Joel

22.3K posts

Joel banner
Joel

Joel

@DailyPlanetoid

“The falsification of history has done more to impede human development than any one thing known to mankind” - unknown

Australia Katılım Mart 2009
1.2K Takip Edilen3K Takipçiler
Joel retweetledi
Joel
Joel@DailyPlanetoid·
Wow, the double whammy! First it was Not So Tactical Gary, who blocked me for calling him a retarded Ranga (slur for redheads in Australia). Then, out of nowhere (kinda), Ben Shapiro’s star goyim, Allie bucktooth Stuckey! 🙏🏼 These fragile little snowflakes will block you over the tiniest roast. They couldn’t give a fuck if you question their morals, but point out an insecurity… BLOCKED! I’ll admit I’ve gone hard on this Biblical blackmailer for months. I called out how she and Riley Gaines are closet lesbians, talking about each other’s ‘good fruits’ like a couple of dykes. Sickening 🤢 But it was me quoting Candace Owens under her own post and getting a pathetic 26 likes that absolutely exposed her weak ass and the hate she carries for Candace… 🤣🤣 Pathetic! Go eat ya rotten fruit.j
Joel tweet media
English
0
1
0
39
chels
chels@ChelseaBumbalo4·
@Villgecrazylady “FontCode” doesn’t change anything. Watermarks don’t prevent showing or verifying an email ..they just track leaks. The original can still be authenticated or redacted. A retyped email is not proof. It’s just someone’s version with no way to verify accuracy or context.
English
3
1
6
977
Mel
Mel@Villgecrazylady·
The reason Candace had to retype the email is because of a security feature embedded in the email called FontCode. FontCode works by weaving tiny, imperceptible perturbations into the font of a text. These perturbations serve as a kind of fingerprint on the email in the chance that it leaks, it’s easy to trace back to the source. This has nothing to do with simple redactions of email addresses.
Mel tweet media
English
82
163
1.4K
338.6K
Joel
Joel@DailyPlanetoid·
@treehoe08041730 @RadcliffeWendy1 @MarcACaputo Well clearly you do because the fact that you’re not believing just one person which is Candace and you’re believing the other which is everyone that saying that Candace is a liar but then not providing evidence to say why she’s a liar do you understand your fallacy here?
English
1
0
0
10
Marc Caputo
Marc Caputo@MarcACaputo·
“The White House Military Office has no knowledge of the communications alleged in this post, and they did not authorize, draft, or publish the content in question. Any attribution to them is completely false.” —White House statement
Marc Caputo tweet media
Candace Owens@RealCandaceO

🚨BREAKING: As we reported on our show yesterday, approximately 1 Hour following the WHCD shooting, the White House Military Office sent an e-mail directing the amplification of Erika Kirk’s “I want to go home” video clip. Unfortunately, the e-mail was sent to the wrong internal groups. They then attempted to have I.T revoke the e-mail. When that failed they ordered every person to destroy the e-mail. I have manually retyped the relevant portion of the e-mail that they wanted destroyed. (As explained on my show yesterday, this is because the DOD’s IT department has imprinted the e-mail with canary tactics to identify individual leaks) So the question now is— why did the military so quickly prioritize making Erika Kirk the face of WHCD shooting? Is that normal emergency protocol or was this unnaturally preplanned?

English
134
215
1K
279K
Joel
Joel@DailyPlanetoid·
Yeah, I’m gonna like say that when it comes to misremembering or saying something mistakenly in the context of a live episode versus completely lying denying or avoiding the actual claims surrounding Charlie Kirk before Candice exposed them is more damning on that side of the fence if you ask me, I can give a shit if Tyler Robinson says car or vehicle or you nitpicking about dates on when she did an interview she didn’t lie, the interview was not publicly released. When she said that she’s in the media she knows how this works. That technically is not a lie. See you later, mate.
Joel tweet media
English
1
0
0
43
Joel
Joel@DailyPlanetoid·
@athenarainbolt @MarcACaputo Anyone that defends Josh Hammer or is trying to say she misinterpreted his public execution tweet, I can’t take you as a serious person goodbye
English
1
0
0
20
Joel
Joel@DailyPlanetoid·
@treehoe08041730 @RadcliffeWendy1 @MarcACaputo As opposed to what what are you be believing this different? You’re saying about words you are just believing someone else else’s words it’s no different everyone has a biased. Why don’t you just block her or something?
English
1
0
0
13
Joel
Joel@DailyPlanetoid·
Because look at the way you people act you provide evidence you show your text messages from your own personal phone that she has and you all still called them fake so she’s just telling you what she knows you go do the fucking work and prove her wrong or just do yourself a favour and stop listening to her content then you’re all seem so frustrated with it
English
1
0
0
13
Joel
Joel@DailyPlanetoid·
You said did she provide evidence for “why did that” she explained why in the pod, i don’t know what more you expect? There was key things in the email that would easily identify her source, showing any evidence as to what she means by would then identify the person… Why would you need to go and get a foyer if you trust your source? If you believe what you’re saying and you know what you’re saying is to be true to the best of your knowledge and the evidence is very clear. We also saw the collection in college of people that posted about a ballroom and Erica there were two operations going on very clearly in the media circuit and your retarded Liye stupid.
English
1
0
0
17
D Trees
D Trees@treehoe08041730·
@DailyPlanetoid @RadcliffeWendy1 @MarcACaputo What EVIDENCE did she provide?? She just said something with no actual evidence yet you’re asking this person to prove what they’re saying with EVIDENCE. Do you people hear yourselves?? Then yesterday she said a FOIA can be requested…why didn’t she do that to begin with??
English
2
0
0
20
Joel
Joel@DailyPlanetoid·
Sorry, but in the increasingly nitpicking world where everyone suddenly cares about details and facts, she needs to deny that she was seen at the Candlewood Hotel. This is too ambiguous and leaves plausible deniability. It’s not that hard for Eric to go on public record herself. Why does she need a lawyer for this? Ask yourself that. Think about it. You use a lawyer when you do not want to be caught on record lying about something that could be proven true, damning, and criminal.
English
1
0
0
26
JaneDoeUKnow
JaneDoeUKnow@MsJaneDoeUKnow·
“Erika Kirk was not at or near Fort Huachuca on September 8, 2025 or September 9, 2025. Neither Mrs. Kirk nor Andrew Kolvet was in Utah on September 10, 2025 until after the assassination took place.” Erika WAS NOT at Fort Hauchuca 9/8, 9/9 or 9/10! Source: Collin Campbell cease and desist letter from Erika’s attorney.
JaneDoeUKnow tweet media
Baron Coleman@baroncoleman

Nobody has ever (to my knowledge) alleged she was at Ft Huachuca on the 9th, so good job nailing that down. The question was whether she was there the evening of the 8th.

English
72
30
252
40.2K
Joel
Joel@DailyPlanetoid·
She did explained exactly why she retyped it out.. she gave her names and she told you who sent it. No one’s debunked that and this exchange doesn’t either because the way he framed his question doesn’t exactly get to meet of the claim. It was very ambiguous and allowed plausible deniability.
English
1
0
0
19
D Trees
D Trees@treehoe08041730·
@DailyPlanetoid @RadcliffeWendy1 @MarcACaputo And you believe her? Did she provide evidence to her explanation of why she did that? No. I cannot believe for people that love facts you question everybody else except Ms. I don’t know know but I know. Insanity.
English
1
0
1
18
Joel
Joel@DailyPlanetoid·
What has she lied about before? Maybe reputable to you, but I don’t know him. It was David Attenborough. I would still ask if i wanted to ask, and the suspicion was even more raised because the way he framed his original question was very ambiguous and easy to have plausible deniability because it was so framed in a very intentional way. If you’re not gonna question him but your question Candice then I’m allowed to question him not Christian care that we all have our biases. There’s nothing wrong with that like move on. I’m allowed to ask a question you’re allowed to not believe it/be suspicious the exact same way you can. Cause like you, I find it interesting that even though she’s been proven correct with text messages from Charlie multiple times that originally his “close friend group” put on record saying things that didnt Matt his verified sentiments a day before he was murdered cough Josh Hammer cough.
English
2
0
0
28
Athena Rainbolt
Athena Rainbolt@athenarainbolt·
@DailyPlanetoid @MarcACaputo He shared much more than Candace. It’s interesting that you ask nothing of her. Why do you just believe her? Candace has lied before. At least this looks like a real email. This is a reputable reporter who is willing to publicly put his reputation on the line.
Athena Rainbolt tweet mediaAthena Rainbolt tweet media
English
1
0
0
20
Joel
Joel@DailyPlanetoid·
@woolman13 @Doobynop @MsJaneDoeUKnow @pattygifflaw Who has officially represented her and issued statements on her behalf anyway? Kolvet’s indirect use of an obscure YouTuber does not qualify as an official representative. She has neither denied the claim nor addressed it publicly, which is notable and telling imo
English
1
0
0
29
Joel
Joel@DailyPlanetoid·
@retard_news Imma email them and see if they respond
English
0
0
0
13
Joel
Joel@DailyPlanetoid·
@retard_news @MarcACaputo Im puzzled but i cant in good faith say he lied, with that domain… it is strange tho and you still should of worded your question to be more accurate @MarcACaputo
English
1
0
1
19
Joel
Joel@DailyPlanetoid·
@MarcACaputo Good work, thank you for confirming i withdraw my claim you lied
English
0
0
0
111
Marc Caputo
Marc Caputo@MarcACaputo·
not that this will persuade the deluded, but hopes springs eternal
English
11
8
61
4K
Joel
Joel@DailyPlanetoid·
@MarcACaputo So you’re saying that another domain wouldn’t be set up the same way?????
English
0
0
0
9
Joel
Joel@DailyPlanetoid·
@MarcACaputo why cant you show the public available email you domain of the white house ?
English
0
0
0
7

Keşfet

@ChelseaBumbalo4 @Villgecrazylady @treehoe08041730 @RadcliffeWendy1 @MarcACaputo @athenarainbolt @Doobynop @MsJaneDoeUKnow