Crypto Jargon

POV: You’re Elon Musk. You just crossed roughly $800 billion net worth. Most people would celebrate, take a victory lap, maybe even slow down. Instead, you reply with four words: “$10T or bust.” You set the new target at ten trillion dollars. Not because you need the money. Because you see what’s possible when AI, robotics, space, and energy all converge under one vision. You’ve already done the “impossible” multiple times. Now you’re telling everyone the next impossible is $10 trillion personal net worth. That’s not a number. That’s a mission. And the entire ecosystem around you just got the memo.

JUST IN: Elon Musk says his goal is to reach a $10 trillion net worth. "$10T or bust"

🚨 S(C)AM ALTMAN’S WORLDCOIN PROJECT JUST GOT EXPOSED FOR “STEALING” MILLIONS OF IRIS SCANS FROM THE WORLD’S POOREST PEOPLE. Thailand just ordered the deletion of 1.2 MILLION biometric records. Kenya forced the full deletion of every scan collected. Spain, Colombia, and multiple others ruled the entire operation illegal, no proper consent, no impact assessments, just aggressive eye-scanning for crypto tokens. Here’s how it worked: - Orb devices rolled into developing countries. - Users got a few dollars (or equivalent in $WLD) for a quick iris scan. - Many never fully understood they were handing over permanent, unchangeable biometric data. - Deceptive practices documented: English contracts in non-English areas, hidden terms, black-market resales of scans for ~$30 a pop. This wasn’t voluntary proof-of-humanity. It was a global biometric data grab disguised as a crypto giveaway, building one of the largest private iris databases on Earth while Altman ran OpenAI. Governments are now forcing mass deletions because the data was collected unlawfully. Once biometrics leak or get misused? You can’t change your eyes. The same guy promising AI for humanity was quietly harvesting the ultimate surveillance asset from the most vulnerable. Worldcoin didn’t “buy” your data. It took it first, then regulators made them give it back.

U.S. loyalty rates by make, February 2026 1. Tesla — 61.1% 2. Subaru — 60.5% 3. Toyota — 59.9% 4. Ferrari — 59.7% 5. Honda — 58.2% 6. Ford — 57.8% 7. Lucid — 57.9% 8. Chevrolet — 56.7% 9. Nissan — 55.7% 10. Mercedes-Benz — 54.7% 11. BMW — 52.9% 12. Kia — 52.9% 13. Hyundai — 51.7% 14. Lexus — 50.4% 15. Mazda — 48.3% 16. GMC — 47.8% 17. Porsche — 46.7% 18. Rolls-Royce — 46.2% 19. Lincoln — 45.9% 20. Volvo — 44.5% 21. Acura — 44.2% 22. Land Rover — 43.9% 23. Lamborghini — 43.6% 24. Jeep — 43.5% 25. Volkswagen — 43.2% 26. Cadillac — 41.2% 27. Aston Martin — 40.8% 28. Audi — 38.0% 29. Ram — 38.8% 30. Buick — 36.0% 31. Genesis — 36.1% 32. Mitsubishi — 34.3% 33. Polestar — 34.9% 34. Infiniti — 31.5% 35. Bentley — 30.0% 36. Rivian — 28.6% 37. McLaren — 25.0% 38. INEOS — 24.7% 39. Chrysler — 21.4% 40. Alfa Romeo — 20.2% 41. VinFast — 20.5% 42. Lotus — 16.3% 43. Jaguar — 15.8% 44. Dodge — 15.5% 45. Maserati — 11.7% 46. Fiat — 3.3% 47. Mini — 0.0% 48. Smart — 0.0% 49. Fisker — 0.0%

The quiet shift no one is tracking: A year ago, defending free speech on X got you called a chaos agent. Now the same journalists demanding moderation are running their scoops on the platform first, because that's where the audience went. The market voted. The narrative is catching up second.