

Daniel, Buddhist Investor
4.1K posts

@DanielRZiv
מצייץ על הון סיכון 💡גישור⚖️ ובודהיזם 🧘🏽♂️ דעותי בלבד וכו׳



היי גרוק, אני מחפש סיבות להצביע לממשלה הנוכחית במקום לממשלת השינוי. המטרה העיקרית היא - לשרוד. אני רוצה להגיע ל-2030. מבחינת אירועים לאומנים, תחת איזו ממשלה הסיכוי שלי לשרוד גדול יותר, הממשלה הקודמת או הנוכחית? תחשב באופן יחסי, מספר נרצחים חלקי ימי כהונה @grok


Introducing SubQ - a major breakthrough in LLM intelligence. It is the first model built on a fully sub-quadratic sparse-attention architecture (SSA), And the first frontier model with a 12 million token context window which is: - 52x faster than FlashAttention at 1MM tokens - Less than 5% the cost of Opus Transformer-based LLMs waste compute by processing every possible relationship between words (standard attention). Only a small fraction actually matter. @subquadratic finds and focuses only on the ones that do. That's nearly 1,000x less compute and a new way for LLMs to scale.



Microsoft just turned an $11 billion startup into a Word feature. Harvey raised $200M at an $11B valuation in March on the bet that legal AI is its own surface. The numbers held that up. $190M ARR per TechCrunch's December reporting. 100,000 lawyers across 1,300 organizations including the majority of the AmLaw 100. Around $1,200 per lawyer per month per Sacra. Big firms paid because Harvey was the only tool in the category that worked. Brad just stapled a legal agent directly inside Microsoft Word, shipping in the $30 per seat Copilot subscription every law firm already pays for. Same surface every lawyer drafts in. Same .docx that gets sent and redlined. No second login, no procurement cycle, no migration. The price gap is roughly 40x. The interesting tell: Microsoft built the agent with legal engineers, many of them from Robin AI, a legal AI startup that recently went under, per Artificial Lawyer's reporting. The talent that knew how to make legal AI work for lawyers landed at Microsoft after their startup couldn't survive standalone. That's the legal AI category in one sentence. Distribution was always the constraint here. Lawyers don't switch tools. Word is where contracts get drafted, redlined, and tracked. Whichever AI lives inside that .docx wins the default workflow, and Microsoft just walked through the door uncontested. Harvey's surviving moat is the AmLaw 100 partner workflow. Domain training, agentic litigation prep, deep integrations with iManage and NetDocuments. Real moat for $1,500-an-hour partners running M&A and complex litigation. It does not extend to the millions of lawyers globally drafting NDAs, redlining vendor contracts, and updating templates. That layer is exactly what Word Legal Agent goes after, and Microsoft can ship it as a feature inside a $360-a-year subscription. The $11B valuation pays out only if legal AI work stays its own surface. Microsoft just absorbed the surface.



made my computer dramatically play BBC news music before every meeting



מתעוררים לבוקר עם חדשות נוראיות, לילות ללא שנה ודאגה.. ועוד יום עבודה מהבית. כדי לשמור על הנפש נסו לשמור על שגרת הבוקר שלכם ⏰ספורט, תפילה, מדיטציה, להתארגן ולהתלבש, להלביש את הילדים. לונג ישראל🇮🇱 צריך לטפח את החוסן שלנו בזמנים כאלו! אין לך שגרת בוקר מוגדרת? אז תעמוד/י על הראש!