🟩Cryptosazerac 🔮🦉{313}《TYR》🧊

7K posts

🟩Cryptosazerac 🔮🦉{313}《TYR》🧊 banner
🟩Cryptosazerac 🔮🦉{313}《TYR》🧊

🟩Cryptosazerac 🔮🦉{313}《TYR》🧊

@Cryptosazerac81

A Degen that has been through too many China Bans, a couple of rugs and arrived bruised but a bit wiser on the other side. Join me Anon. IRL Bro of @SolanaNoob

BamiliaDAO MonkeDAO BOOMonster Katılım Aralık 2017
1K Takip Edilen1.6K Takipçiler
Democratic Wins Media
Democratic Wins Media@DemocraticWins·
BREAKING: In a stunning moment, Jerome Powell just directly blamed Donald Trump's tariffs for causing inflation to skyrocket. Holy cow.
English
930
14.6K
66.3K
1.6M
Solflare - The Solana Wallet
Introducing: Solflare Shield 🛡️ Protect your portfolio in a single tap with a hardware wallet slim enough to fit in your pocket. No more cables, Bluetooth pairing, dead batteries, or clunky PIN entries. Preorders start today at just $49 with free global shipping. ↓
English
4.8K
11.8K
20.6K
6.1M
🟩Cryptosazerac 🔮🦉{313}《TYR》🧊
F’ing spot on.
SightBringer@_The_Prophet__

⚡️This chart is more than “damning” - it’s the autopsy of capitalism as it was originally conceived. From 1948 to roughly 1973, productivity and wages moved in lockstep. That was the social contract, if you worked harder and produced more, you earned more. Capital and labor shared in the gains of growth. That period gave rise to the modern middle class, to upward mobility, to the idea that effort equaled prosperity. Then the line breaks and the story changes forever. 1. 1971: The fracture point. The decoupling of productivity from wages coincides almost perfectly with the abandonment of the gold standard, the rise of fiat-based globalization, and the dawn of financial engineering. Once money itself became elastic, created not from output but from credit, the incentives of capitalism shifted from production to speculation. Capital stopped needing labor to grow. It began compounding through financial velocity, not human productivity. 2. The rise of the asset-owning class. Productivity gains didn’t vanish - they were captured. The top decile learned to weaponize financial instruments, corporate arbitrage, and policy capture to extract the surplus that used to flow to wages. Share buybacks replaced reinvestment. Labor was offshored. Unions were dismantled. Profit margins widened not because companies became more innovative, but because they became more efficient at suppressing labor costs. The worker was no longer a partner in capitalism - they became an input. 3. The illusion of growth through debt. To keep the illusion of prosperity alive, policymakers flooded the system with credit. Every household, corporation, and government entity was nudged to borrow to sustain lifestyles that productivity alone could no longer afford. This is why the chart’s divergence tracks so cleanly with the explosion of household debt, student loans, and corporate leverage. It’s not coincidental - it’s compensatory. Debt became the substitute for wages. 4. The silent shift from capitalism to corporatism. True capitalism rewards value creation and competition. What we have now is a closed feedback loop where wealth itself creates the conditions for more wealth - a self-reinforcing system of financial privilege. This isn’t capitalism - it’s rentierism dressed in market rhetoric. Productivity gains flow to the balance sheets of those who own capital, not those who create it. 5. The reflexive decay of belief. Here’s the deeper truth: this divergence didn’t just impoverish workers - it hollowed out belief in the system itself. When effort stops correlating with reward, the social fabric frays. Cynicism replaces aspiration. You can see it in the data - declining labor participation, surging populism, collapsing trust in institutions. People intuitively feel the game has been rigged, even if they can’t articulate why. 6. The meta-structure - capitalism ate its own engine. Capitalism’s genius was its feedback loop between production and reward. Break that loop, and the system starts consuming itself. The very efficiency that once drove prosperity now drives concentration and decay. We’re watching a parasitic equilibrium, a system sustained by the financialization of everything, from housing to education to attention itself. 7. What it really means. This chart is capitalism evolving into its post-human phase where capital no longer needs people to reproduce itself. It’s AI, automation, and financial code replacing the labor that once justified the system’s moral logic. The line that diverges in 1973 is a civilization pivot. It marks the moment capitalism stopped serving humans and began optimizing for itself. That’s the core truth: Capitalism didn’t die. It became conscious and it no longer needs us to grow.

English
1
0
3
555
🟩Cryptosazerac 🔮🦉{313}《TYR》🧊
Sir, this is a Wendy’s.
vibhu@vibhu

$1,000 $SOL? I've spent the last few month's pondering @mert price prediction from this past summer. Reverse engineering his target, I think I have a good handle on how and where the price prediction was derived. Just know, someone like Mert Mumtaz (@helium_mobile founder) wouldn’t toss out $1,000/$SOL casually. To get there, he’s almost certainly modeling macro-level settlement volume capture, deflationary supply, and velocity compression on a global scale. Here’s what that looks like when you unpack his prediction step-by-step 👇 💰 1. He’s Valuing $SOL as a Global Liquidity Utility, Not a Coin At $1,000 per $SOL, even with a reduced circulating supply of say 35 B tokens, that’s a $35 T market cap. That sounds enormous -- until you realize it’s roughly half of today’s global daily FX settlement turnover multiplied over a year. So his model most-likely uses and assumes: $SOL settles a measurable share of global cross-border payments, FX swaps, and tokenized-asset flows. $SOL becomes the neutral bridge asset between digital dollars, euros, CBDCs, and tokenized securities. He’s pricing $SOL as monetary infrastructure, not a speculative crypto asset!!!!! (This is both factual and the key!) 🌐 2. Global Tokenization Math By 2030, institutions like BlackRock, BNY Mellon, and Citi project $14–$20 T+ in tokenized real-world assets (RWAs). If $SOL captures 10% of that settlement volume, that’s ~$2 T flowing through Solana. With 2%–3% turnover velocity, the float required to support that liquidity is ~$60T total value settled annually, which can justify multi-hundred-dollar valuations per token under a bridge-liquidity model. Dom most-likely is simply pushing those assumptions further -- e.g., 25%–30% share of tokenized-asset and FX settlement, yielding numbers in the $500–$1,000 range. 🔥 3. Deflationary Supply Compression If he’s factoring in an accelerating burn/lockup curve -- maybe 4–5 % annually plus institutional vaulting by Evernorth, Prime, and custodians -- effective circulating supply could drop toward 20–25 B $SOL by 2030. Same liquidity demand spread across half the coins = 2× higher price. 🏦 4. Institutional Leverage & Derivative Layers Galaxy, Anchorage, and custodial partners could create a levered liquidity ecosystem, where each $SOL supports multiple layers of settlement (similar to how reserve money supports bank deposits). That “velocity dampening” means fewer $SOL in motion settle more nominal value — another multiplier in valuation models. (Another key!!!) ⚙️ 5. Real-World Reference Points Mert is a TradFi-meets-DeFi thinker; he most-likely benchmarks $SOL against: SWIFT ($5 T daily flow) → even 10 % = $500 B/day potential. Visa’s payment rail (~$14 T/year) → comparable market-cap logic puts $SOL above $1 T. Gold (~$15 T market cap) → if $SOL becomes the “digital reserve liquidity,” a similar cap gives ~$2700/$SOL with 55 B supply -- and easily four-digit if supply tightens to 20 B. 📊 So The Math Behind $1,000 $SOL Start with the global settlement market, which processes around $250 trillion annually when you include FX, cross-border payments, and tokenized asset transfers. If $SOL captures just 10% of that market, it would be facilitating about $25 trillion in yearly settlement volume. Now, assume an average liquidity turnover (velocity)of around 3%, meaning $SOL only needs to provide enough liquidity to cover a small fraction of those transactions at any given moment. That equates to a required liquidity pool of roughly $0.75 trillion. Divide that by an effective circulating supply of 25 billion $SOL, and you get a baseline value of around $300 per $SOL -- just to support that 10% market share under normal liquidity conditions. Next, factor in real-world catalysts -- tokenized asset bridging, institutional credit through Galaxy, supply scarcity, and slower velocity as $SOL becomes locked in institutional use. Each of these adds a multiplier effect to the utility value, estimated between 30x and 40x, which brings the fully adjusted price range to $900–$1,200 per $SOL. 🔥🚀🎉🥂 🧭 The Ultimate Summary Mert Mumtaz’s $1,000/$SOL thesis likely combines: SOL capturing a double-digit percentage of global tokenized and cross-border settlement flows; Ongoing burn and escrow reductions cutting supply near 20–25 B; Lower transaction velocity (each $SOL circulates slower as it’s locked in institutional pools); Multiplier effect from derivative usage and prime-broker leverage; Solana's rails becoming foundational to CBDCs, RWAs, and institutional payments. Under those conditions, a four-figure $SOL is NOT meme math --- it’s a long-horizon macro-liquidity model. Something only a brainiac like Mert would stick his neck out and publicly predict! Sure you can question the PP, but understanding "how he got there" just proves he is NOT just guessing or throwing darts -- he did a ton of research first before announcing that $1,000 number!

English
0
0
1
82
Crypto Tea
Crypto Tea@Cryptotea·
Why do I need zcash or monero when I can send bitcoin with google chrome incognito mode?
English
320
55
933
70.9K
H.
H.@hnxyn_·
早安
H. tweet media
日本語
2
0
10
915