Cubby

@dalepartridge That's not demons. You usually can tell in the eyes. She's just a retard

This is a demon. She’s literally wearing a “666” necklace. Demons love possessing women because they are easy to manipulate and hold much cultural power.

@hoshizorarock Except this one 🇮🇱🗑️

世界の国旗というのは全てもれなく美しいです。 その理由は我々の祖先が国のために妥協せずに真剣に考え抜いたデザインだからです。

@CommieGibberish Don't forget making Christians and Muslims fight as well

Diversity is Jews’ strength.

@ABralder @CatholicRob Everything you just typed made 0 sense.

@Cubby2435 @CatholicRob You analysis is wrong because both the UBS and Dr Nestle went away from the Texts Receptus DECADES before doing anything with the Vatican. Read more and use less AI. You are also wrong in a lot of other things but I won't waste my time.

What's really funny is how Protestantism thrived pre-internet and began to collapse when people could fact check their nonsense in real time.

@TheBabylonBibi Here's why

Melania Holds Surprise Press Conference To Make Nation Wonder If She Had Relations With Epstein

@KimDotcom For anyone wondering why she did this ↓ ↓

I’m confused… Didn’t her husband… The President of the United States… say that the Epstein files were a hoax and we should all move on?

Proof of dispensationalism before Darby Tertullian (c. 200 AD), Against Marcion: God "has administered His dispensations" across distinct periods (Adam, Abraham, Moses, Christ, millennial reign)Irenaeus (c. 180 AD), Against Heresies III.11.8: "For this reason were four principal covenants given to the human race: one, prior to the deluge, under Adam; the second, that after the deluge, under Noah; the third, the giving of the law, under Moses; the fourth, that which renovates man... by means of the Gospel." Justin Martyr (c. 150 AD), Dialogue with Trypho: Distinct economies/ages (pre-circumcision, pre-law, post-law); different divine programs (Adam-Noah, Noah-Moses, Moses-Christ, Christ-millennium). Clement of Alexandria (c. 200 AD): Four dispensations; three patriarchal ages (Adam-Noah-Abraham) distinct from Mosaic law and Church age.a1a1fa Hippolytus (c. 220 AD): Distinct economies/ages with literal future 1000-year reign and tribulation periods. Methodius (d. 311 AD) & Victorinus (d. 304 AD): Divisions of history into dispensations/ages ending in earthly millennium

🇳🇱

Proof of dispensationalism before Darby Tertullian (c. 200 AD), Against Marcion: God "has administered His dispensations" across distinct periods (Adam, Abraham, Moses, Christ, millennial reign)Irenaeus (c. 180 AD), Against Heresies III.11.8: "For this reason were four principal covenants given to the human race: one, prior to the deluge, under Adam; the second, that after the deluge, under Noah; the third, the giving of the law, under Moses; the fourth, that which renovates man... by means of the Gospel." Justin Martyr (c. 150 AD), Dialogue with Trypho: Distinct economies/ages (pre-circumcision, pre-law, post-law); different divine programs (Adam-Noah, Noah-Moses, Moses-Christ, Christ-millennium). Clement of Alexandria (c. 200 AD): Four dispensations; three patriarchal ages (Adam-Noah-Abraham) distinct from Mosaic law and Church age.a1a1fa Hippolytus (c. 220 AD): Distinct economies/ages with literal future 1000-year reign and tribulation periods. Methodius (d. 311 AD) & Victorinus (d. 304 AD): Divisions of history into dispensations/ages ending in earthly millennium

QUESTION: Did the Orthodox, Catholic, ANY Protestant denomination, or any serious Christian theologian BEFORE 1800 teach that the Church is NOT Israel? ANSWER: NO – not a single one. For over 1,800 years of church history—from the apostles through the early fathers (Justin Martyr, Augustine), the Reformers (Luther, Calvin), the Puritans, and right up to 1800—every major Protestant tradition and serious theologian taught that the Christian Church IS the true Israel of God. • One people of God. • One olive tree (Romans 11). • One holy nation (1 Peter 2:9). • One commonwealth of Israel (Ephesians 2). • The Church as the fulfillment and expansion of Israel through Christ, the true Seed of Abraham. Even those who expected a future mass conversion of ethnic Jews (like some 17th-century Puritans such as Increase Mather or Cotton Mather) still saw those Jews being saved into the one Church—not as a separate people with a separate destiny. No recognized denomination (Reformed, Lutheran, Anglican, Baptist, Congregationalist, etc.) ever taught otherwise. No major theologian ever argued that God has two distinct peoples running on two separate tracks—one earthly Israel and one heavenly Church. That sharp split only appeared in the 1830s with John Nelson Darby and the early Plymouth Brethren. Before 1800? Zero exceptions. The historic, universal Christian view was crystal clear: The Church is Israel. #BibleTruth #Theology #ChurchHistory #IsraelAndTheChurch

@Nicksdankmemes3 Yeah Alan dershowitz is def innocent 🤣🤣🤣

The amount of comments still yammering on about “ReAd ThE nAmEs MaSsIe” under here, you’re still completely: - Misconstruing what he said. - Missing the point that none of this would have been necessary if THE DOJ DIDN’T ABANDON ITS DUTIES IN THE FIRST PLACE by dropping the case entirely back in July. 🤦🏼‍♂️

Proponents of the theory, notably Manly P. Hall in The Secret Teachings of All Ages, state: “In Peru he was called Amaru. From the latter name comes our word America. Amaruca is, literally translated, ‘Land of the Plumed Serpent.’”

Proof of dispensationalism before Darby Tertullian (c. 200 AD), Against Marcion: God "has administered His dispensations" across distinct periods (Adam, Abraham, Moses, Christ, millennial reign)Irenaeus (c. 180 AD), Against Heresies III.11.8: "For this reason were four principal covenants given to the human race: one, prior to the deluge, under Adam; the second, that after the deluge, under Noah; the third, the giving of the law, under Moses; the fourth, that which renovates man... by means of the Gospel." Justin Martyr (c. 150 AD), Dialogue with Trypho: Distinct economies/ages (pre-circumcision, pre-law, post-law); different divine programs (Adam-Noah, Noah-Moses, Moses-Christ, Christ-millennium). Clement of Alexandria (c. 200 AD): Four dispensations; three patriarchal ages (Adam-Noah-Abraham) distinct from Mosaic law and Church age.a1a1fa Hippolytus (c. 220 AD): Distinct economies/ages with literal future 1000-year reign and tribulation periods. Methodius (d. 311 AD) & Victorinus (d. 304 AD): Divisions of history into dispensations/ages ending in earthly millennium

Since you clearly can't, here you go The key aspect changed in new Protestant Bible translations via the Vatican-influenced Nestle-Aland/UBS critical Greek text (confirmed on NA27 page 45 through the official agreement) is the wholesale shift from the Textus Receptus (TR)—the Byzantine-based Greek New Testament used by Reformers and the King James Version—to the shorter Alexandrian critical text drawn from older manuscripts like Codex Vaticanus (held in the Vatican Library) and Sinaiticus. This ecumenical text, adopted internationally for translations under joint supervision, results in thousands of omissions, brackets, or wording alterations in Protestant Bibles such as the NIV, ESV, NASB, NLT, and NRSV. Specific examples include: complete removal of 1 John 5:7 (the Comma Johanneum, the clearest explicit statement of the Trinity: “For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one”); omission of the long ending of Mark 16:9-20 (which includes resurrection appearances and signs like handling serpents); deletion of John 7:53–8:11 (the woman caught in adultery and “let him who is without sin cast the first stone”); dropping Acts 8:37 (the Ethiopian eunuch’s confession of faith before baptism: “I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God”); changing 1 Timothy 3:16 from “God was manifest in the flesh” (TR/KJV, strongly affirming Christ’s deity) to “He was manifested in the flesh” or “who appeared in a body”; and shortening Matthew 1:25 by removing “firstborn” (which some interpret as supporting Mary having other children, countering perpetual virginity). Other shifts affect blood-atonement phrasing in Colossians 1:14 or subtle doctrinal clarity in dozens of verses. Cumulative effect, per critics, softens certain Protestant-emphasized proof texts while aligning with interconfessional goals. In comparison, the Protestant Reformation erupted precisely because of Catholic Church control over Scripture and doctrine. Martin Luther’s 95 Theses in 1517 targeted indulgences, papal authority, and the sale of salvation, insisting on Sola Scriptura (Scripture alone as the final authority, not tradition or Vatican decrees), Sola Fide (faith alone), and the priesthood of all believers. Reformers rejected the Latin Vulgate’s dominance, which the Church guarded to maintain interpretive monopoly, and instead demanded vernacular translations directly from the original Greek and Hebrew texts available at the time—primarily the TR compiled by Erasmus, which became the “received text” for Luther’s German Bible, Tyndale’s English work, and the KJV. The Reformation happened to free the Bible from Rome’s institutional grip, expose corruptions like relic veneration and purgatory, and restore lay access so ordinary people could read God’s Word without priestly mediation or added traditions. It was a direct protest against the very centralized power the Vatican exercised over religious texts and practice. Thus, the irony in modern translations lies here: while claiming scholarly accuracy via “older” manuscripts, the NA/UBS critical text—developed under explicit Vatican-UBS partnership—replaces the very Greek foundation the Reformers defended against Rome. Protestant Bibles now embed a text shaped by ecumenical agreement and manuscripts long preserved in Catholic custody, leading some TR advocates to argue it subtly reintroduces indirect Vatican influence by diluting explicit doctrinal supports that bolstered Sola Scriptura and justification by faith. Mainstream scholars counter that the critical text restores the earliest readings without doctrinal loss, as parallel verses uphold the same truths elsewhere. Yet the Reformation’s core battle—Scripture’s independence from institutional control—makes this textual pivot noteworthy for Protestants valuing the historic break from Rome. The result is that today’s NIV or ESV, while widely used, differ in over 5,000 places comparitively

@Cubby2435 @CatholicRob You don't seem to know what you're talking about. Please describe what aspect of the Nestle Edition is tilted Catholic.

@Dan__Duncan @JayDyer Study out demonic possession and the eyes throughout the KJV. Kinda mind blowing.

@Cubby2435 @JayDyer There is something with his eyes, demonic?

Lies - Ive hosted alex jones for 6 yrs - full shows and 4th hours- and alex has never told me what I could not say lol

@ABralder @CatholicRob Can you not read.

@racistnature Swallow this black pill goyim

Swallow your blackpills goy.

@Nicksdankmemes3 Oop

Drink up MAGA…

It's almost as if this administration is full of criminals. What else is new though?

@LPNH Hmm

We have a strategy you can try.

@TheTNHoller I wonder why a comedian was the only person to bring this up

LOL ok buddy

@RoKhanna @RepThomasMassie Well this is odd isn't it ?

.@RepThomasMassie & I agree!