Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Danish Debater
17.6K posts

Danish Debater
@DanishDebater
Exploring why we think as we do? I'm open to discourse on many things, but especially communication. Your expertise matters. Now conducting interviews!
Katılım Nisan 2020
273 Takip Edilen454 Takipçiler

@evilsteveve @TrolleyDave1971 Its also important that I hold that no matter your position, you have a -burden of *justification*- not proof nessesarily.
But to be coherent and honest about a position, you must be able to justifiy said position, at least to yourself, & IF you decide to engage on it, to others.
English

@evilsteveve @TrolleyDave1971 I'd argue that Dave does take the position that Theism is false, as do I.
But we acknowledge that said position is held on incomplete information, limited ability to obtain knowledge, as well as fallible logic & reasoning.
As such we belive, but do not know, that Theism is false.
English

None of them. I believe gods don't exist.
D_Preacher@D_Preacher_1
Agnostic atheist → “I don’t believe in gods, but I don’t claim certainty.” Gnostic atheist → “I know gods don’t exist.” Agnostic theist → “I believe in God, but can’t prove it.” Gnostic theist → “I know God exists.” Which category do you belong here?
English

@gysgt_3BN6MAR @Damaan4u33 So, while the quote above is false, what you said is outright stupid.
No one, not a single world leader nor citizen of places with free press, respect the current US administration.
Some fear, most laugh (with consern) and former enemies of US look on with glee and exploit it.
English

@Damaan4u33 Hey dumbass…the U.S. is more respected around the world than it has been since the early 80’s you cheesedick shitbird…Kamala as president LOL! Even you wouldn’t have your space anymore. It would chock full o’ smelly browns…
English

@TBrown0987 Because you have shown over and over again that you have a mind set on; doing what you truely think is right & is good, And doing so on principle, not just to "win" an argument.
So even if/when we dissagree, I know it is comming from a good heart.
2/2
English

@TBrown0987 As I've said before, you are the type of person I could overwhelmingly dissagree or agree with, & it would not matter.
& I'm sure we could have a great time talking about whatever it was, maybe not even getting closer to agreeing, but still have a good time on frindly terms. 1/2
English

@Lion_IRC @GeraldN19662123 @JacksonWheat1 2/2
The big bang theory:
"should be understood only as the theory that says the universe evolved from a hot dense state enjoys a rare majority support of 68%..." "...Notably, there is more consensus on this issue than any other issue we surveyed."
#bib.bib4" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">arxiv.org/html/2503.1577…
English

@Lion_IRC @GeraldN19662123 @JacksonWheat1 Google AI?
Maybe go a bit deeper?
Last survey:
"a theory of the aftermath of the bang" that says, "nothing about what banged, why it banged, or what happened before it banged"-Alan guth
68% agree that thr big bang does not actualy talk about the beginning, 17% think it does.
1/2
English

For the love of God, Stephen Meyer IS NOT A SCIENTIST! He’s not a physicist, cell biologist, or paleontologist. His opinions on these topics mean nothing!
Piers Morgan Uncensored@PiersUncensored
"We've discovered the universe itself definitely had a beginning - we can no longer say it's that eternal self-existing thing!" Piers Morgan asks Stephen Meyer on what, if anything, existed before the universe began. 📺youtu.be/zBI8vU7vadY @piersmorgan | @StephenCMeyer
English

@momomcares2016 @RepJeffries Hmm, and what did your military intelligence say about the 2015 deal? Its effect? What did they say it did and how well? What did they say about it when Trump withdrew from it? And what was the effect of his withdrawl? Not what Trump said, what did the military intilligence say?
English

@RepJeffries And you are positively, 100 percent, undoubtedly sure Iran kept their word not to build a nuclear weapon under that 2015 deal? Really? Well please tell what, how and why you know MORE than our military intelligence! Nope, didn't think so. Thank God Trump puts America first.
English

@LatFilosof I guess if you take a "butterflie flaps its wings" approach....
English

I love when buying ice cream causes shark attacks, my favorite causation.
Phil Hoyeck@PAHoyeck
English

@RasmusJarlov @halvgammelmand Forsent eller før tid er vel lige galt?
Det er forkert over for andre at komme (ubegrundet) for sent.
Og det er forkert at forvente andre kommer før tid for ikke at komme for sent.
Og det er forkert (og stressende) at komme før tid og forvente andre er klar.
Så kom til tiden
Dansk

@RasmusJarlov @halvgammelmand Nøglen der er vel at forsøge at komme til tiden, det er fair.
Begrundet er ok,
men det indbefatter også:
at komme ud af døren til tiden.
Ikke bruge 5min på mobilen, når du blev forsinket på motorvejen.
Ikke bruge 10min i entren for at snakke med en bekendt *mens* de andre venter.
Dansk

@ElBataller @PROMAKOS_ -> not just evolution, but all fields really that has anything to say about how the deep time of the world, then any notion of an eden, adam and eve and original sin, must conform to reality.
**Literal** dust to man rib to woman speach from snake and fruit to death is simply out.
English

@ElBataller @PROMAKOS_ What is death really, if you are not aware of life?
Dont get me wrong, Im aware the consept is not what christians (at large) belive, but considering the general tendency to allegories and imagery, if you think that the bible is true in some sense, and follow the science on ->
English

Esto deja mal a los cristianos y reproduce el peor estereotipo anticientífico. La Iglesia católica acepta la evolución como hecho científico desde Pío XII (Humani Generis 1950), Juan Pablo II la reafirma en 1996, y Francisco una vez más en 2014 (y nunca se negó oficialmente). La tradición cristiana clásica nunca leyó el Génesis como cronología científica, ya desde el principio, san Agustín en De Genesi ad litteram en el siglo V advertía explícitamente contra los cristianos que defienden interpretaciones literales frente a evidencia natural porque hacen quedar mal al cristianismo y dan pie a la burla de los incrédulos. El creacionismo como corriente es invención protestante norteamericana del siglo XX, no doctrina histórica cristiana. Y mezclar metodologías es un error categorial, la resurrección es una afirmación histórico-teológica que se sostiene por testimonio apostólico, la evolución es una explicación científica que se valida por evidencia convergente (fósil, genética, anatomía comparada, biogeografía, etc etc). Son registros distintos y confundirlos ridiculiza la fe.
Oliver Burdick@oliverburdick
The real facts:
Español

@RasmusJarlov @halvgammelmand Jeg er nu enig med den halv gamle.
At komme, ubegrundet, for sent er respektløst over for andre.
Ikke alle du skal mødes med i løbet af dagen har den ekstra tid at sætte af den dag, at komme for sent er at sætte din højere en alle andres, eller indikere det eller de er uvigtigt.
Dansk

@halvgammelmand Sagt med al respekt og uden at ville provokere, så synes jeg du burde slappe lidt af. Det lyder som en stresskultur.
Dansk

@AnnaGulper @RasmusJarlov @HHepplewhite While I agree with the spirit of what you say, but im more the opposite.
I am against the *current* Russia
But Im not against Russians as a whole or as a people, Im agsinst the movements, actions and those who do the bad stuff, support it or defend it...
English

@RasmusJarlov @HHepplewhite There is something true, but the chosen words are thin.
Russia is a wonderful country. There are many honest and diligent people. Sometimes i hate the USA...but it is just the government making me upset..not the entire country. It is a kind of Anti-Nationalism.
English

@ElBataller @PROMAKOS_ Oh, and for "if made in his image we should not be apes"
In genesis, God does not do "poof" man, there!, he forms someting into man, and first when he breath life into him, is he in glds image:
Formin adam= evolution
Breathing life= point of awareness
Sin= choosing "bad"
English

@ElBataller @PROMAKOS_ Did.
Yet it is still because of them, because they evolved to be able to do it, they did it, and that halped them survive, thus original sin is simply survival of the fittest meets first deliberate, known, "wrong" action in a more premitive aingle forefather.
English







