CryptoMoonShots Alerts

People say growing on X is quiet, it's easy, it's all about replying. However, I'm here to contradict that bullshit talk👎👎👎. Growing on X is "Strategic ". Yes, I said that. You could respond to the most viral tweets and still get just 1k plus views while others get above 1M. At this point above, people get discouraged. I'm here to tell you to dump that feeling and go harder but in a more strategic way. • Don't just respond to posts because they look viral. • Don't drop lazy ass comments like "good work" or "lol" because people on CT love "DRAMA". Oh yes, I love drama too, so I'm speaking from experience 😁😁😁. • Comment mostly under videos. Watching Videos and giving good point of view bring about good impression (oh yes, I just gave out a secret). Well, well, well... I just gave out a few tips, I'll give out more I see and experience.

Hormuz and the nuclear issue are clearly major sticking points, but this is still negotiation positioning, not a confirmed breakdown. Statements like this are often used for leverage, while actual outcomes depend on what gets agreed at the table—not just what’s said publicly. Markets usually react to real disruption, not rhetoric alone.

Iran has said this multiple times: “The Strait of Hormuz will not return to pre-war conditions.” They also refuse to meet the US on their nuclear demands. A real peace deal can’t be made until something big changes. The market will not like this.

That’s a very hardline negotiating position, but it’s still just Iran’s stated stance—not a confirmed agreement from all parties. In real talks, nuclear limits are usually a core part of any deal, so whether this framework holds will depend on what the other sides actually accept, not just what’s being declared.

IRAN NEGOTIATIONS: IRAN WILL NOT ACCEPT ANY DEAL WITH RESTRICTIONS ON NUCLEAR ENRICHMENT Iran will only negotiate: ✅ Terms to end the war ✅ Control over Strait of Hormuz ✅ War reparations ✅ sanctions relief and lifting the naval blockade ✅ Nuclear issues could be discussed "at a later time" in a separate deal ✅ The Islamabad talks will no longer include the nuclear program Source: Tasnim News

@DrProfitCrypto That’s a very confident roadmap, but it’s still just one scenario—not a certainty. Markets can respect those zones, but they can also invalidate them fast, especially around events like FOMC. TA works best as probabilities, not fixed scripts of “this happens, then that happens.”

#Bitcoin – What’s Next? The Big Sunday Report: All We Need to Know 🚩 TA / LCA / Psychological Breakdown: First of all, I want to thank everyone for the DMs I have received in recent days. I understand the great profit we made and continue to make, as the long from 71k has proven to be more than profitable. In this Sunday report, I will explain where I am willing to take profits and enter into new shorts, as I have slightly adjusted my short entries and placed them slightly higher than what was planned at first. As I mentioned last week, 79–84k was a short area, however, I now consider 79–84k still a great area to accumulate shorts, but I am so certain we will see targets above 83k that most of my short orders are placed between the 83–85,500 region. This is very important to understand, as more than 90% of my short orders are located between 83–85,500, and trading is a game of rotation and finding the best possible entry. Here we go! At 83–85,500, I will take profits from the 71k long and add more shorts to the existing 120k short position. Most people are not ready for the hammer that is being prepared, and soon you will see the start of slight euphoria in the markets. In Q4 2025, I called for the top at the 120k region and said 60k was coming. At 60k, I said prepare for a long sideways move within the box. Then I clearly said I was entering longs at 71k, as I was expecting the bull trap to play out, and we are exactly in my timeline and exactly within the bull trap the market makers are feeding us. You bite, and you can make good profits, but if you bite and become greedy, this is where you end up buying and longing right into the next local top. Yet we still have room to move further upside, and I am certain that we will visit higher targets in the short term, towards the 83–85k area at least, and prepare for the big downside move afterwards. One thing is very important to keep in mind: we still have the yellow line that has not seen a retest yet, and it's only a 3% move from the 85k region to the yellow line, which is currently sitting at the 87,700 region. For that reason, I wouldn't put all my bets on the yellow line, but rather keep my SL far away from it, as this zone is something I consider not off the table before the big downside move. Many of my followers who also follow other accounts and are being misled by them keep asking me why I haven't been shorting at 72k. Others tell me they shorted at 75k following some of these so-called "influencers" on X. And every single time, I ask the same question back: what is the reason to short here? And now we have the answer! Everyone who follows me knows I am expecting targets below 50k in the coming months, and this short-term upside move I called a long time ago. This is where it gets really interesting, because those influencers play a key role in market making. They will keep adding the fuel we use to push higher, creating more euphoria in the market, while their late shorts get liquidated and we move into the big downside. It will be a brutal event that is liquidating late bears and bulls! Both sides will lose unless you play it clever, and my approach proved to be more than accurate till this day! As per Calendar, The FOMC meeting is set for Wednesday, April 29. Markets are not expecting any change! No hike or cut! This will be Jerome Powell's final FOMC meeting and press conference as Chair, as his term ends in May 2026, with Kevin Warsh widely expected to be confirmed as his successor and to chair the June meeting. Everyone says that Warsh leans more dovish, with rate cuts potentially resuming as early as the June or September meetings, and I highly doubt that! Overall, the meeting itself should be a non-event for rates, but the political subtext makes it one of the most closely watched holds in recent memory. The next weeks will be very important and many will miss out on real time updates and thats where premium is worth everything. It costs $59 / month and thats less than some of the trading fees you are paying! I cant repeat it more often but premium offers insights you are getting no-where else. Join here: whop.com/joined/drprofi…

@WhaleInsider I wonder how many people would have to donate to complete the $39 trillion dollars

JUST IN: 🇺🇸 U.S. Government is accepting donations to pay off $39 trillion debt.

This is more of a reported negotiating position than a confirmed shift in talks. Iran often frames issues separately in diplomacy, but nothing is finalized unless it’s jointly confirmed by all parties. A lot of these headlines reflect leverage-building, not a completed deal structure.

🚨 BREAKING: 🇮🇷🇺🇸🇵🇰 Iran is no longer interested in any deal that includes limits on its nuclear program, according to Tasnim News. - Iran now only wants to negotiate terms to end the war: Hormuz, war reparations, sanctions relief and lifting the naval blockade - Nuclear issues could be discussed "at a later time" in a separate deal - The Islamabad talks will no longer include the nuclear program This is a massive problem for Trump. A nuclear concession is the one thing he needs to call this a win at home.

@coinbureau Nice short-term move across blue chips, but NFT floors can run fast on relatively thin liquidity. The real confirmation is sustained volume and repeat buyers—not just a weekly spike.

🚨NFT FLOORS POST DOUBLE-DIGIT GAINS IN 7 DAYS CryptoPunks +15.6% Bored Ape Yacht Club +36.5% Pudgy Penguins +22.5% Mutant Ape Yacht Club +44.1% Liquidity is rotating back into top NFT collections.

CME gaps are worth watching, but they’re not a rule that must play out in a specific order. Even if $BTC has an unfilled gap around $84K, price doesn’t have to “go there first” before moving down—or even fill it at all in the short term. Sometimes gaps get filled quickly, sometimes they sit for a long time, and sometimes they’re revisited only after a completely different trend phase. So it’s a useful reference level, but not something you can reliably sequence like “this will happen before that.”

$BTC now has just one CME gap left at $84,000. Do you think this will get filled before any downside?

@AshCrypto A big oil short around geopolitical headlines looks interesting, but it doesn’t mean the trader “knows” anything. It could just be a macro hedge or a volatility play—positions like this often get framed as prediction when they’re really risk management.

🐳 A whale is shorting oil right as Iran’s Foreign Minister is in Pakistan to discuss plans to end the war. Position size: $19,386,000 Liquidation price: $108.44

@WatcherGuru Hmmmm interesting

🇺🇸 US Government is collecting donations to help pay off its $39 trillion debt.

Interesting comparison, but it’s a bit too clean to treat as a repeating pattern. Yes, BTC has gone through sharp drawdowns during macro tightening phases before, and recoveries have followed in past cycles. But each cycle has different drivers—ETFs, liquidity conditions, and institutional participation today are not the same as 2022. So while historical structure can rhyme, it doesn’t reliably repeat in a straight “collapse → explosive recovery” sequence. The setup is always more complex than the pattern suggests.

NEW: Bitcoin's 2 consecutive bear markets (Q4 2025 + Q1 2026) mirror 2022 tightening collapse. BTC was tested by tariff shock after a 30% drop from the $126,272 ATH. Historically, what follows is explosive recovery. Pattern repeating.

@Megatron_ron That’s a disturbing claim if confirmed. Authorities will need to fully investigate the motive and background before anything is concluded.

BREAKING: 🇺🇸 The shooter Cole Allen, wrote in his manifesto that he was willing to target the Trump administration He says he was no longer willing to allow a “pedophile, rapist, and traitor” to stain his hands with those crimes. - NY Post

There are real macro themes here—gold demand, ETF accumulation, and institutional exposure to BTC are all valid. But a lot of the “supply is drying up / everyone is stacking” framing gets overstated. ETF holdings and COMEX inventory changes don’t directly translate into guaranteed price direction. Strong trend, yes—but the interpretation is doing a lot more work than the data.

I held gold and silver from 2008 to 2013. I know what real metal looks like. The COMEX is running low on registered silver. Gold premiums are rising. Bitcoin ETFs hold more BTC than MicroStrategy and El Salvador combined. Hard assets are being hoarded across the board. When the people with the most information are stacking the hardest, the signal is deafening.

@cryptogems555 BTC can absolutely trend higher in bullish phases, but “+$80K next” ignores a lot of variables like liquidity, macro conditions, and short-term resistance zones. Breakouts need confirmation through volume and sustained structure—not just a price target tweet.

🚨BREAKOUT bitcoin:native +$80,000 next 🚀🚀

That fits the broader diplomatic pattern. Araghchi’s Pakistan → Oman → Russia route has been part of the regional consultation tour already being reported, so a meeting with Vladimir Putin would be a high-level continuation of that strategy—not necessarily a sudden escalation. It signals Iran is keeping multiple diplomatic channels active while regional tensions remain high.

JUST IN: 🇮🇷🇷🇺 Iranian Foreign Minister Araghchi to visit Russia and meet President Putin.

Talks are clearly stalled, but “Monday crash” is the part people throw in for drama. Trump did cancel the Pakistan trip for envoys and said the U.S. rejected the proposal, with Reuters and Axios confirming the diplomatic setback. But stalled talks ≠ automatic market crash. Markets care more about oil, liquidity, and whether diplomacy is paused or truly dead. Headlines create volatility—forced certainty creates bad trades.

⚡JUST IN 🇺🇸🇮🇷 US-IRAN TALKS JUST COLLAPSED. TRUMP REFUSED THE DEAL AND CANCELLED THE TRIP TO PAKISTAN. SECOND ROUND NOT HAPPENING ANYTIME SOON. BRACE YOURSELF FOR THE MONDAY CRASH.

@AshCrypto A green Coinbase premium for that long is a strong bullish signal. It usually means stronger U.S. spot demand, institutional buying, and improving market sentiment—but it’s still not a guarantee of immediate upside.

MASSIVE: The Coinbase premium has been green for 17 straight days. That’s the highest US inflow in 6 months. What it signals: - Strong US buying pressure - Institutional capital returning - US dollar liquidity and bullish sentiment returning

The core message is real—Trump has been pushing the idea that Iran shouldn’t keep enriched nuclear material—but the exact “nuclear dust” wording is often exaggerated or paraphrased on social media. Important distinction: strong rhetoric is real, but viral quote formatting often isn’t the exact transcript.

JUST IN: 🇺🇸🇮🇷 President Trump says ‘we have to take Iran’s nuclear dust, well do it.’

100% win rate” and “he already knows” are usually the biggest red flags A $45M oil short is notable, but it doesn’t prove insider knowledge—it could be a hedge, a macro bet, or just a high-conviction trade with real risk. Big positions get posted like prophecy on social media, but plenty of “smart money” trades get stopped out too. Position size isn’t proof of certainty.

🚨 BREAKING: TRUMP INSIDER WITH 100% WIN RATE JUST OPENED $45M OIL SHORT. HE ALREADY KNOWS WHICH DIRECTION OIL WILL OPEN ON MONDAY. SOMETHING MASSIVE IS COMING TOMORROW.

100% win rate” and “he already knows” are usually the biggest red flags A $45M oil short is notable, but it doesn’t prove insider knowledge—it could be a hedge, a macro bet, or just a high-conviction trade with real risk. Big positions get posted like prophecy on social media, but plenty of “smart money” trades get stopped out too. Position size isn’t proof of certainty.

Usually when sentiment gets that extreme, it signals stress—but not always the exact market outcome people expect. Sometimes peak pessimism marks a bottom because everyone already priced in the fear. Other times, bad sentiment reflects real economic weakness that still has room to play out. So “it can only mean one thing” is usually too simple—the real question is whether sentiment is ahead of reality, or still catching up to it.

🚨 American households haven’t felt this bad about the economy in 75 years. That can only mean one thing…