Daniel Weltman

@messina_jp Like this one!

Many such graphs.

Vol. 38, Iss. 3 of Public Affairs Quarterly is out online! Featuring articles by @Nick_Kreuder and Nicole Hassoun (@binghamtonu), @Danny_Weltman (@AshokaUniv), John Meadowcroft (@Kingspol_econ), and Bouke de Vries (@ugent). scholarlypublishingcollective.org/uip/paq/issue/…

My review of @MaattCuull Matthew Cull's book What Gender Should Be has been published in the Journal of Social Ontology 10(1): journalofsocialontology.org/index.php/jso/… philpapers.org/rec/WELWGS-2

My article "Colonialism Is Per Se Wrong Only If Colonialism Is Not Per Se Wrong: Supersession and the Bourgeois Predicament" has been published in Public Affairs Quarterly 38(3): doi.org/10.5406/215205… philpapers.org/rec/WELCIP

My article co-written with Gil Hersch, "It’s Not the Slope that Matters: Well-Being and Shapes of Lives," has been posted online by the Journal of Moral Philosophy. doi.org/10.1163/174552…

My review of J.P. Messina's (@messina_jp) book Private Censorship has been published in The Journal of Value Inquiry. doi.org/10.1007/s10790…

My article "Saving cosmopolitanism from colonialism" has been published in Ethics & Global Politics Vol 17 Issue 4 tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10…

@enzoreds Also Burgess, Cappelen, and Plunkett, Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics (2020)

Philosophers! Can you think of recent examples of successful, agenda-setting edited collections? For me a great example is Ruth Chang’s volume on incommensurability, but that was in 1998. Has the genre died or have I not been paying attention?

@enzoreds Maybe Fine and Ypi, Migration in Political Theory (2016); Flickshuh and Ypi, Kant and Colonialism (2014); Fabre and Lazar, The Morality of Defensive War (2014); Brownstein and Saul, Implicit Bias (2016); Heuer and Lang, Luck Value and Commitment (2012)?

My university's Political Science department is hiring for two positions, any subfield (political theory included). For details see: apply.interfolio.com/147240 and apply.interfolio.com/147241

@RebeccaBuxton A Brief Guide to Writing the Philosophy Paper by the Harvard College Writing Center.

I'm lecturing MA Philosophy students this year on "Philosophical Writing" which should teach them how to write a good philosophy paper (some of them haven't done philosophy at undergradlevel). Has anyone taught something like this and have any recommendations for readings?

@ZizekianScholar Happy to help!

My article "What Do We Want? To Eliminate Gender! When Do We Want It? Later!" has appeared online as a preprint in Pacific Philosophical Quarterly: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/pa…

@briandavidearp Yes, you're one of the abolitionists that I cite!

Looks interesting, will have to give it a read. From the abstract, looks broadly in line with what I argued in “Abolishing Gender” academic.oup.com/book/39207/cha…

@kathleenbot yes 😭

@kathleenbot The former. For a change of pace, the second and third books in the trilogy are super misogynist instead, so that's something to look forward to.

@MattSleat @enzoreds I thought we were asking what we think, not what Williams thinks. I agree with you if the question is about Williams exegesis.

@Danny_Weltman @enzoreds Ok - but now we’re no longer within Williams’ theory, which is what Enzo’s question is about.

Bernard Williams nerds & assorted realists! Did Sparta meet the BLD?

@enzoreds Clarification for my vote (Hell no): this is what I think, not what Williams thinks. Presumably that's what you're asking, but if it's a question of Williams exegesis I think he's "Yes"