Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Trissy
7.6K posts

Trissy
@Cryptotrissy
One final bull run https://t.co/dTXalVRUda
Katılım Şubat 2015
985 Takip Edilen17.2K Takipçiler


Trading ~ the conflict ideas
Leaving aside fundamentals, addressing the psychological, cultural and sociological, trading in one way is about identifying and capitalising on a conflict ideas. where:
1. you're the minority
2.
(i) there's a perceivable sustainable attention sink (ii) you have reason to believe the majority will change bias
3. your asset selection reflects the best expression of that attention sink
On a larger scale this way of viewing things can be seen in the trajectory of BTC, and in AI. Both charts up and to the right across times passage could be viewed simplistically as the reconciliation of that conflict. Through this lens the "top" arrives when the conflict is resolved, in other words, consensus.
On a much smaller scale we are presented with these opportunities almost daily onchain. They can be identified by:
1. is it different?
2. are a lot of people talking about it?
All of this stuff is a scam and goes to zero eventually, that's not really so relevant. What matters is the arc of any coins life cycle as expressed through the conflict of ideas.
English

been playing the v4 hook ponzis a bit and saw this on base @bloomv4_
its a combination of a couple ponzis from recent weeks
- uPEG token/NFT hybrid
- a permanent bonding curve like sato
- collectible tulip NFTs that earn yield
buy bloom (plant), mint whole units, priced depending on where the bonding curve is (sato style)
select unrevealed tulips and start blooming
refresh after a few seconds and select finish bloom
so far the code looks okay and the ponzi seems to be working, with all ponzis, be careful and ape what u are willing to experiment with.
this is one of the more interesting ponzis ive seen thus far since it incorps several mechanics from others.


English

Need your help recommending a few more Telegram channels to include in the guide
This memecoin guide will probably reach a lot of people so quality matters. Only channels from genuinely reputable traders
>If you want to recommend your own channel, go ahead and I'll take a look
>If any of the current ones isn't good in your opinion, tell me why. I'm not a robot— I don’t know everything about these people/ can't track all that's posted in there. My perception of them is positive and I don't mind being corrected
Thanks!

English

𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐞𝐥 𝐧𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐧𝐠𝐞
888888$ to 8888888$
doing a trading challenge again. third time's a charm
little bit of context:
did a 100k-to-1m trading challenge on twitter from summer to winter in 2024. took me 119 days to complete (was prime conditions back then). highest multiple was 5x, it was done with sound risk management rails and 100+ trades, no big outlier wins or big kingmaker trades and no airdrop money or any form of monetizing my social media. that was my prime. i was max focussed, followed protocol, brushed off mistakes quickly and got back on track fast after setbacks.
shortly after completion of this challenge i off-ramped a bit of money and started a second one. 500k-to-5m challenge, every trade in public wallets and logged in my telegram channel because twitter suspened my acc. ran from december 2024 and stopped in august 2025 with a balance of around 1.5m. it was a failure. the first couple of months went stellar and i quickly tripled my money (again on sound risk management, no excessive risk) but then things started to derail. i took bigger risks, i stopped following protocol, i let trades run longer than necessary and i got sloppy on logging changes. then destiny struck in form of the alt5 sigma and wlfi trades..some of you remember. i got blinded by greed and oversized horribly. was wounded badly and all went downhill from there. in the months that followed i had trouble processing this loss and i could not find my way back. my trading went more and more shizo (pasternaks finest soldiers remember), i overtraded a lot and took low conviction setups instead of being patient. still made some bank here and there and ended the year 2025 breakeven but was mentally wrecked. started drinking and fell into depression. spend everyday reminiscing of what could have been, torturing myself.
bottom line: i could not handle operating a 7-figure portfolio at that time and i had deficits in emotional control that went under the radar previously. i invested a lot of effort, time and money to work on these problems (thank you M for the help) and now i am rdy to try again.
why am i doing this?
my best performances were always while trading in public. i like the pressure, the accountability and it prevents me from doing stupid things when i know people are watching. also this space is full of larps and liars who give people a false impression of what it really means to trade fulltime. i want to give an unfiltered insight into this journey and hope others will follow and we bring a bit of the old glory of CT back. where people had the balls to put their money where their mouth is and respect was only granted to those who had skin in the game and stood their ground in the arena.
the only real downside of doing this sort of public challenges is the risk of anchor bias due to fixed targets. i am aware of that, but in my case i think the benefits outweight the negatives. shooters shoot.
going full Cortez mode again, the boats will be burned. everything that can be sacrificed will be sacrificed. i will move to a fresh tax haven where i don't know a single soul, to lower my tax rate from 16% to 8%. will spend as much time as possible in front of the screen and try to push myself to the maximum. majority of my money will be in the markets again, no big safety nets and no plan B. either let me fly or give me death. no inbetween.
every trade will be logged (entry, exit, size) and will be facilitated on public wallets as much as possible. end of every quarter i will crunch the numbers and publish a summary and an equity curve.
i am using the same template as in my first 2 public trading challenges. the progress bars start at 10% instead of 0% so that eventual negative balances can be displayed. 0% is 0$, 10% is starting point and 100% is 8888888$.
comments will either be disabled or not read. the reasons for this are two-fold. first i want to fade out all the hate and clowning of mistakes that is a sad byproduct of stepping out under the public eye and second because i want to be alone with my thoughts and not get influenced by the opinions of others. i am immensely grateful to my community that supported me and had my back so many times. i truly appreciate all of you, much love. but now its time to be alone with myself and focus on the path. please bear with me.
𝐡𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐬:
888888 USDC
𝐭𝐨𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐀𝐔𝐌 𝐢𝐧 𝐝𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐚𝐫:
888888
𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐠𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐛𝐚𝐫 (𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐳𝐞𝐝):
▮▮▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯ 10%
𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐠𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐛𝐚𝐫 (𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐥𝐮𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐮𝐏𝐧𝐋):
▮▮▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯ 10%
English

Rumblings of AI szn 2.0 are starting to emerge.
Two coins with the highest potential:
$RALPH
A looping agent that repeatedly runs the model until a task is successfully completed. It feeds Claude’s full output, including errors and test results back into a fresh prompt each iteration. Using a brute force loop continues until a defined success condition is met.
Unlike complex orchestrators, Ralph is intentionally simple, it uses bash scripts or wrappers to relaunch Claude with updated context each time. This avoids prompt degradation and token overflow by resetting the context window per loop. It excels at automating error prone tasks like debugging, test driven development and recursive code refinement, especially when the goal is clear and human oversight is minimal.
Ralph’s like a quant that loops through iterations until it reaches a specific outcome. It excels at tasks where the goal is deterministic and testable, such as building trading strategies, fixing bugs or refining outputs until a pass condition is met. The strength lies in persistence, not planning. Meaning it’s better suited to more experienced developers as you’ll need to have your requirements doc very well thought out.
The roadmap is building loom which is essentially a swarm style framework that just multiples it's loops. @GeoffreyHuntley started building pieces of this future stack (custom source control, sandboxed execution environments, telemetry feedback loops etc) to enable AI weaver agents to not only write code in loops but also coordinate, deploy and self correct on a larger scale.
This would be the end goal and northern star for agents to reach as it combines persistence with orchestration.
This represents the north star for autonomous agents: combining Ralph’s brute force persistence with multi agent orchestration, unlocking full cycle AI development with minimal human oversight.
$GSD
What makes GSD (Get Shit Done) special is its structured validation loop, no plan is executed until a verifier agent confirms it's complete and sound. If a task fails to meet the goal, GSD automatically invokes debugger and planner agents to diagnose and fix the issue, repeating this loop until it passes. This persistence mirrors the Ralph Wiggum “loop until success” model, but with a more disciplined architecture.
Unlike Ralph, which relies on long prompt chains that can run into context window limits, GSD isolates each task into a fresh Claude context, reducing token bloat and avoiding prompt degradation.
While Gas Town uses complex multi agent orchestration, based off a Kubernetes approach, GSD finds a middle ground, coordinating small, validated agent loops that build toward large outcomes without overwhelming infrastructure. It prioritizes clean context reuse, structured planning and token efficient execution while maintaining user control at each phase.
Which is why I like GSD and @official_taches so much. As it works with you in the planning stage to carefully set your requirements and ends up providing a much more accurate result. I really like Ralph as a concept and it opens peoples minds to the possibility of agents which can run fully autonomously.
However, if I’m being specific with my code base and requirements doc, GSD acts more like a senior engineer. Asking all the right questions, making sure there’s logic and cohesion in the code and what databases you’re connected to etc. Throughout the build, it’ll come back to check in, ensuring the current outputs are correct and the system is being built as intended. If I’m a developer or trying to build something with unique customization, this is a massive positive for me.
Both tools are great and are a breath of fresh air. This is the most interesting development we’ve had in a long time. Many are missing the forest for the trees and I’d be paying much more attention if you’re tapped out.
The fact we've got multiple viral dev frameworks to convert over to crypto is really good signs that innovation will be rewarded and the meta continued with the right aptitude towards building.
Covered both of these tokens at 2 mil mcap in my telegram. However I think they go much higher and we’re on the cusp of a large move.


English

@Cryptotrissy Thank you
I may or may not have stolen some words from your channel
English

Overview of current projects I'm watching (AI szn 2.0)
I dont know about you guys but this kinda reminds me of layup last AI szn late 2024. Strong rebounds after first leg up. High quality viral devs entering our space which are on the edge of the biggest change since the internet. I'm not saying it will end up going the same way again, I'm saying you should pay attention.
Current 'leaders';
>>utility
-- $RALPH ; Ralph is a looping agent that repeatedly reruns a model with fresh context until a defined success condition is met, excelling at deterministic, testable tasks like debugging and TDD. The north star is Loom: a swarm-style framework that scales this brute-force persistence into coordinated, self-correcting autonomous agents. Crazy viral on X & github/in AI community.
-- $GSD ; GSD uses a structured validation loop where verifier, planner, and debugger agents repeat until a task is correct, keeping each step in a fresh context to avoid token bloat. Instead of brute-force autonomy, it works like a senior engineer—shaping requirements, asking the right questions, and continuously checking that the system is built as intended. Level of adoption (github download/star chart) is literally parabolic.
-- $X1XHLOL ; dev (16 y/o gigabrain with most github stars on a single repo- 110k) describes a fully homomorphic encryption marketplace (FHE) in his whitepaper. An open-source AI security scanner that actively tests for: > prompt injection, social engineering, role confusion ,multi-turn escalation, encoding tricks, .. Lucas (dev) just open-sourced the core engine while keeping the hosted product (dashboard, reports, infra) as SaaS. a16z
'Big Ideas 2026 predictions' called out AI agent security as THE critical infrastructure problem for this year. token has actual utility: subscription payments, early access, discounts. Defining new category / moving before incumbents.
-- $GRASP ; GRASP began as a mental framework for assessing AI risk, similar to how Ralph started as a concept rather than a product, but it’s now evolving into something concrete centered on reducing token usage, improving agent reliability (especially for looping agents), and applying GRASP principles---
((G: Governance (ownership + override) R: Reach (permissions + blast radius) A: Agency (autonomy + looping power) S: Safeguards (evals, monitoring, rollback) P: Potential Damage (worst-case impact))
---to appeal to conservative businesses. The creator brings strong DevOps, infrastructure, and AI experience, plans to fund development and marketing through the the token, and will share more details on tech/future plans/.. on Jan 23. Dev is also irl friends with Ralph dev.
-- $CMEM ; 14.7k stars on github, offering persistent memory for Claude across devices and workflows. It’s now one of the most popular Claude plugins with ~15k GitHub stars, top trending rankings, and strong adoption among professional developers. "A Claude Code plugin that automatically captures everything Claude does during your coding sessions, compresses it with AI (using Claude’s agent-sdk), and injects relevant context back into future sessions." Context and memory are v important.
-- $GRU ; Web3 native dev with solid track record, a system that lets you spawn and control Claude agents on your own machine directly from Telegram/Discord, giving you the ability to monitor their work and approve or reject actions before they run. The platform supports both supervised and fully autonomous modes, secure encrypted secret storage, multi-agent coordination, and extensibility through MCP servers. It also includes priority scheduling, shared context between agents, and full conversation and audit trails so autonomous work remains controllable and traceable. Mert loves the idea ; vibecoding from mobile.
>>memes
-- $CLAUDE (make no mistakes) ; commonly used phrase among AI devs
-- $NOCODE ; there is no code
-- $LOCALHOST ; if a retard codes something and tries to share it online not knowing localhost only points to people their own machine
-- $CURSED ; gen Z programming language. Ralph built it
>>??
-- $SOL ; Claude keeping tomato alive. Very complex/interesting experiment.
Sorry if I missed some coins (share them below), sorry if I didn't include the most bullish info on your coin. Just trying to make people aware of what's happening.
Follow for more, I'll try my best to keep sharing alpha & my thoughts on what's happening. Let's print 🫡

English

There we go
First sign of recovery onchain and the coins with the strongest bids are the ai coins. This meta is gonna see a round 2, as we’re seeing with Ralph and I expect ceilings to be raised this time as the winners are clear and we see greater concentration of liquidity.
$Gsd is the one with big potential here. The timing of its launch during the end of the first wave of this meta means lots of people weren’t looking creating a market inefficiency, and additionally it also doesn’t have bag holders who bought higher, unlike all the other strong plays in the narrative right now.
One of the best r/r plays at this moment
cryptic@crypticd22
Scarred by the developments of $gas, too many will now turn their attention away just as the real gem is born Opportunity arises from adversity This remains the most interesting meta we’ve had in a long time and I don’t think it’ll die so quickly
English

quick euphoria followed by deep depression
dopamine receptors fed and fried
everytime the playbook is the same, btc/majors bounce of local lows, onchain picks up a new meta and turbo bids it, late entrants come in and buy the top, btc/majors correct, everyone capitualte their bags, meta leaders bottom/consolidate, btc/majors bounce off a higher low, meta leaders bounce even harder
whenever a new meta goes through a boom and bust this quickly, its usually an indicator of there being some underlying value present
when prices go up noone cares about ownership, token integration or equity
when prices go down everyone comes out with the pitchforks and starts poking holes at the meta
ai16z spent 2 weeks consolidating between 10-40m after its intial run to 190m before its parabolic run
virtuals spent 4 months consolidating between 20-80m after its intial run to 160m before its parabolic run
history rarely repeats itself, but it often rhymes, stick around, stay intune with onchain and perhaps you are able to run it back
when, not if, btc/majors turn around to the upside, my bet is on crypto x ai of the last couple weeks or something new in the same domain bouncing the hardest
osamabinstudying history and patiently bidding bottoming formations




osamabinfresh@amabinvesting
gsd is better than gru which is better than ralph which is better than gas which is better than leon which is better than gsd which is better than gru which is better than ralph which is better than gas which is better than leon which is better than
English



