Daniel C. Diaddigo
3.4K posts

Daniel C. Diaddigo
@DanielDiaddigo
Director Strategic Initiatives I Trading time for things that matter | Author Sterling’s Path 📘 | up to $300 mil access to capital |
Katılım Aralık 2009
343 Takip Edilen711 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet

@BiblicalBeauty And… The widow’s life is in the balance. She gives everything she has left to a system that enriches its leaders. Then goes home to die. The irony - the system is death.. Its leaders are merchants of death.
English

That feeling when you hear kids being taught to give their all like the widow who gave her last two mites and then went home to die, but John MacArthur blew your mind on the passage’s actual meaning years ago… 😬
"The Lord makes no comment about giving except that she gave more than everybody else relative to what she had. She is not commended. They are not condemned.
No one's attitude or spirit in the giving is discussed. And no principle regarding giving is drawn by our Lord. The narrative is not intended to deal with any of those matters.
The reason the Lord doesn't say anything about it is that's not what it's about. And if you look at the context before and after, this is all about the condemnation of wicked spiritual leaders and a corrupt religious system that is about to be destroyed...
How would you feel if you saw a destitute widow who only had two coins left to buy her food for her next meal give those two coins to a religious system? How would you feel?
You would say, 'Something is wrong with that system when that system takes the last two coins out of a widow's hand.' That's what you would say and you would be right to say that. Giving your last two coins to a false religious system!
How would you feel if you saw a destitute, impoverished person give to her religion her last hope for life to go home perhaps and die? You'd be sick. You'd feel terrible. You would be repulsed.
Any religion that is built on the back of the poor is a false religion. What a sad, misguided, woeful, poor victimized lady. It's tragic, painful.
And I think that's exactly how Jesus saw it, exactly. He saw that corrupt system taking the last two pennies out of a widow's pocket."
Full link below

English

A disjointed storyline with flat character arcs. Emily Blunt is the lone bright spot - carrying a bad script. Spielberg took a “something for everybody” approach and created a “nothing for anybody” cocktail of confusion.
Once again Hollywood demonstrates its complete theological ignorance of Christian doctrine.
Spielberg traded thoughtfulness for hype and comes off like a student cramming for a test in a subject he barely understands.
And seriously - what's up with the moose and why does Rocket the raccoon look more realistic?
English

Breaking News: Disclosure Day is NOW PLAYING only in theaters. Get tickets now: disclosuredaymovie.com/tickets
English

A disjointed storyline with flat character arcs. Emily Blunt is the lone bright spot - carrying a bad script. Spielberg took a “something for everybody” approach and created a “nothing for anybody” cocktail of confusion.
Once again Hollywood demonstrates its complete theological ignorance of Christian doctrine.
Spielberg traded thoughtfulness for hype and comes off like a student.
cramming for a test in a subject he barely understands.
And seriously - what's up with the moose and why does Rocket the raccoon look more realistic?
English

Review:
A disjointed storyline with flat character arcs. Emily Blunt is the lone bright spot - carrying a bad script. Spielberg took a “something for everybody” approach and created a “nothing for anybody” cocktail of confusion.
Once again Hollywood demonstrates its complete theological ignorance of Christian doctrine.
Spielberg traded thoughtfulness for hype and comes off like a student cramming for a test in a subject he barely understands.
English

@KobeissiLetter A nice description with some pretty pictures. Some of us just want to know if BTC is broken.
English

@megbasham @RealCandaceO Well.. so much for Oswald Chambers and Elizabeth Elliot
English

@RealCandaceO Are you SERIOUS right now!? You have shared so private texts from Charlie in an attempt to smear his reputation and destroy his legacy. Everyone sees it, everyone knows it, and no one’s going to forget it.
English

Sharing private letters from your dead husband for the express purpose of fundraising is as tasteless as it is classless and I am without patience for those pretending otherwise.
There is nothing beautiful about this. It is shameless emotional-manipulation for money, made worse by the fact that these e-mails are not even authored by her.




English

@WesleyLHuff Option 3. Women’s unique capacity to bear children is testimony to God’s design. (Men can’t). Having a child also rearranges and serves to more align a family’s worldview with that design. At issue is orderliness - seeing the world as God created it.
English

What on earth is Paul talking about when, in 1 Tim. 2:15, he says: “Yet she will be saved through childbearing—if they continue in faith and love and holiness, with self-control.” Let’s tackle a tricky passage together!
Paul’s statement about women being “saved through childbirth” is walked through in a few different ways, and the ambiguity stems from whether he refers to a specific childbirth or childbearing in general.
Some of the first in-depth analysis comes in the 4th century. Gregory of Nyssa understood the text literally, interpreting it as referring to the salvation of mothers who bear spiritually regenerated children. Whereas Theodore of Mopsuestia, extended this to all women saved through childbearing. Ambrosiaster qualified this by specifying that salvation applies only when children are “reborn in Christ.” Augustine, however, departed from this literal reading, arguing that Paul’s teaching should be understood “figuratively and mystically.”
Contemporary scholarship divides into two primary camps:
1) identifying “the woman” as Eve and “the childbirth” as the birth of the Messiah, reading “τῆς τεκνογονίας” as a reference to a specific childbirth rather than childbearing in general. The verses prior do say: “For Adam was formed first, then Eve; and Adam was not deceived, but the woman was deceived and became a transgressor” (2:13-14). Under this messianic reading, even transgression of God’s ordained male/female roles can be redeemed through Christ’s birth, an event contrasted with Adam’s sin, where one brought death and the other brought life.
2) focuses on literal childbearing. Tom Schreiner argues that “saved through childbirth” refers to women being preserved physically when they give birth, since childbirth was a major concern for women in the first century, whereas spiritual salvation doesn’t appear to address the specific concerns of 1–2 Timothy (see Schreiner’s “Paul and Gender”). Under this view, childbirth becomes a metaphor for dangers in a fallen world, and the promise of protection functions similarly to other biblical assurances that don’t guarantee literal preservation.
A third option interprets childbearing as representative of women’s acceptance of their proper role in family and church, signaling their rejection of false teaching and return to traditional domestic values (this is argued in Douglas Mangum and E. Tod Twist’s Logos Research commentary).
The passage’s meaning ultimately depends on which interpretive framework best accounts for Paul’s theological purpose in 1 Timothy. What are your thoughts?
English

@DavidLimbaugh Also - God allows evil to run its course so that one day every opposition to His will shall be found to have resulted in futility. No creature (including the anointed cherub) can govern independently of God.
One day this will be not a thesis but historical fact.
English

I don’t wonder much anymore why God allows evil/suffering & it’s no longer an obstacle to my faith. In fact, it strengthens it, paradoxically.
For me, a slightly more difficult, but related question is why he allows Satan to exist, to tempt us , and wreak havoc, but that too no longer bothers me much. I think I get that as well, though I won’t elaborate here.
Evil, free will, the spiritual realm. …
English

@GlenBradley Or as predicate for establishing a one world government.
English

I've been around for a minute, and I remember that between around 1970 and 2000 it was a common trope among Christians when discussing the end times that the government would go full disclosure on space aliens in order to provide cover for actual demons roaming the Earth.
I remember this being a pretty common topic. People haven’t really talked about it for quite a while, and I was surprised the subject did not come up recently when they started making hints at alien disclosure.
Does anyone else remember this being talked about back in the day?

English

The most disturbing part of this interrogation wasn’t the confession…
It was how normal he sounded.
#TrueCrime #Interrogation
English


@JoshuaBarzon Unseen Realm doesn’t belong on this meme. 🤦🏻♂️
English









