@DaddyManson13@TaigaxHolic Doesn't matter what the marks on the page represent. It's a mark on a page. Others didn't like marks on pages throughout history. Are you sure you want to burn art and sanction the artists purely because you don't like the subject?
twitter freaks will straight up call you a pedophile because I don't pop a blood vessel over lines on paper.
I'm sorry. But even if I look at something and think "oh thats fucked lol", my brain fundamentally understands it is not real.
I am incapable of getting angry about it.
@SancastleAir@TaigaxHolic You’re missing the point. It’s what the “marks on a page” represent. Lolicon literally comes from LOLITA. Majority of people that enjoy that specific art like it for one reason. Also, yes. Non consenting sexual scenes with fictional adults is also bad.
@DaddyManson13@TaigaxHolic And that's where it falls down. They aren't children. They're marks on a page. They don't have an age. They're not real.
Apply the same principle to drawn "adults" in fictional non consenting sexual scenes.
Do they get the same rights as the drawn "child"?
If not, why not?
@SancastleAir@TaigaxHolic You’re right, it doesn’t matter what I like or dislike, but it does matter that so many people think it’s morally just to create, buy, and get off to animated children in pornographic scenarios.
@DaddyManson13@TaigaxHolic Doesn't matter what you do or don't like. I don't particular like Goya, especially the one with Saturn eating his own son but it doesn't mean I want it banned or destroyed. Others might enjoy it. Art is subjective.
@DaddyManson13@TaigaxHolic As an example. If I drew a comic where an adult man wanted sex with a 12 year old girl I would go to prison for ten years. If I owned that comic. I would go to prison for five years
If I owned just the words which described that situation. Nothing 🤷
amazon.co.uk/Lolita-Penguin…
@DaddyManson13@TaigaxHolic Too many words in that sentence. Post art.
They're not children, they're marks on a page. They don't have rights, as they're not real. Learn to separate ink and paper from flesh and bone
@DaddyManson13@TaigaxHolic Irrelevant. It's marks on paper or canvas. It's a fiction. It's not real. It's not pretending to be real. It's a piece of art. Art can be anything, a statue, a bed covered in dogends or even manga.
You're not one of these people below are you?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Degenerat…
Cry louder, I can't hear you... Actually, it's true I have trouble hearing with all the emotional babies like you crying.
And luckily for me, I'm in France and the French state doesn't care at all and has clearly understood that the correlation between the two is fanciful, can you imagine... You're dumber than the French government, that's harsh...
No, here it's you and just you with your way of thinking, in fact... It's your brain that's totally incapable of dissociating the two, you're the real problem it means you're afraid of what this art might arouse in you
Personally I make Furry content, a lot... I even have Furry decorations, yet when I see a dog I don't think about fucking it, you see ?
Or even if I draw someone dismembered, I sometimes enjoy gore, but I'm not going to go outside and dismember someone
We can even extrapolate a bit, breastfeeding makes a lot of people uncomfortable, even worse when adults do it between themselves, but why ? Because people are incapable of dissociating tenderness, maternal need and sexual on a chest
Really do some work on yourself, I repeat myself for a few days now but, 2 is the number of people convicted for possession of pedopornographic images and Loli images, 2 in 26 years, and without any causal link being established
To this day no Furry fan has ever been convicted for Zoophilia, you see what I'm trying to make you understand ?
And what England did is an open door to mass censorship and sanctions for everything and nothing, you should try to think a little further, and not stop at your emotional feeling which is visibly totally immature, grow up a bit... I see you commenting several times, and your arguments are hollow
@DaddyManson13@TaigaxHolic whether it is problematic, and whether it is criminal and legally prosecutable are separate.
Penultimately what matters is the act and jurisdiction and what laws apply.
Everything else is a disagreement on Freedom of Speech protections.
@DaddyManson13 I don't know and I don't care. Imposing any restrictions on art is a slippery slope. If you think censorship starts and stops with just the stuff YOU PERSONALLY find icky, you're in for a rude awakening.
@TaigaxHolic Funny way of saying you like kids. Art is art, but not when it sexualises children. The fact you have NO ISSUE with it honestly makes me think you need your hard drive checked.
I'm sorry but there is nothing you can say to me that will genuinely get me upset enough to actually take drawings seriously.
I simply have more important things to care about. I am not online enough to pretend to be worked up over something so obviously non-harmful. Art is Art.