Curious Partaker

8.7K posts

Curious Partaker banner
Curious Partaker

Curious Partaker

@CuriousPartaker

Curious and curiouser this world becomes to me. Unveiling its mysteries, a vast tapestry.

Austin, TX Katılım Kasım 2015
401 Takip Edilen470 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Curious Partaker
Curious Partaker@CuriousPartaker·
If Congress really wants to stop these lower courts from usurping the president's constitutional powers, they need draft and pass legislation to strip of them of their ability to do so. Here is a preliminary draft: Limiting Judicial Overreach Act of 2025 A BILL To amend Title 28 of the United States Code to restrict the authority of United States district courts to issue injunctions with nationwide effect, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the "Limiting Judicial Overreach Act of 2025." SECTION 2. FINDINGS AND PURPOSE. (a) Findings.—Congress finds that: (1) The Constitution of the United States vests judicial power in the federal courts to resolve cases and controversies between specific parties. (2) The issuance of nationwide injunctions by United States district courts, which extend beyond the parties and geographic jurisdiction of the issuing court, has disrupted the uniform administration of federal law and encroached upon the legislative and executive branches’ authority. (3) Such injunctions have led to forum shopping, conflicting rulings, and undue interference with national policy, undermining the rule of law and the separation of powers. (4) Congress has the authority under Article III, Section 2, Clause 2 of the Constitution to regulate the jurisdiction and remedial powers of the inferior federal courts. (b) Purpose.—The purpose of this Act is to clarify and limit the scope of injunctive relief issued by United States district courts to prevent overreach and ensure that such relief is tailored to the parties and jurisdiction before the court. SECTION 3. LIMITATION ON NATIONWIDE INJUNCTIONS. Title 28 of the United States Code is amended by adding the following new section after section 2284: § 2285. Limitation on Scope of Injunctive Relief by District Courts (a) Definition.—For purposes of this section: (1) The term "injunction" means any order issued by a United States district court that prohibits or mandates an action by a party, including preliminary injunctions, permanent injunctions, and temporary restraining orders. (2) The term "nationwide injunction" means an injunction that purports to apply beyond the parties to the case and the geographic jurisdiction of the issuing district court, including an injunction that suspends or enjoins the enforcement of a federal statute, regulation, or executive action on a nationwide basis. (b) Restriction on Nationwide Injunctions.— (1) No United States district court shall issue an injunction that extends beyond: (A) the specific parties before the court; or (B) the geographic boundaries of the judicial district in which the court sits, whichever is narrower. (2) Any injunction issued by a district court shall be limited in scope to provide relief only to the named plaintiffs or defendants in the case, or to persons or entities within the court’s territorial jurisdiction, unless expressly authorized by an Act of Congress. (c) Exception.—This section shall not apply to: (1) injunctions issued to enforce a final judgment of the Supreme Court of the United States; or (2) cases in which Congress has explicitly granted district courts the authority to issue injunctions with broader geographic or remedial scope by statute. (d) Severability of Injunctions.—If any portion of an injunction issued by a district court is found to exceed the limitations set forth in subsection (b), that portion shall be severed and deemed unenforceable, while the remainder of the injunction shall remain in effect to the extent it complies with this section. (e) Appellate Review.— (1) Any party to a case in which an injunction is issued, or any person directly affected by such an injunction, may seek expedited review in the appropriate United States Court of Appeals to determine compliance with this section. (2) The Court of Appeals shall issue a ruling on such a challenge within 60 days of the filing of the appeal, unless exceptional circumstances require additional time, as determined by the court. (f) Rule of Construction.—Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the authority of the Supreme Court of the United States or the United States Courts of Appeals to issue injunctions or other equitable relief consistent with their respective jurisdictions. SECTION 4. IMPLEMENTATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE. (a) Applicability.—This Act shall apply to all injunctions issued, modified, or enforced by a United States district court on or after the effective date of this Act, including pending cases. (b) Effective Date.—This Act shall take effect 30 days after the date of its enactment. SECTION 5. SEVERABILITY. If any provision of this Act, or the application thereof to any person or circumstance, is held invalid, the remainder of this Act, and the application of such provision to other persons or circumstances, shall not be affected thereby. @SpeakerJohnson @POTUS @VP
English
6
13
29
4.7K
Curious Partaker
Curious Partaker@CuriousPartaker·
@HistorianUSA1 We had to have our parents’ permission, but we would get paddled on stage behind a curtain during lunch. Even the worst kids didn’t act anything like my students today and I teach at a ‘good’ public school. The lack of real consequences has ruined education.
English
0
0
1
38
DocumentingLibs
DocumentingLibs@HistorianUSA1·
This mom is melting down because a Georgia principal told her he can paddle her daughter WITHOUT her permission after he told her daughter about the consequences of her actions. She confronted him about it and he told her is can under state law. 😂 Ma’am…we need more principals like him. Kids running wild, zero respect, teachers getting assaulted daily — and the solution isn’t another “meeting” or “behavior plan.” It’s a paddle in the back pocket as a reminder that actions have immediate consequences. Spare the rod, spoil the child. This country raised multiple successful generations with school paddles. We didn’t have active shooter drills and TikTok-diagnosed anxiety every 5 minutes. Principal is 100% right. Bring back corporal punishment. Parents who don’t like it can homeschool.
English
332
279
841
51.9K
Curious Partaker
Curious Partaker@CuriousPartaker·
@chico_ray Pakistan is not a trustworthy intermediary. Negotiating with terrorists is futile.
English
0
0
1
19
Chico Muya
Chico Muya@chico_ray·
I swear, if I hear the words: “At the request of Pakistan” ever again, I’m going to lose my mind.
English
40
79
701
6.1K
Curious Partaker
Curious Partaker@CuriousPartaker·
@UnchartedX1 The ‘modern fakes’ rebuttal is absurd. It falls apart with even a cursory look at the evidence and historical context.
English
0
0
2
142
Ben van Kerkwyk - UnchartedX
Ancient Hard Stone Precision Vases... are Fakes? Again? My response: unchartedx.com/site/2026/05/2… There have been some claims made recently - and again - that the amazing hard stone vases from Ancient Egypt shown to possess remarkable precision attributes have been conclusively shown to be 'modern fakes.' I quite disagree. The context around these vases, their precision and sophistication has been extensively documented by myself as well as several others across what's loosely termed 'the vase scan project.' I do not need to re-hash all the amazing findings made on these artifacts, I have hours of content on my channel that covers it. I've been asked about this recent claim a few times, so I thought I'd track down the origin for it and address it. You can find the article I've written in response to these claims on my website, unchartedx.com - or go direct to the article here: unchartedx.com/site/2026/05/2… Now back to making my video on ancient Mendes. Cheers Ben.
Ben van Kerkwyk - UnchartedX tweet media
English
19
30
296
41.7K
CSMM
CSMM@CSMM1984·
@CuriousPartaker @WallStreetMav so you choose india over israel, in other words you hate indo aryans but suck the schlong of semites, good goy
English
1
0
0
10
Wall Street Mav
Wall Street Mav@WallStreetMav·
If you could deport the migrants of just one country, which would you choose to deport all of them?
English
426
15
314
62.3K
Fixing Education
Fixing Education@FixingEducation·
Philadelphia Public Schools may be getting rid of half days next year. The superintendent asked the board to look into removing them due to low attendance and parents needing to find child care. Did the superintendent make this request for the right reasons?
English
31
3
48
17K
Curious Partaker
Curious Partaker@CuriousPartaker·
@KellyLMcCarty Because both sides have sold us out. They do not care about or represent our interests.
English
0
0
1
24
OSINTdefender
OSINTdefender@sentdefender·
@usedgov Garbage AI slop from the U.S. Department of Education, which I’m sad to say is currently not surprising.
English
54
54
2.8K
52.8K
Nick shirley
Nick shirley@nickshirleyy·
🚨UPDATE: Minnesota fraudster is charged for childcare fraud. Fahima Mahamud received 3.67 million dollars for her “daycare” and tried to escape America prior. This is the SAME daycare where the $250 million dollar “feeding our future” scam took place ARREST ALL THE FRAUDSTERS
English
1.5K
20K
96.5K
1.3M
Curious Partaker
Curious Partaker@CuriousPartaker·
@anjewla90 How ironic. Inbred jihadis praising Nazis get killed by retards praising Nazis.
English
0
0
6
65
Curious Partaker
Curious Partaker@CuriousPartaker·
@SajdaMughal Sorry, this is what you bottom feeders call ‘resistance’. You don’t get to change your minds now that it doesn’t suit you.
English
2
0
3
310
Curious Partaker
Curious Partaker@CuriousPartaker·
@ggreenwald This center justified the indiscriminate massacre of women and children as ‘resistance’. They deserve harsh criticism and zero sympathy.
English
0
0
1
125
Glenn Greenwald
Glenn Greenwald@ggreenwald·
Immediately after incidents like the murder of two Israeli staffers in DC and the WHCD shooting, it was widely asserted that such violence was caused by those who harshly and angrily criticize Israel or Trump. Are harsh criticisms of Islam/Muslims therefore the cause of this?
The Associated Press@AP

The two suspects in a Monday shooting at the Islamic Center of San Diego are dead, according to a police source. The Islamic Center is the largest mosque in San Diego County, according to its website. Aerial TV footage showed more than a dozen children holding hands and being walked out of the parking lot of the center that is surrounded by scores of police vehicles.

English
186
461
1.9K
107.3K
Curious Partaker
Curious Partaker@CuriousPartaker·
@brhodes They characterized the October 7th massacre as ‘resistance’. No dehumanization needed. They already are subhumans.
English
0
0
1
35
Curious Partaker
Curious Partaker@CuriousPartaker·
@sneako They would consider this resistance to oppression if the roles were reversed. Considering this center's ties to Islamic terrorism have been well documented, I cant say I have much sympathy for them.
English
0
0
4
844
SNEAKO
SNEAKO@sneako·
Prayers for San Diego I went to this Islamic center in 2023 soon after I became muslim. Horrific to hear of a tragedy inspired by hate happening in such a place beauty.
English
544
1.3K
16.8K
315K
Nick Sortor
Nick Sortor@nicksortor·
🚨 BREAKING: An ACTIVE SHOOTER situation is underway at the Islamic Center of San Diego, police confirm A MASSIVE emergency response is underway. No word yet on casuaIties, as the situation is still active.
English
184
480
1.8K
262.6K
Gunther Eagleman™
Gunther Eagleman™@GuntherEagleman·
Austin, Texas police have arrested a third juvenile linked to a shocking wave of 12 random shootings across the city. The suspects, ages 14, 15, and 16, are accused of firing at homes, pedestrians, and even two fire stations. The third teen fled but was tracked down and detained late last night.
English
533
2K
6.6K
171K