CubeBudgets

How's everyones performance today after last night... 🙄

Manifestation requires perspiration.

Low Trust Pilot Score? Here's how we actively collect 4 & 5 stars for our clients with emails. 20 - 30 Days after someone receives their order, send them an automated email with -> Dynamic Block with 5 different ratings ( like the one in the image ) -> 1-3 Stars go to a private feedback form -> 4 & 5 Stars go to Trustpilot But even with this, you still won't collect a good number of reviews if your Offer suck. " I'll give them 10% off their next order." Brother, forget 10%, people don't even like your product, so even if you give them 50% off, they don't care. If your product is good and is already receiving a good repurchase rate, then an offer on the next purchase is good. But what works the best is usually a chance to win something or a gift. Eg: Someone writes a review -> Send a complimentary product ( low COGS ) Someone leaves a review -> get them a giveaway entry Email is just a channel. The main reason that people will or will not leave a review is what they're getting after they complete the task. Make it make sense to them.

a great friend of mine who's consistently making $200-$300k a month told me about 3-4 months ago. "the more i do, the more i have to do" he runs an actual operation with over 150+ employees on payroll. rly shows you how important writing your tasks down for the day/week are. if you don't, you get caught up in tasks that are meaningless and don't push the needle at all. tim ferris talked about how he only did 1-2 needle moving tasks a day, and that was it. sometimes i get caught up with 20/30 things on my todo list today that need to get done. but honeslty, 25+ of them just aren't needed. the more i do, the more i have to do. you get caught in this trap of having 100+ tabs open, jumpign around, working incredibly ineffectively. just do 1-2 BIG tasks each day, and you'll push ur biz 10x further than if you did 20/30 small, retarded, uncessary things everyday

You need more magnesium

Store A: $3,200/month Store B: $41,000/month Same product. Same supplier. Same ad creative. Difference: Store A: aliexpress title, supplier photos, feature list Store B: outcome headline, lifestyle images, trust stack I broke down exactly what Store B did differently. 2hr video breakdown. normally for paid users only. Comment "STORE" and I'll DM it. (must be following)

It’s 2026 & cost caps are still the best way to scale. Anyone who disagrees is dumb. The more I spend on Meta, the more I realize how advanced the machine actually is. And the thing is, it makes sense. Because every single day, more money is spent on Meta than the day before. Therefore, data only accumulates - meaning the machine is ONLY GETTING SMARTER - especially when you factor AI into the equation. No one is smarter than the machine. There are too many dumb people on this app who think they are way smarter than they are. Remember when Andromeda came out? All these dorks started panicking. Meanwhile, I thought it was the best thing that happened to Meta ads in years. Pre-andromeda, 90% of our ad spend was going to around 10% of our ads. This was problematic because we had to launch 50+ ads before we found an ad that broke into the top 10%. A big waste of resources. But now, there is way more even distribution & it’s beautiful. Of course, there are still winners that carry a lot of spend. But I would say 90% of our ad spend is now going to 30-45% of our ads. THIS IS GAME CHANGING. It means that every time we hit publish on an ad, the likelihood of it unlocking a new audience pocket increases a lot. Which is the definition of sustainable scaling. It also means that performance will only get better over time - because FB will have increasingly more options to choose from when connecting users to the right ads. Anyone who isn’t excited about Andromeda (& the future of Meta AI in general) is a retard. Scaling on Meta has NEVER been easier & that’s coming from someone who started running FB ads at 16 years old. The opportunity right now is immense. This is why I’ve been preaching the same method of scaling for years - because I predicted the direction the algorithm was going. You need: - a solid campaign structure - with cost caps - inflated budgets - & a tonne of creatives Now, with Andromeda & GEM - this structure has never been more important. You need a media buying strategy where there is no guess work. You need to minimize your risk of human error & let the machine do what it’s great at. WHICH IS WHY COST CAPS ARE THE WAY. You need to flood all your campaigns with as many high quality creatives as possible. Then focus on building the right account structure & understanding the art of adjusting your caps. The machine is getting smarter & smarter - give it what it wants & watch your ad spend go through the roof. Look at this campaign for example. It spent 20% over budget yesterday. With cost caps. Do you understand how bullish that is? Before any of the agency dorks start saying: “bUt wE’rE sCaLiNg wItHouT CosT CaPs” I don’t care. I’ve never said cost caps are the only way to scale. I said they are the BEST way to scale. Anyone who understands maths at a basic level should be able to figure that out. Cut the bad spend, increase the good. GOOD LUCK & HAPPY SCALING.

this is why it’s so damn important to be legit in ecom it’s not all about the margins and cash flow your products need to be the highest quality possible

Most of you mf’s are thinking wrong I want 100 stores at 1k day

Icon is a a bit of a farce Signed up to see if it would live up to the hype. It doesn’t Doesn’t do anywhere near what they say it does Examples: Paying for 100 ads a week to be automatically generated. Been onboard for around 2 weeks now. It’s made a grand total of 3 ads (all bad) “Launch ads with one click” this is a blatant lie, not possible. Also huge limitations in what you actually have control over when launching Also, no show from their team for the onboarding call. Poor form Avoid

Framing as "28 years for a 2.2x return lol" is misleading bc the investment was spread over 28 yrs (not lump sum, one-time buy) If you invested the same $100,800 today, you'd have $514,000+ inflation-adjusted (6% 'real' CAGR) That's 5x returns 🙂 which is insanely good. The S&P500 is not really for getting rich. As more people park their savings in index funds, it kinda becomes a 'Store of Value' with a bit of risk (for NET returns)