We are all Satoshi

167 posts

We are all Satoshi banner
We are all Satoshi

We are all Satoshi

@Darkerduck

Katılım Aralık 2011
1.5K Takip Edilen249 Takipçiler
We are all Satoshi retweetledi
Jason Dreyzehner
Jason Dreyzehner@bitjson·
BCH did this last year, btw (fast math)
vitalik.eth@VitalikButerin

We have been running a cryptanalysis program for Poseidon2 for almost two years now, and the plan is to continue it for a while more. It's already born fruit, identifying some important security issues in Poseidon2 (which we could solve either by adding extra rounds, or by going back to Poseidon1, which has so far stood against attacks). If we had made a precompile, then we would have had to stick to one particular version of Poseidon, and when something like this happened, migrate to a different version, leaving a dangling precompile that nobody uses but that (like all others) contributes to unneeded greater complexity of implementing a new client, consensus failure risk, etc etc. Once we "set in stone" a particular hash as The New Primary Hash of Ethereum, then yeah of course there will be a precompile for it. But we are now exploring a much more practical and flexible short-term approach: a precompile that can do vector math over 32-bit numbers (think: numpy). This massively increases efficiency compared to raw execution, both because we stop over-charging by 8-64x for each operation (you don't need to pay gas for a MUL opcode whose worst-case involves big 70-digit numbers if all you're doing is 123835 * 7534622578), and because it means you only do one round of "control flow overhead" for a whole vector of numbers (size 16 in Poseidon2), instead of once per number. This simultaneously will make it much easier to implement all versions of Poseidon, and lattice operations in quantum-resistant signatures, and lattice operations in FHE. It's basically "the GPU for the EVM", and it's not more complicated to spec than one single precompile.

English
2
7
69
2.1K
We are all Satoshi retweetledi
Charles Curran
Charles Curran@charliebcurran·
Seedance 2.0 Prompt: Sum up the AI discourse in a meme - make sure it’s retarded and gets 50 likes.
English
1.5K
6.4K
69.4K
14.8M
We are all Satoshi retweetledi
Aaron Day
Aaron Day@AaronRDay·
Everyone talks about how Bitcoin is open source code. Someone pays for the devs. Here’s the rogue’s gallery funding Bitcoin (from 1.5 years ago).
Aaron Day@AaronRDay

He who funds the developers who hold the repository keys, rules. So, who funds Bitcoin? I’ve spent the last year and a half warning about CBDCs and encouraging people to exit banks and the dollar, using self-custody crypto, gold, and silver instead. With exchanges under pressure and public ledgers becoming surveillance tools, it’s clear Bitcoin users can be tracked using chain analysis and AI. This has pushed me towards privacy coins like Zano, which I now see as crucial in combating CBDCs. Initially skeptical about Zano's premine, I found the funds are auditable and well-managed, unlike Bitcoin, which has been hijacked by external funding influences. Let’s examine who funds Bitcoin development and their potential conflicts of interest. Jack Dorsey was one of the main participants in the censorship industrial complex, likely changing the outcome of the 2020 election and censoring Americans' speech. He profits by keeping the base layer slow and expensive through centralized solutions. Reid Hoffman, rabid political donor and co-founder of LinkedIn, has been accused of funding and supporting disinformation campaigns, including one during the 2017 Alabama Senate election. Hoffman has also been linked to Cambridge Analytica, faced criticism for allegedly blocking conservative voices on LinkedIn, and has ties to the Chinese government through investments in a Chinese AI firm. He has admitted to visiting Epstein’s Island. Michael Saylor, CEO of MicroStrategy, has a history of run-ins with the SEC, including a 2000 settlement in which he paid $8.3 million in fines and disgorgement for accounting irregularities and insider trading. He has stated that Bitcoin shouldn’t compete with the dollar, euro, Visa, and Mastercard, and should focus on compliance with KYC/AML and taxes. John Dillon is a mysterious figure in Bitcoin's early history, known for his controversial role in funding certain development efforts. Using a pseudonymous identity, he claimed to hold a high position in the intelligence community, funded contentious changes to Bitcoin like Replace-by-Fee (RBF), supported the small-block narrative, and had direct communications with influential Core developers, including Peter Todd. Barry Silbert, founder of Digital Currency Group (DCG), has been embroiled in controversy. Critics accuse him of questionable financial practices, including using DCG funds to prop up Genesis and failing to disclose the company's financial woes. His close ties to traditional finance, including significant investment from Mastercard, have raised questions about his allegiance to Wall Street interests over the crypto community. Joi Ito, the former director of the MIT Media Lab, accepted significant funding from Jeffrey Epstein for the Media Lab and attempted to conceal the extent of his relationship with Epstein. Between MIT and his venture activities, Ito has funded the Lightning Network, SegWit, and US CBDC pilots. Jeffrey Epstein’s crimes include sex trafficking and abuse of minors, compounded by allegations of using his wealth and influence to silence victims and evade justice. His funding ties to Joi Ito and public statements about Bitcoin being a store of value and not a currency raise questions about hidden agendas in Bitcoin's development. Henri de Castries, former AXA CEO and Bilderberg Group chairman, led AXA to become an early investor in Blockstream. His extensive ties to traditional finance, Bilderberg Group involvment, and regular attendance at global meetings like the WEF raise questions about the influence of established financial powers on Bitcoin's development. Peter Thiel’s funding of Bitcoin development through his venture capital firm raises concerns due to his ties to the deep state and Palantir, a surveillance giant that has worked with the CIA and NSA. As a significant stakeholder in Blockstream, some fear Thiel may exert control over Bitcoin's development, potentially paving the way for government backdoors.

English
5
18
56
2.4K
We are all Satoshi retweetledi
Aaron Day
Aaron Day@AaronRDay·
LMAO. Epstein hijacked Bitcoin. This is pure cope.
English
19
19
199
9.6K
We are all Satoshi retweetledi
Jason Dreyzehner
Jason Dreyzehner@bitjson·
The May 2026 upgrade is now active on Chipnet at block 279,792! 🎉 This upgrade completes the restoration of Bitcoin Script on Bitcoin Cash (CashVM), making CashVM a simple, ultra-efficient, high-level programming environment for sound money. Left: 2016 opcodes, right: 2026 opcodes 🔥 (source: vm.cash) Over the last decade, Bitcoin Cash has delivered: • 2018: Opcode restoration (OP_CAT, OP_XOR, OP_DIV, OP_MOD, etc.), • 2019: Schnorr signatures with multisig batch verification, • 2020: Density-based signature limits, • 2022: OP_MUL and introspection, • 2023: Cross-covenant commitments (CashTokens), • 2025: Density-based general limits and BigInts, • 2026: Loops, functions, bitwise, and Pay-2-Script. Each upgrade carefully preserved Bitcoin Cash's transaction-level parallelization, enabling global-scale, layer-1 throughput – without compromising Bitcoin Cash's scalability, decentralization, and censorship-resistance. Fully-validating, archival BCH nodes run on consumer hardware and still outperform clusters of high-powered, centralized sequencers required by account-based networks. With this upgrade, CashVM becomes even more powerful, allowing contract developers to efficiently implement post-quantum cryptography, homomorphic encryption, zero-knowledge proof systems, and more – without waiting for network upgrades. Case Study: Quantumroot Quantumroot is a quantum-secure vault contract design offering full 256-bit classical, 128-bit quantum security strength. Possible since May 2025, but made 10-100× more efficient by the 2026 upgrade: Quantumroot sweep transactions are 15% smaller per-UTXO than P2PKH wallets. Upgrade Details The 2026 upgrade includes four Bitcoin Cash Improvement Proposals (CHIPs): Loops CHIP Introduces the well-established, OP_BEGIN/OP_UNTIL loop construction to CashVM, bounded by the density-based limits activated in the 2025 upgrade. Loops eliminate duplication in repeated procedures, significantly reducing transaction sizes and enabling previously impractical constructions. Functions CHIP Enables factoring of contract bytecode into reusable functions with OP_DEFINE/OP_INVOKE, eliminating duplicated logic and reducing transaction sizes. Functions improve the efficiency of complex financial and cryptographic computations, including zero-knowledge proof verification, homomorphic encryption, post-quantum cryptography, and more. Bitwise CHIP Re-enables bitwise operations, including OP_INVERT for bit inversion, arithmetic shifts (OP_LSHIFTNUM and OP_RSHIFTNUM) for numeric values, and binary/logical shifts (OP_LSHIFTBIN and OP_RSHIFTBIN) for binary data. These operations allow CashVM contracts to more efficiently implement a variety of financial and cryptographic algorithms. Pay-2-Script CHIP Makes Pay-2-Script (P2S) outputs standard, enables longer token commitments (up to 128 bytes), and unifies the standard unlocking bytecode length limit with the consensus limit (10,000 bytes). These changes improve wallet ecosystem safety, simplify contract design, and reduce transaction sizes for many vault, multi-party covenant, and decentralized financial applications.Technical Specs For more details, see the CHIPs: - Loops: github.com/bitjson/bch-lo… - Functions: github.com/bitjson/bch-fu… - Bitwise: github.com/bitjson/bch-bi… - Pay-2-Script: github.com/bitjson/bch-p2s
Jason Dreyzehner tweet mediaJason Dreyzehner tweet media
English
10
57
144
16.5K
We are all Satoshi retweetledi
Versan Aljarrah - Black Swan Capitalist
In 2024, I came across a report on Jeffrey Epstein having direct ties to Bitcoin and the push toward CBDCs. Now these new emails surface revealing that he's been linked to Bitcoin’s early development all along. Interesting how “coincidences” always show up right on schedule.
Versan Aljarrah - Black Swan Capitalist tweet mediaVersan Aljarrah - Black Swan Capitalist tweet media
Versan Aljarrah - Black Swan Capitalist@VersanAljarrah

Here we go! Brace yourselves as the truth prepares to surface on #Epstein's ties to #Tether and #Bitcoin

English
51
488
2.2K
490.7K
We are all Satoshi retweetledi
Moria Ⓜ️ MUSD
Moria Ⓜ️ MUSD@MoriaMoney·
🐋 DeepMint 🐋 Moria Ⓜ️ DeepMint will enable loans of unlimited size by splitting the position across multiple UTXOs, while maintaining a unified loan structure. The loan share the same collateralization ratio, interest rate, and is managed under a single ownership NFT
Moria Ⓜ️ MUSD tweet media
English
5
12
43
1.6K
We are all Satoshi retweetledi
🧪🧪🧪🧪
🧪🧪🧪🧪@h4lvor·
if you love @CauldronSwap or @MoriaMoney i strongly encourage you to support pat’s fundraiser fundme.cash/campaign/39 if you’ve ever used trezor, edge, trust or exodus this also affects you. pat is doing gods work to bring full cashtoken+bcmr support into blockbook (its written in GO) cashtokens support in blockbook means trezor, edge, trust, exodus wallet etc will support cashtokens like MUSD Ⓜ️ godspeed @mainnet_pat
GIF
English
3
12
31
857
We are all Satoshi retweetledi
Moria Ⓜ️ MUSD
Moria Ⓜ️ MUSD@MoriaMoney·
Earn Bitcoin Cash (self-custodial) with Moria Protocol + @CauldronSwap 🧪🤝🐋 🐋 Split your BCH holdings 50/50 🐋 Take one half and mint $MUSD 🐋 Make a 50-50 BCH-MUSD pool on @CauldronSwap 🐋 Earn LP fee everyday (14.47% APY) ➢ Visit moria.money to learn about Moria Protocol and mint $MUSD
Moria Ⓜ️ MUSD tweet media
English
3
21
48
2.1K
We are all Satoshi retweetledi
Ross Ulbricht
Ross Ulbricht@RealRossU·
Roger Ver was there for me when I was down and needed help. Now Roger needs our support. No one should spend the rest of their life in prison over taxes. Let him pay the tax (if any) and be done with it. #FreeRoger
Ross Ulbricht tweet mediaRoss Ulbricht tweet media
English
1.3K
5.2K
33.3K
3.7M
We are all Satoshi retweetledi
Min Choi
Min Choi@minchoi·
This is wild. Vibe coding with AI just completely changed the game. People can't stop creating games with Grok, Windsurf, Cursor & Claude 3.7 Sonnet. 10 wild examples: 1. Fortnite meets Minecraft on Three.js 🤯
English
108
318
2.5K
514K
We are all Satoshi retweetledi
pat
pat@mainnet_pat·
Hey guys, I'd like to announce a new WC2-enabled dApp Dropship.Cash. It is a tool to flexibly airdrop BCH and fungible CashTokens. You can create your custom airdrop lists, load FT and NFT holders from blockchain, use custom airdrop strategies and more. Give it a try!
English
2
15
50
1.4K
We are all Satoshi retweetledi
Justin Bons
Justin Bons@Justin_Bons·
BTC is fool's gold Do not take it seriously as an investment: BTC is an emperor with no clothes; a mere meme coin Without capacity, scarcity, privacy, DeFi, or even long-term security, BTC has no legs to stand on! We must break the collective delusion before it is too late! 🧵 All of the qualities of Bitcoin we hold dear: Censorship resistance, immutability, financial sovereignty & decentralization; are no longer championed by BTC but by its children instead. All of BTC's original cypherpunk principles have been lost to its own swamp of corruption; A story as old as time: As power corrupts & absolute power corrupts absolutely: BTC was effectively captured by a relatively small group of people who managed to entirely pivot the purpose, vision & fundamental design of BTC. This did not happen without a fight. That history is now known as the block size debates, cumulating in 2017 when "Bitcoin Core" "won" & Bitcoin lost. One of the greatest tragedies is that most people are still being misled in regard to the reality behind this story: Read "Hijacking Bitcoin" to learn more about that history! There is little hope left for change in BTC, as the decision-making/governance is dominated by this very same group today. BTC's governance is effectively a type of "GitHub" dictatorship. The biggest change Core managed to push is blocking any future increases to BTC's capacity, contrary to the original plans for Bitcoin, as Satoshi had clearly laid out in his writing that he intended BTC to SCALE! The truth is that today, optimistically, BTC is only capable of about 7 Transactions Per Second! This means BTC cannot be used for anything significant at all; even the much-lauded "digital gold" "use case" does not work. (speculation alone is not a use case!) Tragically, this also means that the only way BTC can gain further "adoption" is through centralized custodians: The antithesis of Satoshi's original vision! People can pretend like it is working fine, as all usage has been driven off by this uncompetitive behavior. The chain does work fine for as long as no one uses it. However, as soon as any significant amount of people tried to actually interact with the BTC blockchain, fees would skyrocket & transacting would become extremely unreliable, at which point people leave. This cycle has been happening on a small scale for several years now, explaining why high fees cannot be sustained & only come in the form of fee spikes; This particular dynamic is also what spells doom for BTC in the long run, as this change by Core has also ruined the long-term security model, as these fees were supposed to pay for the security of the network. Core has effectively changed the economic design of BTC to rely on a small number of TXs with extremely high fees instead of a large number of TXs with extremely low fees. This not only destroyed all utility but also annihilated the long-term security model, as this expectation of users paying high fees is totally unrealistic in a competitive environment. This will all cause BTC to completely collapse in on itself in 8 to 12 years, at which point an inflation increase beyond the 21M limit will be the only way to at least keep the chain alive. This will certainly happen, as certain Core developers have now made this very clear. This, in particular, will also cause the chain to splinter more, hastening its demise. There are also several compounding death spiral effects that will occur during this same time period. All while the capacity is so low that people will not actually be able to exit, causing a "bank run" like situation. That is because even today, it would take months for every BTC holder to move their coins. BTC is pretending to be something it is not; it cannot be money (No Medium of Exchange without capacity) & it is a terrible Store of Value without long-term security or scarcity. Furthermore, if all of the proposed benefits cannot be scaled to the masses, it is pointless. Because at that point, we are only playing pretend so that the price can keep going up. At a certain point, the price will not be able to keep going up & a reckoning will have to take place. We have covered the math, the history, the consensus & economics in far more detail in some of my other articles, so please read those if you want to go deeper; I can reference them in the comments if you ask as well. This article is intended to be a shorter & more digestible journey into these ideas, as my other work is far more thorough, maybe too thorough, explaining my motivation to write this. You will also notice despite the massive amount of hate this thread will get, there will be hardly any reasonable counter-arguments; that is because there are none; we are correct to predict BTC's doom! People often attempt to put BTC into its own category, to avoid comparison. That is because BTC does not survive an objective comparative analysis, as it is a dinosaur destined for extinction. BTC is a cryptocurrency, a technology, it is not divinely ordained, no matter how much people project their religiosity onto it. We have to assume some of the bigger players already know all of this & are playing games with retail. Big money might often be evil, but it is rarely stupid. Because the timeline for BTC's technical collapse is mostly set in stone (8-12 years), we should expect a "social" collapse to occur before that, so buyer beware! I am still the same Bitcoiner I was in 2013 when I first joined: A hardcore supporter of cypherpunk principles through the mass adoption of cryptocurrency. Somewhere along the way, BTC left behind the "mass adoption" part, turning it into a purely speculative plaything for the rich. BTC changed, not me; I am still that same Bitcoiner! Support Bitcoin by abandoning BTC & allowing Satoshi's vision to come alive by supporting Bitcoin's children. The next generation is our salvation, as we refuse to sacrifice our principles, Bitcoin's principles, for the sake of BTC! 🕊️
English
116
85
362
55.9K
We are all Satoshi retweetledi
calle
calle@callebtc·
🚨 LND exploit in the wild 🚨 If you are running LND older than 0.18.5 and/or LITD older than 0.14.1, upgrade immediately. Apparently, affected Lightning nodes can be completely drained by attackers.
English
22
134
327
97.1K
We are all Satoshi retweetledi
Nikita Zhavoronkov
Nikita Zhavoronkov@nikzh·
May I present to you the future of Bitcoin payments: the failure rate for your $50 transaction is an amazingly low 40%. If the Bitcoin price drops a bit, your success rate will be a gorgeous 50%. And don’t worry about zero privacy, high fees, and multiple vulnerabilities ⚡️
AMBOSS ⚡@ambosstech

Lightning payment reliability for $100 payments has been launched higher by Bitcoin's price increase. $100 of BTC can now be sent anywhere in the lightning network with a 77% chance of success, up 20% from last year. To improve further, lightning network topology must shift.

English
35
35
191
16.4K
We are all Satoshi retweetledi
Roger Ver
Roger Ver@rogerkver·
Mr. President, I am an American, and I need your help. Only you, with your commitment to justice, can save me @realDonaldTrump
English
1.2K
2.9K
9.8K
2.7M