突突突
1.4K posts

突突突
@Cryptototo0
2021年4月入圈,又菜又爱玩。 $BTC $BNB $SOL 币安20%返佣:https://t.co/zGWzrnJxQS Bitget 40%返佣:https://t.co/gNBBZAOPBi
Hongkong Katılım Ekim 2021
769 Takip Edilen3.1K Takipçiler

@web3annie 每个玩加密的人都会经历这个阶段,给自己点信心,我们曾经能赚到钱,以后也一定能再赚到钱!
赚到钱记得分散投资,或者说:给自己留个底牌。
中文
突突突 retweetledi

No complexity. No accident.
10/10 was caused by irresponsible marketing campaigns by certain companies.
On October 10, tens of billions of dollars were liquidated. As CEO of OKX, we observed clearly that the crypto market’s microstructure fundamentally changed after that day.
Many industry participants believe the damage was more severe than the FTX collapse. Since then, there has been extensive discussion about why it happened and how to prevent a recurrence. The root causes are not difficult to identify.
⸻
What actually happened
1.Binance launched a temporary user-acquisition campaign offering 12% APY on USDe, while allowing USDe to be used as collateral with the same treatment as USDT and USDC, and without effective limits.
2.USDe is a tokenized hedge fund product.
Ethena raises capital via a so-called “stablecoin,” deploys it into index arbitrage and algorithmic trading strategies, and tokenizes the resulting fund. The token can then be deposited on exchanges to earn yield.
3.USDe is fundamentally different from products such as
BlackRock BUIDL and Franklin Templeton BENJI, which are tokenized money market funds with low-risk profiles.
USDe, by contrast, embeds hedge-fund-level risk. This difference is structural, not cosmetic.
4.Binance users were encouraged to convert USDT and USDC into USDe to earn attractive yields, without sufficient emphasis on the underlying risks. From a user’s perspective, trading with USDe appeared no different from trading with traditional stablecoins—while the actual risk profile was materially higher.
5.Risk escalated further as users:
•converted USDT/USDC into USDe,
•used USDe as collateral to borrow USDT,
•converted the borrowed USDT back into USDe,
•and repeated the cycle.
This leverage loop produced artificial APYs of 24%, 36%, and even 70%+, widely perceived as “low risk” simply because they were offered by a major platform. Systemic risk accumulated rapidly across the global crypto market.
6.At that point, even a small market shock was sufficient to trigger a collapse.
When volatility hit, USDe depegged quickly. Cascading liquidations followed, and weaknesses in risk management around assets such as WETH and BNSOL further amplified the crash. Some tokens briefly traded near zero.
The damage to global users and companies—including OKX customers—was severe, and recovery will take time.
⸻
Why this matters
I am discussing the root cause, not assigning blame or launching an attack on Binance. Speaking openly about systemic risks is sometimes uncomfortable, but it is necessary if the industry is to mature responsibly.
I expect there may be significant misinformation and coordinated FUD directed at OKX in the near future. Even so, speaking honestly about systemic risk is the right thing to do—and we will continue to do so.
As the largest global platform, Binance has outsized influence—and corresponding responsibility—as an industry leader. Long-term trust in crypto cannot be built on short-term yield games, excessive leverage, or marketing practices that obscure risk.
The industry needs leaders who prioritize market stability, transparency, and responsible innovation—not a winner-take-all mentality where criticism is treated as hostility.
Crypto is still early.
What we choose to normalize today will determine whether this industry earns lasting trust—or repeats the same mistakes again.


English
突突突 retweetledi

英文区都在骂cz,骂币安,我这一年的感受
从 TST 上线开始,
一个测试币,CZ 回复,随后cz钱包地址买入,
接着是 Mubarak,CZ 换头像。
再到 Broccoli西兰花,cz你明明知道大家会用你狗的名字发meme,你专门选了一个时间,公布狗的名字,全网都在等狗叫什么,说句不好听的,你在用你的影响力,对大家进行服从性测试。
Giggle,cz你的慈善教育项目,强行和同名代币绑定,币安一方面上线giggle,你又一方面说giggle永远不发币。
币安上线4usdt合约,cz“4”的手势, FUD 的梗。
“币安人生”,直接和币安平台绑定,最后甚至和cz中文书名同名。
为什么上线的都是和cz你个人或者币安挂钩的币??
区块链不是主打一个公平,主打一个去中心化吗?这段时间没有base,sol链的meme币上线币安。
YZi Labs 投资 Aster,在aster跌到0.93 美元附近,CZ 你买入并公开发出来,你可以买,但是你不要发出来,懂吗?
cz你在反复向市场释放个人行为与平台影响力高度耦合的信息,让散户去遐想。
我只能说一句,
@cz_binance
,你被骂并不冤,
从一开始,就有各种人和项目试图围绕你蹭流量,找角度,造叙事。
你不应该做的事情,就是回应,更不应该去买任何相关代币。
也不该让币安上线任何和你个人、和币安平台强绑定的币。
因为这些代币未来的涨跌,市场一定会自动归因到你和币安身上。
Giggle 跌了,币安需要单独发公告解释手续费捐赠。
“币安人生”表现不好的时候,cz的中文书名叫《币安人生》,导致上涨后再次下跌,这些都会被情绪反噬。
你不该助长这种风气,你是币安交易所创始人,
你的一句话,一个动作,都会有人拿全部身家去下注。
虽然你们这样做造就了bsc链的繁荣,但是这是虚假繁荣啊,没有任何意义。
你们平台扶起来和个人挂钩和平台挂钩的代币,只会让大家对币安平台中立性的质疑,只会持续消耗信任。
链本身没有高低之分,Sol 也好,Base 也好,ETH 也好,BSC 也好。
你不能因为 BSC 是币安链,就长期、明显地去倾斜资源,打压其他链的生态。
再说 @Four_FORM_
BSC 链上最火的 meme 平台,
在 meme 情绪最顶的时候,项目方依然在持续出货,价格一路创新低。
这种没有格局、只会收割的项目,本身就不值得任何流量扶持。
至少在@Pumpfun meme 爆发的时候,价格和平台热度是正相关的。
而 four 平台的流量走势,却和bsc的火热是反着来的。
所以,从今年开始,我的建议
不要再让任何 meme,和cz你个人,和币安平台产生让散户去遐想的绑定,
代币价格的表现,最终一定会被投射成对你、对币安的情绪反馈,
币安一个交易所,是中立的,不要嘴上说社区,然后上线跟你,跟币安挂钩的币,真正的社区币,哈基米,恶俗企鹅等上线币安alpha以后反而没有得到真正的扶持,让meme回归社区,而不是绑定“二圣”。
关于一姐
@heyibinance
,21年币安账号被封,我联系一姐微信,一姐亲自拉群帮我处理问题,25年出现同样的历史遗留问题,我联系一姐微信,一姐依然帮我找sisi解决问题,如果没有一姐,我的钱不知道什么时候能解冻,我可能已经露宿街头,如果是其他交易所,我根本联系不到任何人,只会封掉我的账号。在此期间,我从未发过x闹事,一姐也不知道我的推特号,我在一姐的微信里只是一个普通用户,这就是客服小何的来源。
无论你有没有影响力,一姐看到了就会回复,所以我永远不会骂一姐。
我的建议:
@heyibinance
能不能要求币安alpha上币组,不要围绕着cz和你说过的梗去上币,其他都没啥问题。
关于tradfi板块,为什么bybit,bitget的黄金白银手续费这么低,流动性这么好,币安上的黄金白银流动性很差,我在bybit开10手黄金,500万刀仓位,手续费才60刀,到币安开就几千刀不止了,还有资金费率,希望币安能把黄金白银做成mt5经纪商形式,手续费很低,没有资金费率的标准。
中文

DONT BUY IT!
FbmmdcCYHL7WETG89xtWmNFMzQAaQ8Zs9NXVbimibonk
$DONT
DONT ⚠️@DisclaimerCoin
5.1% of $DONT total supply burned? Hmmm...










