Daniel Dushy
1 posts
World-renowned cancer researcher Dr. Thomas Seyfried just dropped one of the most provocative statements you’ll hear from a tenured professor:
“No tumor we have ever studied — and I’ve published the papers — can survive without glucose and glutamine.
Starve those two fuels, put the body into nutritional ketosis with ketone levels the cancer cells can’t use, and the tumor cells get hammered and slowly die.
At the very end you might need a touch of radiation or a little chemo to mop up the stragglers — but why isn’t metabolic therapy the FIRST line of attack for every patient?”
Watch the 60-second clip below — he says it even more directly.
This is the same Boston College professor who’s been publishing this metabolic theory of cancer for 15+ years and claims most cancers are a mitochondrial metabolic disease, not primarily a genetic one.
Oncologists: what’s the strongest counter-evidence to his claims?
Patients & researchers: have you seen this approach used in practice?
Drop studies, critiques, or real-world experience — I read every reply.
(Sharing a scientist’s public statements only — this is not medical advice)
English