Cullien
1.5K posts
@Cullian1
Passionate about all things MotorSport, 2 wheels & 4, don't look back in anger I heard you say..
They exploded inflammatory diseases and called it COVID! therealdrjudy.com/judy-mikovits-… Because that's exactly what they're doing to create the myocarditis. Remember when I showed in the Vaccine Education Summit that young woman that looked like she had lupus, well, Suramin is an antidote, if you will, to the mechanism of action, which is: inhibit reverse transcriptase because we know this COVID-19 isn't a vaccine, it's a manufactured virus. And they put Syncytin. They put the XMRV envelope spike protein, that alone causes all the diseases that could qualify as COVID, Long Haul COVID, they knew exactly what they were doing, and they published, in January of 2020 a review of all the wonderful cancers and viruses, and everything that suramin inhibits. And it was all of our work and all we tried to say for almost 30 years since I first worked with it in 1986 with HIV AIDS. Now you hear, Oh, AIDS is coming back. Oh, black man. And you know, we're going right back to the game is the same. We could have cured AIDS in 1986 with things like Suramin and Ivermectin and cancer. They're making money. Turn on the TV now, then you see 15 new COPD drugs, and they're blaming us for our bad behavior, and they exploded inflammatory diseases and called it COVID. Judy Mikovits, PhD - 08/03/2022 Ernest Hancock interviews Dr Judy Mikovits: freedomsphoenix.com/Media/329784-2…
They exploded inflammatory diseases and called it COVID! therealdrjudy.com/judy-mikovits-… Because that's exactly what they're doing to create the myocarditis. Remember when I showed in the Vaccine Education Summit that young woman that looked like she had lupus, well, Suramin is an antidote, if you will, to the mechanism of action, which is: inhibit reverse transcriptase because we know this COVID-19 isn't a vaccine, it's a manufactured virus. And they put Syncytin. They put the XMRV envelope spike protein, that alone causes all the diseases that could qualify as COVID, Long Haul COVID, they knew exactly what they were doing, and they published, in January of 2020 a review of all the wonderful cancers and viruses, and everything that suramin inhibits. And it was all of our work and all we tried to say for almost 30 years since I first worked with it in 1986 with HIV AIDS. Now you hear, Oh, AIDS is coming back. Oh, black man. And you know, we're going right back to the game is the same. We could have cured AIDS in 1986 with things like Suramin and Ivermectin and cancer. They're making money. Turn on the TV now, then you see 15 new COPD drugs, and they're blaming us for our bad behavior, and they exploded inflammatory diseases and called it COVID. Judy Mikovits, PhD - 08/03/2022 Ernest Hancock interviews Dr Judy Mikovits: freedomsphoenix.com/Media/329784-2…
⚠️ Since the media are cherry picking this, let me explain what control actually looks like. The land use framework was published yesterday. There was no parliamentary vote on it, yet you will be forced to accept it. The framework aligns closely with the same priorities around land, climate and biodiversity seen in Agenda 2030 SDG 15 even if it doesn’t explicitly reference it. What it means in practice is that the government won’t need to own the land to increasingly decide how it’s used. This isn’t about taking land. It’s about redefining how it’s used. And that’s far more powerful. ▪️moves land from ownership to managed permission. You may still own it, but what you can actually do with your land, and profit from, will increasingly be controlled by centrally defined priorities set by the government. That includes food, housing, nature, carbon and infrastructure. It means your land sits within that system. ▪️A national map. A single, government led spatial view of England, layering farming, housing, energy, biodiversity and climate targets into one system. Once that exists, planning decisions, subsidies and restrictions will increasingly be guided by it. I suspect so will tax. ▪️land becomes digital. Fully mapped, measured, and classified via data, including soils, flood risk, biodiversity value and land use. Once land is digitised like that, it becomes manageable at a National scale, regardless of what you want to do with your own bit. ▪️ownership becomes more transparent Who owns what, where, and how much, will be increasingly mapped and accessible. Giving the state the ability to apply pressure, incentives or restrictions with greater precision. Again, I suspect extra taxes. ▪️At the same time, large landowners and farmers are being pulled into alignment. They will be expected to publish land use plans, report emissions and demonstrate how they contribute to national goals, often linked to funding and support schemes. If they don’t do as they are told by government, funding may not be given. So, there is no confiscation or ‘force’, just a coordinated compliance with a wider system. Funding will increasingly be directed toward “approved” uses, with growing pressure on uses that don’t align, the behavioural nudge type approach. All of this is tied to climate targets, biodiversity commitments, and wider international priorities the public never directly voted on. Complete control and government overreach looks just like this ⚠️
