Curious Partaker

If Congress really wants to stop these lower courts from usurping the president's constitutional powers, they need draft and pass legislation to strip of them of their ability to do so. Here is a preliminary draft: Limiting Judicial Overreach Act of 2025 A BILL To amend Title 28 of the United States Code to restrict the authority of United States district courts to issue injunctions with nationwide effect, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the "Limiting Judicial Overreach Act of 2025." SECTION 2. FINDINGS AND PURPOSE. (a) Findings.—Congress finds that: (1) The Constitution of the United States vests judicial power in the federal courts to resolve cases and controversies between specific parties. (2) The issuance of nationwide injunctions by United States district courts, which extend beyond the parties and geographic jurisdiction of the issuing court, has disrupted the uniform administration of federal law and encroached upon the legislative and executive branches’ authority. (3) Such injunctions have led to forum shopping, conflicting rulings, and undue interference with national policy, undermining the rule of law and the separation of powers. (4) Congress has the authority under Article III, Section 2, Clause 2 of the Constitution to regulate the jurisdiction and remedial powers of the inferior federal courts. (b) Purpose.—The purpose of this Act is to clarify and limit the scope of injunctive relief issued by United States district courts to prevent overreach and ensure that such relief is tailored to the parties and jurisdiction before the court. SECTION 3. LIMITATION ON NATIONWIDE INJUNCTIONS. Title 28 of the United States Code is amended by adding the following new section after section 2284: § 2285. Limitation on Scope of Injunctive Relief by District Courts (a) Definition.—For purposes of this section: (1) The term "injunction" means any order issued by a United States district court that prohibits or mandates an action by a party, including preliminary injunctions, permanent injunctions, and temporary restraining orders. (2) The term "nationwide injunction" means an injunction that purports to apply beyond the parties to the case and the geographic jurisdiction of the issuing district court, including an injunction that suspends or enjoins the enforcement of a federal statute, regulation, or executive action on a nationwide basis. (b) Restriction on Nationwide Injunctions.— (1) No United States district court shall issue an injunction that extends beyond: (A) the specific parties before the court; or (B) the geographic boundaries of the judicial district in which the court sits, whichever is narrower. (2) Any injunction issued by a district court shall be limited in scope to provide relief only to the named plaintiffs or defendants in the case, or to persons or entities within the court’s territorial jurisdiction, unless expressly authorized by an Act of Congress. (c) Exception.—This section shall not apply to: (1) injunctions issued to enforce a final judgment of the Supreme Court of the United States; or (2) cases in which Congress has explicitly granted district courts the authority to issue injunctions with broader geographic or remedial scope by statute. (d) Severability of Injunctions.—If any portion of an injunction issued by a district court is found to exceed the limitations set forth in subsection (b), that portion shall be severed and deemed unenforceable, while the remainder of the injunction shall remain in effect to the extent it complies with this section. (e) Appellate Review.— (1) Any party to a case in which an injunction is issued, or any person directly affected by such an injunction, may seek expedited review in the appropriate United States Court of Appeals to determine compliance with this section. (2) The Court of Appeals shall issue a ruling on such a challenge within 60 days of the filing of the appeal, unless exceptional circumstances require additional time, as determined by the court. (f) Rule of Construction.—Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the authority of the Supreme Court of the United States or the United States Courts of Appeals to issue injunctions or other equitable relief consistent with their respective jurisdictions. SECTION 4. IMPLEMENTATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE. (a) Applicability.—This Act shall apply to all injunctions issued, modified, or enforced by a United States district court on or after the effective date of this Act, including pending cases. (b) Effective Date.—This Act shall take effect 30 days after the date of its enactment. SECTION 5. SEVERABILITY. If any provision of this Act, or the application thereof to any person or circumstance, is held invalid, the remainder of this Act, and the application of such provision to other persons or circumstances, shall not be affected thereby. @SpeakerJohnson @POTUS @VP

@LeadingReport Slavery by a different name. They want to have an underclass subsidized by our tax dollars that allows them to suppress wages and maximize profits.

A large group of House Republicans are backing legislation that would grant legal status to illegal immigrant farm workers who were present in the U.S. as of May 31, 2026.

@AuronMacintyre Easiest win on immigration you’ll ever get. All it takes is the will to do it. They very clearly have no desire.

THEN ARREST AND DEPORT THEM YOU HAVE THEIR NAME AND ADDRESS

@DMichaelTripi They both very clearly want and NEED to be able to rig elections and steal votes. They would be out of a job in short order if not, and their house of cards would come tumbling down.

NEW: Rep. Thomas Massie says Republicans are not expected to pass the SAVE Act and have no intention to do in order to score future political points against Democrats on voter ID laws.

@suenosdeuomi @RepThomasMassie @jammles9 Anything you do in society as an adult requires you to have an ID. Every responsible adult has one. We all know who is being ‘willfully blind’.

@CuriousPartaker @RepThomasMassie @jammles9 Willfully blind ignoramus. 🙈

REPUBLICANS HAVE NO INTENTION OF PASSING THE SAVE ACT. Voter ID polls well, so GOP is using Democrat intransigence to score political points. That’s it. This week we vote on a CR to fund government thru DECEMBER which means the plan to attach SAVE to an approps bill is a bust.

@DMichaelTripi When you hear the word ‘bipartisan’, you better get the lube. You’re about to get screwed.

NEW: House bipartisan agriculture bill expected to pass will grant amnesty to undocumented farm workers unlawfully present in the United States.

@suenosdeuomi @RepThomasMassie @jammles9 It does nothing of the sort. Anyone that can’t get an ID does not deserve to vote. That is virtually nobody.

@CuriousPartaker @RepThomasMassie @jammles9 Supporting voter eligibility is not the same as supporting the Save Act, a voter suppression bill that in fact imposes a poll tax. Everyone wants safe & secure elections. Save Act ain’t it. 🚫

@RepThomasMassie @jammles9 It’s what we voted for and what the vast majority of Americans support. They are dangling it like a carrot they have no intention of ever letting us get a hold of because it would allow us to vote them out of office and disrupt the status quo.

@jammles9 The SAVE ACT fight is fake, always was. It’s designed to make you furious. There is no plan to pass it. Republican politicians are playing you. It’s designed to distract you from increased debt, war, inflation, and further usurpations of your rights.

@japan_nobunaga Yes. This is true of America and every other western country. Japan for Japanese. America for Americans. This shouldn't be controversial at all.

What Japan needs is more Japanese people. Not more people in Japan. There is a difference.

@remarks They are literally doing everything in their power to throw away the midterms. Nobody voted for this. It's just betrayal after betrayal.

JUST IN: 🇺🇸 New House agriculture bill would grant amnesty to illegal immigrants with farm work history if passed.

@LeadingReport They’re totally going to listen. They’ll even throw in a couple hundred thousand more commie students he loves so much.

President Trump says he will speak with China about stopping it from interfering in American elections.

@SStricklandMMA I played ever since I was 5 and never flopped in my entire life. That’s one part of the sport I never could stand.

White bride haha well the intrusive thoughts won on that one... Anyways soccer is real fucking gay... How are you a grown ass man faking being hit? Are there any soccer players out there? Do you feel no shame when you fake being injured?

@realMaalouf @mrddmia There should be no Islamic calls to prayer in America. Take your fake religion back to the trash heaps you came from.

Meanwhile in Dearborn, Muslims are reportedly demanding that churches stop ringing their bells on Sunday. “This is a Muslim-majority town and you must respect us. According to Sharia, church bells can’t be louder than our Islamic call to prayer.” Don't give them an inch!

@MattWalshBlog The GOP says they are going to defeat communism while importing hundreds of thousands of communists from China to replace American students and workers.

Ok I’m back. What did I miss?

@HouseGOP So explain to us why you are importing hundreds of thousands of communists from China to replace American workers.

Freedom isn’t negotiable. America will NEVER bow to communism. 🇺🇸

@Polymarket One thing for certain is that not a single thing will be done about it.

NEW: Anna Paulina Luna claims upcoming declassified files will detail alleged foreign agents placed in congressional offices.

@BillAckman Maybe we just shouldn’t be educating them. We should focus our resources on our own people who actually have loyalty to us and share our cultures and values.

We need to fix our immigration policy so we can admit the creators so they can build on American soil and create value here. In particular, it makes no sense to educate the best and brightest at Federally subsidized educational institutions and then send them home.

@SwagosarusPSN It’s very clear what’s going on here. Lindsey’s donors want to hold onto the power they purchased.

Lindsey Graham passes.. then his sister whom he raised because their parents passed makes a deal as a place holder for his senate seat. She promises not to run for the seat in the special election. 3 days later she reneges on her promise and joins the race. Trump endorses Darline Graham for the special election. Low information voters in SC will vote for Darline Graham based on sympathy and/or Trumps endorsement. Darline Graham has already proven herself a lier and is a cold remorseless woman. Her brother isn’t even cold yet and she has took over his old life and is just as corrupt. SC is nepotism. These politicians should be tarred and feathered.

@RonDeSantis Good chance for them to show us where their loyalties lie.

Low-hanging fruit. Stop the CCP student visas!

@camhigby Corporations are not people and should not share the same rights as individuals.

I support privacy rights. I don’t support the braindead idea that you have a right to privacy in public. If I did, it literally would be impossible to do my job. Journalism wouldn’t exist. But, I guess I’m a Nazi for disagreeing with you

@attackdogX If necessary, you should be able to use lethal force to defend your property.

‘Squatters rights’ definitely makes the top list of one of the dumbest things in America. A homeowner leaves on vacation, their house is empty, or, maybe the house is empty simply because they are getting ready to sell it. Maybe the house is empty because it’s their house and no one’s fcking business as to why it’s empty. Regardless, some broke ass losers see an empty home & just Decide: “yay, it’s mine now” The homeowner then has to wait months, going through the court system, which is a nightmare in itself, they have to take some legal obstacle, jump through hoops as if it’s a gladiator death match of the ages just to throw you bums out while their property is being endlessly trashed by you. That is some of the biggest bullsht I’ve ever heard. If you are in my home without permission, there is no good reason why I should not be able to grab you by the hair and throw you TF out immediately & expeditiously without any legal recourse.