token standards was 2015. The second best time is to use a chain that already did. XPR Network docs: docs.xprnetwork.org Hugo's original post: hugo0.com/blog/how-erc20…
Hugo Montenegro@uwwgo

ERC-20 is the worst thing that ever happened to Ethereum. I hate it. I have had to built around it for years. Thus, I wrote a hit piece on ERC-20. Here's the TLDR on why the standard is terrible: 1.) You cannot attach information to a transfer This makes programmatically building logic on erc20 payments impossible. That's really dumb. 2.) approve(). Self-explanatory. 3.) ERC-20 and Ether are both "coins", but they are different. This is very very very confusing for normies and makes for horrible UX. Read my full hit piece on the worst standard in Ethereum history here: hugo0.com/blog/how-erc20…

English
5
39
120
12.1K
shayno crypto
shayno crypto@CryptoShayno·
@DeclanFox14 Is it possible to be able to stake our linea on metamask wallet one day Declan it would be nice and would encourage more holders.
English
5
0
2
1K
Declan Fox
Declan Fox@DeclanFox14·
Linea is primed to be the first battle tested Native Rollup technology stack, and we directly support this EIP and direction. We made a unique decision early on to follow the mainline EVM specification exactly with no forks, hence it’s the only L2 stack that an L1 EL client can sync to out of the box! This was extremely challenging with ZK proofs but we stuck to it and now this aligns with the convergence of L1 and L2 and applies nicely to V’s restated vision. First step, Stage 1 zkEVM, which will be rolling out very soon along with other unique Linea features, such as Yield Boost. Let’s keep building!
vitalik.eth@VitalikButerin

There have recently been some discussions on the ongoing role of L2s in the Ethereum ecosystem, especially in the face of two facts: * L2s' progress to stage 2 (and, secondarily, on interop) has been far slower and more difficult than originally expected * L1 itself is scaling, fees are very low, and gaslimits are projected to increase greatly in 2026 Both of these facts, for their own separate reasons, mean that the original vision of L2s and their role in Ethereum no longer makes sense, and we need a new path. First, let us recap the original vision. Ethereum needs to scale. The definition of "Ethereum scaling" is the existence of large quantities of block space that is backed by the full faith and credit of Ethereum - that is, block space where, if you do things (including with ETH) inside that block space, your activities are guaranteed to be valid, uncensored, unreverted, untouched, as long as Ethereum itself functions. If you create a 10000 TPS EVM where its connection to L1 is mediated by a multisig bridge, then you are not scaling Ethereum. This vision no longer makes sense. L1 does not need L2s to be "branded shards", because L1 is itself scaling. And L2s are not able or willing to satisfy the properties that a true "branded shard" would require. I've even seen at least one explicitly saying that they may never want to go beyond stage 1, not just for technical reasons around ZK-EVM safety, but also because their customers' regulatory needs require them to have ultimate control. This may be doing the right thing for your customers. But it should be obvious that if you are doing this, then you are not "scaling Ethereum" in the sense meant by the rollup-centric roadmap. But that's fine! it's fine because Ethereum itself is now scaling directly on L1, with large planned increases to its gas limit this year and the years ahead. We should stop thinking about L2s as literally being "branded shards" of Ethereum, with the social status and responsibilities that this entails. Instead, we can think of L2s as being a full spectrum, which includes both chains backed by the full faith and credit of Ethereum with various unique properties (eg. not just EVM), as well as a whole array of options at different levels of connection to Ethereum, that each person (or bot) is free to care about or not care about depending on their needs. What would I do today if I were an L2? * Identify a value add other than "scaling". Examples: (i) non-EVM specialized features/VMs around privacy, (ii) efficiency specialized around a particular application, (iii) truly extreme levels of scaling that even a greatly expanded L1 will not do, (iv) a totally different design for non-financial applications, eg. social, identity, AI, (v) ultra-low-latency and other sequencing properties, (vi) maybe built-in oracles or decentralized dispute resolution or other "non-computationally-verifiable" features * Be stage 1 at the minimum (otherwise you really are just a separate L1 with a bridge, and you should just call yourself that) if you're doing things with ETH or other ethereum-issued assets * Support maximum interoperability with Ethereum, though this will differ for each one (eg. what if you're not EVM, or even not financial?) From Ethereum's side, over the past few months I've become more convinced of the value of the native rollup precompile, particuarly once we have enshrined ZK-EVM proofs that we need anyway to scale L1. This is a precompile that verifies a ZK-EVM proof, and it's "part of Ethereum", so (i) it auto-upgrades along with Ethereum, and (ii) if the precompile has a bug, Ethereum will hard-fork to fix the bug. The native rollup precompile would make full, security-council-free, EVM verification accessible. We should spend much more time working out how to design it in such a way that if your L2 is "EVM plus other stuff", then the native rollup precompile would verify the EVM, and you only have to bring your own prover for the "other stuff" (eg. Stylus). This might involve a canonical way of exposing a lookup table between contract call inputs and outputs, and letting you provide your own values to the lookup table (that you would prove separately). This would make it easy to have safe, strong, trustless interoperability with Ethereum. It also enables synchronous composability (see: ethresear.ch/t/combining-pr… and ethresear.ch/t/synchronous-… ). And from there, it's each L2's choice exactly what they want to build. Don't just "extend L1", figure out something new to add. This of course means that some will add things that are trust-dependent, or backdoored, or otherwise insecure; this is unavoidable in a permissionless ecosystem where developers have freedom. Our job should make to make it clear to users what guarantees they have, and to build up the strongest Ethereum that we can.

English
125
60
386
54.1K
Charlie Ward Show
Charlie Ward Show@Charlieshowtv·
Be honest guys, do you really believe in $10,000 per #XRP??
Charlie Ward Show tweet media
English
187
63
578
19.8K
Charlie Ward Show
Charlie Ward Show@Charlieshowtv·
TIME IS UP ALREADY. GET PREPARED AND BE READY. THE ENTIRE TRUTH IS ABOUT TO BE REVEALED. BE PREPARED AND AVOID BEING LEFT BEHIND! I WILL GIVE OUT $200,000 XRP TO PATRIOTS WHO REPOST, FOLLOW AND DROP A 👍. STAY TUNED!
Charlie Ward Show tweet media
English
90
83
192
8.9K